Skip to content

Probiotics in Women With Primary Dysmenorrhoea

A Novel Approach to Manipulate Intestinal Homeostasis in Primary Dysmenorrhoea Women: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04119011
Enrollment
72
Registered
2019-10-08
Start date
2019-10-01
Completion date
2020-03-31
Last updated
2021-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Dysmenorrhea

Keywords

probiotics

Brief summary

This study compares the effect of probiotics versus placebo in women with primary dysmenorrhoea

Detailed description

This is a randomized controlled trial comparing probiotics against placebo in women with primary dysmenorrhoea

Interventions

BIOLOGICALProbiotic

(Lactobacillus acidophilus, lactobacillus casei, lactobacillus lactis) and Bifidobacterium (Bifidobacterium bifidum, bifidobacterium longum, bifidobacterium infantis) lactose, sugar, milk powder, oligosaccharides, ascorbic acid, citric acid, maltodextrin, and orange flavor

OTHERPlacebo

lactose, sugar, milk powder, oligosaccharides, ascorbic acid, citric acid, maltodextrin, and orange flavor

Sponsors

B-Crobes Marketing(M) Sdn Bhd
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
National University of Malaysia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

placebo and probiotic are labelled A or B, this is prepared by the manufacturer and blinded from the participant and investigator, the unblinding takes place only after completion of the data collection

Intervention model description

randomized placebo-controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* regular menstrual cycles between 21 to 45 days * primary dysmenorrhoea only * willing to consume sachets twice daily for 3 months

Exclusion criteria

* current Intrauterine Copper Device (IUCD) user * recent hormonal (estrogen or progesterone) therapy in last 3 months * on treatment for allergy such as antihistamine * diarrhoea with dairy product * often take drugs which may affect the test results (such as medicines treating constipation or digestive medicine such as laxatives or enema) * any malignant tumor regardless of type or site

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Frequency of Non-steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) use between placebo and probiotic group3 months during treatment with probiotic or placebomean number of Non-steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) use per cycle
severity score after treatment (verbal rating score)after 3 months of treatmentmean Verbal Rating Score on scale 0 to 3, on day 2 of menses after 3 months of treatment with placebo/probiotic
Quality of life before treatment (Physical and mental health score assessed by SF12v2 questionnaire)baselinemean quality of life score using validated health survey questionnaire Short Form 12 version 2 (SF12v2) (permission obtained from primary author) Answers from each question will be calculated using formula into percentage of average physical health score and average mental health score, on scale 0 to 100 in which higher percentage represents higher quality of life, and score less than 50 represents poor quality of life
Quality of life after treatment (physical and mental health score assessed by SF12v2 questionnaire)at 3 months after completed treatment with probiotic or placebomean quality of life score using validated health survey questionnaire Short Form 12 version 2 (SF12v2) (permission obtained from primary author) Answers from each question will be calculated using formula into percentage of average physical health score and average mental health score, on scale 0 to 100 in which higher percentage represents higher quality of life, and score less than 50 represents poor quality of life
pain score before treatment (visual analog scale VAS)baselinemean Visual Analog Score on scale 0 to 10, on day 2 of menses at baseline
pain score after treatment (visual analog scale VAS)after 3 months of treatmentmean Visual Analog Score on scale 0 to 10, on day 2 of menses after 3 months of treatment with probiotic/placebo
severity score before treatment (verbal rating score)baselinemean Verbal Rating Score on scale 0 to 3, on day 2 of menses at baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Concentration of inflammatory markers post-treatmentAt 3 months after commencement of treatmentmean concentration of serum pro-inflammatory markers on day 2 of menses (Interleukin-1,2,4,5,6,7,8,10,12p70,13,17, Tumour necrosis factor-alpha, Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor, and Regulated on activation normal T-cell expressed and secreted) all in pg/mL, reported individually in table form
intestinal microbiota before and after treatment with probioticson date of randomization and at 3 month after completed treatment with probiotic or placeboRelative abundance of microbiome DNA in percentage
Concentration of inflammatory markers pre-treatmentbaselinemean concentration of serum pro-inflammatory markers on day 2 of menses (Interleukin-1,2,4,5,6,7,8,10,12p70,13,17, Tumour necrosis factor-alpha, Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor, and Regulated on activation normal T-cell expressed and secreted) all in pg/mL, reported individually in table form

Countries

Malaysia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026