Skip to content

The Effect of Platelet-rich Fibrin Matrix on Skin Rejuvenation

The Effect of Platelet-rich Fibrin Matrix on Skin Rejuvenation: A Split Face Comparison

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04128046
Enrollment
30
Registered
2019-10-16
Start date
2018-09-03
Completion date
2019-06-01
Last updated
2019-10-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nasolabial Fold, Skin Quality, Skin Rejuvenation, Wrinkle

Brief summary

Platelet-rich fibrin matrix (PRFM) is made from platelets that are extracted from a patient's blood, and many plastic surgeons and dermatologists have used it to fill in wrinkles and lines on the face. Both patients and doctors have observed that it gives extra volume in these areas and improves overall appearance. However, there is no research that shows how PRFM affects skin quality, such as pores, spots, red areas, and texture. The aim of this study is to determine whether PRFM has a role in rejuvenating facial skin.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPRFM injection

Using a 27-gauge microcannula, a total of 4 mL of PRFM was injected intradermally into the mid-cheek and NLF (2 mL for each site) on one side of the face.

PROCEDURESaline injection

Using a 27-gauge microcannula, a total of 4 mL of saline was injected intradermally into the mid-cheek and NLF (2 mL for each site) on the contralateral side of the face.

Sponsors

New York Medical College
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adults 18 years of age and older who had a dermatological concern, specifically, conspicuous spots, pores, rhytids, uneven texture, or red or brown discoloration, and a VISIA complexion analysis score greater than 10 * Agreed to continue any contraceptive hormonal therapy for duration of the study * Agreed to not initiate the use of hormonal therapy during the study * Agreed to not undergo any facial procedures or treatments, including injections and fillers, lasers, peels, and topical therapies, during the duration of the study * Agreed to adhere to a standardized skin care regimen throughout the duration of the study consisting of the use of a single cleanser and moisturizer twice a day * Agreed to refrain from excessive sun exposure/tanning

Exclusion criteria

* History of skin/connective tissue disorders * History of immunosuppressive therapy or radiotherapy * Participation in facial procedures, such as injections, lasers, peels, and dermabrasion, in the last six months * Use of topical/prescription acne medications in the last three months * Current smokers or prior smokers who quit fewer than 10 years ago

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in VISIA skin scoreSkin analysis performed at initial visit, at 6 weeks, and at 12 weeks following initial treatmentDifference between pre- and post-treatment VISIA analysis scores for skin parameters of spots, wrinkles, texture, and pores

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Wrinkle Severity Rating ScaleRating occurred at initial visit, at 6 weeks, and at 12 weeks following initial treatmentDifference between pre- and post-treatment quantitative grading of nasolabial folds for each group. Graded from 1 through 5, with 5 representing the worst score
Skin Rejuvenation Outcomes Evaluation (SROE)Evaluation distributed at initial visit, at 6 weeks, and at 12 weeks following treatment.Patient-reported outcome measure validated for skin resurfacing techniques. Each item is rated on a 0-4 scale. The final score is computed by dividing the total score for the instrument by 24 and multiplying by 100, giving a range of 0-100. The difference in the change in SROE score for each cohort was calculated.
VISIA Outcomes QuestionnaireEvaluation distributed at initial visit, at 6 weeks, and at 12 weeks following treatment.Evaluation targeted specifically at identifying changes in the skin parameters analyzed by VISIA. Each item is rated on a 0-4 scale. The final score is computed by dividing the total score for the instrument by 24 and multiplying by 100, giving a range of 0-100. The difference in the change in VISIA outcomes score for each cohort was calculated.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026