Skip to content

Effective Mechanisms of Wu-Chu-Yu Tang on Gastroesophageal Disorder

Effective Mechanisms of Wu-Chu-Yu Tang on Gastroesophageal Disorder

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04118647
Enrollment
55
Registered
2019-10-08
Start date
2019-10-31
Completion date
2021-09-30
Last updated
2019-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

24 Hours Esophageal PH and Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance Testing, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disorder, Wu-Chu-Yu Tang

Brief summary

Gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD) is due to gastric content reflux to esophagus cause symptom and complication including intra-esophagus such as reflux esophagitis, and extra-esophagus such as cough etc. Because the changes of dietary habit, and improvement of examination skill and data analysis, the prevalence of GERD increased 2.5 multiple from 1995 to 2002, and suggesting the prevalence is 25% in Taiwan community. The etiology of GERD is multi-effect, such as transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and abnormal pressure of lower esophageal sphincter, which may induced the esophageal mucosal injury by gastric acid, bile or pancreases enzyme. Wu-Chu-Yu tang consists of Evodia fargesii Dode (Evodia Fruit), Panax ginseng C. (Ginseng), Ziziphus jujube Mill (Chinses Date), Zingiber officinale Rosee (Fresh Ginger).According to I-Fang-Chi-Chieh and Shanghonzobinglun recordings that Wu-Chu-Yu tang can treat vomiting, and also can relax gastric tonicity and can enhance peristalsis of stomach. According to Randomized, double blind, placebo control trial to evaluate the efficacy of Wu-Chu-Yu Tang on gastroesophageal reflux disease, we know the Wu-Chu-Yu tang have the equivalent effect proton pump inhibitor omeprazole. But, the mechanism of Wu-Chu-Yu tang is still unknown.

Interventions

DRUGWu-Chu-Yu tang

Wu-Chu-Yu tang at a rate of 3.0 g three times per day for 28 days.

Sponsors

China Medical University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Gender:male or female. 2. Age:from 20 years old (inclusive) to 75 years old (inclusive). 3. Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. 4. there is a heartburn or acid regurgitation phenomenon. 5. After detailed description of the entire research purpose or process, voluntarily participate in the study and sign the consent form.

Exclusion criteria

1. Exclude peptic ulcers, gallstones (including intrahepatic and common bile ducts) and major diseases such as: cancer, congestive hear failured NYHA class\>II, COPD attack. 2. Barrett's esophagus, narrow esophagus or caustic injury of upper gastrointestinal tract. 3. History of esophagus and gastroduodenal surgery. 4. Tarry stool suspected gastrointestinal bleeding. 5. History of alcohol or drug abuse. 6. Patients with a history of allergies to the test drug. 7. Can not cooperate with mental illness. 8. Pregnant women or women who are breastfeeding. 9. Liver function SGOT and SGPT are more than twice the normal value. 10. renal function test BUN, Creatinine is greater than the normal value.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
24 hours esophageal PH28 daysAnalysis the 24 hours PH change
DeMeester score28 daysDeMeester score had two major component as 1.total time of pH\<4(%) and 2.number of reflux episode. Each major part had two minor component.Fist one, percentage of total time pH\<4, had 1. percentage of upright time when pH\<4 and 2.percentage of supine time when pH\<4. Secondary part, number of reflux episode, had 1.number of reflux episode over 5 mintues and 2.longest reflux time. Finally, there was a composite score as the DeMeester score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reflux Disease Questionnaire56 daysReflux Disease Questionnaire had one major component as Thinking about your symptoms over the past 7 days, how often have you had the following? And then there were six minor component: a. A burning feeling behind your breastbone b. Pain behind your breastbone c. A burning feeling in the centre of the upper stomach d. Pain in the centre of the upper stomach e. An acid taste in your mouth f. Unpleasant movement ofmaterial upwards from the stomach. Each question was different frequency as have not had, 1 day, 2 days, 3-4 days, 5-6 days or daily in one week. Each frequency had one score and subscale had score from one to six. The total score was one to thirty six. The score more less means more better outcome.
SF-36 questionnaire56 daysThe scores of each question are added together to obtain the scale. The total score, the higher the total score, the quality of healthy life The higher.

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactChing-Liang Hsieh, Ph.D
clhsieh@mail.cmuh.org.tw+886-4-22053366

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026