Skip to content

Adjuvant Use of Neostigmine in Sepsis and Septic Shock.

Safety and Efficacy of Neostigmine Infusion as Adjuvant Therapy in Sepsis and Septic Shock

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04130230
Enrollment
50
Registered
2019-10-17
Start date
2019-03-06
Completion date
2021-10-01
Last updated
2024-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sepsis, Septic Shock

Brief summary

The inflammatory response represents an important, central component of sepsis. Therefore, it is believed that blunting inflammation will decrease mortality. In vivo test series with mice that had undergone cecal ligation and puncture (recognized sepsis model), physostigmine salicylate significantly inhibited the release of various cytokines (tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin1β, and interleukin 6). These results were similar to those obtained by vagus nerve stimulation. In animal sepsis model using physostigmine not only decreased inflammation but also, diminished the decrease in blood pressure following infection. Animals treated with the peripheral choline esterase inhibitor neostigmine showed no difference compared with physostigmine-treated animals. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the efficacy of choline esterase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy in patients with sepsis or septic shock. Outcome measures include: percentage reduction in procalcitonin blood level, percentage of patients achieving significant reduction in procalcitonin levels, Mean Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, percentage decrease in lactate dehydrogenase blood level, length of stay in hospital intensive care unit, and in hospital mortality.

Interventions

DRUGNeostigmine

Neostigmine continuous infusion plus standard therapy for sepsis and septic shock.

DRUGStandard therapy

Standard therapy for sepsis and septic shock

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-85 years. * Patients diagnosed with sepsis or septic shock according to Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock mentioned above. * Patients who have ≥ 2 of the following four criteria plus documented infection: 1. Fever ≥ 38 °C or hypothermia ≤ 36 °C. 2. Tachycardia ≥ 100/min. 3. Tachypnea ≥ 20/min or hyperventilation. 4. Leukocytosis ≥ 12000/mm3 or leukopenia ≤ 4000/mm3 or ≥ 10% immature neutrophils in the differential count.

Exclusion criteria

* Known hypersensitivity to choline esterase inhibitors. * Known absolute contra-indications against choline esterase inhibitors such as, myotonic dystrophy; depolarization block by depolarizing muscle relaxants; intoxication by irreversibly acting cholinesterase inhibitors; closed craniocerebral trauma; obstruction in the gastrointestinal tract (mechanical constipation); obstruction in the urinary tract (mechanical urinary retention) * Known relative contraindications against choline esterase inhibitors: bronchial asthma; bradycardia; AV-conduction disturbances. * Having undergone solid organ transplantation. * Pregnant and lactating women. * Participation in another clinical trial. * Presence of primary or concomitant illness, impending death.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA score)Change from baseline SOFA score at five daysIncrease in SOFA score is associated with worse outcome.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026