Skip to content

Physiological Flow of Liquids in Healthy Swallowing

Physiological Flow of Liquids in Healthy Swallowing

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04114617
Enrollment
80
Registered
2019-10-03
Start date
2016-01-01
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2022-12-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aging, Deglutition, Healthy Swallowing

Keywords

Swallowing, Deglutition

Brief summary

Thickened liquids are commonly used as an intervention for people with dysphagia (swallowing impairment). However, the field currently lacks a proper understanding of how this intervention works. The overall goal of the project is to collect measurements of bolus flow through the oropharynx (i.e., mouth and throat) during swallowing. The factors that are expected to influence bolus flow include the liquid/food consistency (i.e., thin, slightly-thick, mildly-thick, moderately-thick, extremely thick, solid) and the forces applied during swallowing (i.e., tongue pressures and swallowing muscle contraction). The objective is to determine how these factors interact to influence the flow of a bolus through the oropharynx in healthy swallowing.

Detailed description

The aims of this study are as follows: Aim 1: To determine the relationship between bolus flow and healthy swallowing physiology. The investigators will collect concurrent videofluoroscopic and physiological measures of swallowing (tongue pressure, electromyography \[sEMG\]) in healthy adults using barium stimuli across the continuum of liquid consistency (thin, slightly thick, mildly thick, moderately thick and extremely thick liquids, as defined by the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative, www.iddsi.org). Significance: This will show the impact of consistency on bolus flow through the oropharynx, controlling for the forces used to initiate flow and propel the bolus. Aim 2: To compare healthy swallowing physiology for barium versus non-barium stimuli. The investigators will collect physiological measures of swallowing using barium and non-barium stimuli matched for consistency. Significance: This will determine how swallowing behaviors (tongue pressures, sEMG) differ between barium and non-barium stimuli with matched consistency, enabling us to develop models of flow accounting for these differences. Aim 3: To compare healthy swallowing physiology across different commercial barium products. Significance: This will determine whether differences in barium concentration or brand influence swallowing behaviors, enabling us to make recommendations regarding ideal contrast agents for use in radiographic swallowing assessment.

Interventions

OTHERStarch-thickened liquids

Thickener added in amounts required to reach slightly thick, mildly thick, moderately thick and extremely thick consistencies, as defined by the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative flow test.

Thickener added in amounts required to reach slightly thick, mildly thick, moderately thick and extremely thick consistencies, as defined by the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative flow test.

COMBINATION_PRODUCTBarium concentration

Commercially available barium products diluted to different concentrations (i.e., 20% w/v, 40% w/v) through the addition of water

Sponsors

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
CollaboratorNIH
University Health Network, Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

\- healthy adults

Exclusion criteria

* prior history of swallowing, motor speech, gastro-esophageal or neurological difficulties, chronic sinusitis or taste disturbance * history of surgery to the speech or swallowing apparatus (other than routine tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy) * Type 1 Diabetes * cognitive communication difficulties that may hinder comprehension of the study documents * known allergies to latex, food coloring or dental glue * current pregnancy * recent x-ray to the neck (in the past 6 months) * occupationally exposure to radiation exceeding 10 milliSieverts in the year

