Skip to content

Gut-microbiota Targeted Nutritional Intervention for Gut Barrier Integrity at High Altitude

Efficacy of a Gut-microbiota Targeted Nutritional Intervention for Promoting Gut Barrier Integrity During Short-term Exposure to Hypobaric Hypoxia.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04111263
Enrollment
33
Registered
2019-10-01
Start date
2019-10-06
Completion date
2022-11-05
Last updated
2022-12-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastrointestinal Injury, Acute Mountain Sickness

Keywords

Microbiome, Intestinal permeability, Cognition, Immune, Fiber, Military, Altitude, Polyphenol

Brief summary

The aim of this randomized, crossover clinical trial is to determine the efficacy of a gut microbiota-targeted nutritional intervention containing a blend of fermentable fibers and polyphenols (FP) for mitigating increases in GI permeability, and decrements in immune function and neuropsychologic performance following rapid ascent to simulated high altitude. Fifteen healthy young adults will participate in each of three study phases that include a 14-day supplementation period in which participants will consume 1 of 2 supplement bars: placebo (PL, will be consumed during 2 phases) and FP supplementation (will be consumed during one phase only). During the final 2-d of each phase, participants will live in a hypobaric chamber under sea level or high altitude conditions.

Detailed description

The collection of microbes inhabiting the human gastrointestinal (GI) tract, known as the gut microbiota, is increasingly recognized as a mediator of GI, immunologic, and neuropsychologic responses to various environmental and physiologic stressors. The hypobaric hypoxia characteristic of high altitude environments is a stressor that has recently been associated with increased GI permeability, and which has been shown to cause decrements in immune, neuropsychological and physical function. To what extent modulation of the human gut microbiota can mitigate these responses during high altitude exposure is undetermined. The aim of this randomized, crossover clinical trial is to determine the efficacy of a gut microbiota-targeted nutritional intervention containing a blend of fermentable fibers and polyphenols (FP) for mitigating increases in GI permeability, and decrements in immune function and neuropsychologic performance following rapid ascent to simulated high altitude. Fifteen healthy young adults will participate in each of three study phases in random order. Each phase will include a 14-day supplementation period in which participants will consume 1 of 2 supplement bars: placebo (PL, will be consumed during 2 phases) and FP supplementation (will be consumed during one phase only). During the final 2-d of each phase, participants will live in a hypobaric chamber. During one phase the chamber environment will mimic low-altitude conditions (SHAM). During two phases the chamber environment will mimic the barometric pressure at Pike's Peak CO (460 mmHg; HA).

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTFP

Fiber and polyphenol blend

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPlacebo

Matched placebo

OTHERHigh altitude

Simulated high altitude in altitude chamber using hypobaric hypoxia

Sea level environment in altitude chamber

Sponsors

US Army Combat Capabilities Development Command- Soldier Center
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR)
CollaboratorFED
University of Reading
CollaboratorOTHER
United States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double-blinded

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
17 Years to 39 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women aged 18 - 39 years (active duty personnel who are 17 yr of age will also be allowed to participate) * In good health * Physically active * For active duty, passed most recent body composition assessment; for civilians, body mass index (BMI) ≤ 30.0 kg/m2. * Self-reports having a bowel movement at least as frequently as every-other-day * Self-reports normal vision (with or without glasses) and hearing

