Skip to content

CLOSE-guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using High Power and Stable RF Applications

CLOSE-guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using High Power and Stable RF Applications: a Randomized Study. The POWERAF Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04122963
Acronym
POWERAF
Enrollment
100
Registered
2019-10-10
Start date
2019-02-15
Completion date
2020-06-30
Last updated
2021-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

In this prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded,monocentric study, we aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of higher power CLOSE-guided PVI in patients referred for a first ablation for paroxysmal AF. We aim to include 100 patients into two groups (1:1). The experimental group will receive AF ablation with 45 Watt and stricter stability criteria (3 mm for 3 seconds) compared to the control group which will receive AF ablation according to the standard CLOSE-protocol (35 Watt and stability criteria of 3 mm for 8 seconds).

Detailed description

BACKGROUND: In a population of paroxysmal AF 'CLOSE'-guided PVI (Target Ablation index (AI) \>550 and \>400 for anterior and posterior wall respectively, interlesion distance ≤6mm) has been shown to obtain single-procedure durable PV isolation. However, the optimal RF power and stability criteria is unknown. OBJECTIVES: With this study, we aim at evaluation the efficacy and the safety of higher power (45 watts) and stricter stability criteria (3 mm for 3 sec) as compared to a standard CLOSE protocol (35 watts with stability of 3 mm for 8 sec) in patients referred for a first ablation for paroxysmal AF. POPULATION: Eligible patients are patients with paroxysmal AF who are planned for a 'CLOSE'-guided PV isolation for paroxysmal AF. At the time of the procedrual planning, we will ask the patient his/her consent for collectio of data. We aim at including 100 patients.

Interventions

PROCEDUREHigh power CLOSE-guided PVI ablation

CLOSE-guided PVI ablation with 45 Watt and stricter stability criteria (3 mm for 3 seconds)

PROCEDUREStandard CLOSE-guided PVI ablation

Standard AF ablation according to the CLOSE-protocol

Sponsors

AZ Sint-Jan AV
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients referred for symptomatic paroxysmal AF and without advanced structural heart disease * Signed Patient Informed Consent Form * Age 18 years or older * Able and willing to comply with all follow-up testing and requirements

Exclusion criteria

* Persistent atrial fibrillation (history of AF\>7days or history of cardioversion \> 48h of AF) * Previous ablation for AF * LA antero-posterior diameter\>50 mm (parasternal long axis view , PLAX) * LVEF \<35% (ejection fraction) * AF secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, or reversible or non-cardiac cause * CABG procedure within the last three months * Awaiting cardiac transplantation or other cardiac surgery * Documented left atrial thrombus on imaging * Diagnosed atrial myxoma * Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding * Acute illness or active systemic infection or sepsis * Unstable angina * Uncontrolled heart failure * Myocardial infarction within the previous two months * History of blood clotting or bleeding abnormalities * Contraindication to anticoagulation therapy (ie, heparin or warfarin) * Life expectancy less than 12 months * Enrollment in any other study evaluating another device or drug * Presence of intramural thrombus, tumor or other abnormality that precludes catheter introduction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy: Acute procedural successAt time of ablationFirst pass pulmonary vein isolation confirmed after adenosine injection
Safety: Absence of clinical complicationsFrom time of ablation to 1 month post procedureAbsence of clinical complications during the procedure and up to one month thereafter

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Fluoroscopic duration and irradiation (AK)At time of ablation
Amount of ablation points associated with temperature riseAt time of ablation
Maximum temperature in case of temperature riseAt time of ablation
Incidence of adverse events related to ablationFrom time of ablation to 6 months post procedure
First pass encirclement isolation rateAt time of ablation
Procedural duration timeAt time of ablation
Number of dislocationsAt time of ablation
Number of ablation points with an oesophageal temperature rise >39°CAt time of ablation
Maximum temperature in case of oesophageal temperature riseAt time of ablation
Longterm procedural success rateSix months after ablation
Reconnection rate after adenosineAt time of ablation
Duration for pulmonary vein isolationAt time of ablation

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026