Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Acetylcysteine for the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Rhinosinusitis

Efficacy and Safety of Acetylcysteine for the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Rhinosinusitis: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04123405
Enrollment
944
Registered
2019-10-10
Start date
2020-10-22
Completion date
2021-04-20
Last updated
2021-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rhinosinusitis

Keywords

acute uncomplicated rhinosinusitis, acetylcysteine

Brief summary

The trial was conducted as a prospective, randomized, multinational, multicenter, double-blind study in 4 parallel groups of patients.

Detailed description

The study was the prospective, randomized, multinational, multicenter, double-blind study in 4 parallel groups of patients. Patients underwent screening examinations at Visit 1. Patients who met all inclusion/ no exclusion criteria were randomized at the baseline visit (Day 1) to the double-blind treatment for a duration of 14 days but in case of delayed final visit (Day 15) the patient could voluntarily take reserve study medication for a maximum of 3 additional days. After the end of the double-blind treatment phase, the patients underwent an end-of-treatment (EOT) examinations on Day 15 (+3). A follow-up phone call within 7 days after Day 15 (or earlier in case of premature termination) was performed.

Interventions

DRUGacetylcysteine

600 mg tablet

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo to acetylcysteine

Sponsors

Sandoz
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female subjects aged between 14 and 75 years inclusive on the date of consent 2. Diagnosis of acute, uncomplicated rhinosinusitis defined at screening visit 1 and at Visit 2 as: 1. major symptom score (MSS) assessed by the patient ≥8 and ≤12 points for the following: rhinorrhea/ anterior discharge, postnasal drip, nasal congestion, headache, and facial pain/pressure, whereupon the nasal congestion is mandatory and no more than 3 of the 5 symptoms are rated as severe 2. individual score for facial pain/pressure ≥1 (mild) and ≤2 (moderate) 3. presence of symptoms ≤3 days prior to screening visit 3. For adults (≥18 years): Informed consent to participate in the trial provided in written form; For adolescents (≥14 - \<18 years): own subject informed consent/ assent to participate in the trial and the informed consent from all parent(s)/ legal guardian(s) provided in written form.