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diameter of Upper Esophageal Sphincter OpeningBaseline (single timepoint only)During swallowing, the upper esophageal sphincter opens to allow the bolus to move from the pharynx into the esophagus. Narrow opening of the sphincter may obstruct bolus flow. We measured the degree (diameter) of upper esophageal sphincter opening on the frame of maximum distension. Line measurements were made in Image J software. This line measure was then divided by the length of the C2-C4 cervical spine. This cervical spine scalar provides a common anatomical reference that is a proxy for pharyngeal size, enabling the comparison of constriction across different people with different neck length and pharynx size. We report median values and 97.5% confidence intervals for pharyngeal constriction by consistency (thin, slightly thick, mildly thick, moderately thick and extremely thick liquid).
Pharyngeal Area at RestSingle timepoint (baseline only)The area of the pharynx was measured, in pixels (using ImageJ software), on a lateral view videofluoroscopic image showing the pharynx at rest. The resulting area measure was then divided by the squared length of the C2-C4 cervical spine. This cervical spine scalar provides a common anatomical reference that is a proxy for pharyngeal size, enabling the comparison of pharyngeal size across different people with different neck length. Larger pharyngeal area measures may reflect atrophy of the pharyngeal muscles while smaller pharyngeal area may reflect narrowing due to edema.We report median values and 97.5% confidence intervals for pharyngeal area.
Number of Participants With Unsafe SwallowingBaseline (single timepoint only)Swallowing safety was measured using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale, an 8-point categorical scale which captures the depth to which any material enters the airway and whether or not the material is ejected. Levels 1 and 2 on the scale are considered safe, while levels \> 2 are considered unsafe. Actual scale scores (1-8) will be recorded and then converted to binary categorical scores (\< 3 vs \>/= 3). We will report the frequency (count) of participants showing scores \> 2 by bolus consistency.
Amount of Residue in the PharynxBaseline (single timepoint only)Residue is material remaining behind in the pharynx after the swallow. We measured residue by tracing the area of barium visible on a lateral view x-ray (in pixels, using ImageJ software) and dividing that area by the squared length C2-C4 cervical spine. This cervical spine scalar provides a common anatomical reference that is a proxy for pharyngeal size, and enables the comparison of residue severity across different people with different neck length and pharynx size. In healthy swallowing, residue is expected to be minimal. We report median values and 97.5% confidence intervals for amount of residue by consistency (thin, slightly thick, mildly thick, moderately thick and extremely thick liquids).
Number of Participants Displaying More Than 2 Swallows Per BolusBaseline (single timepoint only)The number of swallows needed to clear a single bolus will be counted. 1-2 swallows is considered efficient, while \> 2 for a single bolus is considered inefficient. We report the frequency (count) of participants displaying \> 2 swallows per bolus by consistency.
Duration of the Time Interval Between the Bolus Entering the Pharynx and Onset of the Pharyngeal Swallow (Swallow Reaction Time)Baseline (single timepoint only)The time interval between the first frame showing the bolus entering the pharynx (passing the ramus of the mandible) and the first frame showing onset of the hyoid burst movement in swallowing, calculated in milliseconds. We report median values and 97.5% confidence intervals for each bolus consistency (thin, slightly thick, mildly thick, moderately thick and extremely thick liquid barium). Longer time intervals reflect delays in initiating the pharyngeal swallow.
Duration of the Time Interval Between Onset of the Hyoid Burst and Opening of the Upper Esophageal SphincterBaseline (single timepoint only)The time interval between the first frame showing onset of the hyoid burst movement in swallowing and the first frame showing opening of the upper esophageal sphincter, calculated in milliseconds. We report median values and 97.5% confidence intervals for each bolus consistency (thin, slightly thick, mildly thick, moderately thick and extremely thick liquid barium). Longer time intervals reflect a delay in opening of the upper esophageal sphincter.
Duration of Upper Esophageal Sphincter OpeningBaseline (single timepoint only)The time interval between the first frame showing opening of the upper esophageal sphincter and the first subsequent frame showing closure of the upper esophageal sphincter behind the tail of the bolus, calculated (in milliseconds). We report median values and 97.5% confidence intervals for each bolus consistency (thin, slightly thick, mildly thick, moderately thick and extremely thick liquid barium). Shorter durations of upper esophageal sphincter opening reflect inadequate durations of opening to allow material to pass through the sphincter from the pharynx into the esophagus.
Duration of the Time Interval Between Onset of the Pharyngeal Swallow and Closure of the Entrance to the Airway (Time-to-Laryngeal-Vestibule-Closure)Baseline (single timepoint only)The time interval between the first frame showing onset of the hyoid burst movement in swallowing and the first frame showing closure of the laryngeal vestibule, calculated in milliseconds. We report median values and 97.5% confidence intervals for each bolus consistency (thin, slightly thick, mildly thick, moderately thick and extremely thick liquid barium). Longer time intervals reflect delays in achieving airway closure.
Laryngeal Vestibule Closure DurationBaseline (single timepoint only)The time interval between the first frame showing closure of the entrance to the airway (laryngeal vestibule closure onset) and the first subsequent frame showing opening of the entrance to the airway (laryngeal vestibule closure offset) calculated in milliseconds. We report median values and 97.5% confidence intervals for each bolus consistency (thin, slightly thick, mildly thick, moderately thick and extremely thick liquid barium). Shorter durations of laryngeal vestibule closure reflect premature termination of airway protection.
Degree of Pharyngeal ConstrictionBaseline (single timepoint only)During swallowing, the muscles of the pharynx contract to achieve constriction (closure) of the pharynx behind the bolus. The squeezing and pressure generated by this action help to move the bolus downwards through the pharynx. We measured the degree of pharyngeal constriction by identifying the frame of greatest pharyngeal constriction, and tracing the area of any unobliterated pharyngeal space on lateral view x-ray (in pixels, using ImageJ software). The resulting area measure was then divided by the squared length of the C2-C4 cervical spine. This cervical spine scalar provides a common anatomical reference that is a proxy for pharyngeal size, enabling the comparison of constriction across different people with different neck length and pharynx size. In healthy swallowing, constriction is expected to be complete, with larger measures reflecting incomplete or poor constriction. We report median values and 97.5% confidence intervals for pharyngeal constriction by consistency.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Amplitude of Tongue-Palate PressureBaseline (single timepoint only)During swallowing, the tongue rises to contact the hard palate, generating pressure that squeezes the bolus backwards through the mouth towards the pharynx. The amplitude of tongue-palate pressure were measured continuously throughout swallowing using the KayPentax Digital Swallow Workstation Swallowing Signals Lab 3-bulb tongue pressure array, and the highest (peak) pressure was identified for each swallow. We will report mean values and standard error for peak pressure by bolus consistency (thin, slightly thick, mildly thick and moderately thick liquid). Higher amplitudes of pressure represent greater force for bolus propulsion.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Healthy Adults
Healthy adults aged 18-82.
80
Total80