Exclusion criteria

* Born at altitudes greater than 2,100 m (\ 7,000 feet) * Living in areas that are more than 1,200 m (\ 4,000 feet), or have traveled to areas that are more than 1,200 m for five days or more within the last 2 mo * Pregnant, expecting to become pregnant during study, or breastfeeding * Any of the following medical conditions: 1. Musculoskeletal injuries that compromise exercise capability 2. Metabolic or cardiovascular abnormalities (e.g., kidney disease, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, etc.) 3. Suspected or known strictures, fistulas, or physiological/mechanical GI obstruction 4. Evidence of apnea or other sleeping disorders 5. Evidence of prior high altitude pulmonary or cerebral edema diagnosis 6. Disease of the GI tract including, but not limited to diverticulitis, inflammatory bowel disease, peptic ulcer disease, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis 7. Anemia or Sickle Cell Anemia/Trait 8. Alcoholism or other substance abuse issues 9. History of gastric bezoar 10. Swallowing disorders; severe dysphagia to food or pills 11. Implanted or portable electro-mechanical medical devices 12. Allergy to skin adhesive * Past GI surgery * Colonoscopy within 3 months of study participation * Taking prescription medications other than a contraceptive (unless approved by Medical Office and study PI) * Regular use of over-the-counter medications (including antacids, laxatives, stool softeners, and anti-diarrheals) unless approved by Medical Office and study PI * Any use of antibiotics, except topical antibiotics, within 3 months of study participation * Not willing to refrain from using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs) or antihistamine during the study * Not willing to stop consumption of prebiotic- or probiotic-containing supplements (e.g.,VSL#3, PRO-15, etc.), or other dietary supplements at least 2 weeks before and throughout study participation * Not willing to stop consumption of probiotic-containing foods (e.g., yogurt, etc.) during study participation. * Not willing to refrain from smoking any nicotine product (includes e-cigarettes), vaping, and chewing tobacco during controlled-diet periods. * Not willing to abstain from caffeine and alcohol during controlled-diet periods. * Allergies, intolerances, unwillingness or inability to eat provided foods and beverages * Following vegetarian/vegan diet * Unable to regularly sleep for 7-10 hr/night * Any previous blood donation, within 8 weeks of the first blood draw of the study, of a volume that when combined with the amount of blood to be collected during the study would exceed 550 mL

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in intestinal permeabilityStudy days 20, 40 and 60Intestinal permeability measured by the ratio of the urinary excretion of sucralose and erythrirol

