Skip to content

Effectiveness of Corticosteroid vs. Ketorolac Shoulder Injections: A Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized Trial

Effectiveness of Corticosteroid vs. Ketorolac Shoulder Injections: A Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04115644
Enrollment
82
Registered
2019-10-04
Start date
2017-05-01
Completion date
2017-09-14
Last updated
2023-12-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Full Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear, Rotator Cuff Tendinitis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the functional outcomes of patients with shoulder pathology treated with either ketorolac or corticosteroid injections, in a randomized double-blinded study. Investigators will compare the effectiveness of ketorolac compared to corticosteroid. Specific Aim 1: Hypothesis 1: Injection of the shoulder (in the subacromial space) with Ketorolac will be more effective than corticosteroid injection for the treatment of a variety of shoulder pathologies. The risks associated with this study primarily concern adverse reactions to the study drugs. The drugs used in this study are not narcotics or habit-forming but can have side effects. The patient's physician will screen for any heart, intestinal, or kidney disease or condition that would increase the chance for the patient to have an unwanted side effect.

Detailed description

The proposed study is a three arm, double-blinded, prospective randomized controlled clinical trial with follow-up immediately after the injection and at day 2, and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12. In this study investigators will compare the effectiveness of ketorolac compared to corticosteroid. Subjects being seen for a rotator cuff injury will be randomized into one of three treatment groups pertaining to their pathology. The intervention will begin once the subject has consented and answered the Baseline Outcome Shoulder Questionnaire. The Baseline Outcome Questionnaire consists of the Visual Analog Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Short Form-12, and questions pertaining to patient characteristics, injury characteristics, co-morbidities, patient history, medications, and demographics.

Interventions

DRUGKetorolac

Group 2 (ketorolac): will receive an injection of 3 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine and 2 cc ketorolac 30 mg/ml

DRUGMarcaine (placebo)

Group 1 (control): will receive an injection of 5 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine

Group 3 (kenalog): 4 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine and 1 cc triamcinolone.

Sponsors

Michael Khazzam
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Rotator Cuff Tendinitis * Atraumatic Rotator Cuff Tear * Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy * Subjects who speak English

Exclusion criteria

* Age: \< 18 years old * Prior Shoulder Surgery * Fracture * Acute Traumatic Rotator Cuff Tear * Infection * Uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus (HbA1c \>8) * Recent Prior Shoulder Injection in either the Subacromial space * Workers Compensation * History of Gastric Ulcers * Tumor Involving the Shoulder Region * Prior history of gastrointestinal bleeding, allergic reactions, impaired renal function, seizures or cardiac arrhythmias * Subject unable to provide informed consent * Subjects who don't speak English * Patients who are pregnant or lactating at time of screening or are of child bearing age * Patients currently receiving an aspirin, NSAID regimen or any other anti-inflammatory agents that could affect inflammation response. * Patients with any bleeding disorders. * Patients with severe renal failure. * Patients likely to have severe problems maintaining follow-up, including patients diagnosed with severe psychiatric conditions, patients who live too far outside the hospital's catchment area, patients who are incarcerated and patients who have unstable housing situations. * Patients who are allergic to aspirin, ketorolac tromethamine and other NSAIDs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog ScaleBaseline - pre-injectionPain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale prior to first injection. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.
American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)BaselinePain, instability, and activities of daily living as measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Score. The ASES is a 100-point scale that consists of two dimensions: pain and activities of daily living. One pain scale is worth 50 points, and activities of daily living worth 50 points. A higher score indicates a better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)BaselineMeasure the patient's self-reported function on a scale of 0 to 100
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)BaselineSleep quality as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Short Form 12 (SF-12)BaselineGeneral health survey as measured by the Short Form 12 (SF-12)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1 (Control)
will receive an injection of 5 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine Marcaine (placebo): Group 1 (control): will receive an injection of 5 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine
26
Group 2 (Ketorolac)
will receive an injection of 3 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine and 2 cc ketorolac 30 mg/ml Ketorolac: Group 2 (ketorolac): will receive an injection of 3 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine and 2 cc ketorolac 30 mg/ml Marcaine (placebo): Group 1 (control): will receive an injection of 5 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine
30
Group 3 (Kenalog)
Pt will receive an injection of 4 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine and 1 cc triamcinolone. Group 3 is standard of care Marcaine (placebo): Group 1 (control): will receive an injection of 5 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine Kenalog: Group 3 (kenalog): 4 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine and 1 cc triamcinolone.
26
Total82

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup 1 (Control)Group 2 (Ketorolac)Group 3 (Kenalog)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants13 Participants15 Participants34 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
20 Participants17 Participants11 Participants48 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants5 Participants3 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
17 Participants21 Participants22 Participants60 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants22 Participants17 Participants48 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants8 Participants9 Participants34 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 260 / 300 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 260 / 300 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 260 / 300 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)

Pain, instability, and activities of daily living as measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Score. The ASES is a 100-point scale that consists of two dimensions: pain and activities of daily living. One pain scale is worth 50 points, and activities of daily living worth 50 points. A higher score indicates a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Data were not collected.

