Skip to content

Shared Decision-Making: AFib 2gether Mobile App

Shared Decision-Making: Implementing the AFib 2getherTM Mobile App

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04118270
Acronym
AFib 2gether
Enrollment
50
Registered
2019-10-08
Start date
2019-11-01
Completion date
2020-06-26
Last updated
2022-05-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation New Onset

Brief summary

Shared Decision-Making: AFib 2gether™ is a research study that focuses on a mobile application developed by Pfizer, Inc with consultation from Dr McManus' called AFib 2gether™. Through this app, patients can determine their risk of stroke due to atrial fibrillation and prioritize questions and concerns for discussion with their cardiology provider.

Interventions

DEVICEAfib 2gether TM Mobile Application

The Afib 2gether mobile app determines a patient's stroke risk through a series of questions that the patient will answer in the app.

Sponsors

Pfizer
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Providers: * Caring for at least 3 patients aged 18 years and older * Have at least 3 patients with International Classification of Diseases tenth revision (ICD-10) diagnostic code consistent with atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter * Have at least 3 patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score of 2 or more * Have at least 3 patients who are not on anticoagulation * Have at least 3 patients with upcoming appointments within the next 4 months Patients: * Age 18+ * Preferred language is English * Atrial fibrillation diagnosis * Chads vasc score 2 or higher * Not on anticoagulants * No watchman or atrial appendage closure * Had an ambulatory care center (ACC) cardiology appointment in the past 12 months * Future appointment in the next 4 months with the same provider

Exclusion criteria

Providers: * Providers who do not care for at least 3 patients aged 18 years and older * Have patients that do not have an ICD-10 diagnostic code consistent with AF or atrial flutter * Does not have patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score of 2 or more * Their patients are on anticoagulation * Their 3 patients do not have an upcoming visit within the next 4 months Patients: * Under the age of 18; patients * No ICD-10 diagnostic code consistent with AF or atrial flutter * Did not have a visit with a cardiovascular medicine specialist in the previous one year * Patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score less than 2 * Currently prescribed an anticoagulant * No upcoming cardiology visit in the next 3 months * Has a WATCHMAN device or left atrial appendage closure surgery * On hospice or for whom life expectancy is less than six months and patients * Bleeding episode or fall with injury in the last four weeks * Does not speak English * Prisoner

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient MARS ScoresImmediately after visitPatients evaluated the perceived usefulness of the AFib 2gether mobile application by taking the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) questionnaire. This evaluated 3 domains: functionality, aesthetics, and a star-based question. These scores are rated 1-5 with 5 being the highest (best) score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Provider MARS ScoresImmediately after visit.Providers were asked to navigate the app features and rate their overall opinion of the mobile app by answering questions using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). This scale evaluates 3 domains: functionality, aesthetics, and a star-based rating question. These scores are rated 1-5 with 5 being the highest (best) score.
Reason Why the Patient Was Not on AC Prior to Their AppointmentImmediately after visitThis was an evaluation of why the patient was not on an anticoagulant (AC) prior to their appointment.
Afib 2gether Accuracy AssessmentImmediately after visit.The provider was asked to review the patients stroke risk score on the AFib 2gether app and compare to provider clinical assessment for accuracy. The number of accurate scores were recorded. Ten of the original thirteen providers completed this assessment.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients Placed on Anticoagulation After Cardiology Appointmentup to 6 monthsThis outcome measures the number of patient participants with a CHA2DS2-VASc stroke scale score of 2 or higher who are placed on anticoagulation therapy following cardiology appointment. Patients switch to AC will be monitored via the electronic health record. The CHA2DS2-VASc scale is an evaluation of stroke risk for patients with atrial fibrillation. The scale is a composite of 7 questions, with an overall scale score of 0 to 9, with low scores indicating low risk for stroke, and high scores indicating high risk for stroke.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

We identified 40 patients seeing 13 cardiology providers. Of the 40 patients, 2 were later found ineligible and 1 patient was disenrolled due to provider preference leaving us with 37 patient encounters to analyze. Of the 13 providers, 10 completed the accuracy assessment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
AFib 2gether(TM) App
Patients with known Atrial Fibrillation will be assigned to download and use an app targeted at determining stroke risk and increasing knowledge of Atrial Fibrillation and stroke risk along with treatment options and will use this information to facilitate a discussion with their cardiovascular provider. Afib 2gether TM Mobile Application: The Afib 2gether mobile app determines a patient's stroke risk through a series of questions that the patient will answer in the app.
37
Providers
Providers caring for the patients with known Atrial Fibrillation will be asked to review the patients' stroke risk score on the AFib 2gether app and compare to their clinical assessment for accuracy. Baseline measures were not collected for providers.
0
Total37

