Skip to content

A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Single Dose of UBX0101 in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Dose Study of UBX0101 in Moderate to Severe, Painful Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04129944
Enrollment
183
Registered
2019-10-17
Start date
2019-10-30
Completion date
2020-08-07
Last updated
2021-12-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Keywords

Osteoarthritis, Painful Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Senescence

Brief summary

A study to assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a single-dose intra-articular administration of UBX0101 in patients with moderate to severe painful knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Detailed description

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, parallel-group study to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a single-dose intra-articular (IA) administration of UBX0101 in patients with moderate to severe painful knee osteoarthritis (OA). Approximately 180 patients will be randomized (1:1:1:1) to one of four treatment groups (three dose levels of UBX0101 and Placebo; approximately 45 patients per group), all administered by IA route at Week 0. The four treatment groups will be enrolled concurrently. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of IA administration of UBX0101 on the change from baseline to Week 12 of pain in the target knee.

Interventions

Investigational drug intra-articular injection

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo intra-articular injection

Sponsors

Unity Biotechnology, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Patients who are ambulatory with a diagnosis of OA of the knee and who have baseline pain with a mean of ≥ 4 and ≤ 9 on the 11-point (0-10) average daily pain NRS for at least five of seven days during the Screening period. * Kellgren-Lawrence grade of 1-4 on a weight-bearing radiograph of target knee. * Patients aged ≥ 40 and ≤ 85 years. * Patients are permitted but not required to use an oral NSAID, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), tramadol, or acetaminophen, provided that they have been taking a stable dose and regimen of medication for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening. Key

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with any condition, including laboratory or imaging findings and findings in the medical history or in the pre-study assessments, that in the opinion of the Investigator or the Medical Monitor constitutes a risk or contraindication for participation in the study or that could interfere with the study objectives, conduct, or evaluation or prevent the patient from fully participating in all aspects of the study. * Patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m2 or a body habitus that precludes the MRI. * Patients with fibromyalgia * Systemic autoimmune disease with musculoskeletal involvement or any history of a systemic inflammatory arthritis * Patients who have received IA treatment in the target knee with steroids or hyaluronic acid derivatives within the last 16 weeks prior to Screening, or with extended-release corticosteroid (e.g., Zilretta®) within the last 20 weeks * Patients who are using a topical NSAID or topical analgesics on the target knee. * Patients who have used opioid analgesics (other than tramadol), marijuana or marijuana-derived products (e.g., cannabidiol), and topical capsaicin on the target knee within 8 weeks prior to Screening * Patients with a history of traumatic knee injury to the target knee, including, but not limited to, patients with meniscal root tear, within 2 years of study entry. * Patients who have undergone diagnostic arthroscopy to the target knee in the previous 6 months. * Patients who have undergone arthroscopic surgery (including microfracture and meniscectomy) on the target knee in the last 2 years prior to the Screening visit or are anticipated to have arthroscopic surgery on either knee at any time during the study period. * Patients with a history of previous total or partial knee arthroplasty. * Patients with an effusion at the Screening visit, which, in the opinion of the Investigator following examination and discussions with the patient, requires drainage for symptom relief. * Patients who have had regenerative joint procedures on any joint, including, but not limited to, platelet-rich plasma injections, stem cell transplantation, autologous chondrocyte transplantation, or mosaicplasty. * Patients with secondary arthritis that involves the target knee or would confound assessments of knee OA

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale (WOMAC-A) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboBaseline to Week 12WOMAC-A is assessed by a Likert scale on a range from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme), with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Function Subscale (WOMAC-C) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboBaseline to Week 12WOMAC-C is assessed by a Likert scale on a range from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme), with higher scores indicating higher levels of physical disability
Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily Pain (ADP) Intensity Scores on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboBaseline to Week 12ADP is assessed by NRS on a range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable), with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain
Change From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboBaseline to Week 24WOMAC-A is assessed by a Likert scale on a range from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme), with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain WOMAC-C is assessed by a Likert scale on a range from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme), with higher scores indicating higher levels of physical disability. Average Daily Pain (ADP) is assessed by Numerical Rating Score (NRS) on a range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable), with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo: Placebo intra-articular injection
46
UBX0101 0.5 mg
UBX0101: Investigational drug intra-articular injection
45
UBX0101 2.0 mg
UBX0101: Investigational drug intra-articular injection
46
UBX0101 4.0 mg
UBX0101: Investigational drug intra-articular injection
46
Total183