Exclusion criteria

1. History of hypersensitivity or intolerance to the active substance or any of the excipients of the trial medication 2. Patient with history of hereditary fructose intolerance, galactose intolerance, lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption 3. Chronic rhinosinusitis (symptoms lasting longer than 3 months) 4. Subjects who have undergone sinus or nasal surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis in the 6 months prior to screening visit 5. Sinus lavage within 7 days prior to screening visit 6. Odontogenic rhinosinusitis 7. Allergic (perennial or seasonal) rhinitis 8. Bronchial asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 9. Nasal polyposis or clinically relevant nasal septum deviation 10. Concomitant otitis 11. Intranasal or systemic use of corticosteroids within 30 days prior to screening visit 12. Intranasal or systemic use of antibiotics within 30 days prior to screening visit 13. Use of nasal decongestants within 2 days prior to screening visit 14. Concomitant treatment of common cold-like symptoms within 7 days prior to screening visit with any of the following: 1. Analgesics 2. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs 3. Antihistamines 15. Concomitant use of intranasal saline irrigation 16. Use of immunosuppressive agents within 30 days prior to screening visit 17. Immunocompromised state 18. Suspicion for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (defined as presence of purulence for 3 to 4 days with fever ≥ 38.3°C) 19. Pregnant or breast-feeding female patient 20. Female patient of childbearing potential (not surgically sterilized/hysterectomized or postmenopausal for at least 1 year) who is not currently using (documented at screening visit) and not willing to use medically reliable methods of contraception for the entire trial duration such as oral, injectable or implantable contraceptives, intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUD), sexual abstinence or vasectomized partner 21. Any other condition of the patient (e.g. serious or unstable medical or psychological condition, acute psychosis) that in the opinion of the investigator may compromise evaluation of the trial treatment or may jeopardize patient's safety, compliance or adherence to protocol requirements 22. Participation in ANY research study involving another investigational medicinal product (IMP) within 30 days prior to screening visit, or simultaneous participation in another clinical study or previous participation in present study 23. Suspected alcohol/ drug dependence or abuse (including heavy smoking: ≥ 20 cigarettes daily) 24. Use of snuff tobacco 25. Legal incapacity and/or other circumstances rendering the patient unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the trial 26. Subjects who are known or suspected: * not to comply with the trial directives * not to be reliable or trustworthy * to be a dependent person, e.g. a relative, family member, or member/employee of the investigator's or sponsor's staff * subject is in custody or submitted to an institution due to a judicial order.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Full Analysis SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The MSS combines the 5 most relevant symptoms of rhinosinusitis based on expert clinician recommendations (rhinorrhea/ anterior discharge, postnasal drip, nasal congestion, headache, and facial pain/pressure). The patient rated the severity of each of the five symptoms of the MSS using a four-point rating scale of increasing severity (0 = none/not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The MSS is then the sum of single ratings with a possible range from 0 to 15. Mean change from baseline in the daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) over the entire treatment period was calculated as the average total score from Day 2 to 15 compared to Baseline (Day 1). Negative change from baseline means improvement.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Per-Protocol SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The MSS combines the 5 most relevant symptoms of rhinosinusitis based on expert clinician recommendations (rhinorrhea/ anterior discharge, postnasal drip, nasal congestion, headache, and facial pain/pressure). The patient rated the severity of each of the five symptoms of the MSS using a four-point rating scale of increasing severity (0 = none/not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The MSS is then the sum of single ratings with a possible range from 0 to 15. Mean change from baseline in the daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) over the entire treatment period was calculated as the average total score from Day 2 to 15 compared to Baseline (Day 1). Negative change from baseline means improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Major Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The MSS combines the 5 most relevant symptoms of rhinosinusitis based on expert clinician recommendations (rhinorrhea/ anterior discharge, postnasal drip, nasal congestion, headache, and facial pain/pressure). The patient rated the severity of each of the five symptoms of the MSS using a four-point rating scale of increasing severity (0 = none/not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The MSS is then the sum of single ratings with a possible range from 0 to 15. Mean change from baseline in the daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) over the entire treatment period was calculated as the average total score from Day 2 to 15 compared to Baseline (Day 1). Negative change from baseline means improvement.
Major Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15The MSS combines the 5 most relevant symptoms of rhinosinusitis based on expert clinician recommendations (rhinorrhea/ anterior discharge, postnasal drip, nasal congestion, headache, and facial pain/pressure). The patient rated the severity of each of the five symptoms of the MSS using a four-point rating scale of increasing severity (0 = none/not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The MSS is then the sum of single ratings with a possible range from 0 to 15. Mean change from baseline in the daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) over the entire treatment period was calculated as the average total score from Day 2 to 15 compared to Baseline (Day 1). Negative change from baseline means improvement.
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Full Analysis SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14SNOT-22 Questionnaire is a disease specific Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measure that comprises a list of 22 symptoms and social or emotional consequences of the nasal disorder. Every participant is asked to rate how severe each problem had been on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The total score is the sum of the scores for all 22 items, ranging from 0 to 110, with a lower score indicating better HRQoL.
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Per Protocol SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14SNOT-22 Questionnaire is a disease specific Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measure that comprises a list of 22 symptoms and social or emotional consequences of the nasal disorder. Every participant is asked to rate how severe each problem had been on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The total score is the sum of the scores for all 22 items, ranging from 0 to 110, with a lower score indicating better HRQoL.
Time to Onset of Action, Full Analysis SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15Time to onset of action was defined as first day of active treatment on which MSS showed statistically significant (p value\<0.05) improvement from placebo.
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Per Protocol SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14SNOT-22 Questionnaire is a disease specific Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measure that comprises a list of 22 symptoms and social or emotional consequences of the nasal disorder. Every participant is asked to rate how severe each problem had been on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The total score is the sum of the scores for all 22 items, ranging from 0 to 110, with a lower score indicating better HRQoL. A negative change from baseline in SNOT-22 is considered a favorable outcome.
Number of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 4, 7, 10 and 15Number of responders and non-responders to treatment based on the assessment of overall response to treatment by the investigator were reported.
Number of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 4, 7, 10 and 15Number of responders and non-responders to treatment based on the assessment of overall response to treatment by the investigator were reported.
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Full Analysis SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14SNOT-22 Questionnaire is a disease specific Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measure that comprises a list of 22 symptoms and social or emotional consequences of the nasal disorder. Every participant is asked to rate how severe each problem had been on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The total score is the sum of the scores for all 22 items, ranging from 0 to 110, with a lower score indicating better HRQoL. A negative change from baseline in SNOT-22 is considered a favorable outcome.
Time to Onset of Action, Per-Protocol SetBaseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15Time to onset of action was defined as first day of active treatment on which MSS showed statistically significant (p value\<0.05) improvement from placebo.