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHealthy Adults
Age, Continuous46 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
77 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
61 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
80 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
38 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 80
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80

Outcome results

Primary

Amount of Residue in the Pharynx

Residue is material remaining behind in the pharynx after the swallow. We measured residue by tracing the area of barium visible on a lateral view x-ray (in pixels, using ImageJ software) and dividing that area by the squared length C2-C4 cervical spine. This cervical spine scalar provides a common anatomical reference that is a proxy for pharyngeal size, and enables the comparison of residue severity across different people with different neck length and pharynx size. In healthy swallowing, residue is expected to be minimal. We report median values and 97.5% confidence intervals for amount of residue by consistency (thin, slightly thick, mildly thick, moderately thick and extremely thick liquids).

Time frame: Baseline (single timepoint only)

Population: A sample of 80 adults was enrolled. Due to data quality issues, data were missing for 4 participants for thin liquid barium and for 3 participants for the remaining consistencies.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Thin Liquid BariumAmount of Residue in the Pharynx0.2 % of the (C2-4)squared scalar reference
Slightly Thick Liquid BariumAmount of Residue in the Pharynx0.3 % of the (C2-4)squared scalar reference
Mildly Thick Liquid BariumAmount of Residue in the Pharynx0.6 % of the (C2-4)squared scalar reference
Moderately Thick Liquid BariumAmount of Residue in the Pharynx0.2 % of the (C2-4)squared scalar reference
Extremely Thick Liquid BariumAmount of Residue in the Pharynx0.1 % of the (C2-4)squared scalar reference
Primary

Degree of Pharyngeal Constriction

During swallowing, the muscles of the pharynx contract to achieve constriction (closure) of the pharynx behind the bolus. The squeezing and pressure generated by this action help to move the bolus downwards through the pharynx. We measured the degree of pharyngeal constriction by identifying the frame of greatest pharyngeal constriction, and tracing the area of any unobliterated pharyngeal space on lateral view x-ray (in pixels, using ImageJ software). The resulting area measure was then divided by the squared length of the C2-C4 cervical spine. This cervical spine scalar provides a common anatomical reference that is a proxy for pharyngeal size, enabling the comparison of constriction across different people with different neck length and pharynx size. In healthy swallowing, constriction is expected to be complete, with larger measures reflecting incomplete or poor constriction. We report median values and 97.5% confidence intervals for pharyngeal constriction by consistency.

Time frame: Baseline (single timepoint only)

Population: A sample of 80 adults was enrolled. Due to data quality issues, data were missing for thin liquid in 4 participants, and for the remaining consistencies in 3 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Thin Liquid BariumDegree of Pharyngeal Constriction1 % squared C2-C4 cervical spine length
Slightly Thick Liquid BariumDegree of Pharyngeal Constriction1.2 % squared C2-C4 cervical spine length
Mildly Thick Liquid BariumDegree of Pharyngeal Constriction1.2 % squared C2-C4 cervical spine length
Moderately Thick Liquid BariumDegree of Pharyngeal Constriction0.7 % squared C2-C4 cervical spine length
Extremely Thick Liquid BariumDegree of Pharyngeal Constriction0.2 % squared C2-C4 cervical spine length
Primary

