Pediatric Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
Proton therapy, Children and adolescents, Image guidance, Setup uncertainty
Brief summary
This research study establishes a repository for imaging data generated during image-guided proton therapy for various pediatric cancers. The data facilitate the estimation of patient positioning uncertainty, the comparison of image guidance methods, and the identification of factors contributing to large setup deviations to improve the accuracy of radiation therapy in the future. Primary Objective To establish a repository of imaging data acquired during the radiation therapy course with linked radiation treatment plans and clinical information from pediatric patients of all cancer types receiving image-guided proton therapy to facilitate secondary and exploratory objectives. Secondary Objectives * To estimate distributions of patient setup uncertainty measured with daily pre- treatment volumetric cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. * To compare patient setup corrections derived based on 2D (orthogonal radiographs) and 3D (volumetric CBCT scans) image guidance. * To assess residual setup errors after CBCT-guided correction based on post- correction repeat CBCT. * To estimate distributions and time trends of patient motion during a radiation therapy course based on weekly pre- and post-treatment CBCT scans. * To identify clinical and treatment factors that contribute to significantly large setup uncertainty and intra-fractional movement in pediatric patients. Exploratory Objectives * To determine variation in patient anatomy using images acquired during the treatment course. * To evaluate the usefulness of on-treatment CBCT scans for detecting daily changes in proton ranges, evaluating deviations from planned tumor dosimetry, and triggering adaptive replanning.
Detailed description
Image guidance data collected in this study include daily volumetric pre-treatment CBCT for image guidance, post-correction CBCT, weekly post-treatment CBCT, and 2D orthogonal radiographs. Setup uncertainty will be estimated for head and body cohorts separately, further divided into different anatomic sites. The usefulness and necessity of daily volumetric image guidance for pediatric proton therapy patients will be determined. Knowledge gained from this study will provide a basis for reducing patient positioning uncertainty and designing optimal treatment plans for pediatric patients receiving proton therapy.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patient will receive proton therapy of ≥5 daily fractions. * Research participant or legal guardian/representative gives written informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
* Unwillingness of research participant or legal guardian/representative to give written informed consent. * If patients previously enrolled in this study and completed protocol-specified imaging scans but return for re-irradiation, they will not be eligible to participate again.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Site-specific distributions of patient setup uncertainty. | 5 years after activation | The numbers of subjects enrolled in the head cohort and the body cohort. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Differences in setup errors calculated from orthogonal radiographs and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) | 5 years | This is to determine if setup corrections estimated from orthogonal radiographs are similar to those from volumetric imaging. The differences of each positional shift (x, y, z, pitch, roll, yaw) are measured. |
| Residual errors after image-guided setup corrections | 5 years | This is to determine if residual setup errors are submillimeter after image guidance with robotic cone beam computed tomography and 6 degree-of-freedom patient positioner. Residual errors differences for six parameters (x, y, z, pitch, roll, yaw) are measured. |
| Distributions of intra-fractional patient motion | 5 years | This is to estimate the change in patient position during a treatment fraction based on pre- and post-fractional volumetric imaging. The differences of each positional shift (x, y, z, pitch, roll, yaw) are measured. |
| Risk factors of large setup uncertainty and intra-fractional movement | 5 years | Risk factors (e.g., age, anesthesia, and anatomic site) that associate with the significantly large setup uncertainty and intra-fractional movement will be identified. The association with p value between age and setup uncertainty is measured. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORChia-ho Hua, PhD
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Outcome results
None listed