Countries

Bulgaria, Germany, Moldova, Russia

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled from 42 clinical centers located in Bulgaria, Germany, Moldova and Russia.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized in 1:1:1:1 ratio

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group A: 600 mg Acetylcysteine
one tablet test product plus three tablets placebo per day (taken as two tablets dissolved in a glass of water, twice daily)
235
Group B: 1200 mg Acetylcysteine
two tablets test product plus two tablets placebo per day (taken as two tablets dissolved in a glass of water, twice daily)
238
Group C: 2400 mg Acetylcysteine
four tablets test product per day (taken as two tablets dissolved in a glass of water, twice daily)
238
Group D: Placebo
four tablets placebo per day (taken as two tablets dissolved in a glass of water, twice daily).
233
Total944

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event1233
Overall StudyContact to subject lost0001
Overall StudyExclusion criteria met1202
Overall Studyscreening failure1000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1302

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineGroup D: PlaceboTotalGroup A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineGroup B: 1200 mg Acetylcysteine
Age, Continuous41.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
41.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
41.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
41.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
40.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
5 Participants2 Participants13 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
232 Participants231 Participants928 Participants230 Participants235 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
145 Participants141 Participants556 Participants128 Participants142 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
93 Participants92 Participants388 Participants107 Participants96 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 2350 / 2380 / 2380 / 233
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 23515 / 23815 / 2388 / 233
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2350 / 2380 / 2381 / 233

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Full Analysis Set

The MSS combines the 5 most relevant symptoms of rhinosinusitis based on expert clinician recommendations (rhinorrhea/ anterior discharge, postnasal drip, nasal congestion, headache, and facial pain/pressure). The patient rated the severity of each of the five symptoms of the MSS using a four-point rating scale of increasing severity (0 = none/not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The MSS is then the sum of single ratings with a possible range from 0 to 15. Mean change from baseline in the daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) over the entire treatment period was calculated as the average total score from Day 2 to 15 compared to Baseline (Day 1). Negative change from baseline means improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: Full-Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the trial medication and who had at least one post-baseline assessment of MSS during the double-blind treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Full Analysis Set-4.8213 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98247
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Full Analysis Set-4.7394 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9909
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Full Analysis Set-4.7758 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.96938
Group D: PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Full Analysis Set-5.0180 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98262
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Per-Protocol Set

The MSS combines the 5 most relevant symptoms of rhinosinusitis based on expert clinician recommendations (rhinorrhea/ anterior discharge, postnasal drip, nasal congestion, headache, and facial pain/pressure). The patient rated the severity of each of the five symptoms of the MSS using a four-point rating scale of increasing severity (0 = none/not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The MSS is then the sum of single ratings with a possible range from 0 to 15. Mean change from baseline in the daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) over the entire treatment period was calculated as the average total score from Day 2 to 15 compared to Baseline (Day 1). Negative change from baseline means improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: Per-Protocol Set (PPS) included all FAS-evaluable patients who completed the double-blind treatment period without major protocol violations that could affect the efficacy evaluation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Per-Protocol Set-4.9085 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.92431
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Per-Protocol Set-4.8688 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.84448
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Per-Protocol Set-4.8002 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.90569
Group D: PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) Over the Entire Treatment Period, Per-Protocol Set-5.1256 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.95072
Secondary

