Skip to content

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis Who Are Naive to Biologic DMARD Therapy

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Adalimumab-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis Who Are Naive to Biologic DMARD Therapy

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04115748
Acronym
PENGUIN 1
Enrollment
67
Registered
2019-10-04
Start date
2019-12-03
Completion date
2021-05-11
Last updated
2022-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psoriatic Arthritis

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of filgotinib compared to placebo as assessed by the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response in participants with active psoriatic arthritis who are naive to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy. The study consists of two parts, the Main Study and the Long Term Extension (LTE).

Interventions

DRUGFilgotinib

Tablets administered orally once daily with or without food

DRUGAdalimumab

Injection administered subcutaneously once every 2 weeks

Tablets administered orally once daily with or without food

Injection administered subcutaneously once every 2 weeks

Sponsors

Galapagos NV
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Gilead Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Meet Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) and have a history consistent with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) ≥ 6 months at Screening * Have active PsA defined as ≥ 3 swollen joints (from a 66 swollen joint count \[SJC\]) and ≥ 3 tender joints (from a 68 tender joint count \[TJC\]) at Screening and Day 1; these may or may not be the same joints at Screening and Day 1 * Must have a documented history or active signs of at least one of the following at Screening: * Plaque psoriasis * Nail changes attributed to psoriasis * Have had inadequate response or intolerance to ≥1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARD), apremilast and / or NSAID, administered over the course of ≥ 12 weeks for the treatment of PsA, as per local guidelines / standard of care Key

