Skip to content

Evaluation of S-600918 in Adults With Refractory Chronic Cough

A Phase 2b, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Dose-selection Study of S-600918 in Patients With Refractory Chronic Cough

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04110054
Enrollment
406
Registered
2019-10-01
Start date
2020-02-13
Completion date
2020-12-28
Last updated
2024-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Cough

Keywords

P2X3 receptor antagonist, Refractory chronic cough, S-600918

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to determine the optimal dose of S-600918 in patients with refractory chronic cough by evaluating the change from baseline in 24-hour cough frequency (coughs per hour) with S-600918 compared with placebo.

Interventions

DRUGS-600918

Tablets for oral administration

DRUGPlacebo to S-600918

Tablets for oral administration

Sponsors

Shionogi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Having refractory chronic cough (including unexplained chronic cough) for at least 1 year. * If female and of childbearing potential, agreement to use one of the allowed contraceptive methods. * Capable of giving signed informed consent. Key

Exclusion criteria

* Currently smokes or uses potentially irritating inhalational agents (eg, e-cigarettes, smokeless cigarettes, vaping); stopped smoking or using potentially irritating inhalational agents within the last year; or has a smoking history of 20 pack-years or more. * Has chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or uncontrolled asthma. * Has a clinically unstable medical condition. * History of or ongoing significant psychiatric disorder. * History of respiratory tract infection or significant change in lung function or a pulmonary condition in the last 4 weeks. * History of malignancy in the last 5 years. * History of severe drug allergy. * History of alcohol or drug abuse in the last year or currently uses any form of marijuana or illicit drugs. * Has a clinically significant finding on a chest x-ray or chest computed tomography (CT) scan in the last year. * Has systolic blood pressure \> 160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure \> 90 mm Hg. * Received S-600918 previously. * Received an investigational drug in the last 3 months. * Received an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor in the last 3 months or requires such treatment. * Has a positive serologic test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antigen or antibody, hepatitis B virus surface antigen, or hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (RNA). * If female, pregnant or trying to become pregnant or breastfeeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in Number of Coughs Per Hour in 24 Hours Following 4 Weeks of Study TreatmentBaseline to Week 4Change in cough was calculated based upon the number of coughs per hour in 24 hours at Week 4 and baseline. Results are presented as percent change from baseline. Reported percent change is based on a mixed model for the log-transformed ratio of the number of coughs per hour in 24 hours at each visit with treatment, week, and treatment-by-week as fixed effect, participant as random effect, and region (Japan, Europe, or the United States) and the log-transformed coughs per hour in 24 hours at baseline as covariates. The number of coughs per hour while awake was measured using a cough monitor.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Awake Following 4 Weeks of Study TreatmentBaseline to Week 4Change in cough was calculated based upon the number of coughs per hour in 24 hours at Week 4 and baseline. Results are presented as percent change from baseline. Reported percent change is based on a mixed model for the log-transformed ratio of the number of coughs per hour while awake at each visit with treatment, week, and treatment-by-week as fixed effect, participants as random effect, and region and the log-transformed coughs per hour while awake at baseline as covariates. The number of coughs per hour while awake was measured using a cough monitor.
Number of Participants With 30%, 50% and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Awake After 4 Weeks of Study TreatmentBaseline to Week 4The number of coughs per hour while awake was measured using a cough monitor.
Percent Change in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Asleep Following 4 Weeks of Study TreatmentBaseline to Week 4Change in cough was calculated based upon the number of coughs per hour in 24 hours at Week 4 and baseline. Results are presented as percent change from baseline. Reported percent change is based on a mixed model for the log-transformed ratio of the number of coughs per hour while asleep at each visit with treatment, week, and treatment-by-week as fixed effect, participants as random effect, and region and the log-transformed coughs per hour while asleep at baseline as covariates. The number of coughs per hour while awake was measured using a cough monitor.
