Disruptive Behavior Disorders
Conditions
Keywords
Parenting Interventions, Parent Training, Technology-based intervention, Disruptive Behavior Problems, Early Childhood
Brief summary
The Parenting Young Children Check-up (PYCC) is a 3-part system for parents of children with Disruptive Behavior Problems (DBPs). First, at a pediatric visit, parents complete a screener for DBPs and, if reported, go through a tablet-based program to receive feedback and learn about the PYCC. Next, parents receive text messages to connect them to further parent training content. Third, parent training content is delivered via a web-based resource, which includes videos to teach parenting skills. In this proof-of-concept trial, the investigators will examine the acceptability of the tablet-based program and motivation of parents to engage in the PYCC and use the web-based resource. At a pediatric visit, parents will be told about the research opportunity by a staff member before, during, or after their visit. There will be a flier for parents, which will be available for receptionists to include with in-take paperwork. If parents express openness to participating, a research assistant will meet with them, go over the consent form, and let them complete the screener. Parents will complete a demographics questionnaire and the DBP screener. If parents report elevated DBPs, then they will be eligible to further participate. If they are eligible and choose to participate, the research assistant will have them go through the tablet-based program. Next, they will complete a brief questionnaire asking for input on the PYCC. Each of these components will be completed in the Computerized Intervention Authoring System (CIAS). The brief questionnaire is intended to evaluate perceptions of 1) ease of use, 2) usefulness of the information, 3) likability, and 4) intentions to use the PYCC web-based resource. Items will be rated on a 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree) scale. Parents will also verbally answer 6 open-ended interview questions about the program and suggest improvements. Answers will be audio-recorded and transcribed. All participants (whether only completing the screening or both parts of the study) will receive a resource list as well as a list of URLs to access videos on the video-based content on PYCC website. An ID number will need to be entered to use the website and the investigators will track website use. This data collection is not hypothesis driven. Rather, the intent is to gather mixed methods feedback from parents to shape the PYCC program.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALParenting Young Children Check-up (PYCC)
The PYCC intends to motivate parents to learn behavioral parenting strategies to reduce child disruptive behavior.
Sponsors
Wayne State University
Study design
Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Inclusion criteria
* Age 18 or above * English speaking * Parent to a child ages 2-5 * Report their child has elevated disruptive behavior problems on the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory
Exclusion criteria
* Parent reports child has Autism Spectrum Disorder * Parent reports child has an intellectual disability * Parent reports child is receiving treatment for Oppositional Defiant Disorder or Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Intentions to Use the Parenting Young Children Check-up Web-based Resource: Qualitative | Baseline | One oral question, asking if parents intent to use the Parenting Young Children Check-up web-based resource, tapped into this outcome. Responses from participants were coded to reflect what percent of parents were interested in using the web-based resource, what percent of parent are not interested in using the web-based resource, and what percent are unsure. |
| Intentions to Use the Parenting Young Children Check-up Web-based Resource: Quantitative | Baseline | Two items (created for this project) were used to assess this outcome. Parents were asked their intentions to use the web-based resource (i.e., videos on the website). Items were rated on 5-point Likert scale (0 = Definitely Disagree, 4 = Definitely Agree). To create the final score, the two items were averaged with a possible range from 0-4 with higher scores indicating stronger intentions to use the Parenting Young Children Check-up web-based resource. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Perceived Usefulness of the Parenting Young Children Check-up Program | Baseline | Seven questionnaire items (created for this project) were used to assess this outcome. Parents were asked about perceived usefulness of each part of the program. Each of the 5 items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = Definitely Disagree, 4 = Definitely Agree); higher scores indicate more perceived ease of use. An average usefulness score was computed by averaging the responses to the 5 items; the possible range was from 0-4 with higher scores indicate more ease of use). |
| Suggestions for Program Improvements | Baseline | One oral interview question (Tell me your ideas about how to make the program better?') will tap into this outcome. Responses will be coded for specific suggestions to improve the Parenting Young Children Check-up program. |
| Likeability of the Parenting Young Children Check-up Program | Baseline | Four questionnaire items (created for this project) tapped into this outcome. Parents were asked about how much they like each part of the program. Items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = Definitely Disagree, 4 = Definitely Agree); higher score indicated more likability. An average likability score was computed by taking the average of the 4 responses; possible range from 0-4 with higher scores indicate more likability. |
| Perceived Ease of Use of the Parenting Young Children Check-up Program | Baseline | Five questionnaire items (created for this project) were used to assess this outcome. Parents were asked about perceived ease of use of each part of the program. Each of the 5 items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = Definitely Disagree, 4 = Definitely Agree); higher scores indicate more perceived ease of use. An average ease of use score was computed by averaging the responses to the 5 items; the possible range was from 0-4 with higher scores indicate more ease of use). |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants That Use the Web-based Parent Training Resources | Between baseline and 3-months after | All participating parents will have an ID to access web-based parent training resources. The investigators will track to see who makes use of the resources; the frequency of use (n and % of families that use the web-based resource) will be reported. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Intervention Parents went through the brief tablet-based intervention for the Parenting Young Children Check-up | 6 |
| Total | 6 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Intervention |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 27.83 years |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 5 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 6 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 6 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 6 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 6 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 6 |
Outcome results
Primary
Intentions to Use the Parenting Young Children Check-up Web-based Resource: Qualitative
One oral question, asking if parents intent to use the Parenting Young Children Check-up web-based resource, tapped into this outcome. Responses from participants were coded to reflect what percent of parents were interested in using the web-based resource, what percent of parent are not interested in using the web-based resource, and what percent are unsure.
