Skip to content

A Research Study on How Well Semaglutide Works in Adolescents With Overweight or Obesity

Effect and Safety of Semaglutide 2.4 mg Once Weekly on Weight Management in Adolescents With Overweight or Obesity

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04102189
Enrollment
201
Registered
2019-09-25
Start date
2019-10-07
Completion date
2022-03-28
Last updated
2025-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity, Overweight

Brief summary

This study will look at the change in teenagers' body weight from the start to the end of the study. This is to compare the effect on body weight in teenagers taking semaglutide (a new medicine) and teenagers taking dummy medicine. The teenagers in the study and their parents will also have talks with study staff about healthy food choices, how to be more physically active and what they can do to help the teenagers lose weight. The teenagers will either get semaglutide or dummy medicine - which treatment is decided by chance. The teenagers will take 1 injection every week, on the same day of the week for about 15 months. The study medicine is injected with a thin needle in a skin fold in the stomach, thigh or upper arm. The teenagers will have 17 clinic visits, will have blood samples taken and will have to complete questionnaires and keep a diary. All this will be explained before study start.

Interventions

DRUGSemaglutide

Participants will receive semaglutide s.c. once weekly for a dose escalation period of 16 weeks and a maintenance period of 52 weeks

OTHERPlacebo

Participants will receive semaglutide placebo s.c. once weekly for a total of 68 weeks

Sponsors

Novo Nordisk A/S
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Sponsor staff involved in the clinical trial is masked according to company standard procedures

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed consent of parent(s) or legally acceptable representative of subject and child assent, as appropriate obtained before any trial-related activities. Trial-related activities are any procedures that are carried out as part of the trial, including activities to determine suitability for the trial * Male or female, ages 12 to below 18 years at the time of signing informed consent * BMI equal to or above 95th percentile OR equal to or above 85th percentile (on gender and age-specific growth charts (CDC.gov)) with 1 or more weight related comorbidity (treated or untreated): hypertension, dyslipidaemia, obstructive sleep apnoea or type 2 diabetes * History of at least one self-reported unsuccessful dietary effort to lose weight For subjects with type 2 diabetes at screening the following inclusion criteria apply in addition: \- HbA1c equal to or below 10.0% (86 mmol/mol) as measured by central laboratory at screening

Exclusion criteria

* Prepubertal subjects (Tanner stage 1) * History of type 1 diabetes * A self-reported (or by parent(s)/legally acceptable representative where applicable) change in body weight above 5 kg (11 lbs) within 90 days before screening irrespective of medical records * Subjects with secondary causes of obesity (i.e., hypothalamic, monogenic or endocrine causes) * For subjects with type 2 diabetes only: Uncontrolled and potentially unstable diabetic retinopathy or maculopathy. Verified by a fundus examination performed within the past 90 days prior to screening. Pharmacological pupil-dilation is a requirement unless using a digital fundus photography camera specified for non-dilated examination