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyDeath0001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1012

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboUBX0101 0.5 mgUBX0101 2.0 mgUBX0101 4.0 mgTotal
Age, Continuous65.0 years63.0 years66.0 years63.0 years64.0 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants5 Participants9 Participants3 Participants28 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
35 Participants40 Participants37 Participants43 Participants155 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants11 Participants8 Participants11 Participants38 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
38 Participants34 Participants37 Participants34 Participants143 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants20 Participants15 Participants16 Participants66 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants25 Participants31 Participants30 Participants117 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 460 / 450 / 461 / 46
other
Total, other adverse events
18 / 4620 / 4526 / 4622 / 46
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 462 / 451 / 463 / 46

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale (WOMAC-A) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving Placebo

WOMAC-A is assessed by a Likert scale on a range from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme), with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: Missing data for some subjects.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale (WOMAC-A) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboBaseline2.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.577
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale (WOMAC-A) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in Score from Baseline to Week 12-1.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.924
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale (WOMAC-A) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWeek 121.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.848
UBX0101 0.5 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale (WOMAC-A) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboBaseline2.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.509
UBX0101 0.5 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale (WOMAC-A) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in Score from Baseline to Week 12-0.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.678
UBX0101 0.5 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale (WOMAC-A) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWeek 121.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.731
UBX0101 2.0 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale (WOMAC-A) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWeek 121.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.718
UBX0101 2.0 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale (WOMAC-A) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboBaseline2.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.658
UBX0101 2.0 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale (WOMAC-A) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in Score from Baseline to Week 12-1.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.884
UBX0101 4.0 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale (WOMAC-A) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboBaseline2.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.647
UBX0101 4.0 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale (WOMAC-A) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in Score from Baseline to Week 12-1.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.747
UBX0101 4.0 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale (WOMAC-A) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWeek 121.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.707
Secondary

Change From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving Placebo

WOMAC-A is assessed by a Likert scale on a range from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme), with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain WOMAC-C is assessed by a Likert scale on a range from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme), with higher scores indicating higher levels of physical disability. Average Daily Pain (ADP) is assessed by Numerical Rating Score (NRS) on a range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable), with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: Missing data for some subjects.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboNRS Baseline6.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.382
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in WOMAC-C Score from Baseline to Week 24-1.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.902
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in NRS Score from Baseline to Week 24-3.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.235
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWOMAC-C Baseline2.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.546
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in WOMAC-A Score from Baseline to Week 24-1.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.936
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWOMAC-A Week 241.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.872
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboNRS Week 243.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.317
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWOMAC-C Week 241.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.853
PlaceboChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWOMAC-A Baseline2.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.577
UBX0101 0.5 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWOMAC-C Week 241.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.803
UBX0101 0.5 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboNRS Baseline6.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.167
UBX0101 0.5 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in WOMAC-C Score from Baseline to Week 24-1.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.822
UBX0101 0.5 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWOMAC-A Week 241.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.777
UBX0101 0.5 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWOMAC-A Baseline2.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.509
UBX0101 0.5 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in WOMAC-A Score from Baseline to Week 24-1.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.711
UBX0101 0.5 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in NRS Score from Baseline to Week 24-3.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.139
UBX0101 0.5 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboNRS Week 243.14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.094
UBX0101 0.5 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWOMAC-C Baseline2.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.527
UBX0101 2.0 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWOMAC-C Week 241.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.714
UBX0101 2.0 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWOMAC-A Baseline2.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.658
UBX0101 2.0 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWOMAC-A Week 241.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.683
UBX0101 2.0 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in WOMAC-A Score from Baseline to Week 24-1.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.735
UBX0101 2.0 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWOMAC-C Baseline2.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.541
UBX0101 2.0 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in WOMAC-C Score from Baseline to Week 24-1.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.736
UBX0101 2.0 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboNRS Baseline6.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.463
UBX0101 2.0 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboNRS Week 243.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.171
UBX0101 2.0 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in NRS Score from Baseline to Week 24-3.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.458
UBX0101 4.0 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboNRS Baseline6.68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.542
UBX0101 4.0 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWOMAC-C Baseline2.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
UBX0101 4.0 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in WOMAC-A Score from Baseline to Week 24-1.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.884
UBX0101 4.0 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in NRS Score from Baseline to Week 24-2.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.412
UBX0101 4.0 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboNRS Week 243.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.029
UBX0101 4.0 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWOMAC-A Week 241.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.821
UBX0101 4.0 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in WOMAC-C Score from Baseline to Week 24-1.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.728
UBX0101 4.0 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWOMAC-C Week 241.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.848
UBX0101 4.0 mgChange From Baseline (Over the Entire 24-week Period, Including Both the Primary Study Period and the 12-week Follow-up Period) to Week 24 for the WOMAC-A, NRS, and WOMAC-C Scores in Patients Receiving a Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWOMAC-A Baseline2.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.647
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily Pain (ADP) Intensity Scores on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving Placebo

