Skip to content

Comparison of Viscoelastic Measurement by ROTEM® Delta and ClotPro® in Trauma Patients.

Comparison of Viscoelastic Measurement by ROTEM® Delta and ClotPro® in Trauma Patients. Prospective Observational Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04107818
Acronym
ROTCLOT
Enrollment
108
Registered
2019-09-27
Start date
2019-11-21
Completion date
2021-10-13
Last updated
2024-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coagulation Disorder, Polytrauma

Keywords

polytrauma, coagulopathy, viscoelastic tests

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to describe the differences and interchangeability in measurements of viscoelastic tests of coagulation by two different devices in adult trauma patients.

Detailed description

The study will commence following the Approval by The Ethics Research Committee. All patients admitted to our emergency department for trauma from the 1st of October 2019 to the 31st of January 2020 will be enrolled after fulfilling the inclusion criteria and in the absence of any exclusion criteria. Informed consent will be requested. Viscoelastic tests of coagulation will be performed on ROTEM® Delta and ClotPro® simultaneously. We will compare values of clotting time (CT), clot formation time (CFT), alfa angle, maximum clot firmness (MCF) and maximum lysis (ML) for test of extrinsic pathway(EX-test) on ClotPro® vs. test for extrinsic pathway (EXTEM) on ROTEM® Delta. Further we will compare values of clotting time (CT), clot formation time (CFT), alfa angle, maximum clot firmness (MCF) and maximum lysis (ML) for thromboelastometry of fibrinogen (FIB-test) on ClotPro® vs. thromboelastometry of fibrinogen (FIBTEM) on ROTEM® Delta. The secondary outcome will be to describe the dependence of measurement on temperature of patient. Study data will be entered in study form. The measurements can be repeated in time. The indication for next measurement is fully on treating physician. Differences in estimated viscoelastic coagulation parameters and interchangeability of two devices will be analysed.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Brno University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Masaryk University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* age ≥18 years * polytrauma with Injury severity score ≥ 16

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy * anticoagulant therapy * antiplatelet therapy * coagulation disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
maximum lysis (ML) FIB-test and FIBTEMthrough study completion, an average of 3 monthsdifference in maximum lysis measured by FIB-test and FIBTEM
clot formation time (CFT) FIB-test and FIBTEMthrough study completion, an average of 3 monthsdifference in clot formation time measured by FIB-test and FIBTEM
maximum clot firmness (MCF) FIB-test and FIBTEMthrough study completion, an average of 3 monthsdifference in maximum clot firmness measured by FIB-test and FIBTEM
alfa angle FIB-test and FIBTEMthrough study completion, an average of 3 monthsdifference in alfa angle measured by FIB-test and FIBTEM
Clotting time (CT) in EX-test and EXTEMthrough study completion, an average of 3 monthsdifference in clotting time measured by EX-test and EXTEM
Clot formation time (CFT) in EX-test and EXTEMthrough study completion, an average of 3 monthsdifference in clot formation time measured by EX-test and EXTEM
alfa angle in EX-test and EXTEMthrough study completion, an average of 3 monthsdifference in alfa angle measured by EX-test and EXTEM
maximum clot firmness (MCF) in EX-test and EXTEMthrough study completion, an average of 3 monthsdifference in maximum clot firmness measured by EX-test and EXTEM
maximum lysis (ML) in EX-test and EXTEMthrough study completion, an average of 3 monthsmaximum lysis difference in MCF measured by EX-test and EXTEM
clotting time (CT) FIB-test and FIBTEMthrough study completion, an average of 3 monthsdifference in clotting time measured by FIB-test and FIBTEM

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
maximum clot firmness (MCF) FIB-test and Clauss methodthrough study completion, an average of 3 monthscorrelation of maximum clot firmness with blod fibrinogen level
maximum clot firmness (MCF) FIBTEM and Clauss methodthrough study completion, an average of 3 monthscorrelation of maximum clot firmness with blod fibrinogen level
patient temperaturethrough study completion, an average of 3 monthseffect of patients´ temperature on results of measurements

Countries

Czechia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026