Skip to content

Evaluation of Resection Quality of Cerebral Metastases Using Fluorescence Guided Surgery: a Prospective Randomised Study

Evaluation of Resection Quality of Cerebral Metastases Using Fluorescence Guided Surgery: a Prospective Randomised Study- Fluomet Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04116801
Acronym
Fluomet
Enrollment
94
Registered
2019-10-07
Start date
2017-09-19
Completion date
2020-09-30
Last updated
2019-10-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Metastases, Fluorescence Guided Surgery

Brief summary

Few studies have evaluated the use of fluorescein sodium for the resection of brain tumours (especially glioblastomas) but also cerebral metastases. We therefore propose to evaluate the technique of fluorescence guided microsurgery (fluorescein sodium) compared to the conventional microsurgical technique in the resection of cerebral metastases in adults in order to specify, by a prospective and randomised study, the assistance provided by this technique in the quality of resection and the gain in terms of overall survival and local control of brain disease.

Detailed description

Cerebral metastases are a major public health problem in cancer patients. They are the most common brain tumours in adults. It is estimated that approximately 20-40% of patients with primary malignant neoplasia will develop cerebral metastasis during the course of their illness. In addition, the incidence of brain metastases is increasing due, in particular, to the aging of the population, as well as to the improvement of the overall management of cancer patients (cytotoxic or targeted systemic treatment) and easier access to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which improves patient survival. The prognosis of patients with brain metastases is still poor and the median overall survival of these patients is of the order of a few months. Although the management of brain metastases is multidisciplinary, the benefit of surgery has been clearly demonstrated in the literature. Consequently, it is demonstrated that the quality of the tumour excision and in particular the carrying out of the complete excision of contrast enhancement on the MRI is correlated with improved overall survival (especially in case of single metastasis) and improved local control of the disease or progression-free survival, but also a better quality of life. It is therefore essential to perform the most complete excision possible while minimising the associated morbidity. For this purpose, various tools for surgical resection have been developed and are available, including intraoperative fluorescence guided surgery. Sodium fluorescein is a fluorochrome that accumulates, after intravenous injection, into vascularised tumour tissues and is revealed intraoperatively by a light source of suitable wavelength (560 nm) using a set of lenses included in the microscope. The resection is thus guided by this fluorescence, the complete disappearance of which will translate into a complete tumour resection. Its interest is twofold: to increase the percentage of complete tumour resection and to improve survival without recurrence and overall survival.Few studies have evaluated the use of fluorescein sodium for the resection of brain tumours (especially glioblastomas) but also cerebral metastases. If two studies on brain metastases showed a complete resection rate greater than 80% and a better rate of local control of brain disease, it is important to note that these studies were not randomised (with a control arm), they did not really prove the effectiveness of this technique under fluorescence, hence the need to set up a randomised study. We therefore propose to evaluate the technique of fluorescence guided microsurgery (fluorescein sodium) compared to the conventional microsurgical technique in the resection of cerebral metastases in adults in order to specify, by a prospective and randomised study, the assistance provided by this technique in the quality of resection and the gain in terms of overall survival and local control of brain disease.

Interventions

resection of cerebral metastases by microsurgery

Sponsors

Dr Philippe METELLUS
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Ramsay Générale de Santé
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female subject over the age of 18 and under the age of 85 * Subject presenting 1 to 5 cerebral secondary locations of which one lesion (contrast enhancement of at least 1 cm) is accessible to the most complete excision possible * Unprotected adult within the meaning of the law * Subject belonging to a health insurance scheme * Absence of medical contraindications to surgery and anaesthesia * Absence of medical contraindications to performing an MRI * Known absence of allergy to the injectable form of Fluorescein sodium * Subject having signed their written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject who is a minor, pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding woman * Adult subject under legal protection, guardianship or deprivation of liberty by judicial or administrative decision * Subject hospitalised without consent * Anatomical localisation (cerebral trunk, diencephalon) of the cerebral metastasis counter-indicating a wide excision at the discretion of the neurosurgeon * Subject participating in a clinical trial or any other research involving human beings * Subject taking beta-blockers * Subject who has not signed a written informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality excision48 hoursTo evaluate the quality of excision in both neurosurgical techniques, in terms of complete resection of cerebral metastases, objectified by the absence of quantifiable tumour residues on early postoperative MRI (before 48 hours) in both groups, evaluated by one of the neuroradiologists associated with the project.

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactJean Francois OUDET
jeanfrancois.oudet@free.fr+33683346567
Backup ContactMarie Barba
mh.barba@ecten.eu+330664888704

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026