Skip to content

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of EP-104IAR in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled Study Evaluating the Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of Single Dose EP-104IAR for 24 Weeks in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04120402
Acronym
SPRINGBOARD
Enrollment
318
Registered
2019-10-09
Start date
2021-09-10
Completion date
2023-06-01
Last updated
2024-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics (PK) of EP-104IAR in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee

Detailed description

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single injection, 24-week study to evaluate the safety, efficacy and PK of EP-104IAR in subjects with osteoarthritis knee pain Following screening and baseline assessments to determine eligibility, each participant will receive a single IA injection of either EP-104IAR or placebo (vehicle). Participants will be followed up for 24 weeks following the injection for safety, PK and efficacy assessments.

Interventions

DRUGEP-104IAR 25 mg

Single 5 mL intra-articular injection

DRUGVehicle

Single 5 mL intra-articular injection

Sponsors

NBCD A/S
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Subjects will be randomized to received either EP-104IAR or placebo (vehicle) in a parallel group fashion.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Males or females, aged ≥40 years * Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤ 40.0 kg/m2 * Diagnosis of primary OA of the Index knee, with symptoms present for at least 6 months * OA severity Grade 2 or 3 (based on Kellgren Lawrence Grading Scale) * Unsatisfactory pain relief from at least 2 prior standard OA treatments * Qualifying pain in the Index knee during the baseline period * Ambulatory (without the need for a cane/other walking aide) * Female subjects willing to use highly effective birth control methods to prevent pregnancy * Willing and able to comply with study procedures and restrictions, including abstaining from use of restricted medications. Key

Exclusion criteria

* OA of the Index knee due to acute injury or trauma, or unstable joint * X-ray evidence of chondrocalcinosis * Diagnosed or suspected ipsilateral hip OA * Knee pain that is not attributable to OA of the knee * Any other disorders that impact mobility, strength or sensation, or are a co-existent source of pain or inflammation that interfere with assessment of knee pain and function * History of infection in the Index knee * Skin breakdown on the Index knee where the injection will take place * Total Knee Replacement, or any other surgery (including arthroscopy) for the Index knee within prior 12 months, or planned surgery during the study * Total Knee Replacement Surgery of the non-Index knee within prior 6 months, or planned surgery (any location) during the study that would require a restricted medication * IA injection of corticosteroids in any joint within prior 3 months or IA injection of extended-release corticosteroids in any joint within prior 6 months * IA injection in the Index knee of platelet rich plasma, or other prolotherapy within prior 3 months, or hyaluronic acid within prior 6 months * Recent, current or planned use of corticosteroids for any indication (except for permitted uses) * Recent, current or planned use of prohibited medications (including analgesics, marijuana, investigational drugs and devices, immunosuppressive therapy), or unwilling or unable to stop using prohibited medications during the study. * Conditions including: sarcoidosis, amyloidosis, osteomyelitis, Cushing's Syndrome, hepatic or renal disease, Psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, symptomatic depressive or anxiety disorders. * Current malignancy of any type, or history of a malignancy within prior 12 months * Active or quiescent systemic fungal, bacterial (including tuberculosis) viral (including HIV, Hepatitis B or C) or parasitic infections, or ocular herpes simplex, or any recent infection requiring IV or oral antibiotics * Laboratory results indicative of adrenal insufficiency, diabetes or renal or hepatic disease. * Positive urine drug screen for a substance of abuse * Females who are pregnant, lactating * Known or suspected hypersensitivity or contraindication to ingredients in the study drug

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Pain Subscale12 weeksWestern Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst). Least squares mean from a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) for change from baseline with fixed effects for site, treatment, week, treatment-by-week interaction; random effect for subject; and covariate baseline WOMAC pain score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Function Subscale12 weeksWestern Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function subscale (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst). Function subscale includes questions related to the physical functioning of osteoarthritis e.g. stair use, standing, walking etc. From a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) for change from baseline with fixed effects for site, treatment, week, treatment-by-week interaction; random effect for subject; and covariate baseline WOMAC function score.
Difference Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of WOMAC Pain Subscale12 weeksArea under the curve in change from baseline Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst) from Week 0 to Week 12 was calculated on a per-individual basis using the linear trapezoidal rule. AUC was normalized to account for subjects whose actual days and nominal days at Week 12 differed. Treatments were compared using an ANCOVA model containing site; individual baseline WOMAC Pain; and treatment group as covariates.
Difference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Pain Subscale24 weeksWestern Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst). Least squares mean from a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) for change from baseline with fixed effects for site, treatment, week, treatment-by-week interaction; random effect for subject; and covariate baseline WOMAC pain score.
Difference Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in OMERACT-OARSI Strict Responders12 weeksOutcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) strict responders are defined as at least 50% improvement (decrease from baseline) in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain or function subscales (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst) and an absolute change of at least 2 in the respective score. Patients who discontinued prior to Week 12 were considered non-responders.