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) (Percentage [%])Baseline (week 0), week 68Change in BMI (%) from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Body Weight (Kilograms [kg])Baseline (week 0), week 68Change in body weight (kg) from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Change in Body Weight (%)Baseline (week 0), week 68Change in body weight (%) from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Percentage of Participants Achieving >=10% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)At week 68Percentage of participants who achieved \>= 10% weight reduction from baseline (week 0) to week 68 is presented. In the reported data, 'Yes' infers the percentage of participants who have achieved \>= 10% weight reduction, whereas 'No' infers the percentage of participants who did not achieve \>= 10% weight reduction. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from date of randomization to last contact with trial site.
Percentage of Participants Achieving >=15% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)At week 68Percentage of participants who achieved \>= 15% weight reduction from baseline (week 0) to week 68 is presented. In the reported data, 'Yes' infers the percentage of participants who have achieved \>= 15% weight reduction, whereas 'No' infers the percentage of participants who did not achieve \>= 15% weight reduction. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from date of randomization to last contact with trial site.
Percentage of Participants Achieving >=20% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)At week 68Percentage of participants who achieved \>= 20% weight reduction from baseline (week 0) to week 68 is presented. In the reported data, 'Yes' infers the percentage of participants who have achieved \>= 20% weight reduction, whereas 'No' infers the percentage of participants who did not achieve \>= 20% weight reduction. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from date of randomization to last contact with trial site.
Change in BMI Percentage of the 95th Percentile on Gender and Age-specific Growth Charts (CDC.Gov [CDC: {Centers for Disease Control and Prevention}])Baseline (week 0), week 68Change from baseline in BMI percentage of the 95th percentile on gender and age-specific growth charts (CDC.gov) at week 68 is presented. CDC gender and age-specific growth charts: normal (BMI less than \[\<\] 85th percentile), overweight (BMI greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 85th - \<95th percentile), obesity class I (BMI \>=95th - \<120% of the 95th percentile), obesity class II (BMI \>=120% of the 95th percentile - \<140% of the 95th percentile) and obesity class III (BMI \>=140% of the 95th percentile). Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Improvement in Weight Category (Yes/no)At week 68Percentage of participants who achieved improvement in weight category from baseline (week 0) to week 68 is presented. Improvement in weight category was defined as being in a lower weight category at week 68 compared to baseline according to CDC gender and age-specific growth charts: normal (BMI \<85th percentile), overweight (BMI \>=85th - \<95th percentile), obesity class I (BMI \>=95th - \<120% of the 95th percentile), obesity class II (BMI \>=120% of the 95th percentile - \<140% of the 95th percentile) and obesity class III (BMI \>=140% of the 95th percentile). In the reported data, 'Yes' infers the percentage of participants who have achieved improvement in weight category, whereas 'No' infers the percentage of participants who did not achieve improvement in weight category. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from date of randomization to date of last contact with trial site.
Change in BMI (Standard Deviation Score [SDS])Baseline (week 0), week 68Change in BMI SDS from baseline to week 68 is presented. The SDS scores are also called as z-scores. BMI SDS was calculated using the following formula: Z=\[(value /M)\^L - 1\] / S\*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' BMI provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the world health organisation (WHO) Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. Possible values range from -3 to +3, a negative score being beneficial. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Change in BMI (Kilograms Per Meter Square [kg/m^2])Baseline (week 0), week 68Change in BMI (kg/m\^2) from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Change in Waist CircumferenceBaseline (week 0), week 68Change in waist circumference (centimeters \[cm\]) from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Percentage of Participants Achieving >=5% Reduction of BMI (Yes/no)At week 68Percentage of participants who achieved \>= 5% reduction of BMI from baseline (week 0) to week 68 is presented. In the reported data, 'Yes' infers the percentage of participants who have achieved \>= 5% BMI reduction, whereas 'No' infers the percentage of participants who did not achieve \>= 5% BMI reduction. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from date of randomization to last contact with trial site.
Change in Systolic Blood PressureBaseline (week 0), week 68Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Change in Diastolic Blood PressureBaseline (week 0), week 68Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Change in Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) (%)Baseline (week 0), week 68Change in HbA1c (%) from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Change in HbA1c (Millimoles Per Mole [mmol/Mol])Baseline (week 0), week 68Change in HbA1c (mmol/mol) from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L])Baseline (week 0), week 68Change in fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Milligrams Per Deciliter [mg/dL])Baseline (week 0), week 68Change in fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL) from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Change in Fasting Insulin (Picomoles Per Liter [Pmol/L]): Ratio to BaselineBaseline (week 0), week 68Change in fasting insulin (pmol/L) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 5% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)At week 68Percentage of participants who achieved \>= 5% weight reduction from baseline (week 0) to week 68 is presented. In the reported data, 'Yes' infers the percentage of participants who have achieved \>= 5% weight reduction, whereas 'No' infers the percentage of participants who did not achieve \>= 5% weight reduction. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from date of randomization to last contact with trial site.