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in zonulin concentrationsStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Fasting serum zonulin concentration
Difference in glucagon-like peptide-2 concentrationsStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Fasting serum glucagon-like peptide-2 concentration
Difference in intestinal fatty acid binding protein concentrationsStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Fasting and post-exercise serum intestinal fatty acid binding protein concentration
Difference in claudin-3 concentrationsStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Fasting and post-exercise serum claudin-3 concentration
Difference in S100B concentrationsStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Fasting and post-exercise serum S100B concentration
Difference in systemic inflammationStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Fasting serum interleukin (IL) IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, IL-1β, IL-1ra, tumor necrosis factor-α, interferon-γ concentrations
Difference in intestinal inflammationStudy days 6, 18, 21, 23, 27, 39, 42, 44, 48, 60, 63, 65Fecal calprotectin concentration
Difference in glucose concentrationsStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Fasting and post-exercise serum glucose concentrations
Difference in insulin concentrationsStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Fasting and post-exercise serum insulin concentrations
Difference in lactate concentrationsStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Fasting and post-exercise serum lactate concentrations
Difference in glycerol concentrationsStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Fasting and post-exercise serum glycerol concentrations
Difference in cortisol concentrationsStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Fasting and post-exercise serum cortisol concentrations
Difference in bone specific alkaline phosphatase concentrationsStudy days 20, 41, 62Fasting serum bone specific alkaline phosphatase concentration
Difference in carboxy-terminal collagen crosslinks concentrationsStudy days 20, 41, 62Fasting serum carboxy-terminal collagen crosslinks concentration
Difference in tartrate resistant acid phosphatase concentrationsStudy days 20, 41, 62Fasting serum tartrate resistant acid phosphatase concentration
Difference in procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide concentrationsStudy days 20, 41, 62Fasting serum procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide concentration
Difference in osteocalcin concentrationsStudy days 20, 41, 62Fasting serum osteocalcin concentration
Difference in secretory immunoglobulin A concentrationsStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Secretory immunoglobulin A concentrations in tear fluid and saliva
Difference in immune cell phenotypesStudy days 21, 42, 63Immune cell phenotype by flow cytometry
Difference in T-cell simulated cytokine productionStudy days 21, 42, 63T-cell simulated cytokine production by cell culture and flow cytometry
Difference in natural killer-cell cytotoxicityStudy days 21, 42, 63Natural killer-cell cytotoxicity by cell culture and flow cytometry
Difference in development of acute mountain sicknessStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire-short form. Acute Mountain Sickness will be measured multiple times daily using the Lake Louise scoring system wherein higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. AMS severity cutoffs will use mild (0.7-1.53), moderate (1.53-2.63), severe \>=2.63
Difference in gastrointestinal symptoms; quality of lifeStudy weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Gastrointestinal symptoms measure by modified version of the gastrointestinal quality of life index wherein lower scores indicate more severe symptoms.
Difference in gastrointestinal symptoms; irritable bowel syndromeStudy weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Gastrointestinal symptoms measure by modified version of the irritable bowel syndrome symptom severity scale score wherein higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. Scored on scale of 0-500; symptom severity scored as mild (75-174), moderate (175-300), severe (\>300).
Difference in appetiteStudy weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Hunger, fullness, desire to eat, and prospective consumption measured by 100 mm visual analog scale. Scored from 0-100 with higher scores indicating greater sensation.
Difference in changes in mood stateStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Measured by Profile of Mood States Questionnaire; a 65-item inventory of self-reported mood states which factor into six mood sub-scales (tension/anxiety (0-36), depression/dejection (0-60), anger/hostility (0-48), vigor/activity (0-32), fatigue/inertia (0-28), confusion/bewilderment (0-28), and total mood disturbance (0-200) wherein higher scores indicate greater mood state.
Difference in changes in feelingStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Measured by Feeling Scale; a one-item inventory measuring the extent to which participants feel pleasant or unpleasant. Higher scores indicate more unpleasant feeling. Scored from -5 (very bad) to 5 (very good)
Difference in changes arousalStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Measured by Felt Arousal Scale; a one-item inventory measuring the extent to which participants feel aroused. Higher scores indicate greater arousal (low=1 to high =6).
Difference in willingness to take risksStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Measured by Evaluation of Risks Questionnaire; a 24-item questionnaire providing scores on five scales: self-control, danger seeking, energy, impulsivity, and invincibility.
Difference in risk taking behaviorStudy days 7, 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Measured by Balloon Analogue Risk Task
Difference in resting metabolic rateStudy days 7, 21, 42, 63Resting metabolic rate measured by indirect calorimetry
Difference in physical activity energy expenditureStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Energy expenditure measured by indirect calorimetry during 60-minute steady state exercise
Difference in gastrointestinal transit timeStudy days 20, 41, 62Gastric, small intestine and large intestine transit time measured by SmartPill
Difference in gastrointestinal pHStudy days 20, 41, 62Gastric, small intestine and large intestine pH measured by SmartPill
Difference in changes in working memoryStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Measured by N-Back task before, during and after exercise
Difference in changes in spatial working memoryStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Measured by emotional Interference task before, during and after exercise
Difference in changes in spatial memoryStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Measured by Matching to Sample test in the morning and afternoon
Difference in change in reaction timeStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Measured by reaction time task before, during and after exercise
Difference in change in response inhibitionStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Measured by Go/No-Go task before, during and after exercise
Difference in vigilanceStudy days 20, 21, 23, 41, 42, 44, 62, 63, 65Measured by scanning visual vigilance task
Difference in lipopolysaccharide binding protein concentrationsStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Fasting serum lipopolysaccharide binding protein concentration
Difference in language-based logical reasoningStudy days 20, 21, 23, 41, 42, 44, 62, 63, 65Measured by grammatical Reasoning task
Difference in ambulatory vigilance48-hours/day during study weeks 0, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9Measured by wrist-worn vigilance monitor
Difference in fecal short chain fatty acidsStudy days 6, 18, 21, 23, 27, 39, 42, 44, 48, 60, 63, 65Fecal short chain fatty acid concentrations
Difference in gut microbiota compositionStudy days 6, 18, 21, 23, 27, 39, 42, 44, 48, 60, 63, 65Fecal bacterial community diversity and relative abundance measured by 16S rRNA gene sequencing
Differences in microRNA concentrationsStudy days 20, 21, 41, 42, 62, 63Fasting and post-exercise circulating and exosomal microRNA
Difference in simple visual reaction timeStudy days 20, 21, 23, 41, 42, 44, 62, 63, 65Measured by psychomotor vigilance test

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026