Skip to content

Mobile Interpretation Bias Modification Clinical Trial

Mobile Interpretation Bias Modification Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04129866
Acronym
M-IBM
Enrollment
114
Registered
2019-10-17
Start date
2019-12-15
Completion date
2023-03-29
Last updated
2022-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety Sensitivity, Suicidal Ideation

Brief summary

The Mobile-Interpretation Bias Modification clinical trial aims to examine the efficacy of a brief mobile phone delivered interpretation bias modification to reduce anxiety sensitivity cognitive concerns and suicidal ideation in National Guard Personnel. The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy, acceptability, and usability of M-IBM with a sample of 114 National Guardsmen with current suicidal ideation and elevated anxiety sensitivity cognitive concerns. Participants will complete assessments, receive assistance on installing M- IBM on their phone, complete an M-IBM intervention session, and complete post-intervention assessments. Baseline measures of psychopathology, and usability/acceptability of M-IBM will be obtained during the initial session. In addition, 1-month, and 3-month follow-ups would be scheduled to examine changes in psychopathology. The investigators hypothesize that those randomized to M-IBM will experience reductions in anxiety sensitivity cognitive concerns, suicidal ideation. In addition participants will find M-IBM acceptable and easy to use.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALM-IBM

In this paradigm, an ambiguous word or two-word phrase related to ASCC is followed by a sentence that resolves the word-sentence meaning as threatening or benign. For example, participants are presented with an ambiguous word or two-word phrase for 1 second. On half the trials the combination of the word/phrase and sentence creates a benign meaning (as in the previous example). On the other half of trials this combination creates an anxious-threat meaning Participants are required to judge the relatedness of the word/phrase and the sentence. Participants are given feedback during training such that judging the anxious-threat combinations to be unrelated and the benign combinations as being related would produce a correct response. In contrast, if participants produce an incorrect response they see incorrect.

BEHAVIORALControl-IBM

Placebo IBM where sentences are not related to anxious threat meaning of cue word.

Sponsors

Military Suicide Research Consortium
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Southern Mississippi
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Elevated ASCC (\>2) and include only Guard members who also have current SI (\> 0) . * Ownership of a smartphone

Exclusion criteria

* those determined by military or study personnel to be actively psychotic, manic, or imminently suicidal and in need of emergency services

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 Cognitive Concerns Subscale30 minutesRange 0 - 24, Higher Scores mean more pathology
The Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview1 month post intervention

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026