Child Behavior, Parent-Child Relations
Conditions
Keywords
parent training, early adversity, early intervention, manualized intervention, high-risk children, parenting, fMRI
Brief summary
FIND (Filming Interactions to Nurture Development) is a potentially disruptive innovation in the field of early childhood intervention. The scientific premise of this proposed work, for which the investigators have strong preliminary evidence, is that for families experiencing economic adversity and related stressors with children ages 12-36 months, the FIND video-coaching program is a potent and efficient tool that addresses many of the known limitations of existing parenting programs and therefore has great potential for achieving impact at scale to support low-income children's optimal development. Our research on FIND to date (including a recently completed randomized efficacy trial) provides evidence of effects on responsive caregiving and key child developmental outcomes at lower dosages (and with greater potential for scalability) than do most existing programs. Preliminary data also suggest that FIND may be especially effective for caregivers with high levels of adverse early life experiences (who are typically difficult to engage/impact). Finally, and potentially quite noteworthy, preliminary data indicate that FIND may achieve such effects via improvement in specific domains of underlying caregiver brain functioning. This research therefore aims to conduct a randomized effectiveness trial in the context of a diverse sample of low-income families with children ages 12-36 months (at study entry) using a longitudinal design with an active control condition.
Detailed description
The investigators will test the central hypothesis that associations between (a) increases in responsive caregiving (the main FIND target) and (b) subsequent caregiver well-being and child developmental and biobehavioral outcomes (secondary targets), will be partially mediated through (c) changes in caregiver neuroimaging-based and behavioral measures of inhibitory control and parent self-concept. The investigators will also examine moderators of hypothesized intervention effects. Aim 1: Quantify main effects of FIND on intervention targets (changes in responsive caregiving) and related caregiver and child outcomes. Hypothesis 1a: Compared with an active control, FIND will significantly increase developmentally supportive, responsive caregiving immediately post-intervention and will endure at the 6-month longitudinal follow-up. These effects will be associated with enduring improvements in self-reported caregiving self-efficacy and stress. Hypothesis 1b: Compared with an active control, FIND will significantly improve child developmental outcomes on cognitive, socioemotional, expressive language and biobehavioral measures (including child chronic stress assessed via hair cortisol concentrations, HCC and Heart Rate Variability, HRV), as well as measures of caregiver and child well-being. The investigators will also test whether FIND-related increases in responsive caregiving (Hypothesis 1a) are associated (at postintervention and 6-month follow-up) with child outcomes. Aim 2: Use fMRI to identify process-level neural mechanisms underlying FIND intervention effects (i.e., why FIND works) and variations in these effects (i.e., for whom FIND works). The investigators hypothesize that FIND-related changes in underlying brain and behavioral mechanisms of caregiver inhibitory control and parenting self-concept will partially mediate observed changes in responsive caregiving. The investigators will also determine how between-subjects variation in changes in these brain measures is associated with differential response to sustained intervention impacts on responsive caregiving, which could be key in future work on increasing the impact of FIND for a broader range of recipients and on developing adaptations for low-responding groups. Aim 3: Determine moderators of intervention impact, including child and caregiver variables and intervention fidelity and dosage. The investigators hypothesize that the relationship between FIND-related changes in caregiver brain activity, caregiving behavior, and caregiver/child outcomes will be moderated by characteristics of the family, including caregiver past/current adversity, family socioeconomic status, and child behavior. The investigators further hypothesize that intervention effects will be moderated by fidelity and dosage. Work on this aim will subsequently enable the investigators to develop supplemental strategies to support those for whom FIND is less effective. Assignment to group: Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions (FIND intervention or active control) before their baseline research visit. While multiple caregivers from one family may participate in the FIND intervention or active control condition (which will be documented and included in analyses), the primary caregiver from each eligible family will be the target participant. This participant will be the one randomized to condition, asked to complete the assessments, and, if they are in the FIND condition, the focus of the videos used in the intervention. Similarly, if families have more than one eligible child in the target age range, the investigators will ask caregivers to select one child who will be the focus of the videos and research assessments. Intervention delivery. For the proposed study, the investigators will train coaches to fidelity to deliver either the FIND intervention or the active control intervention. The investigators have extensive experience and well-established protocols for training and maintaining fidelity during intervention trials, including video-based interventions. To minimize between-group differences in coach demographics, the investigators will