Skip to content

Evaluation of Pain in the Course of in Vitro Fertilization

Evaluation of Pain in the Course of in Vitro Fertilization: the Endalgofiv Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04103320
Acronym
ENDALGOFIV
Enrollment
318
Registered
2019-09-25
Start date
2019-11-18
Completion date
2021-08-04
Last updated
2022-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Keywords

Infertility, In Vitro Fertilization, Endometriosis, pain evaluation

Brief summary

25 to 50% of endometriotic patients are infertile and use medically assisted procreation. In general, the assessment of pain in medically assisted procreation is very little studied. Pain assessment studies in endometriotic patients remain limited to a quantitative assessment of pain symptomatology, without contextualization of painful manifestations. The primary objective of our study is the qualitative and contextualized assessment of pain during In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) protocol in endometriotic and non-endometriotic patients. The secondary objectives of our study are the quantitative study of pain, the measurement of the impact of personal efficiency on painful symptomatology, evaluation of depression, the results of IVF (implantation, pregnancy and live birth rates), and compare pain between endometriotic or non-endometriotic patients and between primary infertility and secondary infertility. According to the results obtained in this study, therapeutic strategies for the management of pain could be proposed, with the aim of improving the quality of life and the results of IVF in these patients.

Interventions

Survey will be at different time of the IVF protocol (at the first medical appointment in the medically assisted department, after stimulation, after oocytes retrieval, after embryo transfer, one month after the IVF protocol)

Sponsors

University Hospital, Lille
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 43 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients who start an IVF cycle in the medically assisted procreation department of the Jeanne de Flandres Hospital (CHRU Lille)

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal to participate in the study * Minor patient * Patient over 43 years old * BMI patient \> 35 * Pregnant woman * Unable to provide clear information to the patient * Patient under guardianship or lack of health cover * Patient in IVF with donation of oocyte * IVF patients for oocyte preservation * Patient who had already participated in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pain catastrophism scale (PCS)one month after the IVF protocolscore between 0 to 52
Comparison of the scores obtained by the pain survey (EN, QDSA, DN4), quality of life survey (EQ-5D), depression and anxiety (HAD), pain catastrophism score (PCS) and assessment of personal efficacy (heiQ).one month after the IVF protocolcomposite criteria to assess of the typology of pain
EN = numerical scale of painone month after the IVF protocolfrom 0 to 10 (0 is no pain and 10 is maximum pain imaginable)
Questionnaire douleur Saint Antoine (QDSA)one month after the IVF protocolQDSA for emotional and sensory dimension of pain. It's a word list to describe a pain, patient must specify the type of pain that she usually feels for 8 days by putting a cross for the correct answer (0 to 4: absent, weak, moderate, strong, extremely strong)
DN4one month after the IVF protocolemotional and sensory dimension of pain, neuropathic pain survey in four questions - score on 7
EQ-5D quality of lifeone month after the IVF protocoloverall score on a numeric scale check the box that best describes your health today, 5 themes (mobility, autonomy of the person, common activities, pain / discomfort, anxiety / depression)
HAD,anxiety and depressionone month after the IVF protocol2 scores on 21 - circle the number that best fits your condition
heiQ = personal efficiency,one month after the IVF protocol40 questions with 8 dimensions

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
implantation rates (%)at Baseline (the first medical appointment), 15 days after embryo transfer, and at one month of the IVF cyclemeasure in endometriotic and non-endometriotic patients,in primary and secondary infertility patients
pregnancy rate (%)at Baseline (the first medical appointment), 15 days after embryo transfer, and at one month of the IVF cyclemeasure in endometriotic and non-endometriotic patients,in primary and secondary infertility patients
live birth rate (0 or 1)at Baseline (the first medical appointment), 15 days after embryo transfer, and at one month of the IVF cyclemeasure in endometriotic and non-endometriotic patients,in primary and secondary infertility patients
renouncing a new IVF attempt: yes or noat Baseline (the first medical appointment), 15 days after embryo transfer, and at one month of the IVF cyclemeasure the impact of pain on the pregnancy project in endometriotic and non-endometriotic patients,in primary and secondary infertility patients
willingness to take a specific treatment with an analgesic goal: yes or no answerat Baseline (the first medical appointment), 15 days after embryo transfer, and at one month of the IVF cyclemeasure the impact of pain on the pregnancy project in endometriotic and non-endometriotic patients,in primary and secondary infertility patients
Comparison of the scores obtained by the pain survey (EN, QDSA, DN4), quality of life survey (EQ-5D), depression and anxiety (HAD), pain catastrophism score (PCS) and assessment of personal efficacy (heiQ).at Baseline (the first medical appointment) and 15 days after the embryo transfercomposite criteria to assess of the typology of pain

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026