Pre-Diabetes, Type 2 Diabetes
Conditions
Keywords
Pre-Diabetes, Men's Health, Type 2 Diabetes, Racial Disparities
Brief summary
The goal of this study is to address the risk of diabetes among men by creating a Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) tailored to men.
Detailed description
The rising epidemic of type 2 diabetes is a major cause of disability and death that disproportionately affects men. Compared to women, men have much worse health and higher death rates for several chronic conditions, including diabetes. The National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP) has been shown to help decrease the chances of developing type 2 diabetes. The NDPP has shown the value of lifestyle change for weight loss and diabetes prevention. The Power-Up study is being done because although the evidence points to the effectiveness of the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), men are less likely to be engaged or participate in DPP. The Power-up study was designed to see whether a DPP tailored for men can help improve engagement, participation, and results for men. Participants will be randomized to either undergo the Power-Up or standard NDPP classes. An assessment of whether a DPP created for men will increase participation in the program and decrease the risk for diabetes as compared to the standard NDPP. Power-Up is designed to Aim 1) Assess the effect of Power-Up vs. standard care NDPP on percent weight loss among men at risk for diabetes; Aim 2) Compare engagement of minority men at risk for diabetes in Power-Up vs. standard care NDPP; and Aim 3) Evaluate the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Costs of Power-Up using the RE-AIM framework. The Power-Up intervention is tailored to the needs and preferences of men and uses: a) men coaches; b) men-only groups; c) messaging tailored to be appreciated and motivational to men; d) adapted content that highlights issues relevant to men. There are 22-28 classes over the course of 12 months for both Power-Up and standard NDPP. The classes are split into two phases which are called the core and the maintenance phases. The core phase of the program will consist of at least 16 classes over the first 6 months. After the core, participants will attend maintenance classes over the next 6 months. Participants will be asked over the course of the 12 months to complete surveys at three different times before, during, and after completing the classes. The hypothesis is that men randomized to Power-Up will achieve significantly greater weight loss (% weight loss from baseline) at 16 weeks and 1 year than men randomized to the standard care, mixed-gender NDPP group (Aim 1). Evaluation of engagement and retention for Aim 2 is based on attendance records for Power-Up and NDPP sessions electronically collected by trained coaches and monitored by study staff. The standards will be followed for NDPP evaluation where engagement is defined as equal or greater than 4 core sessions attended and retention is defined as equal or greater than 9 sessions attended. There will be a collection of quantitative and qualitative data that will be rigorously evaluated: the reach of our recruitment, broader patient-important indicators of effectiveness, adoption at the practice level, and implementation of the intervention (Aim 3). Enrollment consists of 300 participants through our health system partners. Men will be randomized 1:1 to either the Power-Up intervention arm or referred to the standard NDPP at their clinic site. Consistent with current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) standards and current NDPP practices of our health system partners, telephone make-up sessions will be offered by coaches in both conditions to men who miss in-person sessions.
Interventions
Evaluating whether a diabetes prevention program (DPP) tailored for men (Power-Up) will show better or similar percent weight loss and retention than a standard mixed-gender DPP
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
There will be 6 intervention cycles. Approximately 50 men will be randomized 1:1 to each study arm. There will be 4 control cycles for every intervention workshop. Therefore we will have 6 intervention workshops and 24 control workshops. The participants will be randomized to either undergo Power-Up or standard Diabetes Prevention Program sessions.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* At least 18 years old * Most recent HbA1c: 5.7%-6.4% (within last year) or Diabetes Risk Score \>= 5 * Most recent BMI ≥ 25 (within last 6 months) * Access to a device that can join sessions virtually either through a virtual conferencing application * Have valid address and telephone contact information * Have no plans to change their health system/primary care provider or move from their current, NYC area, address in the next year
Exclusion criteria
* Not physically able or willing to attend virtual, group-based sessions * Unable to provide informed consent by telephone * Unable or unwilling to complete baseline telephone surveys or follow-up surveys in English or Spanish
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Weight Change Through 16 Sessions | Up to 6 months, after the delivery of the 16th session (end of the core phase) | The percent weight change through 16 sessions was compared. Mean percent weight change for each arm for all intent-to-treat (ITT) participants (i.e.. attended \>=0 sessions), as well as those who were considered "Engaged" (i.e., attended \>=4 sessions) or "Retained" (i.e., attended \>=9 sessions), through 16 scheduled sessions, was determined. All data is crude and unadjusted with no imputation. |
| Percent Weight Change Through the 12 Month Trial | 12 Months (At end of maintenance phase) | The percent weight change through 12 months was compared. Mean percent weight change for each arm for all intent-to-treat (ITT) participants (i.e., attended \>=0 sessions), as well as those who were considered "Engaged" (i.e., attended \>=4 sessions) or "Retained" (i.e., attended \>=9 sessions), through 12 months, was determined. All data is crude and unadjusted with no imputation. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement of Men in Power-Up vs Standard National Diabetes Prevention Program | 6 Months (At end of the core phase) | Engagement of men at risk for diabetes in Power-Up vs. Standard NDPP was compared based on the number of sessions attended. Engagement is characterized as attending \>= 4 sessions. Counts and percentages of participants who attended at least 4 sessions in the first six months of the workshops are summarized by study arm. This is halfway through the entire trial. |
| Retention of Men in Power-Up vs Standard National Diabetes Prevention Program | 12 Months (At end of the maintenance phase) | Retention of men at risk for diabetes in Power-Up vs. Standard NDPP was compared based on the number of sessions attended. Participants are defined as "retained" if they attended \>=9 more sessions. It is expected that men randomized to the Power-Up sessions will have greater engagement and retention rates than men randomized to standard care and referred to mixed-gender NDPP classes. Counts and percentages of participants who attended at least 9 sessions through the 12 months of workshops are summarized by study arm. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Using the electronic health record (EHR) systems of a large academic medical center and a network of small to medium independent primary care practices throughout New York City, Black and Latino men who met eligibility criteria for NDPP were identified and enrolled in a randomized controlled trial and assigned 1:1 to receive Power-Up or the standard, mixed-gender NDPP over 1 year via online videoconferencing. The participants were recruited over the phone.