Exclusion criteria

* Prior PsA or psoriasis treatment with a biologic DMARD * Prior exposure to a janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor \> 2 doses * Any active / recent infection * Any chronic and / or uncontrolled medical condition that would put the individual at increased risk during study participation or circumstances which may make an individual unlikely or unable to complete or comply with study procedures and requirements, per investigator judgement * Any moderately to severely active musculoskeletal or skin disorder other than PsA or plaque psoriasis that would interfere with assessment of study parameters, as per judgement of investigator NOTE: Prior history of reactive arthritis or axial spondyloarthritis is permitted if there is documentation of change in diagnosis to PsA or additional diagnosis of PsA * Any history of an inflammatory arthropathy with onset before age 16 years old * Active autoimmune disease that would interfere with assessment of study parameters or increase risk to the individual by participating in the study (e.g. uveitis, inflammatory bowel disease, uncontrolled thyroiditis, systemic vasculitis, transverse myelitis), per judgement of investigator * Pregnancy or nursing females * Active drug or alcohol abuse, as per judgement of investigator Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement Response at Week 12Week 12ACR20 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) from baseline in tender joint count based on 68 joints (TJC68), swollen joint count based on 66 joints (SJC66) and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: patient's global assessment of disease activity (PGADA) using a visual analogue scale (VAS) on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor); physician's global assessment of disease activity (PHGADA) using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity); health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) inclusive of activities scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); HAQ-DI pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16MDA is a measure to indicate disease remission, and is based on a composite score of 7 domains. A participant is considered as having achieved the MDA if the participant fulfills at least 5 of the following 7 criteria: TJC68 ≤1; SJC66 ≤1; Psoriatic arthritis disease activity score (PASI) ≤1 for participants with psoriasis covering BSA \<3% \[PASI evaluates the severity and extent of psoriasis. In PASI, body is divided into four parts, head and neck, upper limb, trunk and lower limbs. Each area is assessed for erythema, induration and scaling, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The total score ranges from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease)\]; patient's global assessment of PsA pain intensity (PGAPI) ≤15 \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)\]; PGADA ≤20 \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)\]; HAQ-DI score ≤0.5; LEI score ≤1 for participants with enthesitis at baseline.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16VLDA is a measure to indicate disease remission, and is based on a composite score of 7 domains. A participant is considered as having achieved the VLDA if the participant fulfills all the seven criteria: TJC68 ≤1; SJC66 ≤1; PASI score ≤1 for participants with psoriasis covering BSA \<3% \[PASI evaluates the severity and extent of psoriasis. In PASI, body is divided into four parts, head and neck, upper limb, trunk and lower limbs. Each area is assessed for erythema, induration and scaling, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The total score ranges from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease)\]; PGAPI ≤15 \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to (serious pain)\]; PGADA ≤20 \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)\]; HAQ-DI score ≤0.5; LEI score ≤1 with participants with enthesitis at baseline.
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksDAPSA is calculated by summing the following components: TJC68; SJC66; PGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 very poor)\]; PGAPI \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)\] and CRP. DAPSA scores 0-4 = remission, 5-14 = low disease activity, 15-28 = moderate disease activity, and \>28 = high disease activity. The DAPSA score has a lower bound of 0 and has no upper bound. A higher DAPSA score indicated more active disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineBaseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksThe PhGAP is used to determine the participant's psoriasis lesions overall at a given time point. The participant's psoriasis disease activity is assessed by a physician according to the grades of induration, erythema, and scaling on a scale of 0 to 5. The sum of the three grades is used to obtain the total average score. PhGAP is based on the total average score on a scale of 0-5 where, 0 = cleared, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = marked, and 5 = severe. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at BaselineBaseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksmNAPSI is used to assess each nail abnormality for each of the participant's nails. Three features or groups of features (pitting, onycholysis together with oil-drop dyschromia, and crumbling) of each fingernail are graded on a scale from 0 (no onycholysis together with oil-drop dyschromia, no pitting, no crumbling) to 3 (\>30 onycholysis together with oil-drop dyschromia, \>50 pitting, \>50% crumbling). Four features (leukonychia, splinter, hemorrhages, hyperkeratosis, and red spots in the lunula) are graded with the score of 1 = present or 0 = absent for each fingernail. Each finger has a score between 0 and 13. The total mNAPSI score is the sum of all abnormalities individual score across all fingers, and the total mNAPSI score ranges from 0 to 130. Lower numbers indicate fewer nail abnormalities. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineBaseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksEnthesitis is assessed using LEI. The enthesitis examination by LEI evaluates the presence or absence of pain by applying local pressure on 6 anatomical sites: medial femoral condyle (left and right), lateral epicondyle (left and right), and the achilles tendon insertion (left and right). Enthesitis at each site is scored as 0 (enthesitis absent) and 1 (enthesitis present). LEI is derived as the sum of the enthesitis score over the 6 sites mentioned above. The total score ranges from 0 to 6, higher scores indicates greater degree of enthesitis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in 12-Item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline, 4, and 16 weeksThe PsAID questionnaire assesses the impact of PsA on people's lives. The PsAID is calculated based on 12 numerical rating scales (NRS) questions. Each NRS is assessed as a number between 0 and 10. Total score is calculated as the sum of the individual scores, (some of which were multiplied by a weighting factor) divided by 20 for a total possible score of 0 to 10, where higher score indicates worse impact of disease. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Percentage of Participants With PASDAS Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Weeks 4 and 16Weeks 4, and 16PASDAS is a composite disease activity measure for psoriatic arthritis. It includes components of PGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0=very well to 100=very poor\]; PhGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\]; 36-item short form survey (SF-36) \[a questionnaire which measures quality of life across eight domains to determine a physical component summary (PCS) with a score range of 0-100, higher scores indicates better health status\]; TJC68; SJC66; leeds enthesitis index(LEI) \[assessed at 6 sites with a score range of 0 to 6, higher scores indicates higher degree of enthesitis\]; Tender dactylitis count (TDC) \[with a score range of 0 to 60, higher score indicates higher degree of dactylitis\]; C-reactive protein (CRP). Total score is calculated as the sum of the individual scores (each score adjusted by weighting factors). The score of PASDAS ranges from 0 to 10, lower scores indicates better function. PASDAS LDA is defined as PASDAS ≤ 3.2.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASDAS Remission at Weeks 4 and 16Weeks 4, and 16PASDAS is a composite disease activity measure for psoriatic arthritis. It includes components of PGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0=very well to 100=very poor\]; PhGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\]; 36-item short form survey (SF-36) \[a questionnaire which measures quality of life across eight domains to determine a physical component summary (PCS) with a score range of 0-100, higher scores indicates better health status\];TJC68;SJC66; leeds enthesitis index(LEI) \[assessed at 6 sites with a score range of 0 to 6, higher scores indicates higher degree of enthesitis\]; Tender dactylitis count (TDC) \[with a score range of 0 to 60, higher score indicates higher degree of dactylitis\]; C-reactive protein (CRP). Total score is calculated as the sum of the individual scores (each score adjusted by weighting factors). The score of PASDAS ranges from 0 to 10, lower scores indicates better function. PASDAS remission is defined as PASDAS ≤ 1.9.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16ACR20 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor); PHGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity); HAQ-DI inclusive of activities scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); HAQ-DI pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain); and hsCRP. Participants with missing outcomes were set as non-responders.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16ACR50 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor); PHGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity); HAQ-DI inclusive of activities scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); HAQ-DI pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain); and hsCRP. Participants with missing outcomes were set as non-responders.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16ACR70 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor); PHGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity); HAQ-DI inclusive of activities scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); HAQ-DI pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain); and hsCRP. Participants with missing outcomes were set as non-responders.
Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksTJC68 is an assessment of 68 joints. Each joint is evaluated as 'normal', 'tender', 'tender and swollen', or 'not able to evaluate'. It is derived as the sum of all tender joints. The overall tender joint count ranged from 0 to 68, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of tenderness. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksSJC66 is an assessment of 66 joints. Each joint was evaluated as 'normal', 'swollen', 'tender and swollen', or 'not able to evaluate'. It is derived as the sum of all swollen joints. The overall swollen joint count ranged from 0 to 66, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of swelling. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksPGADA is assessed by the participants using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksPhGADA is assessed by the physician using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksHAQ-DI's pain assessment is done using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksThe hsCRP is the ACR core set measure of acute phase reactant. It was measured at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of filgotinib on the participant's psoriatic arthritis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksThe DAS28 (CRP) is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), PGADA \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)\] and hsCRP for a total possible score of 1 to 9.4. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline, 4, and 16 weeksPASDAS is a composite disease activity measure for psoriatic arthritis. It includes components of PGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0=very well to 100=very poor\]; PhGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\];36-item short form survey (SF-36) \[a questionnaire which measures quality of life across eight domains to determine a physical component summary (PCS) with a score range of 0-100, higher scores indicates better health status\];TJC68;SJC66; leeds enthesitis index(LEI) \[assessed at 6 sites with a score range of 0 to 6, higher scores indicates higher degree of enthesitis\];Tender dactylitis count (TDC) \[with a score range of 0 to 60, higher score indicates higher degree of dactylitis\];C-reactive protein (CRP). Total score is calculated as the sum of the individual scores (each score adjusted by weighting factors). The score of PASDAS ranges from 0 to 10, lower scores indicates better function. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16The DAS28 (CRP) is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), PGADA (VAS; 0 = very well to 100 = very poor), and hsCRP for a total possible score of 1 to 9.4. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) remission is defined as DAS28 (CRP) \< 2.6.
Time to Achieve DAS28 (CRP) LDAUp to 19 weeksThe DAS28 (CRP) is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), PGADA (VAS; 0 = very well to 100 = very poor), and hsCRP for a total possible score of 1 to 9.4. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) LDA is defined as DAS28 (CRP) ≤ 3.2. Time to achieve DAS28 (CRP) LDA is the number of days from the first dose date of study drug administration to the first time when a participant achieves DAS28 (CRP) LDA.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16DAPSA is calculated by summing the following components: TJC68; SJC66; PGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 very poor)\]; PGAPI \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)\] and CRP. DAPSA scores 0-4 = remission, 5-14 = low disease activity, 15-28 = moderate disease activity, and \>28 = high disease activity. The DAPSA score has a lower bound of 0 and has no upper bound. A higher DAPSA score indicated more active disease activity. DAPSA LDA is defined as DAPSA ≤ 14.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16DAPSA is calculated by summing the following components: TJC68; SJC66; PGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 very poor)\]; PGAPI \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)\] and CRP. DAPSA scores 0-4 = remission, 5-14 = low disease activity, 15-28 = moderate disease activity, and \>28 = high disease activity. The DAPSA score has a lower bound of 0 and has no upper bound. A higher DAPSA score indicated more active disease activity. DAPSA remission is defined as DAPSA ≤ 4.
Time to Achieve DAPSA LDAUp to 19 weeksDAPSA is calculated by summing the following components: TJC68; SJC66; PGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 very poor)\]; PGAPI \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)\] and CRP. DAPSA scores 0-4 = remission, 5-14 = low disease activity, 15-28 = moderate disease activity, and \>28 = high disease activity. The DAPSA score has a lower bound of 0 and has no upper bound. A higher DAPSA score indicated more active disease activity. Time to achieve DAPSA LDA is the number of days from the first dose date of study drug administration to the first time when a participant achieves DAPSA LDA. If the DAPSA LDA is not achieved during main study phase, the time to achieve DAPSA LDA will be censored at the last non-missing DAPSA LDA assessment date during main study phase. If the component scores of DAPSA LDA are at different dates for a visit, the latest date will be used for the derivation of time to achieve DAPSA LDA.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16The PsARC response is defined as improvement in at least 2 of the following 4 criteria; ≥ 30% decrease in SJC66, ≥ 30% decrease in TJC68, ≥ 20% decrease in PGADA (VAS; 0 = very well to 100 = very poor), ≥ 20% decrease in PhGADA (VAS; 0 = no disease activity to 100 = maximum disease activity), and with at least one of the 2 joint criteria, with no deterioration in any other criteria.
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineBaseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksPASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent \[%\] to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). A higher score indicates more severe disease. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50% Improvement (PASI50) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeeks 4, 8, 12, and 16PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent \[%\] to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI50, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 50%. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75% Improvement (PASI75) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeeks 4, 8, 12, and 16PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI75, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 75%. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90% Improvement (PASI90) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeeks 4, 8, 12, and 16PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent \[%\] to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI90, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 90%. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% Improvement (PASI100) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeeks 4, 8, 12, and 16PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent \[%\] to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI100, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 100%. A higher score indicates more severe disease.
Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineBaseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksThe enthesitis examination is based on the 16 anatomical sites: the medial epicondyle (left and right), the lateral epicondyle (left and right), the supraspinatus insertion (left and right), the bilateral greater trochanter (left and right), the quadriceps tendon insertion into superior border of patella (left and right), the patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tuberosity (left and right), the achilles tendon insertion (left and right), and the plantar fascia insertion (left and right). Enthesitis at each site is scored as either 0 (enthesitis absent) and 1 (enthesitis present). SPARCC enthesitis index has an overall total score ranging from 0 to 16. Higher score indicates a greater number of sites that are affected by enthesitis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineBaseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksLDI quantitatively measures dactylitis using the circumference of involved digits and control digits and tenderness of involved digits. Digits affected by dactylitis are defined as those with an at least 10% difference in the ratio of circumference of the affected digit to the contralateral digit (digit on opposite hand or foot), or if contralateral digit is also affected, values from a standard reference table. Total score= {{\[Circumference involved digit/ Circumference contralateral Digit (or Tables)\] - 1}x 100} x Tenderness score. Tenderness score (0 = no tenderness, and 1 = tender). The difference between circumference of affected finger and contralateral not affected digit cannot be defined for maximum value. Therefore, it is difficult to provide scale range for the final score. No theoretical range exists for the Leeds Dactylitis Index. Lower Leeds Dactylitis Index score represent better outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineBaseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksTender score (0 = no tenderness, 1 = tender, 2 = tender and wince, 3 = tender and withdraw) is collected for Dactylitis Assessments on the Dactylitis Score Sheet that is used for calculation of LDI total score. Tender dactylitis count (TDC) equals the number of tender fingers and toes (tendor score \>0). For participants with dactylitis status absent for all the fingers and toes, the TDC is set as 0. The total score range of TDC is from 0 to 60, higher scores indicate greater presence of dactylitis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeksThe HAQ-DI score is defined as the average of the scores of eight functional categories (dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities), usually completed by the participant. Responses in each functional category are collected as 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do a task in that area), with or without aids or devices. The eight category scores are averaged into an overall HAQ-DI score on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled). When 6 or more categories are non-missing, total possible score is 3. If more than 2 categories are missing, the HAQ-DI score is set to missing. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement (less disability).
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline, 4, and 16 weeksFACIT-Fatigue scale is a brief, 13-item, symptom-specific questionnaire that specifically assesses the self-reported severity of fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and functioning in the past 7 days. The FACIT-Fatigue uses 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) numeric rating scales for a total possible score of 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate less fatigue. Positive change in value indicates improvement (no or less severity of fatigue).
Change From Baseline in Mental Component Score (MCS) of the 36-Item Short-Form Version 2 (SF-36v2) at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline, 4, and 16 weeksThe SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's quality of life and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality, and 2 component scores (MCS and PCS). MCS consists of social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional scales. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating better health status or functioning. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement (better health status).
Change From Baseline in Physical Component Score (PCS) of the SF-36v2 at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline, 4, and 16 weeksThe SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's quality of life and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality, and 2 component scores (MCS and PCS). PCS consists of physical functioning, bodily pain, role-physical, and general health scales. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating better health status or functioning. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement (better health status).
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16The DAS28 (CRP) is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), PGADA (VAS; 0 = very well to 100 = very poor), and hsCRP for a total possible score of 1 to 9.4. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) LDA is defined as DAS28(CRP) ≤ 3.2.