Major Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis Set

The MSS combines the 5 most relevant symptoms of rhinosinusitis based on expert clinician recommendations (rhinorrhea/ anterior discharge, postnasal drip, nasal congestion, headache, and facial pain/pressure). The patient rated the severity of each of the five symptoms of the MSS using a four-point rating scale of increasing severity (0 = none/not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The MSS is then the sum of single ratings with a possible range from 0 to 15. Mean change from baseline in the daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) over the entire treatment period was calculated as the average total score from Day 2 to 15 compared to Baseline (Day 1). Negative change from baseline means improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: Full-Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the trial medication and who had at least one post-baseline assessment of MSS during the double-blind treatment period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 94.204 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8149
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 84.766 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8631
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 56.983 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7284
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 151.332 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1485
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 75.528 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9747
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 66.323 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7807
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 132.038 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4202
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 1 (Baseline)9.634 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1181
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 38.485 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3376
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 141.583 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3289
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 122.609 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.52
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 113.051 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5229
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 47.821 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4482
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 29.021 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.0348
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 103.634 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6815
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 122.754 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.568
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 1 (Baseline)9.640 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0647
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 29.004 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9883
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 38.513 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2303
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 47.695 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.513
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 56.979 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5706
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 66.203 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8719
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 75.538 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7449
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 84.750 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6755
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 94.322 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7254
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 103.763 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6391
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 113.284 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6658
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 132.246 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5296
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 141.941 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5375
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 151.614 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4459
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 47.723 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7156
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 122.756 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3795
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 141.836 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.33
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 29.038 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1235
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 103.845 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6634
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 132.218 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4293
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 94.445 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7381
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 1 (Baseline)9.702 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0101
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 66.315 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.798
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 113.256 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5716
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 57.013 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.749
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 84.891 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7598
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 75.576 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8508
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 38.416 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.439
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 151.634 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3178
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 47.761 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5058
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 84.387 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6004
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 103.404 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6805
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 93.839 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5924
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 141.596 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3637
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 38.609 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1298
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 112.843 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6469
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 29.074 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9866
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 122.413 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5608
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 151.352 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1882
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 56.917 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6312
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 131.943 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4174
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 66.039 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7838
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 1 (Baseline)9.683 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0652
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Full Analysis SetDay 75.126 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7096
Secondary

Major Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol Set

The MSS combines the 5 most relevant symptoms of rhinosinusitis based on expert clinician recommendations (rhinorrhea/ anterior discharge, postnasal drip, nasal congestion, headache, and facial pain/pressure). The patient rated the severity of each of the five symptoms of the MSS using a four-point rating scale of increasing severity (0 = none/not present, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The MSS is then the sum of single ratings with a possible range from 0 to 15. Mean change from baseline in the daily Major Symptom Score (MSS) over the entire treatment period was calculated as the average total score from Day 2 to 15 compared to Baseline (Day 1). Negative change from baseline means improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: Per-Protocol Set (PPS) included all FAS-evaluable patients who completed the double-blind treatment period without major protocol violations that could affect the efficacy evaluation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 1 (Baseline)9.657 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1201
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 122.493 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3485
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 94.117 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7558
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 38.545 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.289
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 103.521 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6127
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 112.934 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4039
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 47.803 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4779
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 29.080 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.016
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 141.432 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.0812
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 56.962 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7401
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 66.315 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7914
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 131.897 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2146
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 75.479 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.955
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 151.221 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.953
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 84.685 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.825
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 84.605 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6399
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 122.572 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3785
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 56.874 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5865
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 94.181 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6773
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 28.935 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.0268
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 113.144 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5214
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 132.065 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2949
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 103.628 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5174
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 38.395 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2583
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 75.400 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7151
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 151.409 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1312
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 141.749 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2779
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 66.093 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8809
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 47.577 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5472
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 1 (Baseline)9.628 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0595
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 84.892 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7421
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 1 (Baseline)9.698 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0319
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 29.127 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.0089
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 38.528 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2591
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 47.816 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5849
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 57.061 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6522
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 66.349 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 75.604 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.78
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 94.382 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6734
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 103.741 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5507
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 113.146 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4538
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 122.608 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2228
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 132.085 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2013
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 141.708 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1128
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 151.524 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.0846
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 74.981 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7163
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 29.068 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.0278
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 122.300 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4902
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 65.937 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8354
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 56.821 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6717
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 1 (Baseline)9.676 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0823
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 131.816 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3077
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 47.739 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.575
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 38.594 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1921
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 151.193 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9636
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 103.222 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6197
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 93.652 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5495
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 141.444 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2198
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 112.705 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6042
Group D: PlaceboMajor Symptom Score (MSS) Development Over the Course of the Study, Per-protocol SetDay 84.237 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5914
Secondary

Number of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis Set

Number of responders and non-responders to treatment based on the assessment of overall response to treatment by the investigator were reported.

