Pulpitis
Conditions
Keywords
Pulpotomy
Brief summary
In this study, 120 primary molar teeth from healthy children aged between 5 and 9 and who apply to Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry will be subjected to pulpotomy treatments. After proper diagnosis of coronal pulpitis, the teeth will be assigned randomly to one of the 3 groups: 40 primary molars for formocresol (FC) pulpotomy treatments, 40 primary molars for ferric sulfate (FS) treatments and 40 primary molars for 0.5% hyaluronic acid gel (HA) pulpotomy treatments. The tooth decay will be removed, the pulp will be amputated from the chamber of the pulp with a sharp excavator and one of the medicament will be applied to the orifice of the root canals. The cavity will be sealed tight with zinc oxide cement, and the primary molars will be restored with a composite filling material or with a stainless steel crown (SSC). A single investigator will perform the procedure. The teeth will be followed clinically and radiographically at 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th months.
Detailed description
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of the materials used in pulpotomies, and to evaluate the success of hyaluronic gel over the formocresol and/or ferric sulfate considered as the gold standard for this type of treatment. Pulpotomy is an endodontic treatment method aiming to maintain primary molar affected from deep caries and acute pulpitis by removing the effected pulpal tissue, leaving the remaining root canal pulp and maintaining its vitality and function until the tooth exfoliates physiologically. In order to remain canals intact and uninflamed various dental materials are used according to treatment purposes; categorized into three groups as devitalizing, preventive and regenerative treatment. 1. Devitalization: Formocresol, Glutaraldehyde, Electro-surgery 2. Protective: Ferric Sulfate, Calcium Hydroxide, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Lasers 3. Regenerative: Bone Morphogenetic Protein, Enriched Collagen The ideal agent or method for pulpotomy treatment of the primary teeth has not been determined yet but the earliest method of diluted formocresol is considered by many the gold standard. Formocresol is a strong strain that fixes living tissues. It contains formaldehyde gas, organic structures, dentin channels and narrow side channels until the bacteria are also fixed. 10% formalin solution (14% formaldehyde) is used as a tissue fixative. Ferric Sulfate an other material for pulpotomy is used in dentistry mainly as a hemostatic agent. It has several advantages over formocresol such as non-mutagenic property and keeping root canal pulp vital. Hyaluronic acid gel, which is a new product as a pulpotomy material, has been used in dentistry as well as medicine for many years. It is distributed widely in epithelial and connective tissues. Medical uses include joint treatments, skin lotions for atopic dermatitis, cosmetic surgery etc. In dentistry, gingivitis, teething, dental surgery including implants and sinus lifting procedures and oral ulcers are main target for hyaluronic acid treatment. This study extends the use of hyaluronic acid to primary tooth endodontics. In this study, 120 primary molar teeth from healthy children aged between 5 and 9 and who apply to Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Pediatric Dentistry will be subjected to pulpotomy treatments. Sample size calculation showed that at first 40 teeth in each group will be required to detect a significant difference (80% power, two-sided 5% significance level). Ethical approval of the study was taken from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Dentistry at Marmara University (No: 2019/288) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The patients' family will be given information about the pros and cons of the study on the relevant teeth and then a written consent will be obtained. Patients will be selected for this study according to the following criteria: 1. Children who have good cooperation, do not require general anesthesia or sedation, and who do not have any systemic disease, allergic reactions, or any use of medications. 2. No spontaneous, continuous pain in the tooth, no pathological or physiological mobility, no abscess and/or fistula, no tenderness to palpation or percussion. 3. The tooth can be restored with a stainless steel crown (SSC) or a composite filling material after treatment. 4. The physiological resorption in the tooth root not exceeding 1/3. 5. No pathological resorption in the tooth root canals internally and/or externally, no radiolucency in the periapical or furcation regions, no enlargement of periodontal ligaments. Exclusion criteria: 1. Children who have any disorders, spontaneous pain, no restorable primary molars, may exfoliate soon and teeth with apical periodontitis, pulp necrosis, abscess, fistula, swelling or mobility. 