Skip to content

Intranasal Insulin in Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD)

A Single Center Feasibility Study of Intranasal Insulin in Frontotemporal Dementia NIFT-D

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04115384
Enrollment
3
Registered
2019-10-04
Start date
2019-09-09
Completion date
2023-05-15
Last updated
2023-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Frontotemporal Dementia, Behavioral Variant

Keywords

intranasal, insulin

Brief summary

This project will study intranasal (IN) insulin in Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) in 12 patients. Study Investigators aim to evaluate the feasibility of the EXAMINER cognitive battery as a cognitive outcome measure in FTD, the ability of the HealthPartners Center for Memory and Aging's ability to sufficiently recruit subjects with FTD, and the safety of IN regular insulin administered 20 IU twice per day in two specific variants of FTD (behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bv-FTD), semantic dementia (SD)) over a 4 week period.

Detailed description

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) with its multiple pathological manifestations, is a disease that results in progressive deterioration of social comportment, executive function, and language. Despite the debilitating nature of FTD and the relatively high prevalence in the younger patient population, available pharmacological interventions are limited to symptomatic treatments. There are no therapeutic agents that have been developed that specifically treat the progressive cognitive symptoms of FTD. This project will study IN insulin in FTD in 12 patients. Investigators aim to evaluate the feasibility of the EXAMINER cognitive battery as a cognitive outcome measure in FTD, the ability of the HealthPartners Center for Memory and Aging's Center's ability to sufficiently recruit subjects with FTD, and the safety of IN regular insulin administered 20 IU twice per day in two specific variants of FTD (behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bv-FTD), semantic dementia (SD)) over a 4 week period. Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) with its multiple pathological manifestations, is a disease that results in progressive deterioration of social comportment, executive function, and language. Despite the debilitating nature of FTD and the relatively high prevalence in the younger patient population, available pharmacological interventions are limited to symptomatic treatments. There are no therapeutic agents that have been developed that specifically treat the progressive cognitive symptoms of FTD.

Interventions

DRUGNovolin-R insulin

Insulin (Novolin-R) 20 IU/IN (0.1ml/10 units IN in each nostril), twice per day, once in the morning and again in the evening (at least 8 hours between doses) for 4 weeks.

Sponsors

HealthPartners Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
41 Years to 89 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female subject meeting international consensus criteria for probable behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia or criteria for semantic dementia (Gorno-Tempini et al., 2011; Rascovsky et al., 2011) 2. Subject has a Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) score ≥18. 3. Subject is \> 40 and \<90 years of age. 4. Female subjects are post-menopausal or have a negative pregnancy test 5. The subject must be proficient in speaking, reading and understanding English in order to comply with procedural testing of cognitive function, memory and physiology. 6. Subject has a dedicated family member/caregiver, who will be able to attend all visits and report on subject's status. 7. Subject and family member/caregiver have both provided fully informed written consent prior to participation. In the event that subject is legally unable to provide informed written consent due to deterioration in cognitive abilities, fully informed written consent must be provided by a legally authorized representative. 8. Subject must have undergone a brain computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan as part of receiving frontotemporal dementia (FTD) diagnosis

