Skip to content

Effect of Prebiotics on the Gut Microbiome Profile and Beta Cell Function

Evaluating the Effect of Prebiotics on the Gut Microbiome Profile and Beta Cell Function in Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04114357
Enrollment
12
Registered
2019-10-03
Start date
2020-06-22
Completion date
2023-06-09
Last updated
2024-10-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 1 Diabetes

Brief summary

Data suggest that intestinal microbiota might be critically involved both in autoimmunity and in glucose homeostasis. An acetylated and butyrylated form of high amylose maize starch (HAMS-AB) that increases beneficial short chain fatty acid (SCFA) production has been safe and effective in disease prevention in mouse type 1 diabetes (T1D) models. The objective of this application is to assess the effect of administering a prebiotic, such as HAMS- AB, on the gut microbiome profile, glycemia and β-cell function in humans with T1D.

Detailed description

This is a pilot, single center clinical trial to evaluate the effect of using the prebiotic, HAMS-AB, on the gut microbiome profile, glycemia and β-cell function in children and adolescents ages 12-16 years with recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes. Approximately 12 participants will be randomized to first to take the supplement and follow the diabetic diet or follow a diabetic diet alone for 4 weeks and then cross-over after a 4 week washout period. The primary objective is to determine the effect of using the prebiotic on the gut microbiome profile in youth with T1D. The secondary objectives are to determine the effect of using the prebiotic on SCFA production, glycemia and β-cell health and function. Exploratory outcomes include changes in MAIT cells.

Interventions

DRUGAcetylated and Butyrylated High Amylose Maize Starch

Participants will be instructed to consume HAMS-AB in two divided doses at breakfast and dinner for 4 weeks

Sponsors

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
CollaboratorNIH
Indiana University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
11 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Be between 11-17 years of age * Willing to consume HAMS-AB and follow a diabetic diet * Diagnosed by American Diabetes Association criteria with T1D in the last 4-36 months * Random non-fasting C-peptide of 0.17nmol/ml or greater * Willing to use an effective form of contraception if sexually active * BMI\< 85% for age and sex * Positive for any one of the following diabetes-related autoantibodies that are tested clinically \[insulin autoantibody (if tested within 14 days of diagnosis), glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), insulinoma-associated protein-2 (IA-2), or Zinc transporter 8 autoantibodies (ZnT8)\].

Exclusion criteria

1. Presence of severe, active disease that interferes with dietary intake or requires the use of chronic medication, except for well-controlled hypothyroidism and mild asthma not requiring oral steroids. 2. Diabetes other than T1D (Known monogenic forms of diabetes, Type 2 diabetes) 3. Chronic illness known to affect glucose metabolism (e.g. Cushing syndrome, polycystic ovarian disorder, cystic fibrosis) or taking medications that affect glucose metabolism (e.g. steroids, metformin) 4. Psychiatric impairment or current use of anti-psychotic medication 5. Any condition that, in the investigator's opinion, may compromise study participation or may confound the interpretation of the study results. 6. Female participants of child-bearing age with reproductive potential, must not be pregnant and agree to use an effective form of birth control or be abstinent during the study period (see below) 7. History of recurrent infections 8. History of on-going infections or antibiotic treatment within the past three months 9. History of immune compromise 10. Steroid intake (inhaled or oral) 11. Other immunosuppressant use in past 6 months 12. History of gastrointestinal disease 13. Possible or confirmed celiac disease 14. Pregnancy or possible pregnancy 15. Allergy to corn (prebiotic) 16. Allergy to milk or milk products or soy present in Boost 17. Participation in other intervention research trials within the past 3 months 18. Anticipate major changes in diabetes management during study (change from injection to pump, new start of continuous glucose monitoring) 19. Consuming high fiber or vegetarian diet (consuming three or more servings of high fiber foods on 4 or more days per week) using validated dietary assessments (see below under schedule of events table). 20. Taking fiber supplements \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the Gut Microbiome Profilebefore and after completion of each 4 week sequenceWe planned to assess the effect of administering acetylated and butyrylated high amylose maize starch (HAMS-AB) on the gut microbiome profile in people with recently-diagnosed type 1 diabetes (T1D) by sequencing the gut microbiome profile. This measure was assesed using the absolute abundance of certain bacterial species of interest. The changes will be compared before and after each 4 week time period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in the Short Chain Fatty Acid Levels in the Gut.before and after completion of each 4 week sequenceMeasurement of Short Chain Fatty Acid Levels in the Stools.
Changes in Average Glucosebefore and after completion of each 4 week sequenceWe will compare average glucose changes pre/post intervention with HAMS-AB. We will compare their glycemic changes using continuous glucose monitoring data.
C-peptide Levels (Changes in Beta Cell Health).before and after completion of each 4 week sequenceWe will compare β-cell measures pre/post intervention with HAMS-AB and between the intervention and control groups. We will assess β-cell function using mixed meal tolerance-derived C-peptide measurements ( a measure of β-cell function).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Function of Mucosal Associated Invariant T (MAIT) Cellsbefore and after completion of each 4 week sequenceWe will compare changes in % of MAIT cell with CD25 function before and after the interventions
Changes in Phenotype of Mucosal Associated Invariant T (MAIT) Cellsbefore and after completion of each 4 week sequenceWe will compare changes in % of MAIT cells with a BCL2-GzB+ phenotype before and after the interventions
Changes in Frequency of Mucosal Associated Invariant T (MAIT) Cellsbefore and after completion of each 4 week sequenceWe will compare changes in MAIT cell frequency (as measured by % of CD3 T cells that are MAIT cells) before and after the interventions

