Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Edoxaban in Thoracoscopic Ablation

Safety and Efficacy of Edoxaban Versus Warfarin in Patients Undergoing a Thoracoscopic Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04121767
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-10-10
Start date
2017-12-01
Completion date
2020-07-10
Last updated
2020-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anticoagulants and Bleeding Disorders, Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

atrial fibrillation, thoracoscopic ablation, anticoagulation

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of edoxaban and warfarin for prevention of stroke during a 6-month follow up after total thoracoscopic ablation.

Detailed description

In Korea, 5% of patients older than 65 years and 10% of patients older than 80 have a history of atrial fibrillation (AF), which is often associated with sudden death and stroke. Medication and percutaneous radiofrequency catheter ablation are commonly used treatment modalities. Pharmacotherapy is primarily symptomatic treatment; moreover, the effect of conversion to a normal rhythm is minimal, and mainly aimed at stabilizing heart rate. Catheter ablation is associated with a high incidence of recurrence in chronic AF, and it is difficult to treat left atrial appendage, thereby preventing discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy post procedure. Thoracoscopic ablation is known to be a less invasive and more effective modality to treat patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. However, anticoagulation therapy is mandatory in the early postoperative period due to intracardiac thromboembolism associated with atrial stunning despite conversion to a sinus rhythm and resection of the left atrial appendage. Further investigation would be required to assess the efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants such as edoxaban compared to that of warfarin for stroke prevention during the early postoperative period (6 months) after a thoracoscopic procedure. The need to maintain a constant level of blood coagulation and the potential development of complications such as hemorrhages are drawbacks associated with the use of warfarin. While novel oral anticoagulants such as edoxaban do have a role in atrial fibrillation, data regarding their effectiveness and incidence of complications after arrhythmia surgery do not exist. In this study, we will compare warfarin and edoxaban with respect to safety and efficacy, after they are used for 6 months following thoracoscopic ablation in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation

Interventions

DRUGEdoxaban

oral edoxaban 60mg once daily for 3 months

DRUGWarfarin

oral warfarin once daily for 3 months according to prothrombin time

Sponsors

Samsung Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients aged 18 years or older (not exceed 80 years old). 2. Elective thoracoscopic ablation. 3. Presence of atrial fibrillation (paroxysmal, persistent, long-standing persistent).

Exclusion criteria

1. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). 2. History of pulmonary tuberculosis. 3. Other cardiac comorbidities including valvular disease, coronary artery disease. 4. Congenital heart anomalies except for atrial septal defect. 5. Known, clinically important anemia or thrombocytopenia. 6. Pregnancy or lactation. 7. Malignancy. 8. Intracardiac mass or thrombus 9. Life expectancy less than 1 year.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative stroke6 monthsNumber of patients showing thromboembolic neurologic complication after thoracoscopic ablation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative pericarditis6 monthsNumber of patients showing pericarditis requiring readmission after thoracoscopic ablation
Postoperative bleeding6 monthsNumber of patients showing bleeding events due to anticoagulation after thoracoscopic ablation

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026