Countries

Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, Hungary, Japan, New Zealand, Poland, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at study sites in Poland, the United States, Bulgaria, Spain, Australia, Japan, New Zealand, and Canada. The first participant was screened on 03 December 2019. The last study visit occurred on 11 May 2021.

Pre-assignment details

161 participants were screened.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)
Filgotinib 200 mg tablet orally once daily + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily + PTM adalimumab SC injection every two weeks for 16 weeks.
19
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)
Filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily + PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet orally once daily + PTM Adalimumab SC injection every two weeks for 16 weeks.
19
Adalimumab 40 mg (Main Study)
PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet orally once daily + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily + Adalimumab 40 mg SC injection every two weeks for 16 weeks.
9
Placebo (Main Study)
PTM filgotinib 200 mg tablet orally once daily + PTM filgotinib 100 mg tablet orally once daily + PTM adalimumab SC injection every two weeks for 16 weeks.
20
Total67

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007FG008FG009
LTE (After 16 Weeks to Week 50)Adverse Event0000000010
LTE (After 16 Weeks to Week 50)Study terminated by sponsor0000431112
Main Study (Up to 16 Weeks)Study terminated by sponsor1516715000000
Main Study (Up to 16 Weeks)Withdrew consent0001000000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFilgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Adalimumab 40 mg (Main Study)Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Placebo (Main Study)Total
Age, Continuous46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
50 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.8
47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
19 Participants9 Participants18 Participants19 Participants65 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
18 Participants8 Participants18 Participants20 Participants64 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
2 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
3 participants0 participants3 participants1 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
0 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
1 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
1 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
9 participants5 participants9 participants11 participants34 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
2 participants1 participants1 participants3 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
1 participants2 participants4 participants3 participants10 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants4 Participants9 Participants10 Participants30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants5 Participants10 Participants10 Participants37 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 190 / 190 / 90 / 200 / 40 / 30 / 10 / 10 / 20 / 2
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 197 / 192 / 99 / 201 / 40 / 30 / 10 / 11 / 21 / 2
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 191 / 190 / 90 / 200 / 40 / 30 / 10 / 11 / 20 / 2

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement Response at Week 12

ACR20 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) from baseline in tender joint count based on 68 joints (TJC68), swollen joint count based on 66 joints (SJC66) and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: patient's global assessment of disease activity (PGADA) using a visual analogue scale (VAS) on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor); physician's global assessment of disease activity (PHGADA) using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity); health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) inclusive of activities scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); HAQ-DI pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement Response at Week 1276.8 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement Response at Week 1263.2 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement Response at Week 1267.2 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement Response at Week 1244.8 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.04895% CI: [2.6, 61.6]Multiple imputation method
p-value: 0.2395% CI: [-12.4, 49.2]Multiple imputation method
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 12-Item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) Score at Weeks 4 and 16

The PsAID questionnaire assesses the impact of PsA on people's lives. The PsAID is calculated based on 12 numerical rating scales (NRS) questions. Each NRS is assessed as a number between 0 and 10. Total score is calculated as the sum of the individual scores, (some of which were multiplied by a weighting factor) divided by 20 for a total possible score of 0 to 10, where higher score indicates worse impact of disease. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, 4, and 16 weeks

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in 12-Item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline4.82 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.857
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in 12-Item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-2.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.314
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in 12-Item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-1.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.282
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in 12-Item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline4.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.115
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in 12-Item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-2.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.74
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in 12-Item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-1.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.214
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in 12-Item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-1.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.645
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in 12-Item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline5.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.765
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in 12-Item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-2.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.062
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in 12-Item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline4.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.071
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in 12-Item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-0.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.176
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in 12-Item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-0.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.52
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

SJC66 is an assessment of 66 joints. Each joint was evaluated as 'normal', 'swollen', 'tender and swollen', or 'not able to evaluate'. It is derived as the sum of all swollen joints. The overall swollen joint count ranged from 0 to 66, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of swelling. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-3 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 3.8
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-5 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 6.2
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline14 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 10.3
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-8 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 7.9
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-8 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 8.9
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-9 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 7
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-1 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 3.5
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline7 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 3.3
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-2 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 2.9
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-3 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 4
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-4 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 3.1
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-4 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 3.8
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-8 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 7.3
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-6 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 6.1
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline11 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 7.3
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-5 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 5.2
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-4 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 7
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-8 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 6.7
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-2 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 3.1
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-4 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 3.9
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-3 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 2.9
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-4 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 2.9
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-2 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 4.7
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in ACR Component: Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints (SJC66) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline8 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 5.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

DAPSA is calculated by summing the following components: TJC68; SJC66; PGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 very poor)\]; PGAPI \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)\] and CRP. DAPSA scores 0-4 = remission, 5-14 = low disease activity, 15-28 = moderate disease activity, and \>28 = high disease activity. The DAPSA score has a lower bound of 0 and has no upper bound. A higher DAPSA score indicated more active disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-27.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.09
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-12.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.96
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline48.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.55
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-28.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.67
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-19.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.3
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-28.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.42
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-5.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.12
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-18.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-17.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.16
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline30.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.43
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-9.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.13
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-12.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.06
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-10.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.39
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-25.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.6
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-25.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.55
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-17.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.96
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline38.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.82
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-14.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.45
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-11.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.18
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-7.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.72
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-9.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.81
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-10.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.87
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-6.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.41
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline33.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.55
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

The DAS28 (CRP) is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), PGADA \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)\] and hsCRP for a total possible score of 1 to 9.4. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline4.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.27
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-1.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-1.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-1.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-1.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.04
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.74
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-1.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline4.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.65
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Weeks 4 and 16

FACIT-Fatigue scale is a brief, 13-item, symptom-specific questionnaire that specifically assesses the self-reported severity of fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and functioning in the past 7 days. The FACIT-Fatigue uses 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) numeric rating scales for a total possible score of 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate less fatigue. Positive change in value indicates improvement (no or less severity of fatigue).

