Skip to content

Femtosecond Laser-assisted Arcuate Incisions Versus Manual Arcuate Incisions Outcomes

Femtosecond Laser-assisted Arcuate Incisions Versus Manual Arcuate Incisions Outcomes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04126174
Enrollment
41
Registered
2019-10-15
Start date
2019-10-15
Completion date
2021-03-20
Last updated
2021-09-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cataract

Keywords

astigmatism, limbal relaxing incisions

Brief summary

This study is designed to compare the effectiveness of LenSx laser arcuate relaxing incisions vs. manual (blade) arcuate relaxing incisions in patients with low, but significant, levels of astigmatism.

Detailed description

This study is a comparative, prospective, randomized contralateral eye study of visual outcomes after LenSx laser arcuate relaxing incisions utilizing the Woodcock nomogram at 90% thickness vs. manual (blade) fixed keratome diamond knife at 600 microns for arcuate relaxing incisions utilizing the Donnenfeld nomogram. Subjects will be assessed pre-operatively and at 1 day, 1 month and 3 months post-operatively. Clinical evaluations will include measurement of visual acuity, manifest refraction and corneal astigmatism measurement with the Lenstar and slit lamp exam.

Interventions

DEVICEfemtosecond laser system arcuate corneal incision

Corneal arcuate incision made either with a blade (manual) or femtosecond laser system.

OTHERManual LRI

Manual LRI

Sponsors

Science in Vision
CollaboratorOTHER
Gainesville Eye Associates
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Contralateral eye study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Subjects are eligible for the study if they meet the following criteria: Note: Ocular criteria must be met in both eyes. * are willing and able to understand and sign an informed consent; * are willing and able to attend all study visits; * are more than 40 years of age, of either gender and any race; * are presenting for cataract surgery or refractive lens exchange with a desire to reduce astigmatism and will be implanted with a non-toric lens * have good ocular health, with no pathology that compromises visual acuity (outside of residual refractive error and cataract) * have 0.50 D to 1.75 D of regular corneal astigmatism * have potential acuity of 20/25 or better * Are scheduled to have a non-toric monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) (SN60WF) lens implanted in both eyes

Exclusion criteria

If any of the following

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Residual Refractive Astigmatism3 monthsResidual refractive astigmatism measured in diopters

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Eyes With Residual Refractive Astigmatism < 0.50 Diopters (D)3 monthsThe number of eyes with residual refractive astigmatism \< 0.50 diopters (D)
Uncorrected Monocular Distance Visual Acuity3 monthsUncorrected monocular distance visual acuity in logMAR
Spherical Equivalent Refraction3 monthsSpherical equivalent refraction in diopters
Corneal Astigmatism3 monthsAnterior corneal astigmatism

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
Corneal arcuate incision made either with a blade (manual) or femtosecond laser system.
38
Total38

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up33

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Continuous69 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
38 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 410 / 41
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 412 / 41
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 410 / 41

Outcome results

Primary

Residual Refractive Astigmatism

Residual refractive astigmatism measured in diopters

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Femtosecond Limbal Relaxing Incision (LRI)Residual Refractive Astigmatism.21 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.33
Manual LRIResidual Refractive Astigmatism.22 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.31
Secondary

Corneal Astigmatism

Anterior corneal astigmatism

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Femtosecond Limbal Relaxing Incision (LRI)Corneal Astigmatism.63 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.34
Manual LRICorneal Astigmatism.7 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.4
Secondary

Eyes With Residual Refractive Astigmatism < 0.50 Diopters (D)

The number of eyes with residual refractive astigmatism \< 0.50 diopters (D)

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Femtosecond Limbal Relaxing Incision (LRI)Eyes With Residual Refractive Astigmatism < 0.50 Diopters (D)36 Eyes
Manual LRIEyes With Residual Refractive Astigmatism < 0.50 Diopters (D)34 Eyes
Secondary

Spherical Equivalent Refraction

Spherical equivalent refraction in diopters

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Femtosecond Limbal Relaxing Incision (LRI)Spherical Equivalent Refraction-.02 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.37
Manual LRISpherical Equivalent Refraction0 dioptersStandard Deviation 0.27
Secondary

Uncorrected Monocular Distance Visual Acuity

Uncorrected monocular distance visual acuity in logMAR

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Femtosecond Limbal Relaxing Incision (LRI)Uncorrected Monocular Distance Visual Acuity.1 logMARStandard Deviation 0.12
Manual LRIUncorrected Monocular Distance Visual Acuity.08 logMARStandard Deviation 0.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026