ADP is assessed by NRS on a range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable), with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: Missing data for some subjects.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily Pain (ADP) Intensity Scores on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in Score from Baseline to Week 12-3.14 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.626
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily Pain (ADP) Intensity Scores on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboBaseline6.66 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.382
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily Pain (ADP) Intensity Scores on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWeek 123.48 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.597
UBX0101 0.5 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily Pain (ADP) Intensity Scores on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWeek 123.51 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.262
UBX0101 0.5 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily Pain (ADP) Intensity Scores on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboBaseline6.48 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.167
UBX0101 0.5 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily Pain (ADP) Intensity Scores on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in Score from Baseline to Week 12-3.05 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.155
UBX0101 2.0 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily Pain (ADP) Intensity Scores on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWeek 123.67 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.217
UBX0101 2.0 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily Pain (ADP) Intensity Scores on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboBaseline6.56 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.463
UBX0101 2.0 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily Pain (ADP) Intensity Scores on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in Score from Baseline to Week 12-2.83 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.452
UBX0101 4.0 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily Pain (ADP) Intensity Scores on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboBaseline6.68 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.542
UBX0101 4.0 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily Pain (ADP) Intensity Scores on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in Score from Baseline to Week 12-2.63 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.041
UBX0101 4.0 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Weekly Mean of the Average Daily Pain (ADP) Intensity Scores on the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWeek 123.95 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.029
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Function Subscale (WOMAC-C) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving Placebo

WOMAC-C is assessed by a Likert scale on a range from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme), with higher scores indicating higher levels of physical disability

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: Missing data for some subjects.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Function Subscale (WOMAC-C) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboBaseline2.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.546
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Function Subscale (WOMAC-C) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in Score from Baseline to Week 12-1.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.892
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Function Subscale (WOMAC-C) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWeek 121.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.812
UBX0101 0.5 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Function Subscale (WOMAC-C) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboBaseline2.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.527
UBX0101 0.5 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Function Subscale (WOMAC-C) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in Score from Baseline to Week 12-1.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77
UBX0101 0.5 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Function Subscale (WOMAC-C) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWeek 121.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.771
UBX0101 2.0 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Function Subscale (WOMAC-C) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWeek 121.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.772
UBX0101 2.0 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Function Subscale (WOMAC-C) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboBaseline2.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.541
UBX0101 2.0 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Function Subscale (WOMAC-C) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in Score from Baseline to Week 12-0.99 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.878
UBX0101 4.0 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Function Subscale (WOMAC-C) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboBaseline2.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
UBX0101 4.0 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Function Subscale (WOMAC-C) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboChange in Score from Baseline to Week 12-1.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.772
UBX0101 4.0 mgChange From Baseline to Week 12 of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Function Subscale (WOMAC-C) Score in Patients Receiving a Single Dose of UBX0101 Versus Those Receiving PlaceboWeek 121.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.827
Secondary

Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboIncidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)18 Participants
UBX0101 0.5 mgIncidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)20 Participants
UBX0101 2.0 mgIncidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)24 Participants
UBX0101 4.0 mgIncidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)21 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 8, 2026