Skip to content

A Study to Determine Iatrogenic Hyperinsulinemia's Contribution to Insulin Resistance and Endothelial Dysfunction in Type 1 Diabetes

A Study to Determine Iatrogenic Hyperinsulinemia's Contribution to Insulin Resistance and Endothelial Dysfunction in Type 1 Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04118374
Enrollment
14
Registered
2019-10-08
Start date
2021-11-24
Completion date
2024-06-21
Last updated
2025-10-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Keywords

low carbohydrate diet, hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, endothelial dysfunction, vascular health

Brief summary

The investigators will test the hypothesis that reducing insulin doses using a low carbohydrate diet (LCD) will be associated with with improved insulin sensitivity (Aim 1) and blood vessel health (Aim 2).

Detailed description

Insulin resistance (IR) is consistently found in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and pathophysiologically links T1DM with atherosclerotic disease. IR and nascent atherosclerosis, as characterized by endothelial dysfunction, are present early in T1DM. Although atherosclerosis leads to cardiovascular disease (CVD)-the predominant cause of death in T1DM-the early cardiometabolic processes driving atherosclerosis are not currently well-characterized. My overarching hypothesis is that IR and endothelial dysfunction in T1DM are, in part, iatrogenic, occurring as a function of nonphysiologic insulin delivery. Previous research shows IR in T1DM is closely related to iatrogenic hyperinsulinemia. Iatrogenic hyperinsulinemia in T1DM results from injecting insulin into subcutaneous tissue rather than delivering insulin more physiologically into the hepatic portal vein. Hyperinsulinemia, per se, is closely linked with IR and independently predicts CVD in diabetic and nondiabetic populations. Thus, peripheral insulin delivery brings about unintended adverse cardiometabolic consequences in T1DM. The investigators propose a practical intervention to diminish iatrogenic hyperinsulinemia and thereby mitigate CVD risk. The investigators hypothesize that a reduction in iatrogenic hyperinsulinemia brought about by a low carbohydrate diet (LCD) will independently correlate with improved insulin sensitivity (Aim 1) and endothelial function (Aim 2). In this pilot study, the investigators will mechanistically dissect the contribution of iatrogenic hyperinsulinemia to IR and endothelial dysfunction in 8 adults with T1DM using a crossover study of LCD vs. standard carbohydrate diet (SCD) to experimentally modify hyperinsulinemia. The investigators will quantify insulin sensitivity using hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic clamps and measure endothelium-dependent flow mediated vasodilation using high-resolution ultrasound.

Interventions

OTHERStandard Carb Diet

Approximately 50% of caloric intake will come from carbohydrate consumption.

Approximately 25% of caloric intake will come from carbohydrate consumption.

Sponsors

Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age: 18-60 * HbA1c: 5.6-9.0% * Insulin delivery: must be on an insulin pump * Glucose Monitor: must use a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) * BMI 18-33 kg/m\^2 * Body Mass \>/= 50 kg ( 110 lbs)

Exclusion criteria

* severe hypoglycemia : \>/= 1 episode in the past 3 months * diabetes comorbidities (\>= 1 trip to emergency department for poor glucose control in the past 6 months, * New York Heart Association Class II-IV cardiac functional status * SBP \> 140 and DBP \> 100 mmHg, * eGFR by MDRD equation of \<60 mL/min/1.73m\^2 * AST or ALT \> 2.5 times the upper limit of normal * HCT \<35% medications * any antioxidant vitamin supplement (\<2 weeks before STUDY visit) * any systemic glucocorticoid * any antipsychotic * atenolol, metoprolol, propranolol * niacin * any thiazide diuretic * any OCP with \> 35 mcg ethinyl estradiol, * growth hormone * any immunosuppressant * any antihypertensive * any antihyperlipidemic other: * pregnancy * Tanner stage \< 5 * peri or postmenopausal woman * active smoker * gluten-free diet requirement Additional

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Insulin Sensitivity Assessed as Glucose Infusion Ratesweek 1 and week 5Participants completed both a one-week RCD and a one-week SCD, separated by a three-week washout. After each intervention, we measured insulin sensitivity using a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp.To express GIR in mg of glucose per kg of fat-free mass per minute (mg/kg FFM/min), we divided the dextrose infusion rate by the fat-free mass determined by DEXA. Insulin sensitivity showed no significant difference between diets. GIR was 8.1 mg/kg FFM/min after the RCD and 8.6 mg/kg FFM/min after the SCD.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

14 patients were screened for eligibility between November 2021 and March 2024. We recruited adults with type 1 diabetes (age 18-60 years, BMI 18-33 kg/m2, HbA1c 5.9-9.0%) from the Vanderbilt Eskind Diabetes Clinic and community sources in Nashville, TN.

Pre-assignment details

In the full study, 14 participants enrolled and completed the screening visit. Two did not proceed past the run-in period due to scheduling conflicts and inconsistent nutrition logging.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
Standard Carb Diet: Approximately 50% of caloric intake will come from carbohydrate consumption. Low Carb Diet: Approximately 25% of caloric intake will come from carbohydrate consumption. then all study participants crossed over to Low Carb Diet: Approximately 25% of caloric intake will come from carbohydrate consumption. Standard Carb Diet: Approximately 50% of caloric intake will come from carbohydrate consumption.
12
Total12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Continuous33.9 years
BMI26.5 kg/m^2
Diastolic blood pressure82 mmHg
HbA1c7.1 percentage of HbA1c
Heart rate65 bpm
Height1.75 m
Insulin analog used
Aspart
5 Participants
Insulin analog used
Fast-acting insulin aspart
1 Participants
Insulin analog used
Lispro
6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants
Systolic blood pressure120 mmHg
Type 1 diabetes duration20.5 years
Waist-to-hip ratio0.83 ratio
Weight75.3 kg

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 121 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Insulin Sensitivity Assessed as Glucose Infusion Rates

Participants completed both a one-week RCD and a one-week SCD, separated by a three-week washout. After each intervention, we measured insulin sensitivity using a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp.To express GIR in mg of glucose per kg of fat-free mass per minute (mg/kg FFM/min), we divided the dextrose infusion rate by the fat-free mass determined by DEXA. Insulin sensitivity showed no significant difference between diets. GIR was 8.1 mg/kg FFM/min after the RCD and 8.6 mg/kg FFM/min after the SCD.

Time frame: week 1 and week 5

Population: 12 participants received both interventions in this crossover study and were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Standard Carb DietChange in Insulin Sensitivity Assessed as Glucose Infusion Rates8.6 mg/kg FFM/min
Low Carb DietChange in Insulin Sensitivity Assessed as Glucose Infusion Rates8.1 mg/kg FFM/min
p-value: <0.0195% CI: [-0.5, 1.8]ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 27, 2026