Skip to content

A Nurse-led Theory of Planned Behavior Based Physical Activity Intervention Among Turkish Adults

Effectiveness of Theory of Planned Behavior Based Physical Activity Intervention Among 55-74 Years Turkish Adults Living in Nursing Home

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04127955
Enrollment
44
Registered
2019-10-16
Start date
2020-03-31
Completion date
2020-12-15
Last updated
2020-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Physical Activity

Brief summary

The Theory of Planned Behavior has been successfully used in several programs to improve physical activity behavior. In this project, it is aimed to assess the effectiveness of Theory of Planned Behavior based physical activity intervention applied to 55-74 years old people living in nursing home in Turkey.

Interventions

OTHERTheory of Planned Behavior based Physical Activity Intervention

Health education: The first component of intervention consisted of one session 30 minutes educational lesson relation to physical activity. Group walking: The format of the 15-minute group walking session included 5 minutes of warm-up, 5 minute moderate intensity walking, 5 minute cool-down. Counseling (individually tailored): The nurse received training about motivational interview technique for use in their physical activity counseling with participants. Using pedometers and step diary to set goals and monitor progress. Pedometer: pedometer will be used objective physical activity assessment. Measurement of physical activity levels, wearing a pedometer (Omron HJ321E) on a belt over one hip, all day for 7 days, removing for bathing and sleeping. A diary is also provided to record step count. The pedometer will be used for baseline and outcome measurement of step-counts for the trial.

Sponsors

Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to 74 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Willing to participate in the study * Aged 55 to 74 * Cognitive function of a score of greater than 24 on the Mini Mental State Examination * Sedentary (Omaha system physical activity status ratings 1 or 2 score) * To know Turkish literacy * Time and go test score \<14 seconds * Approval of the resident's General Practitioner to participate

Exclusion criteria

* Uncontrolled cardiovascular, musculoskeletal or neurological disorders. * Pain in motion or acute * Communication barrier (due to hearing/vision impairment ) * \> 3 falls in the previous year * Need an walking aid (walkers, cane, crutches, walking sticks, etc.)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in average daily stepsAverage daily steps will be assessed intervention period at week 3-8 and 1 , 2 and 3 months follow-up visits.The number of steps weekly by the pedometer. The number of steps will be evaluated for the first time in the 3rd week of the intervention and each week until the end of the intervention (week 3-8).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in heart rateHeart rate will be assessed baseline, before and after group walking and 1 , 2 and 3 months follow-up visitsHeart rate will be assessed between baseline, before and after group walking and 1, 2, 3 months after the intervention using blood pressure monitors (Omron M3 Comfort®, HEM-7134-E)
Change in theory of planned behavior componentBaseline,3-month follow up.Theory of planned behavior components are including attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavior control, intention and behavior. The response used likert 1-7 format.
Change in The Problem Rating ScaleChange in physical activity will be assessed baseline, the week right after the intervention and 1 , 2 and 3 months follow-up visitsThe Omaha System include three components which are the Problem Classification Scheme, the Intervention Scheme, and the Problem Rating Scale for Outcomes. In this study, the Problem Rating Scale is used that evaluates the level of the problem and the results of the intervention. Change in physical activity measured with Omaha System Problem Rating Scale for Outcomes in which knowledge, behavior, status are rated on five-point Likert-type scales (1 = lowest / worse score, 5 = highest /best score). For example, a nurse may document a client's physical activity Knowledge as 1 (no knowledge), Behavior as 4 (Usually appropriate behavior), and Status as 2 (Severe signs/ symptoms).
Changes in Blood PressureBlood pressure will be assessed baseline, before and after group walking and 1, 2 and 3 months follow-up visitsBlood pressure will be assessed between baseline, before and after group walking and 1, 2, 3 months after the intervention using the upper arm blood pressure monitors (Omron M3 Comfort®, HEM-7134-E)
Changes in EQ-VASVisual analogue scale (VAS) of EQ-5D Questionnaire will be assessed baseline, the week right after the intervention and 1, 2 and 3 months follow-up visitsVisual analogue scale (VAS) of EQ-5D Questionnaire scaled from 0-100, corresponding to the worse and the best health imagined
Change in Body Mass Index (BKI)BKI will be assessed baseline, the week right after the intervention and 3 months follow-up visitWeight (kg) will be measured using a balance scale with the measurement taken to the nearest 0.1 kg. Height (cm) will be measured using a stadiometer with the measurement taken to the nearest 0,5 cm. Weight and Height measurements will be then used to calculate the body mass index \[BMI: Weight (kg) / (Height) 2 (m2)\].
Change in waist hip ratioWaist / hip ratio will be assessed baseline, the week right after the intervention and 3 months follow-up visitWaist circumference was measured at the level of the umbilicus to the nearest 0.1 cm. Hip circumference was measured at the level of the trochanter major. The waist / hip ratio was calculated as waist circumference (cm)/ hip circumference (cm).
Changes in health-related quality of lifeHealth-related quality of life will be assessed baseline, the week right after the intervention and 1, 2 and 3 months follow-up visitsEQ-5D three-level version (EQ-5D-3L) descriptive systems is a five-dimensions questionnaire about the topics mobility, self-care, usual-activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.

Contacts

Primary ContactSelma BAZ, Msc
selma.baz@ogr.iu.edu.tr0212 381 00 00
Backup ContactSelda SEÇGİNLİ, PhD
secginli@istanbul.edu.tr+90 212 4400000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026