Time frame: Baseline, 4, and 16 weeks

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 44.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.75
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 165.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.45
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline32.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.83
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 44.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.53
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 166.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.42
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline33.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.06
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline33.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.66
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 40.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.23
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 164.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.18
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 41.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.53
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 162.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.27
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline31.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.37
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.1495% CI: [-1.1, 7.9]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.1895% CI: [-1.5, 7.7]MMRM
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.1595% CI: [-1.4, 8.7]MMRM
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.06295% CI: [-0.3, 9.9]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

The HAQ-DI score is defined as the average of the scores of eight functional categories (dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities), usually completed by the participant. Responses in each functional category are collected as 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do a task in that area), with or without aids or devices. The eight category scores are averaged into an overall HAQ-DI score on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled). When 6 or more categories are non-missing, total possible score is 3. If more than 2 categories are missing, the HAQ-DI score is set to missing. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement (less disability).

Time frame: Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline1.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.601
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-0.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.293
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-0.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.264
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-0.37 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.387
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-0.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.374
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-0.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.407
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-0.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.575
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-0.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.516
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline0.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.547
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-0.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.474
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-0.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.345
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-0.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.477
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 20.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.332
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-0.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.297
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-0.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.281
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-0.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.297
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-0.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.274
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline0.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-0.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.438
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-0.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.487
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-0.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.321
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-0.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.407
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline0.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.602
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-0.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.337
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.9495% CI: [-0.22, 0.2]MMRM
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.8195% CI: [-0.18, 0.24]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.1395% CI: [-0.39, 0.05]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.07395% CI: [-0.43, 0.02]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.08395% CI: [-0.46, 0.03]MMRM
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.2895% CI: [-0.38, 0.11]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.03895% CI: [-0.54, -0.02]MMRM
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.2595% CI: [-0.41, 0.11]MMRM
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.4195% CI: [-0.39, 0.16]MMRM
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.2695% CI: [-0.43, 0.12]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

HAQ-DI's pain assessment is done using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.7
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.2
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.5
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.9
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.9
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.7
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.7
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.3
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.6
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.4
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.5
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.3
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.7
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.3
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.2
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.7
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.2
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.5
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.3
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.3
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)'s Pain Assessment at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

The hsCRP is the ACR core set measure of acute phase reactant. It was measured at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of filgotinib on the participant's psoriatic arthritis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline8.08 mg/LStandard Deviation 9.335
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-6.37 mg/LStandard Deviation 8.518
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-6.68 mg/LStandard Deviation 8.998
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-5.13 mg/LStandard Deviation 11.271
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-6.04 mg/LStandard Deviation 8.518
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-5.88 mg/LStandard Deviation 9.195
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-0.47 mg/LStandard Deviation 5.496
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-0.69 mg/LStandard Deviation 4.474
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline3.14 mg/LStandard Deviation 2.673
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-0.95 mg/LStandard Deviation 2.564
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-0.10 mg/LStandard Deviation 5.313
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-1.11 mg/LStandard Deviation 3.161
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-7.70 mg/LStandard Deviation 11.874
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-5.99 mg/LStandard Deviation 8.981
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-6.40 mg/LStandard Deviation 9.74
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-6.80 mg/LStandard Deviation 10.918
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-3.80 mg/LStandard Deviation 7.334
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline10.56 mg/LStandard Deviation 16.354
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 122.25 mg/LStandard Deviation 7.788
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 161.05 mg/LStandard Deviation 5.623
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 20.50 mg/LStandard Deviation 4.063
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-1.15 mg/LStandard Deviation 4.979
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline7.11 mg/LStandard Deviation 9.727
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 43.96 mg/LStandard Deviation 13.594
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

PGADA is assessed by the participants using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.8
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.3
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.6
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.9
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.4
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.5
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.8
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.8
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.2
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.6
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.9
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.4
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.3
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.7
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.2
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.7
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.5
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.6
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.4
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

PhGADA is assessed by the physician using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline68 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.4
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.5
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.1
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.8
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-37 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.4
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.6
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.4
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.3
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.6
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.4
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.8
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.6
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.8
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.1
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.8
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.2
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.7
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.4
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

TJC68 is an assessment of 68 joints. Each joint is evaluated as 'normal', 'tender', 'tender and swollen', or 'not able to evaluate'. It is derived as the sum of all tender joints. The overall tender joint count ranged from 0 to 68, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of tenderness. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline22 tender joint countStandard Deviation 14.9
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-6 tender joint countStandard Deviation 8.7
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-9 tender joint countStandard Deviation 10.3
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-13 tender joint countStandard Deviation 9.9
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-13 tender joint countStandard Deviation 7.4
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-14 tender joint countStandard Deviation 7.7
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-7 tender joint countStandard Deviation 7.9
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-5 tender joint countStandard Deviation 6.3
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline13 tender joint countStandard Deviation 8.5
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-3 tender joint countStandard Deviation 7.9
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-1 tender joint countStandard Deviation 5.2
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-7 tender joint countStandard Deviation 7.4
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-5 tender joint countStandard Deviation 3.9
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-7 tender joint countStandard Deviation 5.3
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-7 tender joint countStandard Deviation 7.4
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-10 tender joint countStandard Deviation 6.1
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-10 tender joint countStandard Deviation 8.5
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline17 tender joint countStandard Deviation 11
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 12-4 tender joint countStandard Deviation 4.5
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-5 tender joint countStandard Deviation 8.3
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 2-3 tender joint countStandard Deviation 6.6
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 8-4 tender joint countStandard Deviation 4.8
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Baseline14 tender joint countStandard Deviation 11.6
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Individual ACR Component: Tender Joint Count Based on 68 Joints (TJC68) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-3 tender joint countStandard Deviation 4.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at Baseline

LDI quantitatively measures dactylitis using the circumference of involved digits and control digits and tenderness of involved digits. Digits affected by dactylitis are defined as those with an at least 10% difference in the ratio of circumference of the affected digit to the contralateral digit (digit on opposite hand or foot), or if contralateral digit is also affected, values from a standard reference table. Total score= {{\[Circumference involved digit/ Circumference contralateral Digit (or Tables)\] - 1}x 100} x Tenderness score. Tenderness score (0 = no tenderness, and 1 = tender). The difference between circumference of affected finger and contralateral not affected digit cannot be defined for maximum value. Therefore, it is difficult to provide scale range for the final score. No theoretical range exists for the Leeds Dactylitis Index. Lower Leeds Dactylitis Index score represent better outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

Population: Participants in the FAS with dactylitis at baseline were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-40.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 45.15
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 12-49.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 40.86
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 4-13.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.81
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineBaseline69.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 56.62
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 16-40.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 51.12
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.34
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineBaseline28.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.35
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 12-14.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 413.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.44
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 168.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 41.91
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 16-159.1 score on a scale
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineBaseline159.1 score on a scale
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 4-159.1 score on a scale
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-159.1 score on a scale
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 12-159.1 score on a scale
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineBaseline15.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.45
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 122.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 44.13
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 413.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.64
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 162.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.3
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 83.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 40.81
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline