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention Group
This arm will consume the supplement daily for 4 weeks. Acetylated and Butyrylated High Amylose Maize Starch: Participants will be instructed to consume HAMS-AB in two divided doses at breakfast and dinner
6
Control Group
This arm will not receive the supplement for 4 weeks.
6
Total12

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Baseline-RandomizationAdverse Event21
Baseline-RandomizationLost to Follow-up11
Cross-overAdverse Event01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntervention GroupTotalControl Group
Age, Continuous14.98 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.92
14.28 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.73
13.58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.07
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants7 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants5 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants10 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 participants12 participants6 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants10 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 90 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 97 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 90 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Change in the Gut Microbiome Profile

We planned to assess the effect of administering acetylated and butyrylated high amylose maize starch (HAMS-AB) on the gut microbiome profile in people with recently-diagnosed type 1 diabetes (T1D) by sequencing the gut microbiome profile. This measure was assesed using the absolute abundance of certain bacterial species of interest. The changes will be compared before and after each 4 week time period.

Time frame: before and after completion of each 4 week sequence

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Supplement Intervention and Control DietChange in the Gut Microbiome ProfileBaseline Bifidobacterium Longum818.5 species count
Supplement Intervention and Control DietChange in the Gut Microbiome ProfileBaseline Parabacteroides distasonis4964 species count
Supplement Intervention and Control DietChange in the Gut Microbiome ProfileBifidobacteria Longum (after 4 weeks)1610 species count
Supplement Intervention and Control DietChange in the Gut Microbiome ProfileParabacteroides distasonis (after 4 weeks)561 species count
Control Diet AloneChange in the Gut Microbiome ProfileBifidobacteria Longum (after 4 weeks)177 species count
Control Diet AloneChange in the Gut Microbiome ProfileBaseline Bifidobacterium Longum229 species count
Control Diet AloneChange in the Gut Microbiome ProfileParabacteroides distasonis (after 4 weeks)561 species count
Control Diet AloneChange in the Gut Microbiome ProfileBaseline Parabacteroides distasonis2632 species count
Secondary

Changes in Average Glucose

We will compare average glucose changes pre/post intervention with HAMS-AB. We will compare their glycemic changes using continuous glucose monitoring data.

Time frame: before and after completion of each 4 week sequence

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Supplement Intervention and Control DietChanges in Average Glucosebaseline256 mg/dlStandard Deviation 19
Supplement Intervention and Control DietChanges in Average Glucose4 weeks after232 mg/dlStandard Deviation 31
Control Diet AloneChanges in Average Glucosebaseline228 mg/dlStandard Deviation 13
Control Diet AloneChanges in Average Glucose4 weeks after217 mg/dlStandard Deviation 27
Secondary

Changes in the Short Chain Fatty Acid Levels in the Gut.

Measurement of Short Chain Fatty Acid Levels in the Stools.