Diameter of Upper Esophageal Sphincter Opening

During swallowing, the upper esophageal sphincter opens to allow the bolus to move from the pharynx into the esophagus. Narrow opening of the sphincter may obstruct bolus flow. We measured the degree (diameter) of upper esophageal sphincter opening on the frame of maximum distension. Line measurements were made in Image J software. This line measure was then divided by the length of the C2-C4 cervical spine. This cervical spine scalar provides a common anatomical reference that is a proxy for pharyngeal size, enabling the comparison of constriction across different people with different neck length and pharynx size. We report median values and 97.5% confidence intervals for pharyngeal constriction by consistency (thin, slightly thick, mildly thick, moderately thick and extremely thick liquid).

Time frame: Baseline (single timepoint only)

Population: A sample of 80 adults was enrolled. Due to data quality issues, data for thin liquid were missing for 4 participants, and for 3 participants on the remaining consistencies.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Thin Liquid BariumDiameter of Upper Esophageal Sphincter Opening21 % of the C2-C4 Cervical Spine Scalar
Slightly Thick Liquid BariumDiameter of Upper Esophageal Sphincter Opening19 % of the C2-C4 Cervical Spine Scalar
Mildly Thick Liquid BariumDiameter of Upper Esophageal Sphincter Opening19 % of the C2-C4 Cervical Spine Scalar
Moderately Thick Liquid BariumDiameter of Upper Esophageal Sphincter Opening15 % of the C2-C4 Cervical Spine Scalar
Extremely Thick Liquid BariumDiameter of Upper Esophageal Sphincter Opening16 % of the C2-C4 Cervical Spine Scalar
Primary

Duration of the Time Interval Between Onset of the Hyoid Burst and Opening of the Upper Esophageal Sphincter

The time interval between the first frame showing onset of the hyoid burst movement in swallowing and the first frame showing opening of the upper esophageal sphincter, calculated in milliseconds. We report median values and 97.5% confidence intervals for each bolus consistency (thin, slightly thick, mildly thick, moderately thick and extremely thick liquid barium). Longer time intervals reflect a delay in opening of the upper esophageal sphincter.

Time frame: Baseline (single timepoint only)

Population: A sample of 80 adults was enrolled. Due to data quality issues, data were missing for 4 participants on thin liquid and for 3 participants on the remaining consistencies.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Thin Liquid BariumDuration of the Time Interval Between Onset of the Hyoid Burst and Opening of the Upper Esophageal Sphincter100 milliseconds
Slightly Thick Liquid BariumDuration of the Time Interval Between Onset of the Hyoid Burst and Opening of the Upper Esophageal Sphincter133 milliseconds
Mildly Thick Liquid BariumDuration of the Time Interval Between Onset of the Hyoid Burst and Opening of the Upper Esophageal Sphincter133 milliseconds
Moderately Thick Liquid BariumDuration of the Time Interval Between Onset of the Hyoid Burst and Opening of the Upper Esophageal Sphincter167 milliseconds
Extremely Thick Liquid BariumDuration of the Time Interval Between Onset of the Hyoid Burst and Opening of the Upper Esophageal Sphincter167 milliseconds
Primary

Duration of the Time Interval Between Onset of the Pharyngeal Swallow and Closure of the Entrance to the Airway (Time-to-Laryngeal-Vestibule-Closure)

The time interval between the first frame showing onset of the hyoid burst movement in swallowing and the first frame showing closure of the laryngeal vestibule, calculated in milliseconds. We report median values and 97.5% confidence intervals for each bolus consistency (thin, slightly thick, mildly thick, moderately thick and extremely thick liquid barium). Longer time intervals reflect delays in achieving airway closure.

Time frame: Baseline (single timepoint only)

Population: A sample of 80 adults was enrolled. Due to data quality issues, data were missing for 4 participants on thin liquid and for 3 participants on the remaining consistencies.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Thin Liquid BariumDuration of the Time Interval Between Onset of the Pharyngeal Swallow and Closure of the Entrance to the Airway (Time-to-Laryngeal-Vestibule-Closure)133 milliseconds
Slightly Thick Liquid BariumDuration of the Time Interval Between Onset of the Pharyngeal Swallow and Closure of the Entrance to the Airway (Time-to-Laryngeal-Vestibule-Closure)133 milliseconds
Mildly Thick Liquid BariumDuration of the Time Interval Between Onset of the Pharyngeal Swallow and Closure of the Entrance to the Airway (Time-to-Laryngeal-Vestibule-Closure)133 milliseconds
Moderately Thick Liquid BariumDuration of the Time Interval Between Onset of the Pharyngeal Swallow and Closure of the Entrance to the Airway (Time-to-Laryngeal-Vestibule-Closure)167 milliseconds
Extremely Thick Liquid BariumDuration of the Time Interval Between Onset of the Pharyngeal Swallow and Closure of the Entrance to the Airway (Time-to-Laryngeal-Vestibule-Closure)133 milliseconds
Primary

