Skip to content

Allergy Antibiotics And Microbial Resistance

Penicillin Allergy Status And Its Effect On Antibiotic Prescribing, Patient Outcomes, and Antimicrobial Resistance

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04108637
Acronym
ALABAMA
Enrollment
823
Registered
2019-09-30
Start date
2019-07-04
Completion date
2024-04-30
Last updated
2024-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infection

Keywords

penicillin, allergy, antimicrobial, resistance

Brief summary

ALBAMA study is designed to find out if the effects of Penicillin allergy assessment pathway (PAAP) intervention is on penicillin prescribing

Detailed description

* Antibiotics are important medicines for fighting infections caused by bacteria. Their widespread use has caused a worrying rise in antibiotic resistant bacteria, which are bacteria that are harder to control or kill with antibiotics. Patients with infections caused by antibiotic resistant bacteria are often ill for longer and have an increased risk of serious harm, including death. The spread of resistant bacteria can be slowed down by using antibiotics more carefully. Penicillins are an important group of antibiotics that are recommended treatment for many infections. Doctors will avoid prescribing penicillin for their patients who have a penicillin allergy label in their health records. These patients are usually prescribed different types of antibiotics for their infections. There is concern that these non-penicillin antibiotics may not work as well as penicillins, may cause more side-effects (including killing more of the body's helpful bacteria), and may be more expensive. * About 9 out of 10 people who have a record of penicillin-allergy are found to be not truly allergic to penicillin when thoroughly tested. This means they could safely take penicillins. The aim of ALABAMA is to find out if people with a penicillin-allergy record in their GP health records really do have an allergy by carrying out specialist testing, and to see if it is possible to reduce the number of patients wrongly labelled as penicillin allergic. The investigators will find out if this results in better use of antibiotics and fewer days of symptoms, when patients are prescribed antibiotics for infection. * The investigators are recruiting up to 140 GP practices in Yorkshire and Humber and the South West Peninsula to help with this research, and plans to include up to 1060 people.

Interventions

PROCEDUREpenicillin allergy assessment pathway

Summary of penicillin allergy assessment pathway : Stage-1 PAAP in Primary Care - Clinical History. Screening, questionnaire and antimicrobial history will be undertaken in primary care Stage-2 Skin Test(ST) in hospital clinic (this may not be needed for all participants) Stage 3 Oral Challenge Test (OCT) in hospital clinic Testing will involve half a day in clinic and then a three-day post clinic course of oral antimicrobial therapy, without a reaction

Sponsors

University of Oxford
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Leeds
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Multicentre, two parallel-arm, open label, individually randomised pragmatic trial with a nested-pilot study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study * Male or Female, aged 18 years or above * Current penicillin allergy (or sensitivity) record of any kind in their electronic health record * Receipt of either: penicillin, cephalosporin, tetracycline, quinolone or macrolide class antibiotic or fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim, clindamycin in the previous 12 months N.B.1 Patients who have been formally tested for penicillin allergy in the past and been found not to be penicillin allergic but still have a medical record indicating a penicillin allergy, are eligible for the trial.

Exclusion criteria

* Life expectancy estimated \<1 year by GP * Unable to attend immunology clinic * Unsuitable for entry into testing pathway because: * Allergy history consistent with anaphylaxis to penicillin * History of toxic epidermal necrolysis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) or any severe rash which blistered or needed hospital treatment, and acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis precipitated by a penicillin * Has been formally tested for penicillin allergy in the past and been found to be penicillin allergic * History of brittle/severe asthma or has had a course of steroids in the past 3 months for asthma or unstable coronary artery disease, or dermographism or other severe/poorly controlled skin conditions * Considered unsuitable for trial participation by the GP e.g. because of chaotic lifestyle * Pregnant * Breastfeeding mothers * Taking beta blocker medication, and unable to temporarily withhold these on the day of penicillin allergy testing * Currently taking (or recently taken) systemic steroids and unable to stop these for 10 days pretesting. * Currently taking antihistamines and unable to temporarily withhold these for 72 hours pre-testing GPs may also want to exclude vulnerable patients who are deemed to be unsuitable to participate for other reasons such as, but not limited to, terminal illness, reliability, mental illness, learning difficulties, anxiety, and other family circumstances. N.B.1 Patients that are currently taking medicines with antihistamine properties that cannot be temporarily withheld, or patients with isolated dermographism, may still be eligible to participate but will need to be discussed with the research team prior to consent. N.B.2 Pregnancy and breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Penicillin prescribingMeasured at up to 12 month post-randomisationThe proportion of participants who receive prescriptions for a penicillin when attending for predefined conditions where a penicillin is the first-line recommended antibiotic

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection/ colonisationMeasured up to 12 month post-randomisationTotal number of patients with MRSA infection/colonisation compared between intervention arms
Treatment response failureMeasured after first antibiotic prescription, which can occur any time during the follow-up period for patients(Up to 12 months post randomisation)Treatment response failure will be defined as: Re-presentation with worsening or non-resolving symptoms following treatment with an antibiotic up to 28 days after initial antibiotic prescription (including re-prescription of antibiotic within 28 days of an index prescription) for predefined conditions (TPP/notes review), over the year subsequent to randomisation. This will be compared between groups
Symptom durationMeasured up to 12 month post-randomisationDuration of symptoms (in days) rated 'moderately bad' or worse by patients, after initiation of antibiotic treatment
Total antibiotic prescribingMeasured up to 12 month post-randomisationCount of total antibiotic use (measured as total number of days therapy and as average daily quantity (ADQ) antibiotics. Total number of penicillin and each non-penicillin antibiotic prescriptions (measured as total number of days therapy and ADQ)
Hospital admissionsMeasured up to 12 month post-randomisationCount of total number of hospital admissions
Length of hospital staysMeasured up to 12 month post-randomisationCount of total length of hospital stays
Mortality ratesMeasured up to 12 month post-randomisationMortality rates compared between intervention arms
Cost effectiveness for the PAAP intervention compared to usual careCollated for period: randomisation to up to 12 months of randomisationMeasurement of quality adjusted life years in each arm
De-labellingcheck performed at 3 and 12 monthsThe proportion of ALABAMA participants whose labels were removed and remain removed from the medical eHR
Clostridium difficile infectionMeasured up to 12 month post-randomisationNumber of patients with Clostridium difficile infection
(Process evaluation) To explore patient and clinician experiences of trial procedures.Within 12 months of practice recruitment of a proportion of tested patientsGP and patient interviews
To measure changes in clinician and patient behaviour change regarding prescribing and consuming penicillin following a negative test result.Within 12 months of practice recruitment of a proportion of tested patientsChange in self-reported behaviour by clinicians and patients.
To measure the influences on clinician and patient behaviour change regarding prescribing and consuming penicillin following a negative test result.Within 12 months of practice recruitment of a proportion of tested patientsinfluences on behaviour by clinicians and patients.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
AEs and SAEs reportedMeasured at up to 12 month post-randomisationA descriptive analysis will be performed looking at the safety (number of AEs and SAEs) of de-labelling in the intervention group
Effects of PAAP on all outcomes for follow up past 12 monthsMeasured at the end of the studyDescriptive analysis using data captured in the notes review CRF

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026