2. Families who are not willing to join the study. After proper diagnosis of coronal pulpitis, local anesthesia is administrated, the teeth will be assigned randomly to one of the 3 groups: 40 primary molars for formocresol pulpotomy treatments, 40 primary molars for ferric sulfate treatments and 40 primary molars for 0.5% hyaluronic acid gel pulpotomy treatments. The tooth decay is removed, the roof of the pulp chamber is removed by joining the pulp horns with a bur cut. The coronal pulp is amputated from the chamber of the pulp with a sharp excavator and one or more cotton pellets is placed over the site and pressure is applied. When the hemostasis is insured, one of the medicament is applied to the orifice of the root canals. The cavity will be sealed tight with zinc oxide eugenol cement. The primary molars were restored either with a stainless-steel crown in case of proximal cavities or with a composite filling material in case of occlusal cavities. A single pediatric dentist will perform whole pulpotomy treatments and restorations of all selected teeth. The teeth will be followed clinically and radiographically at 1, 3, 6, 12 months. The teeth will be evaluated clinically and radiographically according to the following criteria: 1. Clinical criteria: Spontaneous pain, tenderness to percussion and/or palpation, pathological mobility and abscess or fistula. 2. Radiographic criteria: Periapical or furcal radiolucency, internal or external root resorption, loss of lamina dura. All evaluations will be performed by two calibrated pediatric dentists. The performing dentist will not be blinded to the treatment materials but the patient and two examiners who evaluated clinical and radiographic findings will be blinded to the treatment.
Interventions
Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crowns and composite filling material.
Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crowns and composite filling material.
Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crowns and composite filling material.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* No systemic disease, * No pathological mobility and/or resorption of the tooth, * No pain and/or abscess, * Parents volunteering, * The patients are between 5-9 years old.
Exclusion criteria
* Systemic disease, * Pathological mobility and resorption of the tooth, * Pain and/or abscess, * Non voluntary, * The patients aren't between 5-9 years old.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups | Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups | Radiographic evaluation for any periapical or bifurcal lesion, cyst formation or obliteration |
| Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups | Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups | Sensitivity to biting, chewing and clinically to the percussion by a probe |
| Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups | Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups | Mobility of the treated tooth and/or the tooth is sensitive to the vibration |
| Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups | Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups | Any pain history at that time frame and/or complaint of discomfort and pain clinically |
| Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups | Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups | Any sign of chronic pulpitis, redness or swelling of the gingiva and/or fistula at that time frame and clinically |
| Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups | Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups | The tooth is missing or ready to exfoliate physiologically and no pathology is examined |
| Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups | Internal, external, early or physiological root resorption from periapical/panoramic radiographs |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Restoration Stability | Change from Baseline at 1 month | The survival rate of stainless steel crown and composite applied to each pulpotomized tooth |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The first participant was enrolled in May 2019 and the last participant was enrolled in September 2019. No important changes in methods or selection criteria have been done. 1st, 3rd and 6th months assessments were made without complications but 1-year examination had some face to face problems with the Covid-19 pandemics. So some final examinations and patient comforts had been done via phone and/or online connections.
Pre-assignment details
The study was initially carried out on 136 primary molars of 47 children. Three children (2 boys, 1 girl) did not show up in any recalls, so the study was performed in 130 primary molars.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar.
Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crowns (SSC) and composite filling material. | 34 |
| Hyaluronic Acid Gengigel teething (%0,54 hyaluronic acid), 0,1ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar.
