Skip to content

Social Deprivation Assessment in Older Adults

Social Deprivation Assessment in Older Adults: Results From the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04105036
Enrollment
30000
Registered
2019-09-26
Start date
2020-04-01
Completion date
2025-03-01
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Geriatrics, Social Deprivation

Brief summary

Social deprivation is a state to which older adults may be exposed, leading to adverse social, psychological, and health outcomes. Social deprivation may be more sensitive than socioeconomic status for predicting adversity while using only a few items for evaluation. However, there is no practical assessment for social deprivation in older Canadian adults. Two indices that capture a broad picture of social vulnerability have previously been developed for older Canadians. Using participants in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA), the overall objective is to examine and compare the associations of the COAD score and index, as well as the Keefe et al. and Andrew et al. indices with prevalent and incident adverse social, psychological, and health outcomes in participants at baseline assessment.

Detailed description

Social deprivation is a state in which individuals are at risk for adverse health, as well as psychological and social outcomes. Social deprivation emphasises relative rather than absolute conditions, taking into account cultural standards of living in its classification of individuals. Increasing age is associated with increasing prevalence of social deprivation, putting older adults at risk for negative outcomes such as poor quality of life and ill-being. Rapid apprehension of social deprivation states by researchers and healthcare providers could improve management, favour proactivity, and increase understanding of health and social trends in older individuals. No Canadian clinical assessment of social deprivation exists. There are only two social vulnerability indices that have been associated with incident health outcomes. On the other hand, the Evaluation of Deprivation and Inequalities in Health Examination Centres (EPICES: Évaluation de la Précarité et des Inégalités de santé dans les Centres d'Examens de Santé) is a brief social deprivation assessment developed and validated in France. The Canadian Older Adult Deprivation (COAD) scale is a modified EPICES assessment. Using participants in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA), the global objective of this study is to examine whether the COAD score is in fact associated with social deprivation and its association with adverse social, psychological, and health outcomes. Social deprivation is considered the state of an individual experiencing social withdrawal, poor economic conditions, and cultural deprivation; it exposes individuals to adverse social, health, and psychological outcomes. Social deprivation has been found to be influenced with many factors, including an individual's socioeconomic status (SES), gender, ethnicity and age, to name a few. The Canadian population is unique in its composition, with large immigrant, diverse, and ageing populations. This emphasises the need for a simple assessment specific to the Canadian population that can quickly yet accurately identify socially deprived older individuals. Currently, such a scale does not exist in the Canadian context. To bridge this gap, the French social deprivation assessment Evaluation of Deprivation and Inequalities in Health Examination Centres (EPICES: Évaluation de la Précarité et des Inégalités de santé dans les Centres d'Examens de Santé) will be adapted to the Canadian context, creating the Canadian Older Adult Deprivation (COAD) scale. Moreover, as two Canadian social vulnerability and isolation indices have been previously created, the potential overlap between these indices and the COAD scale will be examined.

Interventions

OTHERData Collection

Telephone interview questionnaire, in-home face-to-face interview, and data from the Collection Site

Sponsors

Jewish General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participants of the comprehensive CLSA assessment.

Exclusion criteria

* No information on social status * No information on social, psychological, and health outcomes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Social Deprivation1 dayEPICES ( Évaluation de la Précarité et des Inégalités de santé dans les Centres d'Examens de Santé) scale, the cutoff 30.17 will be used

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comorbidities1 dayNumber of comorbidities
Mortality1 dayIncident mortality
Depression1 day10 items from the Center for Epidemiological Studies' Short Depression Scale (CES-D) score ≥10
Falls1 dayNumber (if any) of falls
Mobility aid1 dayIs a mobility aid used
Mobility1 dayDifficulty walking 2 to 3 neighbourhood blocks
Polypharmacy1 dayThe number of prescription medications taken on a daily basis, and in particular any number above 4 per day and the use of psychoactive drugs including benzodiazepines, antidepressants or neuroleptics
Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scales1 dayIADL score out of 8. Where a score of 4-7 is indicative of mild stages of neurocognitive disorders.
Self-reported happiness, perception of health and mental health1 dayScored as excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor
Income1 dayPersonal income before tax
Social interaction/the availability of social support1 dayVariables selected from the: social participation (SPA) questionnaire, social network (SN) questionnaire, social support availability (SSA) questionnaire
Place of living1 dayParticipants place of living is coded as home versus institution
Cognitive performance1 dayCognitive Module Assessment of the CLSA study from baseline assessment (e.g. the Animal Fluency Test)
Activities daily living (ADL)1 dayADL score out of 6. Where a score of 3-5 is indicative of mild stages of neurocognitive disorders.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026