Time frame: before and after completion of each 4 week sequence

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Supplement Intervention and Control DietChanges in the Short Chain Fatty Acid Levels in the Gut.Butyrate23 mmol / kg fecal materialStandard Deviation 6
Supplement Intervention and Control DietChanges in the Short Chain Fatty Acid Levels in the Gut.Propionate16 mmol / kg fecal materialStandard Deviation 9
Supplement Intervention and Control DietChanges in the Short Chain Fatty Acid Levels in the Gut.acetate60 mmol / kg fecal materialStandard Deviation 23
Control Diet AloneChanges in the Short Chain Fatty Acid Levels in the Gut.Butyrate19 mmol / kg fecal materialStandard Deviation 5
Control Diet AloneChanges in the Short Chain Fatty Acid Levels in the Gut.Propionate16 mmol / kg fecal materialStandard Deviation 5
Control Diet AloneChanges in the Short Chain Fatty Acid Levels in the Gut.acetate56 mmol / kg fecal materialStandard Deviation 18
Secondary

C-peptide Levels (Changes in Beta Cell Health).

We will compare β-cell measures pre/post intervention with HAMS-AB and between the intervention and control groups. We will assess β-cell function using mixed meal tolerance-derived C-peptide measurements ( a measure of β-cell function).

Time frame: before and after completion of each 4 week sequence

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Supplement Intervention and Control DietC-peptide Levels (Changes in Beta Cell Health).baseline2.0 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0.3
Supplement Intervention and Control DietC-peptide Levels (Changes in Beta Cell Health).after 4 weeks2.7 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0.6
Control Diet AloneC-peptide Levels (Changes in Beta Cell Health).baseline1.7 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0.3
Control Diet AloneC-peptide Levels (Changes in Beta Cell Health).after 4 weeks2.6 ng/mlStandard Deviation 0.4
Other Pre-specified

Changes in Frequency of Mucosal Associated Invariant T (MAIT) Cells

We will compare changes in MAIT cell frequency (as measured by % of CD3 T cells that are MAIT cells) before and after the interventions

Time frame: before and after completion of each 4 week sequence

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Supplement Intervention and Control DietChanges in Frequency of Mucosal Associated Invariant T (MAIT) CellsBaseline2.3 percentage of CD3 T cells
Supplement Intervention and Control DietChanges in Frequency of Mucosal Associated Invariant T (MAIT) Cellsafter 4 weeks2.1 percentage of CD3 T cells
Control Diet AloneChanges in Frequency of Mucosal Associated Invariant T (MAIT) CellsBaseline1.6 percentage of CD3 T cells
Control Diet AloneChanges in Frequency of Mucosal Associated Invariant T (MAIT) Cellsafter 4 weeks2.4 percentage of CD3 T cells
Other Pre-specified

Changes in Function of Mucosal Associated Invariant T (MAIT) Cells

We will compare changes in % of MAIT cell with CD25 function before and after the interventions

Time frame: before and after completion of each 4 week sequence

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Supplement Intervention and Control DietChanges in Function of Mucosal Associated Invariant T (MAIT) Cellsbefore4.7 percentage of MAIT cells
Supplement Intervention and Control DietChanges in Function of Mucosal Associated Invariant T (MAIT) Cellsafter3.2 percentage of MAIT cells
Control Diet AloneChanges in Function of Mucosal Associated Invariant T (MAIT) Cellsbefore3.8 percentage of MAIT cells
Control Diet AloneChanges in Function of Mucosal Associated Invariant T (MAIT) Cellsafter4.0 percentage of MAIT cells
Other Pre-specified

Changes in Phenotype of Mucosal Associated Invariant T (MAIT) Cells

We will compare changes in % of MAIT cells with a BCL2-GzB+ phenotype before and after the interventions

Time frame: before and after completion of each 4 week sequence

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Supplement Intervention and Control DietChanges in Phenotype of Mucosal Associated Invariant T (MAIT) Cellsbefore16.7 percentage of MAIT cells
Supplement Intervention and Control DietChanges in Phenotype of Mucosal Associated Invariant T (MAIT) Cellsafter5.4 percentage of MAIT cells
Control Diet AloneChanges in Phenotype of Mucosal Associated Invariant T (MAIT) Cellsbefore11.5 percentage of MAIT cells
Control Diet AloneChanges in Phenotype of Mucosal Associated Invariant T (MAIT) Cellsafter9.0 percentage of MAIT cells

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026