Primary

American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)

Pain, instability, and activities of daily living as measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Score. The ASES is a 100-point scale that consists of two dimensions: pain and activities of daily living. One pain scale is worth 50 points, and activities of daily living worth 50 points. A higher score indicates a better outcome.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Data were not collected.

Primary

American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)

Pain, instability, and activities of daily living as measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Score. The ASES is a 100-point scale that consists of two dimensions: pain and activities of daily living. One pain scale is worth 50 points, and activities of daily living worth 50 points. A higher score indicates a better outcome.

Time frame: Week 6

Population: Data were not collected.

Primary

Visual Analog Scale

Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale after first injection. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.

Time frame: Baseline - immediately after the injection

Population: For Group 3 (Kenalog), data for 1 subject was not analyzed as the subject did not complete the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1 (Control)Visual Analog Scale3.197 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Group 2 (Ketorolac)Visual Analog Scale3.577 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Group 3 (Kenalog)Visual Analog Scale3.677 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Primary

Visual Analog Scale

Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale prior to first injection. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.

Time frame: Baseline - pre-injection

Population: For Group 3 (Kenalog), data for 1 subject was not analyzed as the subject did not complete the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1 (Control)Visual Analog Scale5.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Group 2 (Ketorolac)Visual Analog Scale4.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Group 3 (Kenalog)Visual Analog Scale4.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Primary

Visual Analog Scale

Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.

Time frame: Day 2

Population: For Group 3 (Kenalog), data for 1 subject was not analyzed as the subject did not complete the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1 (Control)Visual Analog Scale2.347 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Group 2 (Ketorolac)Visual Analog Scale2.837 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Group 3 (Kenalog)Visual Analog Scale2.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Primary

Visual Analog Scale

Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.

Time frame: Week 1

Population: For Group 3 (Kenalog), data for 1 subject was not analyzed as the subject did not complete the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1 (Control)Visual Analog Scale3.397 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Group 2 (Ketorolac)Visual Analog Scale3.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Group 3 (Kenalog)Visual Analog Scale3.257 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Primary

Visual Analog Scale

Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.

Time frame: Week 2

Population: For Group 3 (Kenalog), data for 1 subject was not analyzed as the subject did not complete the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1 (Control)Visual Analog Scale3.547 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Group 2 (Ketorolac)Visual Analog Scale2.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Group 3 (Kenalog)Visual Analog Scale2.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Primary

Visual Analog Scale

Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.

Time frame: Week 4

Population: For Group 3 (Kenalog), data for 1 subject was not analyzed as the subject did not complete the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1 (Control)Visual Analog Scale3.547 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Group 2 (Ketorolac)Visual Analog Scale2.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Group 3 (Kenalog)Visual Analog Scale2.317 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Primary

Visual Analog Scale

Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.

Time frame: Week 6

Population: For Group 3 (Kenalog), data for 1 subject was not analyzed as the subject did not complete the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1 (Control)Visual Analog Scale3.357 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Group 2 (Ketorolac)Visual Analog Scale2.757 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Group 3 (Kenalog)Visual Analog Scale2.687 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Primary

Visual Analog Scale

Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: For Group 3 (Kenalog), data for 1 subject was not analyzed as the subject did not complete the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1 (Control)Visual Analog Scale3.447 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Group 2 (Ketorolac)Visual Analog Scale1.417 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Group 3 (Kenalog)Visual Analog Scale2.027 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Secondary

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

Sleep quality as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

Time frame: Week 6

Population: Data were not collected.

Secondary

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

Sleep quality as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Data were not collected.

Secondary

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

Sleep quality as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Data were not collected.

Secondary

Short Form 12 (SF-12)

General health survey as measured by the Short Form 12 (SF-12)

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Data were not collected.

Secondary

Short Form 12 (SF-12)

General health survey as measured by the Short Form 12 (SF-12)

Time frame: Week 6

Population: Data were not collected.

Secondary

Short Form 12 (SF-12)

General health survey as measured by the Short Form 12 (SF-12)

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Data were not collected.

Secondary

Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)

Measure the patient's self-reported function on a scale of 0 to 100

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Data were not collected.

Secondary

Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)

Measure the patient's self-reported function on a scale of 0 to 100

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Data were not collected.

Secondary

Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)

Measure the patient's self-reported function on a scale of 0 to 100

Time frame: Week 6

Population: Data were not collected.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026