Change in Total Cholesterol (mmol/L): Ratio to BaselineBaseline (week 0), week 68Change in total cholesterol (mmol/L) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Change in Total Cholesterol (mg/dL): Ratio to BaselineBaseline (week 0), week 68Change in total cholesterol (mg/dL) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Change in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol (mmol/L): Ratio to BaselineBaseline (week 0), week 68:Change in HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Change in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol (mg/dL): Ratio to BaselineBaseline (week 0), week 68Change in HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Change in Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol (mmol/L): Ratio to BaselineBaseline (week 0), week 68Change in LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Change in LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL): Ratio to BaselineBaseline (week 0), week 68:Change in LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Change in Very Low-density Lipoprotein (VLDL) Cholesterol (mmol/L): Ratio to BaselineBaseline (week 0), week 68Change in VLDL cholesterol (mmol/L) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Change in VLDL Cholesterol (mg/dL): Ratio to BaselineBaseline (week 0), week 68Change in VLDL cholesterol (mg/dL) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Change in Triglycerides (mmol/L): Ratio to BaselineBaseline (week 0), week 68Change in triglycerides (mmol/L) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From baseline (week 0) to week 75An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant administered or using a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or usage. All AEs reported here are TEAEs. TEAE is defined as an event that had onset date during the on-treatment period. The on-treatment period was defined as the interval from first to last trial product administration plus 7 weeks of follow-up and excluding any period of temporary treatment interruption defined as greater than (\>) 7 consecutive missed doses (corresponding to \>7 weeks off-treatment).
Change in Triglycerides (mg/dL): Ratio to BaselineBaseline (week 0), week 68Change in triglycerides (mg/dL) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Change in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT): Ratio to BaselineBaseline (week 0), week 68Change in ALT (units per liter \[U/L\]) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.
Number of Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From baseline (week 0) to week 75An SAE is an AE that fulfils at least one of the following criteria: 1) results in death; 2) is life-threatening; 3) requires inpatient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation; 4) results in persistent disability/incapacity; 5) is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; 6) important medical event. All AEs reported here are TEAEs. TEAE is defined as an event that had onset date during the on-treatment period. The on-treatment period was defined as the interval from first to last trial product administration plus 7 weeks of follow-up and excluding any period of temporary treatment interruption defined as \>7 consecutive missed doses (corresponding to \>7 weeks off-treatment).
Change in PulseBaseline (week 0), week 68Change in pulse from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for on-treatment period: the on-treatment period was defined as the interval from first to last trial product administration plus 2 weeks of follow-up and excluding any period of temporary treatment interruption defined as \>2 consecutive missed doses (corresponding to \>2 weeks off-treatment).
Change in Amylase: Ratio to BaselineBaseline (week 0), week 68Change in amylase (U/L) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for on-treatment period: the on-treatment period was defined as the interval from first to last trial product administration plus 2 weeks of follow-up and excluding any period of temporary treatment interruption defined as \>2 consecutive missed doses (corresponding to \>2 weeks off-treatment).
Change in Lipase: Ratio to BaselineBaseline (week 0), week 68Change in lipase (U/L) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for on-treatment period: the on-treatment period was defined as the interval from first to last trial product administration plus 2 weeks of follow-up and excluding any period of temporary treatment interruption defined as \>2 consecutive missed doses (corresponding to \>2 weeks off-treatment).
Change in Calcitonin: Ratio to BaselineBaseline (week 0), week 68Change in calcitonin (nanograms per liter \[ng/L\]) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for on-treatment period: the on-treatment period was defined as the interval from first to last trial product administration plus 2 weeks of follow-up and excluding any period of temporary treatment interruption defined as \>2 consecutive missed doses (corresponding to \>2 weeks off-treatment).
Change in Fasting Insulin (Milli International Units Per Milliliter [mIU/mL]): Ratio to BaselineBaseline (week 0), week 68Change in fasting insulin (mIU/mL) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Countries

Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Ireland, Mexico, Russia, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The trial was conducted at 37 sites in 8 countries, as follows: Austria (3), Belgium (4), Croatia (3), Ireland (1), Mexico (1), Russia (7), Great Britain (6), United States (12).

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive either semaglutide subcutaneously (s.c.) once weekly or semaglutide placebo s.c. once weekly for a dose escalation period of 16 weeks and a maintenance period of 52 weeks. This was followed by a 7-week follow-up period after 'end of treatment' due to the long half-life of semaglutide.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Semaglutide 2.4 mg
Participants received once weekly s.c. injection of semaglutide for 68 weeks. Participants initially received 0.25 milligrams (mg) of semaglutide and the dose was then escalated once in 4 weeks for 16 weeks until the target dose of 2.4 mg was reached which was maintained for a period of 52 weeks: 0.25 mg (week 1 to week 4), 0.5 mg (week 5 to week 8), 1.0 mg (week 9 to week 12), 1.7 mg (week 13 to week 16) and 2.4 mg (week 17 to week 68). The treatment was an adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity.
134
Placebo
Participants received once weekly s.c. injection of placebo matched to semaglutide for 68 weeks. The treatment was an adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity.
67
Total201

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by parent/guardian01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSemaglutide 2.4 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous15.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
15.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
15.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants8 Participants22 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
120 Participants59 Participants179 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Black or African American
11 Participants5 Participants16 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Other
14 Participants6 Participants20 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
104 Participants55 Participants159 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
84 Participants41 Participants125 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
50 Participants26 Participants76 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1330 / 67
other
Total, other adverse events
90 / 13340 / 67
serious
Total, serious adverse events
15 / 1336 / 67

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) (Percentage [%])

Change in BMI (%) from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in Body Mass Index (BMI) (Percentage [%])-16.2 Percentage change of BMIStandard Deviation 12.9
PlaceboChange in Body Mass Index (BMI) (Percentage [%])-0.1 Percentage change of BMIStandard Deviation 8.6
Comparison: Responses were analyzed using an analysis of covariance model with randomized treatment, stratification groups (sex and Tanner stage at baseline) and the interaction between stratification groups as factors and baseline BMI as covariate.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-20.27, -13.23]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT): Ratio to Baseline

Change in ALT (units per liter \[U/L\]) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT): Ratio to Baseline0.79 Ratio of ALTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 63.8
PlaceboChange in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT): Ratio to Baseline1.00 Ratio of ALTGeometric Coefficient of Variation 44.3
Secondary

Change in Amylase: Ratio to Baseline

Change in amylase (U/L) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for on-treatment period: the on-treatment period was defined as the interval from first to last trial product administration plus 2 weeks of follow-up and excluding any period of temporary treatment interruption defined as \>2 consecutive missed doses (corresponding to \>2 weeks off-treatment).

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: SAS included all randomized participants exposed to at least one dose of randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in Amylase: Ratio to Baseline1.15 Ratio of amylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.4
PlaceboChange in Amylase: Ratio to Baseline1.04 Ratio of amylaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.2
Secondary

Change in BMI (Kilograms Per Meter Square [kg/m^2])

Change in BMI (kg/m\^2) from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in BMI (Kilograms Per Meter Square [kg/m^2])-5.9 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 4.9
PlaceboChange in BMI (Kilograms Per Meter Square [kg/m^2])0.0 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 3.1
Secondary

Change in BMI Percentage of the 95th Percentile on Gender and Age-specific Growth Charts (CDC.Gov [CDC: {Centers for Disease Control and Prevention}])

Change from baseline in BMI percentage of the 95th percentile on gender and age-specific growth charts (CDC.gov) at week 68 is presented. CDC gender and age-specific growth charts: normal (BMI less than \[\<\] 85th percentile), overweight (BMI greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 85th - \<95th percentile), obesity class I (BMI \>=95th - \<120% of the 95th percentile), obesity class II (BMI \>=120% of the 95th percentile - \<140% of the 95th percentile) and obesity class III (BMI \>=140% of the 95th percentile). Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in BMI Percentage of the 95th Percentile on Gender and Age-specific Growth Charts (CDC.Gov [CDC: {Centers for Disease Control and Prevention}])-24.9 Percentage point of BMIStandard Deviation 17
PlaceboChange in BMI Percentage of the 95th Percentile on Gender and Age-specific Growth Charts (CDC.Gov [CDC: {Centers for Disease Control and Prevention}])-4.5 Percentage point of BMIStandard Deviation 10.5
Secondary

Change in BMI (Standard Deviation Score [SDS])

Change in BMI SDS from baseline to week 68 is presented. The SDS scores are also called as z-scores. BMI SDS was calculated using the following formula: Z=\[(value /M)\^L - 1\] / S\*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' BMI provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the world health organisation (WHO) Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. Possible values range from -3 to +3, a negative score being beneficial. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in BMI (Standard Deviation Score [SDS])-1.1 standard deviation scoreStandard Deviation 0.9
PlaceboChange in BMI (Standard Deviation Score [SDS])-0.1 standard deviation scoreStandard Deviation 0.5
Secondary

Change in Body Weight (%)

Change in body weight (%) from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in Body Weight (%)-14.8 Percentage change of body weightStandard Deviation 13.2
PlaceboChange in Body Weight (%)2.3 Percentage change of body weightStandard Deviation 9.1
Secondary

Change in Body Weight (Kilograms [kg])

Change in body weight (kg) from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in Body Weight (Kilograms [kg])-15.7 kgStandard Deviation 14.6
PlaceboChange in Body Weight (Kilograms [kg])2.3 kgStandard Deviation 9.7
Secondary

Change in Calcitonin: Ratio to Baseline

Change in calcitonin (nanograms per liter \[ng/L\]) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for on-treatment period: the on-treatment period was defined as the interval from first to last trial product administration plus 2 weeks of follow-up and excluding any period of temporary treatment interruption defined as \>2 consecutive missed doses (corresponding to \>2 weeks off-treatment).

