Gingival Recession
Conditions
Brief summary
42 patients were treated either with E-CTG (N=20) or SCAF (N=22). The recordings included clinician-based (recession depth, recession width, probing depth, clinical attachment level, keratinized tissue width, tissue thickness, clinical attachment gain (CAG), root coverage (RC), keratinized tissue change (KTC)) and patient-based (wound healing index (WHI), dentine hypersensitivity (DH), tissue appearance, patient expectations and aesthetics) parameters that were taken at baseline, T1 (sixth week), T2 (sixth month) and T3 (first year).
Interventions
PROCEDUREE-CTG
Envelope connective tissue graft
Sponsors
Kırıkkale University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* single Miller I GR defects ≤3mm at upper anterior or premolar teeth * systemically healthy * identifiable cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) * PD ≤3 mm
Exclusion criteria
* periodontal surgery experience in the past two years * excessive contacts * mobility * caries * loss of vitality * smoking * pregnancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| recession depth | baseline | Distance between CEJ and GM |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| recession width | baseline | horizontal distance between two borders of recession at CEJ level |
| probing depth | baseline | distance between GM and base of gingival sulcus |
| clinical attachment level | baseline | distance between CEJ and base of gingival sulcus |
| keratinized tissue width | baseline | distance between GM and MGJ |
Outcome results
None listed