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject has medical history and/or clinically determined evidence of other central nervous system (CNS) disorders including, but not limited to brain tumor, active subdural hematoma, seizure disorder, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, corticobasal syndrome, progressive supranuclear palsy, Parkinson's disease, multiple system atrophy, Lewy body dementia, normal pressure hydrocephalus, Huntington's disease, or Jakob-Creutzfeldt disease presenting as dementia. 2. Subject has medical history and/or clinically determined disorders: current B12 deficiency, chronic sinusitis, untreated thyroid disease, or significant head trauma. 3. Subject has history of any of the following: moderate to severe pulmonary disease, poorly controlled congestive heart failure, significant cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular events within previous 6 months, condition known to affect absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of drugs such as any hepatic, renal or gastrointestinal disease or any other clinically relevant abnormality that inclusion would pose a safety risk to the subject as determined by investigator. 4. Subject has had previous nasal and/or oto-pharyngeal surgery and severe deviated septum and/or other anomalies. 5. Subject has a history of any psychiatric illness that would pose a safety risk to the subject as determined by investigator. 6. Subject is currently taking any medications (anticholinergics, antihistamines, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, or insulin) that are clinically contraindicated as determined by investigator. 7. Subject has undergone a recent change (\<1 month) in their selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) or anti-depressant medication. 8. Subject has current or recent drug or alcohol abuse or dependence as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5, Text Revision (DSM-IV TR). 9. Screening laboratory results that are medically relevant, in which inclusion would pose a safety risk to the subject as determined by investigator. 10. The subject has participated in a clinical trial investigation within 1 month of this study. 11. The subject has an insulin allergy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility Measured by EXAMINER BatteryBaseline and Post TreatmentNumber of patients completing the entire EXAMINER battery. Range: 0-3. More participants completing EXAMINER indicates higher feasibility.
Feasibility Measured by RecruitmentBaselineNumber of patients enrolled in this study. Range: 0-12. More participants enrolling indicates higher feasibility.
Safety Measured by Total Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs)2 monthsTotal number of AEs/SAEs during the course of treatment. More AEs/SAEs indicates a less safe treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility Measured by Completion of Study2 monthsNumber of patients completing the entire study. Range: 0-12. More participants completing the study indicates higher feasibility.
Feasibility Measured by Screen Fails2 yearsNumber of patients screen failing during the study. More participants screen failing the study indicates lower feasibility.
Safety Measured by Unique Subjects With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs)4 weeksTotal number of unique participants experiencing AEs/SAEs during the course of treatment. More unique participants experiencing AEs/SAEs indicates a less safe treatment.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pre to Post Appetite Changes by the Appetite and Eating Habit Questionnaire (APEHQ) - Eating Habits Subscore4 weeksA survey about changes in eating behaviors. The sum of frequency times severity of eating habit related questions is the score for this portion. Caregivers of participant are asked to fill this survey out Range: 0-72. Higher scores indicate a greater change in eating habits that produces conflict or embarrassment.
Pre to Post Working Memory Measured by EXAMINER - Dot Counting4 weeksDot counting measures verbal working memory. Participants are asked to count colored shapes on a tables and remember the final total over 6 trials. Scores are totaled as the number of correct answers or the number of answers recalled. Range: 0-27. A higher score indicates better performance.
Pre to Post Appetite Changes by the Appetite and Eating Habit Questionnaire (APEHQ) - Other Oral Behaviors Subscore4 weeksA survey about changes in eating behaviors. The sum of frequency times severity of other oral behavior related questions is the score for this portion. Caregivers of participant are asked to fill this survey out Range: 0-60. Higher scores indicate a greater changes that produces conflict or embarrassment.
Pre to Post Appetite Changes by the Appetite and Eating Habit Questionnaire (APEHQ) - Food Preference Subscore4 weeksA survey about changes in eating behaviors. The sum of frequency times severity of food preference related questions is the score for this portion. Caregivers of participant are asked to fill this survey out Range: 0-84. Higher scores indicate a greater change in food preferences that produces conflict or embarrassment.
Pre to Post Verbal Fluency Measured by EXAMINER - Animal Fluency4 weeksParticipants are asked to name as many animals as he/she can in 60 seconds. Scores are totaled as the number of animals verbalized. A higher score indicates better performance.
Pre to Post Inhibition by EXAMINER - Flanker4 weeksParticipants are asked to choose the direction of one the center arrow in a group 5 arrows. Range: 0- 10. This is a global score that combines accuracy and reaction time. A higher score indicates better performance.
Pre to Post Inhibition by EXAMINER - Set Shifting4 weeksParticipants are asked to match stimulus on different parts of a tablet screen. Range: 0- 10. This is a global score that combines accuracy and reaction time. A higher score indicates better performance.
Pre to Post Appetite Changes by the Appetite and Eating Habit Questionnaire (APEHQ) - Swallowing Subscore4 weeksA survey about changes in eating behaviors. The sum of frequency times severity of swallowing related questions is the score for this portion. Caregivers of participant are asked to fill this survey out. Range: 0-96. Higher scores indicate higher difficulty swallowing that produces conflict or embarrassment.
Pre to Post Appetite Changes by the Appetite and Eating Habit Questionnaire (APEHQ) - Appetite Subscore4 weeksA survey about changes in eating behaviors. The sum of frequency times severity of appetite related questions is the score for this portion. Caregivers of participant are asked to fill this survey out Range: 0-96. Higher scores indicate a greater change in appetite that produces conflict or embarrassment.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Insulin (Novolin-R)
Regular insulin (Novolin-R) 20 IU/IN (0.1ml/10 units IN in each nostril) BID Novolin-R insulin: Insulin (Novolin-R) 20 IU/IN (0.1ml/10 units IN in each nostril), twice per day, once in the morning and again in the evening (at least 8 hours between doses) for 4 weeks.
3
Total3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInsulin (Novolin-R)
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Feasibility Measured by EXAMINER Battery

Number of patients completing the entire EXAMINER battery. Range: 0-3. More participants completing EXAMINER indicates higher feasibility.

Time frame: Baseline and Post Treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Insulin (Novolin-R)Feasibility Measured by EXAMINER Battery3 Participants
Primary

Feasibility Measured by Recruitment

Number of patients enrolled in this study. Range: 0-12. More participants enrolling indicates higher feasibility.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: The original goal was to include 12 participants. Since this is a feasibility outcome, the analysis population is the original goal total.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Insulin (Novolin-R)Feasibility Measured by Recruitment3 Participants
Primary

Safety Measured by Total Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs)

Total number of AEs/SAEs during the course of treatment. More AEs/SAEs indicates a less safe treatment.

Time frame: 2 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Insulin (Novolin-R)Safety Measured by Total Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs)1 Total number of AEs/SAEs reported
Secondary

Feasibility Measured by Completion of Study

Number of patients completing the entire study. Range: 0-12. More participants completing the study indicates higher feasibility.