match coaches who are delivering each intervention as closely as possible on levels of education and early childhood experience, and will include this information as covariates in our analyses of intervention effects. Although the investigators do not anticipate contamination of the FIND material into the active control, it is noteworthy that such contamination will narrow any differences between the groups, thus providing a more rigorous test of our hypotheses. FIND intervention. FIND is a brief home-based video coaching intervention. FIND involves feedback provided by the coach to the caregiver using brief film clips derived from video of caregiver-child interaction collected in the home. The coaching focuses specifically and exclusively on showing caregivers instances in which they are engaging in developmentally supportive interactions during coaching sessions. FIND is delivered in 10 weekly home visits, each of which lasts 30-45 minutes. The process begins with an initial visit in which the coach provides an overview, records 10-15 minutes of the caregiver and child engaged in everyday interactions, and then introduces the concept of serve and return. The video is edited to show brief clips in which the caregiver is engaged in the first of five specific and precisely defined caregiver-based components of serve and return. The next week, the FIND coach reviews the edited clips in detail with the caregiver. Sessions continue, alternating between filming and coaching sessions until all five components have been covered sequentially, with each component building on prior ones. The hierarchical nature of the program is intentionally designed so that even partial completion of the program is hypothesized to confer benefits. FIND editing and coaching processes are fully manualized, including certification protocols, fidelity forms, and rubrics, and designed to be both straightforward and highly replicable. For editing, three short clips are selected from the video gathered in the home. Each clip begins with a brief onscreen text description that is read aloud by the coach, which cues the caregiver to notice the child's initiation (serve) and his/her own supportive response (return). Then the clip plays three times: (1) all the way through; (2) with embedded pauses, which cue the coach to pause and comment on specific elements of the interaction; and (3) all the way through again, giving the caregiver an opportunity to consolidate what he or she has learned. As the clip is playing, the coach narrates the serve and return process. To ensure all families receive the full benefit of FIND, all FIND coaches will participate in the four-phase FIND certification process for coaching and editing, which includes an initial training, fidelity training, application for certification, and certification. The investigators have used this process to train more than 80 certified FIND interventionists to date. Active control intervention. The active control condition for this study is designed to maximize rigor by controlling for nonspecific effects of FIND (supportive home visiting, child observation, and information about development) to determine the unique impact of the hypothesized active ingredients of FIND (i.e., specialized microsocial video coaching on the five caregiver-based components of serve and return). As such, families randomly assigned to the control condition will receive weekly home visits alternating between (a) coaching sessions covering one of five domains of child development (Motor, Cognitive, Language, Play, and Social-Emotional and (b) observation sessions that will include a review of the prior coaching session and an observation and discussion of the caregiver-child interaction. This intervention will consist of 10 home visits each lasting 25-30 minutes. The coach will not engage in any filming or video coaching, but will still be able to discuss caregiving concerns. Materials are adapted from the Partners for a Healthy Baby curriculum developed by Florida State University's Center for Prevention and Early Intervention Policy.
Interventions
FIND is a brief home-based video coaching intervention which involves feedback provided by the coach to the caregiver using brief film clips derived from video of caregiver-child interaction collected in the home. The coaching focuses on showing caregivers instances in which they are engaging in developmentally-supportive interactions during coaching sessions. FIND is delivered over 10 weekly home visits lasting 30-45 minutes. The process begins with an initial visit in which the coach provides an overview, records 10-15 minutes of caregiver-child interaction, then introduces the concept of serve and return. The video is edited to show brief clips in which the caregiver is engaged in the first of five specific caregiver-based components of serve and return. The next week, the FIND coach reviews the edited clips in detail with the caregiver. Sessions continue, alternating between filming and coaching sessions until all five components have been covered sequentially.
BEHAVIORALThe Healthy Toddler Program
HTP, the active control intervention, consists of weekly home visits alternating between (a) coaching sessions covering one of five domains of child development (Motor, Cognitive, Language, Play, and Social-Emotional and (b) observation sessions that will include a review of the prior coaching session and an observation and discussion of the caregiver-child interaction. This intervention will consist of 10 home visits each lasting 25-30 minutes. The coach will not engage in any filming or video coaching, but will be able to discuss caregiving concerns. HTP materials are adapted from the Partners for a Healthy Baby curriculum developed by Florida State University's Center for Prevention and Early Intervention Policy.