Duration of the Time Interval Between the Bolus Entering the Pharynx and Onset of the Pharyngeal Swallow (Swallow Reaction Time)

The time interval between the first frame showing the bolus entering the pharynx (passing the ramus of the mandible) and the first frame showing onset of the hyoid burst movement in swallowing, calculated in milliseconds. We report median values and 97.5% confidence intervals for each bolus consistency (thin, slightly thick, mildly thick, moderately thick and extremely thick liquid barium). Longer time intervals reflect delays in initiating the pharyngeal swallow.

Time frame: Baseline (single timepoint only)

Population: A sample of 80 adults was enrolled. Due to data quality issues, data were missing for 4 participants on thin liquid and for 3 participants on the other consistencies.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Thin Liquid BariumDuration of the Time Interval Between the Bolus Entering the Pharynx and Onset of the Pharyngeal Swallow (Swallow Reaction Time)133 milliseconds
Slightly Thick Liquid BariumDuration of the Time Interval Between the Bolus Entering the Pharynx and Onset of the Pharyngeal Swallow (Swallow Reaction Time)133 milliseconds
Mildly Thick Liquid BariumDuration of the Time Interval Between the Bolus Entering the Pharynx and Onset of the Pharyngeal Swallow (Swallow Reaction Time)167 milliseconds
Moderately Thick Liquid BariumDuration of the Time Interval Between the Bolus Entering the Pharynx and Onset of the Pharyngeal Swallow (Swallow Reaction Time)267 milliseconds
Extremely Thick Liquid BariumDuration of the Time Interval Between the Bolus Entering the Pharynx and Onset of the Pharyngeal Swallow (Swallow Reaction Time)367 milliseconds
Primary

Duration of Upper Esophageal Sphincter Opening

The time interval between the first frame showing opening of the upper esophageal sphincter and the first subsequent frame showing closure of the upper esophageal sphincter behind the tail of the bolus, calculated (in milliseconds). We report median values and 97.5% confidence intervals for each bolus consistency (thin, slightly thick, mildly thick, moderately thick and extremely thick liquid barium). Shorter durations of upper esophageal sphincter opening reflect inadequate durations of opening to allow material to pass through the sphincter from the pharynx into the esophagus.

Time frame: Baseline (single timepoint only)

Population: A sample of 80 adults was enrolled. Due to data quality issues, data were missing for 4 participants on thin liquid and for 3 participants on the remaining consistencies.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Thin Liquid BariumDuration of Upper Esophageal Sphincter Opening467 milliseconds
Slightly Thick Liquid BariumDuration of Upper Esophageal Sphincter Opening467 milliseconds
Mildly Thick Liquid BariumDuration of Upper Esophageal Sphincter Opening467 milliseconds
Moderately Thick Liquid BariumDuration of Upper Esophageal Sphincter Opening400 milliseconds
Extremely Thick Liquid BariumDuration of Upper Esophageal Sphincter Opening400 milliseconds
Primary

Laryngeal Vestibule Closure Duration

The time interval between the first frame showing closure of the entrance to the airway (laryngeal vestibule closure onset) and the first subsequent frame showing opening of the entrance to the airway (laryngeal vestibule closure offset) calculated in milliseconds. We report median values and 97.5% confidence intervals for each bolus consistency (thin, slightly thick, mildly thick, moderately thick and extremely thick liquid barium). Shorter durations of laryngeal vestibule closure reflect premature termination of airway protection.

Time frame: Baseline (single timepoint only)

Population: A sample of 80 adults was enrolled. Due to data quality issues, data were missing for 4 participants for thin liquid and for 3 participants for the remaining consistencies.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Thin Liquid BariumLaryngeal Vestibule Closure Duration467 milliseconds
Slightly Thick Liquid BariumLaryngeal Vestibule Closure Duration467 milliseconds
Mildly Thick Liquid BariumLaryngeal Vestibule Closure Duration467 milliseconds
Moderately Thick Liquid BariumLaryngeal Vestibule Closure Duration434 milliseconds
Extremely Thick Liquid BariumLaryngeal Vestibule Closure Duration434 milliseconds
Primary

Number of Participants Displaying More Than 2 Swallows Per Bolus

The number of swallows needed to clear a single bolus will be counted. 1-2 swallows is considered efficient, while \> 2 for a single bolus is considered inefficient. We report the frequency (count) of participants displaying \> 2 swallows per bolus by consistency.

