Skip to content

Effect of Paratracheal Esophagus Pressure on the Insertion of Laryngeal Mask Airway

Effect of Pressure to Left Paratracheal Esophagus During the Insertion of Laryngeal Mask Airway

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04106635
Enrollment
108
Registered
2019-09-27
Start date
2020-01-02
Completion date
2020-07-17
Last updated
2021-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

General Anesthesia, Pulmonary Aspiration

Keywords

Laryngeal mask airway, Paratracheal esophageal pressure, Cricoid pressure

Brief summary

Laryngeal mask airway is inserted into the oral cavity and seals the upper esophagus and the surrounding tissue, effectively securing airway. Laryngeal mask airway has been widely adopted in the clinical practice. On the other hand, cricoid pressure has been used to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents during induction of general anesthesia. However, cricoid pressure might impede placement of the laryngeal mask airway, thereby preventing effective ventilation. Recently, left paratracheal pressure was introduced as an alternative to cricoid pressure and reported to be more effective than cricoid pressure in the prevention of gastric air insufflation during positive-pressure ventilation by facemask. Since this method compresses low left paratracheal level, it may affect the successful insertion of laryngeal mask airway. In this study, the investigators aimed to evaluate the effect of paratracheal esophagus pressure on the insertion of laryngeal mask airway compare to conventional cricoid pressure.

Interventions

To apply paratracheal pressure, the thumb was placed over the left side of the trachea cephalad to the clavicle and medial to the sternocleidomastoid muscle.

To apply cricoid pressure, the cricoid cartilage is compressed by 30N force with a single-handed three finger maneuvre towards the vertebral bodies.

Sponsors

Ajou University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The group assignments were sealed in opaque envelopes by a research assistant not involved in the study.

Intervention model description

Randomized double blinded clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who are undergoing surgery under general anesthesia where supraglottic airway management will be appropriate * American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification 1-2

Exclusion criteria

* Body mass index \> 35 kg/m2 * High risk of regurgitation (hiatus hernia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, non-fasting status) * Criteria for difficult airway (limitation of mouth opening/neck extension, Mallampati class IV),

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The success rate of device insertionDuring induction of anesthesia, an average of 60 secondsSuccessful insertion of laryngeal mask airway in a maximum of three attempts

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The time for successful insertion of the device: During induction of anesthesia, an average of 60 secondsThe total time is measured from the removal of the face mask until bilateral chest rise with the first capnogram upstroke.
Peak inspiratory pressureAt 5 minute after insertion of laryngeal mask airwayPeak inspiratory pressure is recorded from mechanical ventilator.
The ease of insertion of deviceDuring induction of anesthesia, an average of 60 secondsThe ease of placement was assessed using a subjective scale of 1-4 (1= no resistance, 2 = moderate resistance, 3 = high resistance, 4 = inability to place the device
The number of attempts at insertion of deviceDuring induction of anesthesia, an average of 60 secondsThe number of attempts for successful insertion of laryngeal mask airway
The grade of fiberoptic bronchoscopic viewDuring induction of anesthesia, an average of 5 minutesThe fiberoptic bronchoscopic view is defined as Grade 1, larynx only seen; Grade 2, larynx and epiglottis posterior surface seen; Grade 3, larynx, and epiglottis tip or anterior surface seen-visual obstruction of epiglottis to larynx: \< 50%; Grade 4, epiglottis down-folded, and its anterior surface seen-visual obstruction of epiglottis to larynx: \> 50%; Grade 5, epiglottis downfolded and larynx cannot be seen directly.
Incidence of intraoperative complicationsDuring the surgery, an average of 2 hours after anesthesia inductionIntraoperative complications including coughing, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, hypoxia (SpO2 \< 90%), regurgitation, aspiration, blood staining of the device.
Incidence of postoperative complicationsAn average of 2 hours after extubationPostoperative complications including sore throat, hoarseness/dysphonia, jaw, neck or ear pain, persistent cough, tachypnea, stridor, hypoxia (SpO2 \< 90%), nausea and vomiting.
The presence of gastric air insufflation after induction of anesthesiaDuring induction of anesthesia, an average of 5 minutesThe presence of gastric air insufflation is defined as an increase in antral cross-sectional area and/or presence of air artifacts in the antrum (comet tail, posterior acoustic shadow) confirmed by ultrasound.
Success rate in first attempt: During induction of anesthesia, an average of 60 secondsSuccessful insertion of laryngeal mask airway in a first attempt

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026