Sponsors
University of Oregon
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Masking description
Research assistants collecting the data during lab visits will not know the condition of the participant and will therefore not be biased during data collection.
Intervention model description
Two groups. Half of the participants will be randomized into the experimental condition (FIND) while the other half will be randomized into the active control condition.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Months to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion: * Must be a primary caregiver (18 years or older) with a child between the ages of 12-36 months at study entry * Must live at or below 130% of the federal poverty line or receive services through foster care, TANF, SSI, or be currently homeless Exclusion: * Caregiver does not have custody of their child at least half-time each week * Caregiver has metal implants, metal fragments, pacemaker, or other electronic medical implant * Caregiver is claustrophobic * Caregiver weighs \> 550 lbs. * Caregiver is or thinks they may be pregnant * Caregiver has history of neurological disorders (e.g. twitching of the face, arms or legs; seizures) * Caregiver has tattoos above the neck * Caregiver has history of central nervous system infection (e.g. meningitis) or brain tumor * Caregiver has muscular or myotonic dystrophy (i.e. a condition characterized by tonic muscle spasms) * Caregiver has a significant visual impairment that cannot be corrected by glasses or contacts (e.g. strabismus) * Caregiver has history of concussion or other brain trauma * Caregiver is currently taking psychoactive medications (e.g. SSRIs)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Parent Self-Evaluation Task (PSET) behavior and associated brain activity | Change from baseline at endpoint (3-4 months post-baseline) | Percentage of developmentally-supportive (DS) and developmentally-unsupportive (DU) traits endorsed under the self instruction will be used as a behavioral measure of parenting self-concept, and medial prefrontral cortex activity (mPFC) will be measured via the Self \> Change contract for DS traits |
| Self-reported level of social-emotional development | Change from baseline at endpoint (3-4 months post-baseline) and 6 months post-endpoint | Caregiver report of their child's social emotional problems and competencies. The measure consists of 42 items that are on a 3-point scale (0=not true/rarely, 1=somewhat true/sometimes, 2=very true/always). For certain items a respondent may also respond N which means no opportunity. The measure includes two subscales: * problem total score (31 items) with items summed into a score ranging between 31-93; total score is compared to cut scores (age in months, gender, and cut score) to indicate if there is a possible problem. The problem total cut score is set at the 25th percentile. * competence total score (11 items) with items summed into a score ranging between 11-33; total score is compared to cut scores (age in months, gender, cut score) to indicate if there is a possible problem. The competency total cut score is set at the 15th percentile. |
| Observed spoken language via LENA audio recordings | Change from baseline at endpoint (3-4 months post-baseline) and 6 months post-endpoint | LENA is an audio recording device used to record spoken language in the natural environment. Software automatically analyzes recordings into several different metrics including estimates and percentile scores for adult words spoken to child, conversational turns, child vocalizations, and audio environment. |
| Coded rate of responsive caregiving via conversational turns | Change from baseline at endpoint (3-4 months post-baseline) and 6 months post-endpoint | Conversational turns is a simple coding scheme designed to record timing, quantity, and length of caregiver and child utterances. |
| Coded rate of responsive caregiving via the simple interactions scale | Change from baseline at endpoint (3-4 months post-baseline) and 6 months post-endpoint | The simple interactions scale is a micro-social rating scale that assesses the quality and quantity of interaction between caregivers and their children. The scale is split into two parts: connection and reciprocity. Connection is a measure of synchrony between the caregiver-child dyad. Reciprocity is a moment-to-moment measure of serve and return interactions. Coding for both connection and reciprocity is on a 1-3 scale (CX \[1\], CY \[2\], and CZ \[3\] for connections; RX \[1\], RY \[2\], and RZ \[3\] for reciprocity) using a flowchart and accompanying glossary of terms. Connections is rated frame by frame, while reciprocity is rated in 15-second chunks. Within Connections and Reciprocity, the X (1), Y (2), and Z (3) codes are summed and expressed as a percentage of the total video. If 20 of the 40 reciprocity time segments were coded CX, then CX = 50%. A higher percentage of Z (3) represents higher levels of connection and reciprocity in the caregiver-child interaction. |