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: SAS included all randomized participants exposed to at least one dose of randomized treatment. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in Calcitonin: Ratio to Baseline1.14 Ratio of calcitoninGeometric Coefficient of Variation 47
PlaceboChange in Calcitonin: Ratio to Baseline1.09 Ratio of calcitoninGeometric Coefficient of Variation 36.7
Secondary

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure

Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in Diastolic Blood Pressure-2 mmHgStandard Deviation 9
PlaceboChange in Diastolic Blood Pressure-1 mmHgStandard Deviation 8
Secondary

Change in Fasting Insulin (Milli International Units Per Milliliter [mIU/mL]): Ratio to Baseline

Change in fasting insulin (mIU/mL) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in Fasting Insulin (Milli International Units Per Milliliter [mIU/mL]): Ratio to Baseline0.64 Ratio of fasting insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 62.9
PlaceboChange in Fasting Insulin (Milli International Units Per Milliliter [mIU/mL]): Ratio to Baseline0.99 Ratio of fasting insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 58.2
Secondary

Change in Fasting Insulin (Picomoles Per Liter [Pmol/L]): Ratio to Baseline

Change in fasting insulin (pmol/L) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in Fasting Insulin (Picomoles Per Liter [Pmol/L]): Ratio to Baseline0.64 Ratio of fasting insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 62.9
PlaceboChange in Fasting Insulin (Picomoles Per Liter [Pmol/L]): Ratio to Baseline0.99 Ratio of fasting insulinGeometric Coefficient of Variation 58.2
Secondary

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Milligrams Per Deciliter [mg/dL])

Change in fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL) from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Milligrams Per Deciliter [mg/dL])-4.2 mg/dLStandard Deviation 9.6
PlaceboChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Milligrams Per Deciliter [mg/dL])0.0 mg/dLStandard Deviation 8.6
Secondary

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L])

Change in fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L])-0.2 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.5
PlaceboChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (Millimoles Per Liter [mmol/L])0.0 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.5
Secondary

Change in Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) (%)

Change in HbA1c (%) from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) (%)-0.4 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.3
PlaceboChange in Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) (%)-0.1 Percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.3
Secondary

Change in HbA1c (Millimoles Per Mole [mmol/Mol])

Change in HbA1c (mmol/mol) from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in HbA1c (Millimoles Per Mole [mmol/Mol])-4.2 mmol/molStandard Deviation 3.5
PlaceboChange in HbA1c (Millimoles Per Mole [mmol/Mol])-1.2 mmol/molStandard Deviation 2.9
Secondary

Change in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol (mg/dL): Ratio to Baseline

Change in HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol (mg/dL): Ratio to Baseline1.08 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.5
PlaceboChange in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol (mg/dL): Ratio to Baseline1.03 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21.5
Secondary

Change in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol (mmol/L): Ratio to Baseline

Change in HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68:

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol (mmol/L): Ratio to Baseline1.08 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.5
PlaceboChange in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol (mmol/L): Ratio to Baseline1.03 Ratio of HDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21.5
Secondary

Change in LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL): Ratio to Baseline

Change in LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68:

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL): Ratio to Baseline0.91 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.9
PlaceboChange in LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL): Ratio to Baseline0.96 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15.4
Secondary

Change in Lipase: Ratio to Baseline

Change in lipase (U/L) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for on-treatment period: the on-treatment period was defined as the interval from first to last trial product administration plus 2 weeks of follow-up and excluding any period of temporary treatment interruption defined as \>2 consecutive missed doses (corresponding to \>2 weeks off-treatment).

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: SAS included all randomized participants exposed to at least one dose of randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in Lipase: Ratio to Baseline1.39 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 37.3
PlaceboChange in Lipase: Ratio to Baseline1.12 Ratio of lipaseGeometric Coefficient of Variation 37
Secondary

Change in Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol (mmol/L): Ratio to Baseline

Change in LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol (mmol/L): Ratio to Baseline0.91 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.9
PlaceboChange in Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol (mmol/L): Ratio to Baseline0.96 Ratio of LDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15.4
Secondary

Change in Pulse

Change in pulse from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for on-treatment period: the on-treatment period was defined as the interval from first to last trial product administration plus 2 weeks of follow-up and excluding any period of temporary treatment interruption defined as \>2 consecutive missed doses (corresponding to \>2 weeks off-treatment).