Change From Baseline in Weekly Cough Severity Following 4 Weeks of Study TreatmentBaseline to Week 4Cough severity was assessed by the participant by a visual analog scale with numbers from 0 to 100. Results are presented as change from baseline. Reported change is based on a mixed model for the change in weekly cough severity score after 4 weeks of treatment with treatment, week, and treatment-by-week as fixed effect, participant as random effect, and region (Japan, Europe, or the United States) and the severity score at baseline as covariates. Higher scores indicated higher cough severity.
Number of Participants With 30%, 50%, and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour Over 24 Hours After 4 Weeks of Study TreatmentBaseline to Week 4The number of coughs per hour for 24 hours was measured using a cough monitor.
Number of Responders Defined as Participants With an Increase in LCQ of ≥ 1.3 PointsBaseline to Week 4The LCQ is a patient-reported quality of life (QOL) measure of chronic cough. The questionnaire consists of 19 items to which the participant responds on a 7-point Likert response scale (from 1 to 7). Each item assesses symptoms during cough and the effect of cough on 3 main domains: physical, psychological and social. Domain scores range from 1-7, and the total score ranges from 3 - 2. A higher score indicates a better quality of life.
Change From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Baseline to Week 4The ICIQ-SF is a questionnaire used to evaluate the frequency, severity, and impact of urinary incontinence on the quality of life. The questionnaire includes 3 items with responses measured on Likert scales, and 1 item that is measured via a qualitative response. The 3 nominal responses are summed to give the ICIQ score (this total ICIQ-SF score can range from 0 to 21), where a higher score indicates more severe symptoms. The 1 item remaining that is measured via qualitative response is not given a score; rather, the participant selects 1 description out of 8 possible descriptions of this item.
Change From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)Baseline to Week 4The SF-36 is a 36-item questionnaire to assesses a participant's health status using 8 health concepts: limitations in physical activities because of health problems; limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems; bodily pain; general mental health (psychological distress and well-being); limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems; vitality (energy and fatigue); and general health perceptions. The mental component reports the average of all the emotionally relevant items and the physical component reports the average of all the physically relevant items. Each component is directly transformed into a 0 to 100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. A score of 0 is equal to maximum disability, and a score of 100 indicates no disability. Median change can range from -100 to 100. A positive median change indicates an improved outcome.
Number of Responders as Assessed by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 4The PGIC is a patient-reported measure of overall health status and consists of 1 item adapted from the Clinical Global Impressions scale. The participant selects 1 description out of 7 possible descriptions of this item. The descriptions are numbered from 1 through 7, where lower numbers indicate better quality of life. Participants were considered responders if they reported Very much improved, Much improved, or Minimally improved from baseline on the PGIC assessment.
Change From Baseline in Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) Total ScoreBaseline to Week 4The LCQ is a patient-reported quality of life (QOL) measure of chronic cough. The questionnaire consists of 19 items to which the participant responds on a 7-point Likert response scale (from 1 to 7). Each item assesses symptoms during cough and the effect of cough on 3 main domains: physical, psychological and social. Domain scores range from 1-7, and the total score ranges from 3 - 21. Higher score indicates a better quality of life. Results are presented as change from baseline. Reported change is based on a mixed model for the change in LCQ Total Score after 4 weeks of treatment with treatment, week, and treatment-by-week as fixed effect, participant as random effect, and region (Japan, Europe, or the United States) and the LCQ Score of corresponding domain at baseline as covariates.

Countries

Czechia, Japan, Poland, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
S-600918 50 mg
Participants received 50 mg S-600918 tablets orally once daily for 28 days
100
S-600918 150 mg
Participants received 150 mg S-600918 tablets orally once daily for 28 days
102
S-600918 300 mg
Participants received 300 mg S-600918 tablets orally once daily for 28 days
96
Placebo
Participants received placebo tablets orally once daily for 28 days
102
Total400

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event1143
Overall StudyCOVID-19 reason other than AE0020
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0320