Enthesitis is assessed using LEI. The enthesitis examination by LEI evaluates the presence or absence of pain by applying local pressure on 6 anatomical sites: medial femoral condyle (left and right), lateral epicondyle (left and right), and the achilles tendon insertion (left and right). Enthesitis at each site is scored as 0 (enthesitis absent) and 1 (enthesitis present). LEI is derived as the sum of the enthesitis score over the 6 sites mentioned above. The total score ranges from 0 to 6, higher scores indicates greater degree of enthesitis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

Population: Participants in the FAS with enthesitis at baseline and with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 12-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 4-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 16-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineBaseline2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 12-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 16-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineBaseline2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineBaseline2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 4-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 12-2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 16-2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 120 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineBaseline2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 160 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mental Component Score (MCS) of the 36-Item Short-Form Version 2 (SF-36v2) at Weeks 4 and 16

The SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's quality of life and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality, and 2 component scores (MCS and PCS). MCS consists of social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional scales. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating better health status or functioning. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement (better health status).

Time frame: Baseline, 4, and 16 weeks

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Mental Component Score (MCS) of the 36-Item Short-Form Version 2 (SF-36v2) at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 162.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.34
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Mental Component Score (MCS) of the 36-Item Short-Form Version 2 (SF-36v2) at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 43.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.66
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Mental Component Score (MCS) of the 36-Item Short-Form Version 2 (SF-36v2) at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline49.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.48
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Mental Component Score (MCS) of the 36-Item Short-Form Version 2 (SF-36v2) at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 160.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.42
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Mental Component Score (MCS) of the 36-Item Short-Form Version 2 (SF-36v2) at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline50.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.43
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Mental Component Score (MCS) of the 36-Item Short-Form Version 2 (SF-36v2) at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 40.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Mental Component Score (MCS) of the 36-Item Short-Form Version 2 (SF-36v2) at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 40.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Mental Component Score (MCS) of the 36-Item Short-Form Version 2 (SF-36v2) at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline44.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.67
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Mental Component Score (MCS) of the 36-Item Short-Form Version 2 (SF-36v2) at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 162.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.31
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Mental Component Score (MCS) of the 36-Item Short-Form Version 2 (SF-36v2) at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 160.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.95
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Mental Component Score (MCS) of the 36-Item Short-Form Version 2 (SF-36v2) at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.58
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Mental Component Score (MCS) of the 36-Item Short-Form Version 2 (SF-36v2) at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline48.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.27
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at Baseline

mNAPSI is used to assess each nail abnormality for each of the participant's nails. Three features or groups of features (pitting, onycholysis together with oil-drop dyschromia, and crumbling) of each fingernail are graded on a scale from 0 (no onycholysis together with oil-drop dyschromia, no pitting, no crumbling) to 3 (\>30 onycholysis together with oil-drop dyschromia, \>50 pitting, \>50% crumbling). Four features (leukonychia, splinter, hemorrhages, hyperkeratosis, and red spots in the lunula) are graded with the score of 1 = present or 0 = absent for each fingernail. Each finger has a score between 0 and 13. The total mNAPSI score is the sum of all abnormalities individual score across all fingers, and the total mNAPSI score ranges from 0 to 130. Lower numbers indicate fewer nail abnormalities. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

Population: Participants in the FAS with psoriatic nail involvement at baseline and with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 12-4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 4-3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at BaselineBaseline19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.1
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 160 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.8
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 120 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at BaselineBaseline15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.9
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.9
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 16-3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.6
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 16-14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.7
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.4
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 12-9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.2
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at BaselineBaseline24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.3
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 4-3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 12-3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at BaselineBaseline14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.9
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 16-2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Physical Component Score (PCS) of the SF-36v2 at Weeks 4 and 16

The SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's quality of life and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality, and 2 component scores (MCS and PCS). PCS consists of physical functioning, bodily pain, role-physical, and general health scales. Each domain is scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating better health status or functioning. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement (better health status).

Time frame: Baseline, 4, and 16 weeks

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physical Component Score (PCS) of the SF-36v2 at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline37.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.11
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physical Component Score (PCS) of the SF-36v2 at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 168.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.86
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physical Component Score (PCS) of the SF-36v2 at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 46.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.87
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physical Component Score (PCS) of the SF-36v2 at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline39.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.6
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physical Component Score (PCS) of the SF-36v2 at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 167.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physical Component Score (PCS) of the SF-36v2 at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 45.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physical Component Score (PCS) of the SF-36v2 at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 42.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.12
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physical Component Score (PCS) of the SF-36v2 at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline39.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.58
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physical Component Score (PCS) of the SF-36v2 at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 168.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.73
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physical Component Score (PCS) of the SF-36v2 at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline37.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.83
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physical Component Score (PCS) of the SF-36v2 at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 164.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.85
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physical Component Score (PCS) of the SF-36v2 at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 41.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.24
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.00395% CI: [1.9, 8.6]MMRM
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.00695% CI: [1.5, 8.3]MMRM
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.07695% CI: [-0.4, 8]MMRM
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.195% CI: [-0.7, 7.7]MMRM
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at Baseline

The PhGAP is used to determine the participant's psoriasis lesions overall at a given time point. The participant's psoriasis disease activity is assessed by a physician according to the grades of induration, erythema, and scaling on a scale of 0 to 5. The sum of the three grades is used to obtain the total average score. PhGAP is based on the total average score on a scale of 0-5 where, 0 = cleared, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = marked, and 5 = severe. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

Population: Participants in the FAS with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at baseline and with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 12-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 16-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 4-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineBaseline3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 2-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 12-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 16-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineBaseline2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineBaseline2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 4-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 12-2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 16-2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 16-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 120 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineBaseline2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PhGAP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the Body Surface Area (BSA) at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline

PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent \[%\] to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). A higher score indicates more severe disease. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

Population: Participants in the FAS with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at baseline and with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 4-2.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.19
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineBaseline9.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-3.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.91
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 16-5.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 12-3.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.65
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 16-7.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.69
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineBaseline13.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.12
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 4-5.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.14
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-5.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.93
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 12-5.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.13
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 4-1.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.54
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 12-3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineBaseline6.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.9
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 16-5.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.56
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 4-1.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.41
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 12-4.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.12
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-5.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.03
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineBaseline9.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 16-6.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.85
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) at Weeks 4 and 16

PASDAS is a composite disease activity measure for psoriatic arthritis. It includes components of PGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0=very well to 100=very poor\]; PhGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\];36-item short form survey (SF-36) \[a questionnaire which measures quality of life across eight domains to determine a physical component summary (PCS) with a score range of 0-100, higher scores indicates better health status\];TJC68;SJC66; leeds enthesitis index(LEI) \[assessed at 6 sites with a score range of 0 to 6, higher scores indicates higher degree of enthesitis\];Tender dactylitis count (TDC) \[with a score range of 0 to 60, higher score indicates higher degree of dactylitis\];C-reactive protein (CRP). Total score is calculated as the sum of the individual scores (each score adjusted by weighting factors). The score of PASDAS ranges from 0 to 10, lower scores indicates better function. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, 4, and 16 weeks

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline5.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.32
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline5.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.99
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.99
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline5.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-2.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.37
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) at Weeks 4 and 16Baseline5.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 16-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.04
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) at Weeks 4 and 16Change From Baseline at Week 4-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at Baseline

