Skip to content

Open Discectomy Versus Microscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Open Discectomy Versus Microscope Assisted Discectomy for Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation: a Comparative Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04112485
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-10-02
Start date
2015-03-04
Completion date
2019-08-20
Last updated
2020-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lumbar Disc Herniation

Keywords

Lumbar disc herniation , Open Discectomy, Micrdiscectomy

Brief summary

60 patients involved were divided into two matched groups; Group A: 30 patients were treated with conventional fenestration laminectomy and discectomy and Group B: 30 patients were treated with microdiscectomy. The age of the patients involved in this study ranged from 19 years old to 46 years old

Detailed description

60 patients involved were divided into two matched groups; Group A: 30 patients were treated with conventional fenestration laminectomy and discectomy and Group B: 30 patients were treated with microdiscectomy. The age of the patients involved in this study ranged from 19 years old to 46 years old. All the patient was suffering from symptomatic lumbar disc herniation L4-5. Each patient was assessed clinically and MRI was done for all the patients to prove clinically, the symptomatic lumbar disc herniation which was present in all patients.

Interventions

Sponsors

Hawler Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 46 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults who are symptomatic lumbar disc herniation L4-5. Each patient was assessed clinically and MRI was done for all the patients to prove clinically, the symptomatic lumbar disc herniation which was present in all patients. Conservative treatment for 6weeks was failed

Exclusion criteria

* smoking, previous lumbar spine surgery, Diabetes Melitus (DM) and neuromuscular disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual analogue scoreVisua analogue score was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively to see how much change in pain can occurred after open discectomy and after Microdiscectomy for 1 yearVisual analogue score of back pain and leg pain which represent a score from 0-10 so if patient has no pain so gives 0 and if has severe pain gives 10
Oswestry disability indexOswestry disability index was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively to assess how much changes can occur after open discectomy and Microdiscectomy for 1 year after surgeryOswestry disability index in a measurement of functional ability of patients regarding pain and daily activities

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026