Hyaluronic acid: Gengigel teething: Applying of 0,54% hyaluronic acid for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crowns (SSC) and composite filling material. | 51 |
| Formocresol 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar
Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crowns (SSC) and composite filling material. | 33 |
| Formocresol 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar
Formocresol Buckley formula: Formacresol: Applying of 1/5 diluted formocresol for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crowns (SSC) and composite filling material. | 40 |
| Ferric Sulfate 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar
Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crowns (SSC) and composite filling material. | 34 |
| Ferric Sulfate 0,1 ml to the orifice of the root canals of the primary molar
Ferric sulfate: ViscoStat: Applying of 20% ferric sulfate for one minute to the orifice of root canals of the primary molars, then sealing the chamber with zinc oxide eugenol cement and completing the restoration with stainless steel crowns (SSC) and composite filling material. | 39 |
| Total | 231 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | exfoliation | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Formocresol | Hyaluronic Acid | Ferric Sulfate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 101 Participants | 33 Participants | 34 Participants | 34 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 6.71 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.015 | 6.83 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.98 | 6.65 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.99 | 6.67 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.08 |
| Dental Arch Lower Arch | 65 tooth | 18 tooth | 23 tooth | 24 tooth |
| Dental Arch Upper Arch | 65 tooth | 22 tooth | 28 tooth | 15 tooth |
| Dental Arch/Tooth Type Mandibular 1st primary molars | 40 tooth | 11 tooth | 14 tooth | 15 tooth |
| Dental Arch/Tooth Type Mandibular 2nd primary molars | 25 tooth | 7 tooth | 9 tooth | 9 tooth |
| Dental Arch/Tooth Type Maxillary 1st primary molars | 27 tooth | 9 tooth | 11 tooth | 7 tooth |
| Dental Arch/Tooth Type Maxillary 2nd primary molars | 38 tooth | 13 tooth | 17 tooth | 8 tooth |
| Final Restoration Composite | 41 tooth | 12 tooth | 18 tooth | 11 tooth |
| Final Restoration SSC | 89 tooth | 28 tooth | 33 tooth | 28 tooth |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | 0 Participants | — | — | — |
| Region of Enrollment Turkey | 101 Participants | 33 Participants | 34 Participants | 34 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 80 tooth | 25 tooth | 32 tooth | 23 tooth |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 50 tooth | 15 tooth | 19 tooth | 16 tooth |
| Tooth Type 1st primary molars | 67 tooth | 20 tooth | 25 tooth | 22 tooth |
| Tooth Type 2nd primary molars | 63 tooth | 20 tooth | 26 tooth | 17 tooth |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 34 | 0 / 33 | 0 / 34 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 34 | 0 / 33 | 0 / 34 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 34 | 0 / 33 | 0 / 34 |
Outcome results
Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups
Mobility of the treated tooth and/or the tooth is sensitive to the vibration
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups | 1 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups
Mobility of the treated tooth and/or the tooth is sensitive to the vibration
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 3 month in 3 groups
Population: 1 tooth extracted from HA group
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups | 1 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups | 1 teeth |
Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups
Mobility of the treated tooth and/or the tooth is sensitive to the vibration
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 6 month in 3 groups
Population: 1 tooth exfoliated from FS group (1 participant ) so 1 child and 1 tooth is reduced from FS group
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups | 3 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups | 2 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups | 1 teeth |
Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups
Mobility of the treated tooth and/or the tooth is sensitive to the vibration
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups
Population: 2 teeth exfoliated from HA group (not participants) so 50 teeth reduced to 48 teeth but participants still exist
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups | 4 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups | 4 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Mobile Teeth in 3 Groups | 3 teeth |
Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups
Sensitivity to biting, chewing and clinically to the percussion by a probe
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups
Population: 2 teeth exfoliated from HA group (not participants) so number of teeth reduced from 50 to 48
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups | 2 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups | 6 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups | 2 teeth |
Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups
Sensitivity to biting, chewing and clinically to the percussion by a probe
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups
Population: 1 tooth exfoliated in FS group and 1 participant so no observation for 1 tooth and 1 participant in FS
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups | 11 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups | 8 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups | 3 teeth |
Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups
Sensitivity to biting, chewing and clinically to the percussion by a probe
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups
Population: 1 tooth is extracted in HA group so 50 teeth are evaluated
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups | 10 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups | 8 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups | 3 teeth |
Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups
Sensitivity to biting, chewing and clinically to the percussion by a probe
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups | 7 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups | 6 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth Sensitive to Percussion in 3 Groups | 3 teeth |
Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups
Radiographic evaluation for any periapical or bifurcal lesion, cyst formation or obliteration