The enthesitis examination is based on the 16 anatomical sites: the medial epicondyle (left and right), the lateral epicondyle (left and right), the supraspinatus insertion (left and right), the bilateral greater trochanter (left and right), the quadriceps tendon insertion into superior border of patella (left and right), the patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tuberosity (left and right), the achilles tendon insertion (left and right), and the plantar fascia insertion (left and right). Enthesitis at each site is scored as either 0 (enthesitis absent) and 1 (enthesitis present). SPARCC enthesitis index has an overall total score ranging from 0 to 16. Higher score indicates a greater number of sites that are affected by enthesitis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

Population: Participants in the FAS with enthesitis at baseline and with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 4-2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 12-3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineBaseline4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 16-3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 16-2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineBaseline4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 12-2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 4-2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineBaseline4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 12-2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 16-3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 16-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 12-1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineBaseline5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Enthesitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at Baseline

Tender score (0 = no tenderness, 1 = tender, 2 = tender and wince, 3 = tender and withdraw) is collected for Dactylitis Assessments on the Dactylitis Score Sheet that is used for calculation of LDI total score. Tender dactylitis count (TDC) equals the number of tender fingers and toes (tendor score \>0). For participants with dactylitis status absent for all the fingers and toes, the TDC is set as 0. The total score range of TDC is from 0 to 60, higher scores indicate greater presence of dactylitis. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks

Population: Participants in the FAS with dactylitis at baseline were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-3 tender dactylitis countStandard Deviation 3.3
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 4-1 tender dactylitis countStandard Deviation 0.9
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 16-3 tender dactylitis countStandard Deviation 3.3
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 12-3 tender dactylitis countStandard Deviation 3
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineBaseline4 tender dactylitis countStandard Deviation 4.1
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineBaseline2 tender dactylitis countStandard Deviation 1
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 160 tender dactylitis countStandard Deviation 2.1
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 41 tender dactylitis countStandard Deviation 1
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 80 tender dactylitis countStandard Deviation 1.5
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 12-1 tender dactylitis countStandard Deviation 1.5
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineBaseline6 tender dactylitis count
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 12-6 tender dactylitis count
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 8-6 tender dactylitis count
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 16-6 tender dactylitis count
Adalimumab (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 4-6 tender dactylitis count
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 160 tender dactylitis countStandard Deviation 1.5
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 80 tender dactylitis countStandard Deviation 2.1
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineBaseline1 tender dactylitis countStandard Deviation 1.3
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 40 tender dactylitis countStandard Deviation 1.5
Placebo (Main Study)Change From Baseline in Tender Dactylitis Count (TDC) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Dactylitis at BaselineChange From Baseline at Week 120 tender dactylitis countStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

ACR20 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor); PHGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity); HAQ-DI inclusive of activities scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); HAQ-DI pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain); and hsCRP. Participants with missing outcomes were set as non-responders.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1277.8 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 452.6 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1688.9 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 873.7 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 226.3 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 836.8 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1263.2 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1652.6 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 427.8 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 25.6 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 855.6 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 211.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 433.3 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1275.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1677.8 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1242.1 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 410.0 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 210.5 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 831.6 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1645.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.295% CI: [-13.6, 45.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.695% CI: [-27.8, 17.8]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.00895% CI: [11.5, 73.8]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.1795% CI: [-12, 47.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.01195% CI: [8.1, 76.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.6995% CI: [-30.1, 40.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.03395% CI: [0.9, 70.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.1995% CI: [-15.2, 57.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.00795% CI: [12.4, 75.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.6395% CI: [-28.8, 44.1]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

ACR50 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor); PHGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity); HAQ-DI inclusive of activities scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); HAQ-DI pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain); and hsCRP. Participants with missing outcomes were set as non-responders.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1255.6 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 410.5 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1627.8 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 831.6 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 25.3 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 826.3 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1242.1 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1647.4 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 45.6 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 20 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 811.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 20 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 40 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1237.5 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1633.3 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1210.5 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 45.0 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 25.3 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 810.5 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1615.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.9895% CI: [-19.5, 19.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 2p-value: 0.595% CI: [-20.7, 10.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.5495% CI: [-16.4, 27.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.9295% CI: [-19, 20.1]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.1395% CI: [-9.3, 51.4]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.2295% CI: [-13.6, 45.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.00795% CI: [12.8, 77.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.03995% CI: [0.2, 63]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.3495% CI: [-18.4, 44]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.0495% CI: [-0.1, 64.9]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

ACR70 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) from baseline in TJC68, SJC66 and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: PGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor); PHGADA using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no disease activity) to 100 (maximum disease activity); HAQ-DI inclusive of activities scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled); HAQ-DI pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain); and hsCRP. Participants with missing outcomes were set as non-responders.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 25.3 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1227.8 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 815.8 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 45.3 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1622.2 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 810.5 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1226.3 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 20 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 40 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1631.6 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 80 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 20 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 40 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1212.5 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1622.2 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 120 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 40 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 20 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 85.3 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1610.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 295% CI: [-10, 20.6]
Comparison: Week 295% CI: [-5.4, 5.4]
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-9.9, 20.4]
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-5.3, 5.3]
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-14, 35]
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-17.1, 27.6]
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [1.7, 53.9]
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [1.3, 51.4]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-16.3, 40.8]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-8.2, 51.4]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

DAPSA is calculated by summing the following components: TJC68; SJC66; PGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 very poor)\]; PGAPI \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)\] and CRP. DAPSA scores 0-4 = remission, 5-14 = low disease activity, 15-28 = moderate disease activity, and \>28 = high disease activity. The DAPSA score has a lower bound of 0 and has no upper bound. A higher DAPSA score indicated more active disease activity. DAPSA LDA is defined as DAPSA ≤ 14.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 852.6 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 431.6 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 215.8 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1644.4 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1261.1 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1663.2 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 211.1 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 438.9 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 842.1 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1257.9 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1655.6 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1262.5 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 833.3 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 444.4 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 222.2 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 425.0 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1640.0 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 836.8 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1236.8 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 231.6 percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 295% CI: [-47.6, 16]
Comparison: Week 295% CI: [-51.3, 10.4]
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-26.8, 39.9]
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-20.8, 48.6]
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-20.7, 52.3]
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-31, 41.6]
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-12.4, 60.9]
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-15.2, 57.4]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-32.3, 41.2]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-12.5, 58.8]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

DAPSA is calculated by summing the following components: TJC68; SJC66; PGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 very poor)\]; PGAPI \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)\] and CRP. DAPSA scores 0-4 = remission, 5-14 = low disease activity, 15-28 = moderate disease activity, and \>28 = high disease activity. The DAPSA score has a lower bound of 0 and has no upper bound. A higher DAPSA score indicated more active disease activity. DAPSA remission is defined as DAPSA ≤ 4.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1222.2 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 45.3 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1616.7 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 810.5 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 25.3 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 85.3 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1231.6 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1621.1 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 45.6 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 20 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 80 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 20 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 40 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1212.5 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1622.2 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 125.3 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 45.0 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 25.3 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 810.5 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAPSA Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1610.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 295% CI: [-19.5, 19.5]
Comparison: Week 295% CI: [-20.7, 10.2]
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-18.7, 19.3]
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-19, 20.1]
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-24.8, 24.8]
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-27.6, 17.1]
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-10.1, 44]
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-2.1, 54.8]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-20.3, 33.6]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-16.6, 38.7]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