| Coded rate of responsive caregiving via the serve and return scale | Change from baseline at endpoint (3-4 months post-baseline) and 6 months post-endpoint | The Serve and Return Scale (SRS) is a global coding system used to assess responsive parenting via the FIND 5 Elements. This scale will be used to assess the quality of caregiver responsiveness and the quantity of serve and return interaction in a 10-minute video of free-play between caregivers and their children. Items are on a 3-point scale between low, medium, and high. Higher scores indicate greater rates of responsive caregiving. The measure includes three subscales and a total score: * noticing the child's serves (1 item) score ranging between 1-3 * returning the child's serves (5 items) sum score ranging between 5-15 * caregiver initiation (1 item) score ranging between 1-3 * total score (7 items) sum score ranging between 7-21 |
| Incidence of parenting stress via the parent stress index IV | Change from baseline at endpoint (3-4 months post-baseline) and 6 months post-endpoint | Incidence of parenting stress via the Parent Stress Index-IV. Items are on a 5-point scale ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Higher scores indicated greater parenting stress. The measures includes three subscales and a total score: * parental distress (12 items) sum score ranging between 12-60 * parent-child dysfunctional interaction (12 items) sum score ranging between 12-60 * difficult child (12 items) sum score ranging between 12-60 * total score (36 items) sum score ranging between 36-180 |
| Incidence of parenting stress and child behaviors via the parent daily report | Change from baseline at endpoint (3-4 months post-baseline) and 6 months post-endpoint | A caregiver self-report of the incidence of challenging child behaviors and whether the caregiver perceives the behaviors to be stressful if they are occurring. |
| Self-reported level of perceived sense of competency | Change from baseline at endpoint (3-4 months post-baseline) and 6 months post-endpoint | Caregiver's perceived sense of competency in parenting via the Parent Sense of Competency scale. Items are on a 4-point scale ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Higher scores indicate greater parenting self-competency. The measure includes two subscales and a total score: * satisfaction (9 items) with items summed into a score ranging between 9-36 * efficacy (8 items) with items summed into a score ranging between 8-32 * total score (18 items) with items summed into a score ranging between 18-72 |
| Observed level of inhibitory control via the Stop Signal Task | Change from baseline at endpoint (3-4 months post-baseline) | Inhibitory control will be assessed by the Stop Signal Task (SST) during an MRI scan. The task speed adjusts based on performance and a single response time score will be outputted for each participant. The key neural measure is the degree of blood oxygenation-level dependent (BOLD) signal during stop trials relative to go trials (i.e., the stop \> go contrast over the entire trial period). |
| Parent Reward Task (PRT) behavior and associated brain activity | Change from baseline at endpoint (3-4 months post-baseline) | Self-reported ratings of stimuli will be used as a behavioral measure of reward (higher = better), and ventral striatum activity will be used as a measure of reward responsivity using a contrast of own child \> other child. |
| Concentration of hair cortisol | Change from baseline at endpoint (3-4 months post-baseline) and 6 months post-endpoint | Cumulative HPA axis activity measured via hair cortisol concentrations (HCC) |
| Self-reported incidence of challenging child behaviors | Change from baseline at endpoint (3-4 months post-baseline) and 6 months post-endpoint | Self-report measures of challenging child behaviors, including internalizing and externalizing behaviors, via the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of early adversity | Baseline | Incidence of early adversity measured via the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) |
| Incidence of poor caregiver mental health | Change from baseline at endpoint (3-4 months post-baseline) and 6 months post-endpoint | Incidence of caregiver mental health via self-report measures of anxiety (Penn State Worry Questionnaire \[PSWQ\]) and depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression \[CES-D\]). |
| Number of intervention sessions completed | reported at end of intervention, 3-4 months post-baseline | The number of intervention sessions completed (i.e. dosage) will be assessed by the number of sessions completed by each participant. Total score will range from 0-10. |
| Percentage of intervention sessions at fidelity | reported at end of intervention, 3-4 months post-baseline | Percentage of the 10 total sessions that are at fidelity using a fidelity rubric. |
| Demographics | Baseline | Demographic information including socioeconomic status, age and sex of caregiver and child, education level, race/ethnicity |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed