Skip to content

Auditory Intraoperative Stimulation Effects on Pain and Agitation at Awakening (AUDIOPAW)

Effects of Intraoperative Auditory Stimulation on Pain and Agitation at Awakening After Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy - 4 Arms, Double-blinded, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04112979
Acronym
AUDIOPAW
Enrollment
115
Registered
2019-10-02
Start date
2018-03-01
Completion date
2019-08-24
Last updated
2019-10-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adenotonsillitis, Procedural Anxiety, Procedural Pain

Keywords

Auditory stimulation, adenotonsillectomy, pain, agitation, awakening

Brief summary

Adenotonsillectomy (AT) is one of the most common pediatric surgical procedures. The management of postoperative pain and agitation after AT is still a controversial issue. Safety considerations limit the use of opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, leading to inadequate control of the high levels of postoperative pain experienced by AT patients. Along with pain killers, non-pharmacological strategies have remarkable impact on pain management in children. A systematic review and meta-analysis published in The Lancet in 2015 on adult patients suggest that auditory stimulation with music in the perioperative setting, and even when patients are under general anaesthesia, can reduce postoperative pain, anxiety, and analgesia needs. The authors concluded that there is sufficient evidence to implement auditory stimulation in the treatment of all adult surgical patients, regardless of the mode of administration. Up to now, no research has investigated the effects of intraoperative auditory stimulation on pain and agitation upon awakening after AT in the pediatric population. Objective of this study is to determine the effects of intraoperative auditory stimulation on pain and agitation upon awakening after pediatric AT.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMusic

45 dB SL, normalized, high-frequency sampled W.A. Mozart Symphony n°4 in D K19 and n°5 in B-flat K22 (from Mozart Symphonies Vol. I - Adam Fisher, Dacapo Records, Frederiksberg C., Denmark, 2013)

BEHAVIORALMother's lap

45 dB SL, normalized and filtered, high-frequency sampled heartbeat sound, 75 bpm tempo, looped

BEHAVIORALSoundproof earplugs

Disposable foam earplugs with a noise attenuation of at least 30 dB

Sponsors

IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age 2 to 17 years old * scheduled for adenotonsillectomy * recent audiometry and tympanometry evaluation (\<1 month)

Exclusion criteria

* no informed consent * other combined surgical procedures * comorbidities (e.g. congenital anomalies of the head-and-neck, psychomotor delay, autism spectrum disorders) * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Classification score \>2 * ongoing chronic pharmacological therapy * first language not Italian * environmental noise exceeding limits in the operating room

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain score (Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale), self-administered (collaborative children between 3 and 8 years)Within 10 minutes after awakeningPain score for collaborative children between 3 and 8 years will be evaluated with the self-administered Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating scale, ranged 0-10. Higher scores correspond to higher levels of pain.
Pain score (Visual Analogue Scale), self-administered (collaborative children >=8 years) or administered by parents (non-collaborative children >=8 years)Within 10 minutes after awakeningPain score for \>=8 years old children will be evaluated with Visual Analogue Scale (self administered if collaborative; administered by parents if non-collaborative children), ranged 0-10. Higher scores correspond to higher levels of pain. In accordance with previous studies (Ferreira-Valente et al. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain 2011;152:2399-2404), the scores of Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating scale and Visual Analogue Scale will be considered comparable and combined in one outcome variable.
Pain score (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale), evaluated by parents (for children <=3 years)Within 10 minutes after awakeningFor children \<=3 years, pain score will be evaluated by parents using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale, ranged 0-10. Higher scores correspond to higher levels of pain.
Pain score (Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain scale), evaluated by parents (for non-collaborative children between 3 and 7 years)Within 10 minutes after awakeningFor non-collaborative children between 3 and 7 years, pain score will be evaluated by parents using the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain (CHEOPS) scale, ranged 0-10. Higher scores correspond to higher levels of pain. In accordance with previous studies, the scores of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale and of the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain (CHEOPS) scale will be considered comparable and combined in one outcome variable.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AgitationWithin 10 minutes after awakeningEvaluated using the Paediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale, ranging form 0 to 20. Higher scores correspond to higher levels of agitation.
Frequency of use of pain killer drugsWithin 6 hours after the awakeningNumber of postoperative pain killers drugs administered

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026