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups
Population: 1 tooth is extracted in HA group so 1 tooth is reduced but not participant
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups | 7 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups | 3 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups | 3 teeth |
Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups
Radiographic evaluation for any periapical or bifurcal lesion, cyst formation or obliteration
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups
Population: 1 tooth exfoliated in FS group so 1 tooth and 1 participant are not evaluated in FS group
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups | 4 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups | 4 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups | 3 teeth |
Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups
Radiographic evaluation for any periapical or bifurcal lesion, cyst formation or obliteration
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups
Population: 6 participants, 12 teeth missing for xrays, 2 exfoliations from HA group; 7 participants, 8 teeth missing for xrays from FC group; 7 participants, 7 teeth missing for xrays from FS group
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups | 4 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups | 4 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups | 2 teeth |
Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups
Radiographic evaluation for any periapical or bifurcal lesion, cyst formation or obliteration
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups | 3 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups | 1 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Any Root Lesion From Radiography in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups
Any sign of chronic pulpitis, redness or swelling of the gingiva and/or fistula at that time frame and clinically
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups
Any sign of chronic pulpitis, redness or swelling of the gingiva and/or fistula at that time frame and clinically
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups | 1 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups
Any sign of chronic pulpitis, redness or swelling of the gingiva and/or fistula at that time frame and clinically
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups
Population: 1 tooth exfoliated in FS group so 1 tooth and 1 participant are reduced in FS group
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups
Any sign of chronic pulpitis, redness or swelling of the gingiva and/or fistula at that time frame and clinically
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 12 months
Population: 2 teeth exfoliated from HA group so number of teeth reduced from 50 to 48 but participants are same
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Dental Abscess in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups
Any pain history at that time frame and/or complaint of discomfort and pain clinically
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups
Population: 2 teeth exfoliated in HA group so 50 teeth reduced to 48 but no participant is reduced
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups
Any pain history at that time frame and/or complaint of discomfort and pain clinically
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups
Population: 1 tooth exfoliated (one participant) so 1 tooth and 1 participant are reduced from FS group
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups
Any pain history at that time frame and/or complaint of discomfort and pain clinically
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups
Population: 1 tooth extracted from HA group
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups
Any pain history at that time frame and/or complaint of discomfort and pain clinically
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups | 1 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Patient Discomfort and/or Pain in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups
Internal, external, early or physiological root resorption from periapical/panoramic radiographs
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Periapical resorption | 1 teeth |
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Internal resorption | 6 teeth |
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | External resorption | 1 teeth |
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | No resorption | 43 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | No resorption | 35 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Periapical resorption | 1 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | External resorption | 0 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Internal resorption | 4 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | No resorption | 35 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Internal resorption | 1 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | External resorption | 1 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Periapical resorption | 2 teeth |
Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups
Internal, external, early or physiological root resorption from periapical/panoramic radiographs
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups
Population: 1 tooth extracted in HA group
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Periapical resorption | 2 teeth |
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Internal resorption | 9 teeth |
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | External resorption | 6 teeth |
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | No resorption | 33 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | No resorption | 25 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Periapical resorption | 3 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | External resorption | 1 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Internal resorption | 11 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | No resorption | 26 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Internal resorption | 6 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | External resorption | 3 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Periapical resorption | 4 teeth |
Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups
Internal, external, early or physiological root resorption from periapical/panoramic radiographs
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 6 months
Population: 1 tooth exfoliated from FS group so 1 tooth and 1 participant reduced in FS group