Time frame: 2 months

Population: 12 participants were expected. Only 3 participants were able to complete the trial

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Insulin (Novolin-R)Feasibility Measured by Completion of Study3 Participants
Secondary

Feasibility Measured by Screen Fails

Number of patients screen failing during the study. More participants screen failing the study indicates lower feasibility.

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Insulin (Novolin-R)Feasibility Measured by Screen Fails0 Participants
Secondary

Safety Measured by Unique Subjects With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs)

Total number of unique participants experiencing AEs/SAEs during the course of treatment. More unique participants experiencing AEs/SAEs indicates a less safe treatment.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Insulin (Novolin-R)Safety Measured by Unique Subjects With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs)1 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Pre to Post Appetite Changes by the Appetite and Eating Habit Questionnaire (APEHQ) - Appetite Subscore

A survey about changes in eating behaviors. The sum of frequency times severity of appetite related questions is the score for this portion. Caregivers of participant are asked to fill this survey out Range: 0-96. Higher scores indicate a greater change in appetite that produces conflict or embarrassment.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Insulin (Novolin-R)Pre to Post Appetite Changes by the Appetite and Eating Habit Questionnaire (APEHQ) - Appetite Subscore-0.67 change in score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.53
Other Pre-specified

Pre to Post Appetite Changes by the Appetite and Eating Habit Questionnaire (APEHQ) - Eating Habits Subscore

A survey about changes in eating behaviors. The sum of frequency times severity of eating habit related questions is the score for this portion. Caregivers of participant are asked to fill this survey out Range: 0-72. Higher scores indicate a greater change in eating habits that produces conflict or embarrassment.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Insulin (Novolin-R)Pre to Post Appetite Changes by the Appetite and Eating Habit Questionnaire (APEHQ) - Eating Habits Subscore7 change in score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.3
Other Pre-specified

Pre to Post Appetite Changes by the Appetite and Eating Habit Questionnaire (APEHQ) - Food Preference Subscore

A survey about changes in eating behaviors. The sum of frequency times severity of food preference related questions is the score for this portion. Caregivers of participant are asked to fill this survey out Range: 0-84. Higher scores indicate a greater change in food preferences that produces conflict or embarrassment.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Insulin (Novolin-R)Pre to Post Appetite Changes by the Appetite and Eating Habit Questionnaire (APEHQ) - Food Preference Subscore2.67 change in score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.62
Other Pre-specified

Pre to Post Appetite Changes by the Appetite and Eating Habit Questionnaire (APEHQ) - Other Oral Behaviors Subscore

A survey about changes in eating behaviors. The sum of frequency times severity of other oral behavior related questions is the score for this portion. Caregivers of participant are asked to fill this survey out Range: 0-60. Higher scores indicate a greater changes that produces conflict or embarrassment.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Insulin (Novolin-R)Pre to Post Appetite Changes by the Appetite and Eating Habit Questionnaire (APEHQ) - Other Oral Behaviors Subscore0.33 change in score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.51
Other Pre-specified

Pre to Post Appetite Changes by the Appetite and Eating Habit Questionnaire (APEHQ) - Swallowing Subscore

A survey about changes in eating behaviors. The sum of frequency times severity of swallowing related questions is the score for this portion. Caregivers of participant are asked to fill this survey out. Range: 0-96. Higher scores indicate higher difficulty swallowing that produces conflict or embarrassment.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Insulin (Novolin-R)Pre to Post Appetite Changes by the Appetite and Eating Habit Questionnaire (APEHQ) - Swallowing Subscore0.67 change in score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
Other Pre-specified

Pre to Post Inhibition by EXAMINER - Flanker

Participants are asked to choose the direction of one the center arrow in a group 5 arrows. Range: 0- 10. This is a global score that combines accuracy and reaction time. A higher score indicates better performance.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Insulin (Novolin-R)Pre to Post Inhibition by EXAMINER - Flanker-0.145 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
Other Pre-specified

Pre to Post Inhibition by EXAMINER - Set Shifting

Participants are asked to match stimulus on different parts of a tablet screen. Range: 0- 10. This is a global score that combines accuracy and reaction time. A higher score indicates better performance.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Insulin (Novolin-R)Pre to Post Inhibition by EXAMINER - Set Shifting-0.36 change is score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.13
Other Pre-specified

Pre to Post Verbal Fluency Measured by EXAMINER - Animal Fluency

Participants are asked to name as many animals as he/she can in 60 seconds. Scores are totaled as the number of animals verbalized. A higher score indicates better performance.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Insulin (Novolin-R)Pre to Post Verbal Fluency Measured by EXAMINER - Animal Fluency-0.33 named animalsStandard Deviation 3.21
Other Pre-specified

Pre to Post Working Memory Measured by EXAMINER - Dot Counting

Dot counting measures verbal working memory. Participants are asked to count colored shapes on a tables and remember the final total over 6 trials. Scores are totaled as the number of correct answers or the number of answers recalled. Range: 0-27. A higher score indicates better performance.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Insulin (Novolin-R)Pre to Post Working Memory Measured by EXAMINER - Dot Counting6.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.06

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026