Time frame: Baseline (single timepoint only)

Population: A sample of 80 adults was enrolled. Due data quality issues, partial data were missing for thin liquid for 4 participants, and for 3 participants for the remaining consistencies.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Thin Liquid BariumNumber of Participants Displaying More Than 2 Swallows Per Bolus6 Participants
Slightly Thick Liquid BariumNumber of Participants Displaying More Than 2 Swallows Per Bolus2 Participants
Mildly Thick Liquid BariumNumber of Participants Displaying More Than 2 Swallows Per Bolus2 Participants
Moderately Thick Liquid BariumNumber of Participants Displaying More Than 2 Swallows Per Bolus3 Participants
Extremely Thick Liquid BariumNumber of Participants Displaying More Than 2 Swallows Per Bolus3 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Unsafe Swallowing

Swallowing safety was measured using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale, an 8-point categorical scale which captures the depth to which any material enters the airway and whether or not the material is ejected. Levels 1 and 2 on the scale are considered safe, while levels \> 2 are considered unsafe. Actual scale scores (1-8) will be recorded and then converted to binary categorical scores (\< 3 vs \>/= 3). We will report the frequency (count) of participants showing scores \> 2 by bolus consistency.

Time frame: Baseline (single timepoint only)

Population: A sample of 80 adults was enrolled. Due data quality issues, partial data were missing for thin liquid for 4 participants, and for 3 participants for the remaining consistencies.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Thin Liquid BariumNumber of Participants With Unsafe Swallowing7 Participants
Slightly Thick Liquid BariumNumber of Participants With Unsafe Swallowing1 Participants
Mildly Thick Liquid BariumNumber of Participants With Unsafe Swallowing3 Participants
Moderately Thick Liquid BariumNumber of Participants With Unsafe Swallowing0 Participants
Extremely Thick Liquid BariumNumber of Participants With Unsafe Swallowing0 Participants
Primary

Pharyngeal Area at Rest

The area of the pharynx was measured, in pixels (using ImageJ software), on a lateral view videofluoroscopic image showing the pharynx at rest. The resulting area measure was then divided by the squared length of the C2-C4 cervical spine. This cervical spine scalar provides a common anatomical reference that is a proxy for pharyngeal size, enabling the comparison of pharyngeal size across different people with different neck length. Larger pharyngeal area measures may reflect atrophy of the pharyngeal muscles while smaller pharyngeal area may reflect narrowing due to edema.We report median values and 97.5% confidence intervals for pharyngeal area.

Time frame: Single timepoint (baseline only)

Population: A sample of 80 adults was enrolled. Due to data quality issues, data were missing for 2 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Thin Liquid BariumPharyngeal Area at Rest59 % of the squared C2-C4 length scalar
Secondary

Amplitude of Tongue-Palate Pressure

During swallowing, the tongue rises to contact the hard palate, generating pressure that squeezes the bolus backwards through the mouth towards the pharynx. The amplitude of tongue-palate pressure were measured continuously throughout swallowing using the KayPentax Digital Swallow Workstation Swallowing Signals Lab 3-bulb tongue pressure array, and the highest (peak) pressure was identified for each swallow. We will report mean values and standard error for peak pressure by bolus consistency (thin, slightly thick, mildly thick and moderately thick liquid). Higher amplitudes of pressure represent greater force for bolus propulsion.

Time frame: Baseline (single timepoint only)

Population: A sample of 80 adults was enrolled. This parameter was only collected and analyzed in 40 of those participants, aged 21-59. Due to data quality issues, data were missing for 2 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Thin Liquid BariumAmplitude of Tongue-Palate Pressure16.53 mmHgStandard Error 2.21
Slightly Thick Liquid BariumAmplitude of Tongue-Palate Pressure25.51 mmHgStandard Error 3.58
Mildly Thick Liquid BariumAmplitude of Tongue-Palate Pressure28.61 mmHgStandard Error 3.47
Moderately Thick Liquid BariumAmplitude of Tongue-Palate Pressure51.89 mmHgStandard Error 8.83

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026