Skip to content

Effectiveness of 'Nexpowder' for Hemostatic Treatments of Nonvariceal, Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Endoscopic Hemostactic Powder, 'Nexpowder' for Hemostatic Treatments of Nonvariceal, Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04124588
Enrollment
348
Registered
2019-10-11
Start date
2018-11-01
Completion date
2021-11-11
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Brief summary

A prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled trial to evaluate safety and effectiveness of endoscopic hemostatic powder, 'Nexpowder' for hemostatic treatments of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. This study is a prospective, multi-center, single blind (for patients), controlled investigation planned to evaluate safety and effectiveness of Nexpowder with 352 subject patients.

Detailed description

This investigational study is designed to compare effectiveness of using the standard-of-care hemostatic therapy only, versus the standard-of-care hemostatic therapy plus an additional hemostatic treatment using Nexpower for patients with nonvariceal, upper gastrointestinal bleeding from ulcers with high-risk stigmata (Forrest classification Ia, Ib, or IIa). The primary end-points will be evaluated by assessing the rates of re-bleeding, which occur over three (3) days following initial hemostasis achieved with the standard-of-care hemostatic therapy. Secondary end-points consist of evaluating three items: 1) Ease of use of Nexpowder applied for the test group after reaching initial hemostasis, 2) Nexpowder device malfunction and 3) safety follow-up to check occurrence of adverse event(s)/re-bleeding at 30-day (+5) time point. Only the subjects whose initial hemostasis has been achieved will be registered for this investigation but those who initial hemostasis has failed to be reached with the standard-of-care therapie(s) shall not be registered for this investigation.

Interventions

DEVICENexpowder (Hemostatic powder)

Nexpowder generates gelation-effects when the powder comes into contact with water, forms a physical barrier to control hemorrhage, preserve ulcer sites and thereby demonstrates its effective hemostatic performance. Hydrogels, which turned into gel-formation through water contacts in the gastrointestinal tract protect the wound sites for over 24 hours, are subsequently detached from the lesion, and completely excreted from the patient body system within 3 days.

Argon Plasma Coagulation, Coagulation including Forcep, Hemoclipping, Band Ligation, Epinephrine or Absolute Alcohol Injecction can be used as standard-of-care hemostatic treatment(s).

Sponsors

Next Biomedical Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult male or female with age of older than 19 years. * Patients showing non-variceal upper GI bleeding symptoms * An endoscopic examination indicates that the patients's ulcer is categorized Class Ia, Ib, or IIa according to the Forrest Classifications.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or breast-feeding patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The rates of re-bleeding3 daysAssessing the rates of re-bleeding, which occur over three (3) days following initial hemostasis achieved with the standard-of-care hemostatic therapy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Treatment-Adverse Events & Long term Re-bleeding30 days (+5)Safety follow-up to check occurrence of adverse event(s)/re-bleeding.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026