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Periapical resorption | 7 teeth |
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Internal resorption | 11 teeth |
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | External resorption | 5 teeth |
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | No resorption | 27 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | No resorption | 18 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Periapical resorption | 5 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | External resorption | 5 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Internal resorption | 12 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | No resorption | 18 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Internal resorption | 10 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | External resorption | 5 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Periapical resorption | 5 teeth |
Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups
Internal, external, early or physiological root resorption from periapical/panoramic radiographs
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 12 months
Population: 6 participants, 12 teeth missing for xrays, 2 exfoliations from HA group; 7 participants, 8 teeth missing for xrays from FC group; 7 participants, 7 teeth missing for xrays from FS group
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Periapical resorption | 12 teeth |
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Internal resorption | 11 teeth |
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | External resorption | 7 teeth |
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | No resorption | 5 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | No resorption | 10 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Periapical resorption | 8 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | External resorption | 6 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Internal resorption | 8 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | No resorption | 6 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Internal resorption | 5 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | External resorption | 5 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of Teeth With Root Resorption in 3 Groups | Periapical resorption | 15 teeth |
Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups
The tooth is missing or ready to exfoliate physiologically and no pathology is examined
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month in 3 groups
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups
The tooth is missing or ready to exfoliate physiologically and no pathology is examined
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 3 months in 3 groups
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups | 1 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups
The tooth is missing or ready to exfoliate physiologically and no pathology is examined
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 6 months in 3 groups
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups | 1 teeth |
Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups
The tooth is missing or ready to exfoliate physiologically and no pathology is examined
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 12 months in 3 groups
Population: 2 exfoliations in HA group are shown here
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups | 2 teeth |
| Formocresol | Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Number of the Pathological Exfoliation of Affected Teeth in 3 Groups | 0 teeth |
Restoration Stability
The survival rate of stainless steel crown and composite applied to each pulpotomized tooth
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 month
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Restoration Stability | Stainless steel crown | 33 teeth |
| Hyaluronic Acid | Restoration Stability | Composite | 18 teeth |
| Formocresol | Restoration Stability | Stainless steel crown | 28 teeth |
| Formocresol | Restoration Stability | Composite | 12 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Restoration Stability | Stainless steel crown | 28 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Restoration Stability | Composite | 11 teeth |
Restoration Stability
The survival rate of stainless steel crown and composite applied to each pulpotomized tooth
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 3 months
Population: 1 tooth extracted from HA group so reduced to 50 teeth but no participant reduction
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Restoration Stability | Stainless steel crown | 32 teeth |
| Hyaluronic Acid | Restoration Stability | Composite | 18 teeth |
| Formocresol | Restoration Stability | Stainless steel crown | 28 teeth |
| Formocresol | Restoration Stability | Composite | 12 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Restoration Stability | Stainless steel crown | 28 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Restoration Stability | Composite | 11 teeth |
Restoration Stability
The survival rate of stainless steel crown and composite applied to each pulpotomized tooth
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 6 months
Population: 1 tooth exfoliated from FS group so 1 tooth and 1 participant reduced from FS group
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Restoration Stability | Stainless steel crown | 32 teeth |
| Hyaluronic Acid | Restoration Stability | Composite | 18 teeth |
| Formocresol | Restoration Stability | Composite | 12 teeth |
| Formocresol | Restoration Stability | Stainless steel crown | 28 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Restoration Stability | Composite | 11 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Restoration Stability | Stainless steel crown | 27 teeth |
Restoration Stability
The survival rate of stainless steel crown and composite applied to each pulpotomized tooth
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 12 months
Population: 2 teeth exfoliated from HA group so 50 teeth reduced to 48 teeth in HA group
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_UNITS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyaluronic Acid | Restoration Stability | Stainless steel crown | 31 teeth |
| Hyaluronic Acid | Restoration Stability | Composite | 17 teeth |
| Formocresol | Restoration Stability | Stainless steel crown | 28 teeth |
| Formocresol | Restoration Stability | Composite | 12 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Restoration Stability | Stainless steel crown | 27 teeth |
| Ferric Sulfate | Restoration Stability | Composite | 11 teeth |