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAFib 2gether(TM) AppTotal
Age, Customized
Age: <65
6 Participants6 Participants
Age, Customized
Age: 65-74
14 Participants14 Participants
Age, Customized
Age: 75+
17 Participants17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
36 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
26 Participants26 Participants
Stroke Risk Score
CHA2DS2-VASc score: 2
9 Participants9 Participants
Stroke Risk Score
CHA2DS2-VASc score: 3
10 Participants10 Participants
Stroke Risk Score
CHA2DS2-VASc score: 4
9 Participants9 Participants
Stroke Risk Score
CHA2DS2-VASc score: 5
6 Participants6 Participants
Stroke Risk Score
CHA2DS2-VASc score: 6
2 Participants2 Participants
Stroke Risk Score
CHA2DS2-VASc score: 7
0 Participants0 Participants
Stroke Risk Score
CHA2DS2-VASc score: 8
0 Participants0 Participants
Stroke Risk Score
CHA2DS2-VASc score: 9
1 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 370 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 370 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 370 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Patient MARS Scores

Patients evaluated the perceived usefulness of the AFib 2gether mobile application by taking the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) questionnaire. This evaluated 3 domains: functionality, aesthetics, and a star-based question. These scores are rated 1-5 with 5 being the highest (best) score.

Time frame: Immediately after visit

Population: Patients with a stroke risk score of 2 or higher and have a diagnosis of AF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PatientPatient MARS ScoresFunctionality4.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
PatientPatient MARS ScoresAesthetics4.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.51
PatientPatient MARS ScoresStar-Based4.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
Secondary

Afib 2gether Accuracy Assessment

The provider was asked to review the patients stroke risk score on the AFib 2gether app and compare to provider clinical assessment for accuracy. The number of accurate scores were recorded. Ten of the original thirteen providers completed this assessment.

Time frame: Immediately after visit.

Population: Providers are considered enrolled in the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PatientAfib 2gether Accuracy Assessment10 accurate scores
Secondary

Provider MARS Scores

Providers were asked to navigate the app features and rate their overall opinion of the mobile app by answering questions using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). This scale evaluates 3 domains: functionality, aesthetics, and a star-based rating question. These scores are rated 1-5 with 5 being the highest (best) score.

Time frame: Immediately after visit.

Population: Providers are considered to be enrolled in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PatientProvider MARS ScoresFunctionality4.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
PatientProvider MARS ScoresAesthetics4.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
PatientProvider MARS ScoresStar-Based3.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
Secondary

Reason Why the Patient Was Not on AC Prior to Their Appointment

This was an evaluation of why the patient was not on an anticoagulant (AC) prior to their appointment.

Time frame: Immediately after visit

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PatientReason Why the Patient Was Not on AC Prior to Their AppointmentOther Bleed3 participants
PatientReason Why the Patient Was Not on AC Prior to Their AppointmentLow AF Burden16 participants
PatientReason Why the Patient Was Not on AC Prior to Their AppointmentRefused10 participants
PatientReason Why the Patient Was Not on AC Prior to Their AppointmentNot Listed5 participants
PatientReason Why the Patient Was Not on AC Prior to Their AppointmentFall Risk1 participants
PatientReason Why the Patient Was Not on AC Prior to Their AppointmentGI Bleed2 participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Patients Placed on Anticoagulation After Cardiology Appointment

This outcome measures the number of patient participants with a CHA2DS2-VASc stroke scale score of 2 or higher who are placed on anticoagulation therapy following cardiology appointment. Patients switch to AC will be monitored via the electronic health record. The CHA2DS2-VASc scale is an evaluation of stroke risk for patients with atrial fibrillation. The scale is a composite of 7 questions, with an overall scale score of 0 to 9, with low scores indicating low risk for stroke, and high scores indicating high risk for stroke.

Time frame: up to 6 months

Population: Patients with AF with a stroke risk score that is 2 or higher.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PatientNumber of Patients Placed on Anticoagulation After Cardiology Appointment12 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026