Countries

Czechia, Denmark, Poland

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
EP-104IAR 25 mg
A single use intra-articular injection containing 25 mg of EP-104IAR EP-104IAR 25 mg: Single 5 mL intra-articular injection
163
Placebo (Vehicle)
A single use intra-articular injection containing no active ingredients Vehicle: Single 5 mL intra-articular injection
155
Total318

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEP-104IAR 25 mgPlacebo (Vehicle)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
72 Participants66 Participants138 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
91 Participants89 Participants180 Participants
Age, Continuous64.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.31
63.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.37
63.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.33
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
161 Participants152 Participants313 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
162 Participants153 Participants315 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
40 participants35 participants75 participants
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
85 participants84 participants169 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
38 participants36 participants74 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
94 Participants89 Participants183 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
69 Participants66 Participants135 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1630 / 155
other
Total, other adverse events
76 / 16368 / 155
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 1631 / 155

Outcome results

Primary

Difference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Pain Subscale

Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst). Least squares mean from a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) for change from baseline with fixed effects for site, treatment, week, treatment-by-week interaction; random effect for subject; and covariate baseline WOMAC pain score.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consists of all subjects who were both randomized to and received treatment. Analysis was conducted allocating subjects to the treatment to which they were randomized, irrespective of what was actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
EP-104IAR 25 mgDifference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Pain Subscale-2.89 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.166
Placebo (Vehicle)Difference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Pain Subscale-2.23 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.171
p-value: 0.004ANCOVA
Secondary

Difference Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in OMERACT-OARSI Strict Responders

Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) strict responders are defined as at least 50% improvement (decrease from baseline) in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain or function subscales (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst) and an absolute change of at least 2 in the respective score. Patients who discontinued prior to Week 12 were considered non-responders.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consists of all subjects who were both randomized to and received treatment. Analysis was conducted allocating subjects to the treatment to which they were randomized, irrespective of what was actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EP-104IAR 25 mgDifference Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in OMERACT-OARSI Strict Responders87 Participants
Placebo (Vehicle)Difference Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in OMERACT-OARSI Strict Responders61 Participants
p-value: 0.028Fisher Exact
Secondary

Difference Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of WOMAC Pain Subscale

Area under the curve in change from baseline Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst) from Week 0 to Week 12 was calculated on a per-individual basis using the linear trapezoidal rule. AUC was normalized to account for subjects whose actual days and nominal days at Week 12 differed. Treatments were compared using an ANCOVA model containing site; individual baseline WOMAC Pain; and treatment group as covariates.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consists of all subjects who were both randomized to and received treatment. Analysis was conducted allocating subjects to the treatment to which they were randomized, irrespective of what was actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
EP-104IAR 25 mgDifference Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of WOMAC Pain Subscale-235.67 score on a scale multiplied by daysStandard Error 11.769
Placebo (Vehicle)Difference Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of WOMAC Pain Subscale-166.78 score on a scale multiplied by daysStandard Error 12.169
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Difference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Function Subscale

Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function subscale (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst). Function subscale includes questions related to the physical functioning of osteoarthritis e.g. stair use, standing, walking etc. From a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) for change from baseline with fixed effects for site, treatment, week, treatment-by-week interaction; random effect for subject; and covariate baseline WOMAC function score.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consists of all subjects who were both randomized to and received treatment. Analysis was conducted allocating subjects to the treatment to which they were randomized, irrespective of what was actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
EP-104IAR 25 mgDifference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Function Subscale-2.59 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.161
Placebo (Vehicle)Difference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Function Subscale-2.04 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.166
p-value: 0.014ANCOVA
Secondary

Difference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Pain Subscale

Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale (scores scaled 0-10, with 10 being the worst). Least squares mean from a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) for change from baseline with fixed effects for site, treatment, week, treatment-by-week interaction; random effect for subject; and covariate baseline WOMAC pain score.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consists of all subjects who were both randomized to and received treatment. Analysis was conducted allocating subjects to the treatment to which they were randomized, irrespective of what was actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
EP-104IAR 25 mgDifference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Pain Subscale-2.26 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.171
Placebo (Vehicle)Difference in Change From Baseline Between EP-104IAR and Vehicle in WOMAC Pain Subscale-2.11 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.175
p-value: 0.518ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026