The DAS28 (CRP) is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), PGADA (VAS; 0 = very well to 100 = very poor), and hsCRP for a total possible score of 1 to 9.4. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) LDA is defined as DAS28(CRP) ≤ 3.2.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1266.7 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 436.8 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1650.0 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 863.2 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 231.6 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 863.2 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1268.4 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1684.2 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 444.4 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 233.3 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 833.3 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 233.3 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 455.6 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1262.5 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1666.7 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1236.8 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 425.0 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 242.1 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 852.6 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28(CRP) LDA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1645.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 295% CI: [-46.3, 25.2]
Comparison: Week 295% CI: [-45.3, 27.7]
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-22.1, 45.8]
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-15.6, 54.5]
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-26, 47]
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-26, 47]
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-6.3, 66]
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-3.8, 67]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-32, 42]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [6.8, 71.6]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

The DAS28 (CRP) is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), PGADA (VAS; 0 = very well to 100 = very poor), and hsCRP for a total possible score of 1 to 9.4. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) remission is defined as DAS28 (CRP) \< 2.6.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1255.6 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 410.5 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1644.4 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 847.4 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 210.5 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 826.3 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1242.1 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1652.6 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 427.8 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 211.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 822.2 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 222.2 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 422.2 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1250.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1644.4 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1221.1 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 415.0 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 210.5 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 826.3 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) Remission at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1620.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 295% CI: [-24.8, 24.8]
Comparison: Week 295% CI: [-24.9, 26]
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-30.5, 21.5]
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-18.4, 44]
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-14.1, 56.3]
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-33.3, 33.3]
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-0.3, 69.3]
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-13, 55.1]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-9.7, 58.6]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-1, 66.2]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

MDA is a measure to indicate disease remission, and is based on a composite score of 7 domains. A participant is considered as having achieved the MDA if the participant fulfills at least 5 of the following 7 criteria: TJC68 ≤1; SJC66 ≤1; Psoriatic arthritis disease activity score (PASI) ≤1 for participants with psoriasis covering BSA \<3% \[PASI evaluates the severity and extent of psoriasis. In PASI, body is divided into four parts, head and neck, upper limb, trunk and lower limbs. Each area is assessed for erythema, induration and scaling, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The total score ranges from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease)\]; patient's global assessment of PsA pain intensity (PGAPI) ≤15 \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)\]; PGADA ≤20 \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)\]; HAQ-DI score ≤0.5; LEI score ≤1 for participants with enthesitis at baseline.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 421.1 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 826.3 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1244.4 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1627.8 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 831.6 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1247.4 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1636.8 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 416.7 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1237.5 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 822.2 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1637.5 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 422.2 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1620.0 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 815.8 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 45.0 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1215.8 percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.1795% CI: [-9.7, 41.9]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 4p-value: 0.2795% CI: [-13.3, 36.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.4295% CI: [-20.4, 41.5]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 8p-value: 0.2695% CI: [-16, 47.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.06295% CI: [-5, 62.3]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 12p-value: 0.04795% CI: [-1.5, 64.6]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.5895% CI: [-24.6, 40.2]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Week 16p-value: 0.2795% CI: [-16.2, 49.9]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASDAS Remission at Weeks 4 and 16

PASDAS is a composite disease activity measure for psoriatic arthritis. It includes components of PGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0=very well to 100=very poor\]; PhGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\]; 36-item short form survey (SF-36) \[a questionnaire which measures quality of life across eight domains to determine a physical component summary (PCS) with a score range of 0-100, higher scores indicates better health status\];TJC68;SJC66; leeds enthesitis index(LEI) \[assessed at 6 sites with a score range of 0 to 6, higher scores indicates higher degree of enthesitis\]; Tender dactylitis count (TDC) \[with a score range of 0 to 60, higher score indicates higher degree of dactylitis\]; C-reactive protein (CRP). Total score is calculated as the sum of the individual scores (each score adjusted by weighting factors). The score of PASDAS ranges from 0 to 10, lower scores indicates better function. PASDAS remission is defined as PASDAS ≤ 1.9.

Time frame: Weeks 4, and 16

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASDAS Remission at Weeks 4 and 16Week 40 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASDAS Remission at Weeks 4 and 16Week 1616.7 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASDAS Remission at Weeks 4 and 16Week 1610.5 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASDAS Remission at Weeks 4 and 16Week 40 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASDAS Remission at Weeks 4 and 16Week 40 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASDAS Remission at Weeks 4 and 16Week 1612.5 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASDAS Remission at Weeks 4 and 16Week 40 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASDAS Remission at Weeks 4 and 16Week 165.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-16.4, 27.4]
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-5.1, 5.1]
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-5.3, 5.3]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-13.3, 36.6]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% Improvement (PASI100) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline

PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent \[%\] to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI100, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 100%. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: Participants in the FAS with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at baseline and with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% Improvement (PASI100) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 40 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% Improvement (PASI100) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 80 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% Improvement (PASI100) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1214.3 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% Improvement (PASI100) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1612.5 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% Improvement (PASI100) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 80 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% Improvement (PASI100) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 120 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% Improvement (PASI100) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1620.0 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% Improvement (PASI100) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 40 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% Improvement (PASI100) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1266.7 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% Improvement (PASI100) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 825.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% Improvement (PASI100) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1625.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% Improvement (PASI100) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 40 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% Improvement (PASI100) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 160 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% Improvement (PASI100) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 80 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% Improvement (PASI100) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 40 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% Improvement (PASI100) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 120 percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-18.8, 18.8]
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-22.5, 22.5]
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-18.8, 18.8]
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-22.5, 22.5]
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-31.3, 59.9]
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-22.5, 22.5]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-29.2, 54.2]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-37.6, 77.6]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50% Improvement (PASI50) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline

PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent \[%\] to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI50, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 50%. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: Participants in the FAS with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at baseline and with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50% Improvement (PASI50) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 437.5 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50% Improvement (PASI50) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 825.0 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50% Improvement (PASI50) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1257.1 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50% Improvement (PASI50) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1662.5 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50% Improvement (PASI50) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 840.0 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50% Improvement (PASI50) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1240.0 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50% Improvement (PASI50) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1640.0 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50% Improvement (PASI50) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 440.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50% Improvement (PASI50) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 12100.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50% Improvement (PASI50) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 850.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50% Improvement (PASI50) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 16100.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50% Improvement (PASI50) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 450.0 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50% Improvement (PASI50) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1625.0 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50% Improvement (PASI50) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 850.0 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50% Improvement (PASI50) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 40 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50% Improvement (PASI50) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1250.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-14.8, 89.8]
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-25.4, 100]
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-100, 51.2]
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-97.7, 77.7]
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-73.7, 88]
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-97.7, 77.7]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-35.3, 100]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-67.9, 97.9]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75% Improvement (PASI75) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline

PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI75, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 75%. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: Participants in the FAS with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at baseline and with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75% Improvement (PASI75) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1662.5 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75% Improvement (PASI75) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 825.0 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75% Improvement (PASI75) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 412.5 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75% Improvement (PASI75) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1242.9 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75% Improvement (PASI75) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 840.0 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75% Improvement (PASI75) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1240.0 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75% Improvement (PASI75) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 420.0 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75% Improvement (PASI75) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1620.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75% Improvement (PASI75) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 40 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75% Improvement (PASI75) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 825.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75% Improvement (PASI75) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1266.7 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75% Improvement (PASI75) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1675.0 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75% Improvement (PASI75) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 80 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75% Improvement (PASI75) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 40 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75% Improvement (PASI75) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1625.0 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75% Improvement (PASI75) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 120 percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-29.2, 54.2]
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-37.6, 77.6]
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-23.8, 73.8]
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-25.4, 100]
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-13.4, 99.2]
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-25.4, 100]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-35.3, 100]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-82.5, 72.5]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90% Improvement (PASI90) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline

PASI is assessed in participants with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at Baseline. PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head and neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each of these areas are assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent \[%\] to 100% involvement). The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). For PASI90, the improvement threshold from baseline in PASI score is 90%. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: Participants in the FAS with psoriasis covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at baseline and with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90% Improvement (PASI90) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 40 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90% Improvement (PASI90) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 812.5 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90% Improvement (PASI90) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1214.3 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90% Improvement (PASI90) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1625.0 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90% Improvement (PASI90) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 80 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90% Improvement (PASI90) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1220.0 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90% Improvement (PASI90) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1620.0 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90% Improvement (PASI90) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 40 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90% Improvement (PASI90) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1266.7 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90% Improvement (PASI90) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 825.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90% Improvement (PASI90) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 1650.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90% Improvement (PASI90) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 40 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90% Improvement (PASI90) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 160 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90% Improvement (PASI90) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 80 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90% Improvement (PASI90) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 40 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90% Improvement (PASI90) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in Participants With Psoriasis Covering ≥ 3% of the BSA at BaselineWeek 120 percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-18.8, 18.8]
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-22.5, 22.5]
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-29.2, 54.2]
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-22.5, 22.5]
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-31.3, 59.9]
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-37.6, 77.6]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-23.8, 73.8]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-37.6, 77.6]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

The PsARC response is defined as improvement in at least 2 of the following 4 criteria; ≥ 30% decrease in SJC66, ≥ 30% decrease in TJC68, ≥ 20% decrease in PGADA (VAS; 0 = very well to 100 = very poor), ≥ 20% decrease in PhGADA (VAS; 0 = no disease activity to 100 = maximum disease activity), and with at least one of the 2 joint criteria, with no deterioration in any other criteria.

Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1272.2 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 457.9 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1688.9 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 878.9 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 231.6 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 847.4 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1268.4 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1657.9 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 438.9 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 216.7 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 844.4 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 211.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 444.4 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1275.0 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1677.8 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1247.4 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 430.0 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 231.6 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 857.9 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1645.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 295% CI: [-34.8, 34.8]
Comparison: Week 295% CI: [-47.4, 17.6]
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-7.2, 63]
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-26.6, 44.3]
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-13, 55.1]
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-47.4, 26.3]
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-11.1, 60.8]
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-14.9, 57]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [12.4, 75.4]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-23.4, 49.1]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

VLDA is a measure to indicate disease remission, and is based on a composite score of 7 domains. A participant is considered as having achieved the VLDA if the participant fulfills all the seven criteria: TJC68 ≤1; SJC66 ≤1; PASI score ≤1 for participants with psoriasis covering BSA \<3% \[PASI evaluates the severity and extent of psoriasis. In PASI, body is divided into four parts, head and neck, upper limb, trunk and lower limbs. Each area is assessed for erythema, induration and scaling, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The total score ranges from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease)\]; PGAPI ≤15 \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to (serious pain)\]; PGADA ≤20 \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor)\]; HAQ-DI score ≤0.5; LEI score ≤1 with participants with enthesitis at baseline.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1211.1 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 165.6 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 45.3 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 85.3 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 40 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 125.3 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 80 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1610.5 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 80 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1611.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 40 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 1212.5 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 160 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 125.3 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 40 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Week 810.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-9.9, 20.4]
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-5.3, 5.3]
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-27.6, 17.1]
Comparison: Week 895% CI: [-29.6, 8.5]
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-17.2, 28.9]
Comparison: Week 1295% CI: [-19.5, 19.5]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-10.3, 21.4]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-8.4, 29.5]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With PASDAS Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Weeks 4 and 16

PASDAS is a composite disease activity measure for psoriatic arthritis. It includes components of PGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0=very well to 100=very poor\]; PhGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\]; 36-item short form survey (SF-36) \[a questionnaire which measures quality of life across eight domains to determine a physical component summary (PCS) with a score range of 0-100, higher scores indicates better health status\]; TJC68; SJC66; leeds enthesitis index(LEI) \[assessed at 6 sites with a score range of 0 to 6, higher scores indicates higher degree of enthesitis\]; Tender dactylitis count (TDC) \[with a score range of 0 to 60, higher score indicates higher degree of dactylitis\]; C-reactive protein (CRP). Total score is calculated as the sum of the individual scores (each score adjusted by weighting factors). The score of PASDAS ranges from 0 to 10, lower scores indicates better function. PASDAS LDA is defined as PASDAS ≤ 3.2.

Time frame: Weeks 4, and 16

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants With PASDAS Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Weeks 4 and 16Week 421.1 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants With PASDAS Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Weeks 4 and 16Week 1638.9 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants With PASDAS Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Weeks 4 and 16Week 1642.1 percentage of participants
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Percentage of Participants With PASDAS Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Weeks 4 and 16Week 411.1 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants With PASDAS Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Weeks 4 and 16Week 40 percentage of participants
Adalimumab (Main Study)Percentage of Participants With PASDAS Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Weeks 4 and 16Week 1650.0 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants With PASDAS Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Weeks 4 and 16Week 45.0 percentage of participants
Placebo (Main Study)Percentage of Participants With PASDAS Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Weeks 4 and 16Week 1615.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-9.7, 41.9]
Comparison: Week 495% CI: [-16.5, 28.8]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-8.8, 56.6]
Comparison: Week 1695% CI: [-5.2, 59.4]
Secondary

Time to Achieve DAPSA LDA

DAPSA is calculated by summing the following components: TJC68; SJC66; PGADA \[using VAS on a scale of 0 (very well) to 100 very poor)\]; PGAPI \[using a VAS on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (serious pain)\] and CRP. DAPSA scores 0-4 = remission, 5-14 = low disease activity, 15-28 = moderate disease activity, and \>28 = high disease activity. The DAPSA score has a lower bound of 0 and has no upper bound. A higher DAPSA score indicated more active disease activity. Time to achieve DAPSA LDA is the number of days from the first dose date of study drug administration to the first time when a participant achieves DAPSA LDA. If the DAPSA LDA is not achieved during main study phase, the time to achieve DAPSA LDA will be censored at the last non-missing DAPSA LDA assessment date during main study phase. If the component scores of DAPSA LDA are at different dates for a visit, the latest date will be used for the derivation of time to achieve DAPSA LDA.

Time frame: Up to 19 weeks

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Time to Achieve DAPSA LDA73 days
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Time to Achieve DAPSA LDA82 days
Adalimumab (Main Study)Time to Achieve DAPSA LDA83 days
Placebo (Main Study)Time to Achieve DAPSA LDANA days
Secondary

Time to Achieve DAS28 (CRP) LDA

The DAS28 (CRP) is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the TJC (28 joints), SJC (28 joints), PGADA (VAS; 0 = very well to 100 = very poor), and hsCRP for a total possible score of 1 to 9.4. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) LDA is defined as DAS28 (CRP) ≤ 3.2. Time to achieve DAS28 (CRP) LDA is the number of days from the first dose date of study drug administration to the first time when a participant achieves DAS28 (CRP) LDA.

Time frame: Up to 19 weeks

Population: Participants in the FAS with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Filgotinib 200 mg (Main Study)Time to Achieve DAS28 (CRP) LDA57 days
Filgotinib 100 mg (Main Study)Time to Achieve DAS28 (CRP) LDA58 days
Adalimumab (Main Study)Time to Achieve DAS28 (CRP) LDA29 days
Placebo (Main Study)Time to Achieve DAS28 (CRP) LDA59 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026