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicS-600918 300 mgPlaceboTotalS-600918 50 mgS-600918 150 mg
Age, Continuous56.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
56.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
57.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
58.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
57.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
Average Coughs per Hour in 24 Hours36.21 number of coughs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 37.91
33.85 number of coughs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34.6
35.36 number of coughs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 43
30.40 number of coughs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.92
40.95 number of coughs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 64.68
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants2 Participants14 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
92 Participants100 Participants385 Participants95 Participants98 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
25 Participants22 Participants97 Participants25 Participants25 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants4 Participants9 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants2 Participants4 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
69 Participants72 Participants288 Participants71 Participants76 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
65 Participants77 Participants295 Participants78 Participants75 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants25 Participants105 Participants22 Participants27 Participants
Weekly Severity of Cough72.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.3
71.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5
73.1 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
74.8 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
73.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1010 / 1030 / 1000 / 102
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 10115 / 10334 / 10010 / 102
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1010 / 1030 / 1000 / 102

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change in Number of Coughs Per Hour in 24 Hours Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment

Change in cough was calculated based upon the number of coughs per hour in 24 hours at Week 4 and baseline. Results are presented as percent change from baseline. Reported percent change is based on a mixed model for the log-transformed ratio of the number of coughs per hour in 24 hours at each visit with treatment, week, and treatment-by-week as fixed effect, participant as random effect, and region (Japan, Europe, or the United States) and the log-transformed coughs per hour in 24 hours at baseline as covariates. The number of coughs per hour while awake was measured using a cough monitor.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 4

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and who had cough monitor assessment at both baseline and at least 1 visit after initiation of study drug administration. Here 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
S-600918 50 mgPercent Change in Number of Coughs Per Hour in 24 Hours Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment-55.16 percentage change
S-600918 150 mgPercent Change in Number of Coughs Per Hour in 24 Hours Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment-61.08 percentage change
S-600918 300 mgPercent Change in Number of Coughs Per Hour in 24 Hours Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment-65.32 percentage change
PlaceboPercent Change in Number of Coughs Per Hour in 24 Hours Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment-60.38 percentage change
Comparison: The null hypotheses of equality between the treatment and placebo effects were tested using a mixed model, containing treatment group, week, and interaction between treatment groups and week as fixed effects; participant as random effect; and region and the common logarithm of the frequency of coughs per hour at baseline as covariates. Covariance structure was given as unstructured.p-value: 0.9334ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)

The ICIQ-SF is a questionnaire used to evaluate the frequency, severity, and impact of urinary incontinence on the quality of life. The questionnaire includes 3 items with responses measured on Likert scales, and 1 item that is measured via a qualitative response. The 3 nominal responses are summed to give the ICIQ score (this total ICIQ-SF score can range from 0 to 21), where a higher score indicates more severe symptoms. The 1 item remaining that is measured via qualitative response is not given a score; rather, the participant selects 1 description out of 8 possible descriptions of this item.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 4

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and who had cough monitor assessment at both baseline and at least 1 visit after initiation of study drug administration. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number analyzed' = participants evaluable at the specified timeframe for this specific outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
S-600918 50 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Baseline, Female With Symptoms9.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
S-600918 50 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Change at Week 4 - Female With Symptoms-2.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.9
S-600918 50 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Baseline, Female Without Symptoms0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
S-600918 50 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Change at Week 4 - Female Without Symptoms0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
S-600918 50 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Baseline, Male With Symptoms9.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.3
S-600918 50 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Change at Week 4 - Male With Symptoms-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
S-600918 50 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Baseline, Male Without Symptoms0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
S-600918 50 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Change at Week 4 - Male Without Symptoms0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
S-600918 150 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Change at Week 4 - Male With Symptoms-0.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
S-600918 150 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Baseline, Male With Symptoms5.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
S-600918 150 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Change at Week 4 - Female With Symptoms-1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
S-600918 150 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Change at Week 4 - Male Without Symptoms1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
S-600918 150 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Baseline, Male Without Symptoms0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
S-600918 150 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Change at Week 4 - Female Without Symptoms0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
S-600918 150 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Baseline, Female Without Symptoms0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
S-600918 150 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Baseline, Female With Symptoms8.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
S-600918 300 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Baseline, Male Without Symptoms0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
S-600918 300 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Baseline, Female Without Symptoms0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
S-600918 300 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Change at Week 4 - Female Without Symptoms0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
S-600918 300 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Baseline, Male With Symptoms6.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
S-600918 300 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Change at Week 4 - Male With Symptoms-1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
S-600918 300 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Change at Week 4 - Male Without Symptoms0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
S-600918 300 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Baseline, Female With Symptoms9.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
S-600918 300 mgChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Change at Week 4 - Female With Symptoms-1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Baseline, Female Without Symptoms0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Change at Week 4 - Female Without Symptoms0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Change at Week 4 - Female With Symptoms-1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Baseline, Female With Symptoms8.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Baseline, Male With Symptoms5.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Change at Week 4 - Male Without Symptoms0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Baseline, Male Without Symptoms0.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboChange From Baseline in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Change at Week 4 - Male With Symptoms-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) Total Score