Time frame: Day 4, 7, 10 and 15

Population: Full-Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the trial medication and who had at least one post-baseline assessment of MSS during the double-blind treatment period.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 15Responders230 Participants
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 15Non-responders4 Participants
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 7Responders209 Participants
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 4Non-responders85 Participants
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 4Responders148 Participants
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 10Non-responders6 Participants
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 7Non-responders23 Participants
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 10Responders225 Participants
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 7Non-responders29 Participants
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 15Non-responders6 Participants
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 10Non-responders7 Participants
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 10Responders225 Participants
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 4Non-responders83 Participants
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 4Responders152 Participants
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 7Responders206 Participants
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 15Responders226 Participants
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 7Non-responders15 Participants
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 4Responders151 Participants
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 4Non-responders86 Participants
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 7Responders212 Participants
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 10Responders230 Participants
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 10Non-responders5 Participants
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 15Responders230 Participants
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 15Non-responders8 Participants
Group D: PlaceboNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 7Non-responders18 Participants
Group D: PlaceboNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 7Responders209 Participants
Group D: PlaceboNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 15Non-responders4 Participants
Group D: PlaceboNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 15Responders224 Participants
Group D: PlaceboNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 4Non-responders79 Participants
Group D: PlaceboNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 10Responders219 Participants
Group D: PlaceboNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 4Responders150 Participants
Group D: PlaceboNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Full Analysis SetDay 10Non-responders6 Participants
Secondary

Number of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol Set

Number of responders and non-responders to treatment based on the assessment of overall response to treatment by the investigator were reported.

Time frame: Day 4, 7, 10 and 15

Population: Per-Protocol Set (PPS) included all FAS-evaluable patients who completed the double-blind treatment period without major protocol violations that could affect the efficacy evaluation.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 4Responders138 Participants
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 4Non-responders75 Participants
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 7Responders192 Participants
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 7Non-responders21 Participants
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 10Responders207 Participants
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 10Non-responders6 Participants
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 15Responders211 Participants
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 15Non-responders2 Participants
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 10Non-responders5 Participants
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 10Responders210 Participants
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 4Non-responders75 Participants
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 15Non-responders5 Participants
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 15Responders210 Participants
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 7Non-responders25 Participants
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 7Responders190 Participants
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 4Responders140 Participants
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 15Responders206 Participants
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 7Responders191 Participants
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 7Non-responders21 Participants
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 10Responders209 Participants
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 10Non-responders3 Participants
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 15Non-responders6 Participants
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 4Responders132 Participants
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 4Non-responders80 Participants
Group D: PlaceboNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 7Responders192 Participants
Group D: PlaceboNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 7Non-responders15 Participants
Group D: PlaceboNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 4Non-responders73 Participants
Group D: PlaceboNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 4Responders134 Participants
Group D: PlaceboNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 10Responders202 Participants
Group D: PlaceboNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 15Non-responders2 Participants
Group D: PlaceboNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 15Responders205 Participants
Group D: PlaceboNumber of Responders and Non-responders to Treatment, Per-Protocol SetDay 10Non-responders5 Participants
Secondary

Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Full Analysis Set

SNOT-22 Questionnaire is a disease specific Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measure that comprises a list of 22 symptoms and social or emotional consequences of the nasal disorder. Every participant is asked to rate how severe each problem had been on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The total score is the sum of the scores for all 22 items, ranging from 0 to 110, with a lower score indicating better HRQoL. A negative change from baseline in SNOT-22 is considered a favorable outcome.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14

Population: Full-Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the trial medication and who had at least one post-baseline assessment of MSS during the double-blind treatment period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Full Analysis SetDay 7-35.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.25
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Full Analysis SetDay 14-79.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.27
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Full Analysis SetDay 14-78.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.11
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Full Analysis SetDay 7-38.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.48
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Full Analysis SetDay 7-36.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.61
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Full Analysis SetDay 14-78.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.53
Group D: PlaceboSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Full Analysis SetDay 7-39.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.42
Group D: PlaceboSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Full Analysis SetDay 14-81.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.54
Secondary

Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Per Protocol Set

SNOT-22 Questionnaire is a disease specific Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measure that comprises a list of 22 symptoms and social or emotional consequences of the nasal disorder. Every participant is asked to rate how severe each problem had been on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The total score is the sum of the scores for all 22 items, ranging from 0 to 110, with a lower score indicating better HRQoL. A negative change from baseline in SNOT-22 is considered a favorable outcome.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14

