Skip to content

Assessment of the Clinical and Medico-economic Impact of SinnoTest® in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Assessment of the Clinical and Medico-economic Impact of SinnoTest®, a Software That Predicts the Effectiveness of Biotherapy Treatments, in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04117165
Acronym
SINNO-RA
Enrollment
0
Registered
2019-10-07
Start date
2021-03-01
Completion date
2023-09-01
Last updated
2021-05-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Biological Therapy

Keywords

predictive software, quality of life

Brief summary

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of the main chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (RCI), with a prevalence of about 0.4% of the population. First-line treatment with immunomodulators (synthetic and biological Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (sDMARDs) including methotrexate) is not sufficiently effective in 40% of cases. These patients are then treated with biological Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs) called biotherapies. As the use of these bio-drugs increases each year, they become a major public health and economic issue. Their growth is only just beginning, as they are among the major providers of pharmaceutical innovation. There are about ten bio-drugs currently on the market for rheumatoid arthritis with an average annual treatment cost of 8 to 12 000 euros per patient. This cost is 20 times higher than that of sDMARDs. However, among patients treated with biotherapy, clinical practice shows that approximately one-third (33%) will not respond to the selected bio-drugs. In the event of non-response, physicians currently have no choice but to rotate empirically between different treatments, as no tools capable of predicting response or non-response to these molecules are currently available. SinnoTest® software, a predictive algorithm for responding to bDMARDs by analyzing proteomic biomarkers, will clarify this choice of prescription for patients with failed RA of a first bDMARD in the anti-TNF family.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTBiotherapy Prescription with SinnoTest® software

The rheumatologist will use the SinnoTest® software to give the best biotherapy to the patient according to the results of the software.

DRUGPatient Current Care

The rheumatologist will use the french guidelines of rheumatoid arthritis to choose the more adapted biotherapy treatment to the patient.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Grenoble
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

The patient will not know if his bDMARD treatment was prescribed with or without the help of SinnoTest® software

Intervention model description

Prospective clinical trial, phase III, randomized in 2 parallel groups, multicentric, controlled (prescription with SinnoTest® software versus prescription without SinnoTest® software), single-blind

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis defined according to ACR/EULAR 2010 or ACR 1987 criteria. * Patients in failure (patient insufficiently responding to anti-TNF treatment DAS28 \> 3.2 whether related to primary biotherapy failure, loss of efficacy (loss of response) or adverse event) of a first bDMARD of the anti-TNF family (Adalimumab, Infliximab, Etanercept, Certolizumab or Golimumab). * Stability of synthetic fund processing for 3 months. * Corticosteroids ≤ 0.1 mg/kg/day without cortisone assault within 3 months. * Effective contraception for patients with reproductive capacity (oral contraceptive, intrauterine device, implant, surgical sterilization or abstinence). * Patients who have dated and signed the consent form for the trial. * Patients affiliated to a social security system.

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindication to at least one of the following bDMARDs: Rituximab and/or Abatacept and/or Adalimumab. * Scheduled surgical intervention during the trial. * Difficulties in understanding the French language. * Cognitive function disorders (dementia such as Alzheimer's, etc.). * Patients who cannot be followed up at 12 months. * Psycho-social instability incompatible with regular follow-up (homelessness, addictive behavior, a history of psychiatric pathology or any other comorbidity that would make free and informed consent impossible or limit adherence to the protocol). * Persons referred to in Articles L1121-5 to L1121-8 of the CSP (corresponding to all protected persons: pregnant woman, parturient, breastfeeding mother, persons deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, persons subject to a legal protection measure). * Patients currently participating in other clinical research or who participated in a clinical trial within one month prior to inclusion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical benefit of using SinnoTest® software at 6 months6 monthsClinical benefit of using SinnoTest® software in patients with RA who have failed to respond to a bDMARD of the anti-TNF family compared to usual care practice

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of the response delay to a bDMARD and the number of bDMARDs prescribed during 12 months in both arms.1 yearThe delay and the number of bDMARDs prescribed before a good response
Performance of the software predictive model on the new clinical data from the trial at 6 months and 1 year6 months and 1 yearDescription of the properties of the prediction algorithms on the data of the study
Comparison of the variation in the proteomic profile between M0 (biotherapy start date) and M6Inclusion and 6 monthsDetermination of the blood proteomic profile
Clinical benefit of using SinnoTest® software at 1 year1 yearPatients who respond according to the disease activity criteria from the DAS28 scale
Cost-effectiveness analysis that will compare the group with SinnoTest® compared to the group without SinnoTest®, at 1 year from the community's point of view.1 yearIncremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)
Budget impact analysis from the point of view of Health Insurance at 3 and 5 years.3 and 5 yearsMeasurement of the financial consequences for the Health Insurance of the implementation of SinnoTest® in the context of rheumatoid arthritis at 3- and 5-years' time point.
Cost-utility analysis that will compare the 2 groups at 1 year from the community's perspective.1 yearEuroQol five Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The ratio will therefore be expressed as a cost per QALY earned, which represents the additional cost that will be required to earn a healthy year of life

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026