The LCQ is a patient-reported quality of life (QOL) measure of chronic cough. The questionnaire consists of 19 items to which the participant responds on a 7-point Likert response scale (from 1 to 7). Each item assesses symptoms during cough and the effect of cough on 3 main domains: physical, psychological and social. Domain scores range from 1-7, and the total score ranges from 3 - 21. Higher score indicates a better quality of life. Results are presented as change from baseline. Reported change is based on a mixed model for the change in LCQ Total Score after 4 weeks of treatment with treatment, week, and treatment-by-week as fixed effect, participant as random effect, and region (Japan, Europe, or the United States) and the LCQ Score of corresponding domain at baseline as covariates.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 4

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and who had cough monitor assessment at both baseline and at least 1 visit after initiation of study drug administration. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number analyzed' = participants evaluable at the specified timeframe.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
S-600918 50 mgChange From Baseline in Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) Total Score2.80 score on a scale
S-600918 150 mgChange From Baseline in Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) Total Score3.10 score on a scale
S-600918 300 mgChange From Baseline in Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) Total Score3.86 score on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) Total Score3.17 score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)

The SF-36 is a 36-item questionnaire to assesses a participant's health status using 8 health concepts: limitations in physical activities because of health problems; limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems; bodily pain; general mental health (psychological distress and well-being); limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems; vitality (energy and fatigue); and general health perceptions. The mental component reports the average of all the emotionally relevant items and the physical component reports the average of all the physically relevant items. Each component is directly transformed into a 0 to 100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. A score of 0 is equal to maximum disability, and a score of 100 indicates no disability. Median change can range from -100 to 100. A positive median change indicates an improved outcome.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 4

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and who had cough monitor assessment at both baseline and at least 1 visit after initiation of study drug administration. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number analyzed' = participants evaluable at the specified timeframe.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
S-600918 50 mgChange From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)Baseline - Physical Component Score38.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
S-600918 50 mgChange From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)Change at Week 4 - Physical Component Score-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
S-600918 50 mgChange From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)Baseline - Mental Component Score46.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
S-600918 50 mgChange From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)Change at Week 4 - Mental Component Score2.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.9
S-600918 150 mgChange From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)Change at Week 4 - Physical Component Score-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
S-600918 150 mgChange From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)Baseline - Mental Component Score47.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
S-600918 150 mgChange From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)Change at Week 4 - Mental Component Score1.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
S-600918 150 mgChange From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)Baseline - Physical Component Score38.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
S-600918 300 mgChange From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)Baseline - Mental Component Score47.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
S-600918 300 mgChange From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)Change at Week 4 - Physical Component Score-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
S-600918 300 mgChange From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)Change at Week 4 - Mental Component Score2.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
S-600918 300 mgChange From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)Baseline - Physical Component Score38.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)Change at Week 4 - Mental Component Score3.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)Change at Week 4 - Physical Component Score-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)Baseline - Physical Component Score37.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)Baseline - Mental Component Score47.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Weekly Cough Severity Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment

Cough severity was assessed by the participant by a visual analog scale with numbers from 0 to 100. Results are presented as change from baseline. Reported change is based on a mixed model for the change in weekly cough severity score after 4 weeks of treatment with treatment, week, and treatment-by-week as fixed effect, participant as random effect, and region (Japan, Europe, or the United States) and the severity score at baseline as covariates. Higher scores indicated higher cough severity.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 4

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and who had cough monitor assessment at both baseline and at least 1 visit after initiation of study drug administration. Here 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
S-600918 50 mgChange From Baseline in Weekly Cough Severity Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment-19.99 score on a scale
S-600918 150 mgChange From Baseline in Weekly Cough Severity Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment-22.95 score on a scale
S-600918 300 mgChange From Baseline in Weekly Cough Severity Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment-28.29 score on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weekly Cough Severity Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment-21.74 score on a scale
Secondary

Number of Participants With 30%, 50%, and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour Over 24 Hours After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment

The number of coughs per hour for 24 hours was measured using a cough monitor.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 4

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and who had cough monitor assessment at both baseline and at least 1 visit after initiation of study drug administration. Here 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
S-600918 50 mgNumber of Participants With 30%, 50%, and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour Over 24 Hours After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 30% Reduction55 Participants
S-600918 50 mgNumber of Participants With 30%, 50%, and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour Over 24 Hours After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 70% Reduction24 Participants
S-600918 50 mgNumber of Participants With 30%, 50%, and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour Over 24 Hours After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 50% Reduction38 Participants
S-600918 150 mgNumber of Participants With 30%, 50%, and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour Over 24 Hours After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 30% Reduction66 Participants
S-600918 150 mgNumber of Participants With 30%, 50%, and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour Over 24 Hours After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 70% Reduction26 Participants
S-600918 150 mgNumber of Participants With 30%, 50%, and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour Over 24 Hours After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 50% Reduction46 Participants
S-600918 300 mgNumber of Participants With 30%, 50%, and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour Over 24 Hours After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 50% Reduction50 Participants
S-600918 300 mgNumber of Participants With 30%, 50%, and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour Over 24 Hours After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 30% Reduction66 Participants
S-600918 300 mgNumber of Participants With 30%, 50%, and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour Over 24 Hours After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 70% Reduction31 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With 30%, 50%, and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour Over 24 Hours After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 30% Reduction61 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With 30%, 50%, and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour Over 24 Hours After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 70% Reduction27 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With 30%, 50%, and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour Over 24 Hours After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 50% Reduction49 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With 30%, 50% and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Awake After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment

The number of coughs per hour while awake was measured using a cough monitor.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 4

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and who had cough monitor assessment at both baseline and at least 1 visit after initiation of study drug administration. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number analyzed' = participants evaluable at the specified timeframe.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
S-600918 50 mgNumber of Participants With 30%, 50% and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Awake After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 30% Reduction55 Participants
S-600918 50 mgNumber of Participants With 30%, 50% and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Awake After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 70% Reduction22 Participants
S-600918 50 mgNumber of Participants With 30%, 50% and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Awake After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 50% Reduction41 Participants
S-600918 150 mgNumber of Participants With 30%, 50% and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Awake After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 30% Reduction67 Participants
S-600918 150 mgNumber of Participants With 30%, 50% and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Awake After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 70% Reduction26 Participants
S-600918 150 mgNumber of Participants With 30%, 50% and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Awake After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 50% Reduction48 Participants
S-600918 300 mgNumber of Participants With 30%, 50% and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Awake After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 50% Reduction51 Participants
S-600918 300 mgNumber of Participants With 30%, 50% and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Awake After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 30% Reduction67 Participants
S-600918 300 mgNumber of Participants With 30%, 50% and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Awake After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 70% Reduction29 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With 30%, 50% and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Awake After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 30% Reduction61 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With 30%, 50% and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Awake After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 70% Reduction25 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With 30%, 50% and 70% Reduction in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Awake After 4 Weeks of Study Treatment≥ 50% Reduction46 Participants
Secondary

Number of Responders as Assessed by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

The PGIC is a patient-reported measure of overall health status and consists of 1 item adapted from the Clinical Global Impressions scale. The participant selects 1 description out of 7 possible descriptions of this item. The descriptions are numbered from 1 through 7, where lower numbers indicate better quality of life. Participants were considered responders if they reported Very much improved, Much improved, or Minimally improved from baseline on the PGIC assessment.