Population: Per-Protocol Set (PPS) included all FAS-evaluable patients who completed the double-blind treatment period without major protocol violations that could affect the efficacy evaluation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Per Protocol SetDay 7-36.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.64
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Per Protocol SetDay 14-79.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.9
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Per Protocol SetDay 14-78.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.77
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Per Protocol SetDay 7-39.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.68
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Per Protocol SetDay 7-36.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.44
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Per Protocol SetDay 14-79.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.16
Group D: PlaceboSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Per Protocol SetDay 7-39.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.6
Group D: PlaceboSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Change to Baseline, Per Protocol SetDay 14-81.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.1
Secondary

Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Full Analysis Set

SNOT-22 Questionnaire is a disease specific Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measure that comprises a list of 22 symptoms and social or emotional consequences of the nasal disorder. Every participant is asked to rate how severe each problem had been on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The total score is the sum of the scores for all 22 items, ranging from 0 to 110, with a lower score indicating better HRQoL.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14

Population: Full-Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the trial medication and who had at least one post-baseline assessment of MSS during the double-blind treatment period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Full Analysis SetDay 1 (Baseline)37.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.89
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Full Analysis SetDay 147.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.8
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Full Analysis SetDay 723.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.01
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Full Analysis SetDay 1 (Baseline)36.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.82
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Full Analysis SetDay 146.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.15
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Full Analysis SetDay 721.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.14
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Full Analysis SetDay 722.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.95
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Full Analysis SetDay 1 (Baseline)36.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.21
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Full Analysis SetDay 147.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.07
Group D: PlaceboSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Full Analysis SetDay 1 (Baseline)36.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Group D: PlaceboSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Full Analysis SetDay 146.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.28
Group D: PlaceboSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Full Analysis SetDay 721.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.56
Secondary

Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Per Protocol Set

SNOT-22 Questionnaire is a disease specific Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measure that comprises a list of 22 symptoms and social or emotional consequences of the nasal disorder. Every participant is asked to rate how severe each problem had been on a scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The total score is the sum of the scores for all 22 items, ranging from 0 to 110, with a lower score indicating better HRQoL.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 7 and Day 14

Population: Per-Protocol Set (PPS) included all FAS-evaluable patients who completed the double-blind treatment period without major protocol violations that could affect the efficacy evaluation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Per Protocol SetDay 1 (Baseline)37.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.64
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Per Protocol SetDay 146.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.49
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Per Protocol SetDay 723.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.92
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Per Protocol SetDay 1 (Baseline)36.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.89
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Per Protocol SetDay 147.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.43
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Per Protocol SetDay 721.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.32
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Per Protocol SetDay 722.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.27
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Per Protocol SetDay 1 (Baseline)36.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.86
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Per Protocol SetDay 146.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.67
Group D: PlaceboSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Per Protocol SetDay 1 (Baseline)36.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.88
Group D: PlaceboSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Per Protocol SetDay 146.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
Group D: PlaceboSino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) by Visit, Per Protocol SetDay 721.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.78
Secondary

Time to Onset of Action, Full Analysis Set

Time to onset of action was defined as first day of active treatment on which MSS showed statistically significant (p value\<0.05) improvement from placebo.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: Full-Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the trial medication and who had at least one post-baseline assessment of MSS during the double-blind treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineTime to Onset of Action, Full Analysis SetNA Days
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineTime to Onset of Action, Full Analysis SetNA Days
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineTime to Onset of Action, Full Analysis SetNA Days
Secondary

Time to Onset of Action, Per-Protocol Set

Time to onset of action was defined as first day of active treatment on which MSS showed statistically significant (p value\<0.05) improvement from placebo.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15

Population: Per-Protocol Set (PPS) included all FAS-evaluable patients who completed the double-blind treatment period without major protocol violations that could affect the efficacy evaluation.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group A: 600 mg AcetylcysteineTime to Onset of Action, Per-Protocol SetNA Days
Group B: 1200 mg AcetylcysteineTime to Onset of Action, Per-Protocol SetNA Days
Group C: 2400 mg AcetylcysteineTime to Onset of Action, Per-Protocol SetNA Days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026