Pre-assignment details
The study team began with a total of N=11052 participants (Ps). We were unable to contact n=6235 Ps. Before screening, n=1489 Ps declined to participate, and n=486 Ps were lost to follow-up. During screening, n=476 Ps were ineligible, and n=1739 Ps were eligible and declined to consent. After consent, n=326 Ps were lost to follow-up and not randomized. Enrolled is defined, according to the protocol, as being randomized into one of the study arms. Only 301 Ps were randomized.
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | — |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 53.226 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.737 |
| Age, Customized Age at First Session | 52.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5 |
| Baseline Body Mass Index (BMI) | 33.4 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3 |
| Baseline Weight | 211.5 Pounds STANDARD_DEVIATION 43.6 |
| Born in US No | 153 Participants |
| Born in US Yes | 72 Participants |
| Current Smoking Frequency Daily | 12 Participants |
| Current Smoking Frequency Not at all | 259 Participants |
| Current Smoking Frequency Some Days | 15 Participants |
| Delay between Randomization and Start | 47.5 days STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.8 |
| Employment Status Not Reported | 3 Participants |
| Employment Status Not working, but looking for work | 20 Participants |
| Employment Status Not working, not looking for work | 13 Participants |
| Employment Status Not working, unable to work | 33 Participants |
| Employment Status Perform volunteer work | 2 Participants |
| Employment Status Retired | 40 Participants |
| Employment Status Working full-time | 145 Participants |
| Employment Status Working part-time (including seasonal/work-study, etc.) | 42 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 74 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 76 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 2 Participants |
| Ever Smoked No | 95 Participants |
| Ever Smoked Yes | 60 Participants |
| Has Health Insurance? Don't Know/Not Sure | 3 Participants |
| Has Health Insurance? No | 12 Participants |
| Has Health Insurance? Yes | 141 Participants |
| Highest Level of Education Completed Elementary/Primary School (Includes grades 1-5) | 2 Participants |
| Highest Level of Education Completed High School/Preparatory School | 75 Participants |
| Highest Level of Education Completed Middle School/Junior High (Includes grades 6-8) | 20 Participants |
| Highest Level of Education Completed Some College | 1 Participants |
| Highest Level of Education Completed Trade School/Vocational School | 8 Participants |
| Highest Level of Education Completed University/College | 119 Participants |
| Household Income <= $50,000 | 68 Participants |
| Household Income > $50,000 | 92 Participants |
| Household Income Declined to answer | 35 Participants |
| Life Difficulty from PHQ-8 Symptoms Extremely difficult | 4 Participants |
| Life Difficulty from PHQ-8 Symptoms Not at all difficult | 72 Participants |
| Life Difficulty from PHQ-8 Symptoms Somewhat difficult | 38 Participants |
| Life Difficulty from PHQ-8 Symptoms Very difficult | 19 Participants |
| Marital Status Divorced | 22 Participants |
| Marital Status Living with a partner | 11 Participants |
| Marital Status Married | 60 Participants |
| Marital Status Separated | 6 Participants |
| Marital Status Single | 51 Participants |
| Marital Status Widow(er) | 2 Participants |
| Number of People Supported on Household Income | 2.6 People STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 |
| Personal Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) score | 5.2 score on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 5 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race American Indian/Alaska Native | 3 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Black | 85 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Multiracial | 14 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Other | 61 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race White | 14 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 301 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 301 Participants |
| Source of Health Insurance Medicaid including Medicaid Managed Care | 110 Participants |
| Source of Health Insurance Medicare | 18 Participants |
| Source of Health Insurance Other/Unknown | 18 Participants |
| Source of Health Insurance Private | 51 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 155 | 0 / 146 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 155 | 0 / 146 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 155 | 0 / 146 |