Skip to content

Analysis of the Use of the Fetal Movement Counting for Prolonged Pregnancy.

Analysis of the Use of the Fetal Movement Counting for Prolonged Pregnancy: Prospective Randomized Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04117308
Acronym
COMPTAMAF
Enrollment
278
Registered
2019-10-07
Start date
2019-10-03
Completion date
2022-04-02
Last updated
2022-04-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prolonged Pregnancy

Keywords

Perinatal morbidity, Prolonged pregnancy, Fetal active movement count

Brief summary

Prospective mono-centric randomized open-label study (randomization 1: 1, 2 groups) comparing a group of patients who received conventional information to a group of patients who had been sensitized to a fetal active movement count technique. The study will take place at the University Hospital Center of Saint-Etienne in the gynecology-obstetrics department. An information brochure on the study will be handed over at the end of the term consultation to 41+0 weeks of gestation. After collecting the consent of the patient, the distribution between the two groups will be done by randomization. Thus, for the fetal active movement count group, fetal active movement count education will be proposed during the term consultation with the submission of an information brochure. The control group will also receive a simple information pamphlet with, in writing, what patients currently receive orally: definition of active fetal movements, and the need to consult if the patient perceives less movements of her fetus .The principal objective is to compare perinatal morbidity in relation with the sensation of decrease active fetal movements in case of late pregnancy, according to the fact if the patients use or not the AFM's count.

Interventions

PROCEDUREClassic information

The team delivers to each patient a unique and standardized information brochure including a definition of fetal active movements, and the need to consult if the patient perceives less the movements of her fetus.

PROCEDUREInformation by detailed brochure on the fetal active movements account

Delayed single and standardized explanatory card on fetal movements (definition, interests of their follow-up, technique of movements on fetuses, table to fill during the follow-up noting the number of active movements physical feelings at 3 times of the day, managing the decrease in the number of active fetal movements).

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This is a prospective, single-center, randomized, open-label study evaluating the use of fetal active movements counts on the perinatal morbidity score in patients with prolonged pregnancy.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Any pregnant woman presenting herself in the Gynecology-obstetrics Department of the hospital of Saint-Etienne during the term consultation at 41 weeks of amenorrhea + 0 day. * Non pathological Singleton Pregnancy except for balanced gestational diabetes * Patient affiliated with or entitled to a Social security plan * Patients who have given their participation agreement and signing the consent

Exclusion criteria

* Woman refusing to participate in the study (lack of consent) * Non-francophone woman (and / or enable + read french) * Woman making a maternity change for childbirth (risk of follow-up bias) * Pathological pregnancy * Participation to another interventional study. * Patient subject to legal protection or unable to express consent * Patient who has already benefited from an awareness of the AFM's account

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The presence of more than 2 criteria of a composite perinatal morbidity score.At the delivery.The primary outcome will be the presence of more than 2 criteria of a composite perinatal morbidity score: * Fetal heart rate anomaly during childbirth. * Apgar \< 7 at 5 minutes * Cord arterial Ph \< 7.20 * Acute respiratory distress with the need for surveillance in neonatal resuscitation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of consultationsAt the delivery.Number of consultations with the sensation of decrease active fetal movements.
Consultation's delayAt the delivery.Consultation's delay in relation with the sensation of decrease active fetal movements (classified on \<12 hours or \>12hours).
Ranking of consultations in 'justified' or 'not justified'At the delivery.Ranking of consultations in 'justified' or 'not justified' is depending on the result of the complementary examinations practiced (Ultrasound with Manning score, kleihauer test). A consultation for reduction of fetal active movements is considered justified if presence of abnormal fetal heart rate and / or Manning score less than 8/8 and / or positive kleihauer test.
Mode of laborAt the delivery.Spontaneous or induction of labor, and explications for induction.
ChildbirthAt the delivery.Caesarean, spontaneous outcome, assisted vaginal outcome.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026