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Intentions to Use the Parenting Young Children Check-up Web-based Resource: Qualitative | Reported intentions to use program | 6 Participants |
| Intervention | Intentions to Use the Parenting Young Children Check-up Web-based Resource: Qualitative | Did not report intention to use program | 0 Participants |
Primary
Intentions to Use the Parenting Young Children Check-up Web-based Resource: Quantitative
Two items (created for this project) were used to assess this outcome. Parents were asked their intentions to use the web-based resource (i.e., videos on the website). Items were rated on 5-point Likert scale (0 = Definitely Disagree, 4 = Definitely Agree). To create the final score, the two items were averaged with a possible range from 0-4 with higher scores indicating stronger intentions to use the Parenting Young Children Check-up web-based resource.
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Intentions to Use the Parenting Young Children Check-up Web-based Resource: Quantitative | 3.25 score on a scale |
Secondary
Likeability of the Parenting Young Children Check-up Program
Four questionnaire items (created for this project) tapped into this outcome. Parents were asked about how much they like each part of the program. Items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = Definitely Disagree, 4 = Definitely Agree); higher score indicated more likability. An average likability score was computed by taking the average of the 4 responses; possible range from 0-4 with higher scores indicate more likability.
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Likeability of the Parenting Young Children Check-up Program | 3.63 score on a scale |
Secondary
Perceived Ease of Use of the Parenting Young Children Check-up Program
Five questionnaire items (created for this project) were used to assess this outcome. Parents were asked about perceived ease of use of each part of the program. Each of the 5 items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = Definitely Disagree, 4 = Definitely Agree); higher scores indicate more perceived ease of use. An average ease of use score was computed by averaging the responses to the 5 items; the possible range was from 0-4 with higher scores indicate more ease of use).
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Perceived Ease of Use of the Parenting Young Children Check-up Program | 3.40 score on a scale |
Secondary
Perceived Usefulness of the Parenting Young Children Check-up Program
Seven questionnaire items (created for this project) were used to assess this outcome. Parents were asked about perceived usefulness of each part of the program. Each of the 5 items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = Definitely Disagree, 4 = Definitely Agree); higher scores indicate more perceived ease of use. An average usefulness score was computed by averaging the responses to the 5 items; the possible range was from 0-4 with higher scores indicate more ease of use).
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Perceived Usefulness of the Parenting Young Children Check-up Program | 3.52 score on a scale |
Secondary
Suggestions for Program Improvements
One oral interview question (Tell me your ideas about how to make the program better?') will tap into this outcome. Responses will be coded for specific suggestions to improve the Parenting Young Children Check-up program.
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Suggestions for Program Improvements | No changes suggested | 2 Participants |
| Intervention | Suggestions for Program Improvements | Suggested adding captioning to videos | 1 Participants |
| Intervention | Suggestions for Program Improvements | Suggested giving out a pamphlet for the program | 1 Participants |
| Intervention | Suggestions for Program Improvements | Suggested having in-person classes | 1 Participants |
| Intervention | Suggestions for Program Improvements | Suggested changing voice of program narrator | 1 Participants |
Other Pre-specified
Number of Participants That Use the Web-based Parent Training Resources
All participating parents will have an ID to access web-based parent training resources. The investigators will track to see who makes use of the resources; the frequency of use (n and % of families that use the web-based resource) will be reported.
Time frame: Between baseline and 3-months after
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Number of Participants That Use the Web-based Parent Training Resources | Used web-based resource | 0 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants That Use the Web-based Parent Training Resources | Did not use web-based resource | 6 Participants |