Skip to content

The Use of PRP and BMC in Patients With Internal Disc Disruption Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial in Patients With Internal Disc Disruption

Platelet Rich Plasma and Bone Marrow Aspirate for Lumbar Intradiscal Injections: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial in Patients With Internal Disc Disruption

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04102761
Enrollment
45
Registered
2019-09-25
Start date
2018-03-27
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2021-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Internal Disc Disruption

Brief summary

The condition being studied is chronic low back or leg pain in patients with internal disc disruption (IDD). The intervention to be studied is the intradiscal delivery of autologous Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) or bone marrow concentrate (BMC) into the nucleus pulposus of the disrupted disc(s).

Detailed description

This multi-center randomized controlled pilot trial will be the first to evaluate the response of PRP and BMC for discogenic pain by direct comparison. The investigators propose to incorporate a crossover design that compares placebo to two treatment modalities (i.e. Neutrophil-Poor PRP \[NP-PRP\] and BMC). If the investigators can demonstrate statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in study's primary and secondary outcome measures, this study will have identified a natural, effective and sustainable treatment for discogenic back pain that currently accounts for the highest level of disability in US. This will help guide physicians in the choice of care between surgical and conservative treatment options when treating patients.

Interventions

PROCEDUREIntradiscal PRP & BMC Injections

The intervention to be studied is the intradiscal delivery of autologous Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) or bone marrow concentrate (BMC) into the nucleus pulposus of the disrupted disc(s).

Sponsors

Andrews Research & Education Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Annu Navani
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Subjects will be assigned to one of three arms of the study. The first group will receive a trigger point injection of saline into the deep tissue. The second group will receive an injection of approximately 1-2 mL of Platelet RP into the painful disc/discs. The third group will receive an injection of approximately 1-2 mL of Bone Marrow Concentrate into the painful disc/discs. No more than three discs will be injected.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* A high index of suspicion for discogenic pain, i.e. painful degenerative discs with or without contained protrusions * Age greater than 18 and less than 70 years * Maintained intervertebral disc heights of at least 50% * Pain not generated from facet joints, sacro-iliac joints or any pathology other than discogenic origin. * Pain is not responsive to conservative treatment measures (oral medications, epidural steroid injections, physical therapy) * Pain persists for an extended period of time (i.e., at least 3 months) * High intensity zone (HIZ) in annular fissure detected on T2 or STIR MRI, degenerated discs or contained disc protrusions. * No evidence of contraindications to undergo procedure such as pregnancy, active infection, bleeding disorder, or metastatic cancer * English speaking

Exclusion criteria

* Disc extrusions, disc sequestrations, severe spinal stenosis, or severe disc degeneration with grade 5 Pfirmann index or with Modic 3 level change. * Patient refusal * Presence of a known bleeding disorder * Pregnancy * Systemic or local infection * Presence of an unstable medical or psychiatric condition * Prior intradiscal procedure (ie. IDET, Nucleoplasty) * Inaccessibility to discs such as fusion * Non-English speaking * Prior fusion surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Worsening of Disc Pathology with Injection of Biologics24 weeks post procedurePre and post op discs will be examined and compared for worsening pathology.
Improvement in Disc Pain with Injection of Biologics24 weeks post procedurePre and post op Pain will be measured and compared by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS): Measured from 0-10, 0 minimum score (better outcome) and 10 maximum score (worse outcome) Oswestry Low back disability (ODS): Measured from 0-50, 0 minimum score and 10 maximum score. The numbers are then calculated into percentages between 0% (minimum disability- better outcome)-100% (maximum disability- worse outcome) NASS Patient satisfaction Index (NASS): Measured from 0-4, 0 (better outcome) and 4 (worse outcome)
Improvement in Function in Patients with Injection of Biologics24 weeks post procedurePre and post op function will be measured and compared by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient SatisfactionPre injection, 1 month post op, 3 months post op, 6 months post op, 1 year.Patient satisfaction will be measured by the modified North American Spine Surgery (NASS) Outcome Questionnaire
MedicationsPre injection, 1 month post op, 3 months post op, 6 months post op, 1 year.Medications will be measured by patient's self report.
HospitalizationPre injection, 1 month post op, 3 months post op, 6 months post op, 1 year.Hospitalization will be measured by patient's self report.
Spine SurgeryPre injection, 1 month post op, 3 months post op, 6 months post op, 1 year.Spine Surgery will be measured by patient's self report.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026