Time frame: Week 4

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and who had cough monitor assessment at both baseline and at least 1 visit after initiation of study drug administration. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number analyzed' = participants evaluable at the specified timeframe.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
S-600918 50 mgNumber of Responders as Assessed by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)57 Participants
S-600918 150 mgNumber of Responders as Assessed by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)72 Participants
S-600918 300 mgNumber of Responders as Assessed by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)79 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Responders as Assessed by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)65 Participants
Secondary

Number of Responders Defined as Participants With an Increase in LCQ of ≥ 1.3 Points

The LCQ is a patient-reported quality of life (QOL) measure of chronic cough. The questionnaire consists of 19 items to which the participant responds on a 7-point Likert response scale (from 1 to 7). Each item assesses symptoms during cough and the effect of cough on 3 main domains: physical, psychological and social. Domain scores range from 1-7, and the total score ranges from 3 - 2. A higher score indicates a better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 4

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and who had cough monitor assessment at both baseline and at least 1 visit after initiation of study drug administration. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number analyzed' = participants evaluable at the specified timeframe.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
S-600918 50 mgNumber of Responders Defined as Participants With an Increase in LCQ of ≥ 1.3 Points53 Participants
S-600918 150 mgNumber of Responders Defined as Participants With an Increase in LCQ of ≥ 1.3 Points56 Participants
S-600918 300 mgNumber of Responders Defined as Participants With an Increase in LCQ of ≥ 1.3 Points60 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Responders Defined as Participants With an Increase in LCQ of ≥ 1.3 Points48 Participants
Secondary

Percent Change in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Asleep Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment

Change in cough was calculated based upon the number of coughs per hour in 24 hours at Week 4 and baseline. Results are presented as percent change from baseline. Reported percent change is based on a mixed model for the log-transformed ratio of the number of coughs per hour while asleep at each visit with treatment, week, and treatment-by-week as fixed effect, participants as random effect, and region and the log-transformed coughs per hour while asleep at baseline as covariates. The number of coughs per hour while awake was measured using a cough monitor.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 4

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and who had cough monitor assessment at both baseline and at least 1 visit after initiation of study drug administration. Here 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
S-600918 50 mgPercent Change in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Asleep Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment-54.43 percentage change
S-600918 150 mgPercent Change in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Asleep Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment-53.17 percentage change
S-600918 300 mgPercent Change in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Asleep Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment-65.48 percentage change
PlaceboPercent Change in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Asleep Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment-52.73 percentage change
Secondary

Percent Change in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Awake Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment

Change in cough was calculated based upon the number of coughs per hour in 24 hours at Week 4 and baseline. Results are presented as percent change from baseline. Reported percent change is based on a mixed model for the log-transformed ratio of the number of coughs per hour while awake at each visit with treatment, week, and treatment-by-week as fixed effect, participants as random effect, and region and the log-transformed coughs per hour while awake at baseline as covariates. The number of coughs per hour while awake was measured using a cough monitor.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 4

Population: Full Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and who had cough monitor assessment at both baseline and at least 1 visit after initiation of study drug administration. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure at the specified timeframe.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
S-600918 50 mgPercent Change in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Awake Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment-55.77 percentage change
S-600918 150 mgPercent Change in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Awake Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment-61.75 percentage change
S-600918 300 mgPercent Change in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Awake Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment-66.33 percentage change
PlaceboPercent Change in Number of Coughs Per Hour While Awake Following 4 Weeks of Study Treatment-60.31 percentage change

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026