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: SAS included all randomized participants exposed to at least one dose of randomized treatment. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in Pulse0 Beats per minute (beats/min)Standard Deviation 13
PlaceboChange in Pulse-1 Beats per minute (beats/min)Standard Deviation 13
Secondary

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure

Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in Systolic Blood Pressure-3 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 12
PlaceboChange in Systolic Blood Pressure-1 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9
Secondary

Change in Total Cholesterol (mg/dL): Ratio to Baseline

Change in total cholesterol (mg/dL) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in Total Cholesterol (mg/dL): Ratio to Baseline0.92 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 14.6
PlaceboChange in Total Cholesterol (mg/dL): Ratio to Baseline0.98 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 9.4
Secondary

Change in Total Cholesterol (mmol/L): Ratio to Baseline

Change in total cholesterol (mmol/L) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in Total Cholesterol (mmol/L): Ratio to Baseline0.92 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 14.6
PlaceboChange in Total Cholesterol (mmol/L): Ratio to Baseline0.98 Ratio of total cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 9.4
Secondary

Change in Triglycerides (mg/dL): Ratio to Baseline

Change in triglycerides (mg/dL) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in Triglycerides (mg/dL): Ratio to Baseline0.71 Ratio of triglyceridesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 45.8
PlaceboChange in Triglycerides (mg/dL): Ratio to Baseline1.04 Ratio of triglyceridesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40.9
Secondary

Change in Triglycerides (mmol/L): Ratio to Baseline

Change in triglycerides (mmol/L) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in Triglycerides (mmol/L): Ratio to Baseline0.71 Ratio of triglyceridesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 45.8
PlaceboChange in Triglycerides (mmol/L): Ratio to Baseline1.04 Ratio of triglyceridesGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40.9
Secondary

Change in Very Low-density Lipoprotein (VLDL) Cholesterol (mmol/L): Ratio to Baseline

Change in VLDL cholesterol (mmol/L) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in Very Low-density Lipoprotein (VLDL) Cholesterol (mmol/L): Ratio to Baseline0.71 Ratio of VLDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 46.1
PlaceboChange in Very Low-density Lipoprotein (VLDL) Cholesterol (mmol/L): Ratio to Baseline1.03 Ratio of VLDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40.8
Secondary

Change in VLDL Cholesterol (mg/dL): Ratio to Baseline

Change in VLDL cholesterol (mg/dL) from baseline to week 68 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in VLDL Cholesterol (mg/dL): Ratio to Baseline0.71 Ratio of VLDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 46.1
PlaceboChange in VLDL Cholesterol (mg/dL): Ratio to Baseline1.03 Ratio of VLDL cholesterolGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40.8
Secondary

Change in Waist Circumference

Change in waist circumference (centimeters \[cm\]) from baseline to week 68 is presented. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Semaglutide 2.4 mgChange in Waist Circumference-12.7 cmStandard Deviation 12.2
PlaceboChange in Waist Circumference-0.5 cmStandard Deviation 6.5
Secondary

Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant administered or using a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or usage. All AEs reported here are TEAEs. TEAE is defined as an event that had onset date during the on-treatment period. The on-treatment period was defined as the interval from first to last trial product administration plus 7 weeks of follow-up and excluding any period of temporary treatment interruption defined as greater than (\>) 7 consecutive missed doses (corresponding to \>7 weeks off-treatment).

Time frame: From baseline (week 0) to week 75

Population: The safety analysis set (SAS) included all randomized participants exposed to at least one dose of randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 2.4 mgNumber of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)792 Events
PlaceboNumber of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)328 Events
Secondary

Number of Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An SAE is an AE that fulfils at least one of the following criteria: 1) results in death; 2) is life-threatening; 3) requires inpatient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation; 4) results in persistent disability/incapacity; 5) is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; 6) important medical event. All AEs reported here are TEAEs. TEAE is defined as an event that had onset date during the on-treatment period. The on-treatment period was defined as the interval from first to last trial product administration plus 7 weeks of follow-up and excluding any period of temporary treatment interruption defined as \>7 consecutive missed doses (corresponding to \>7 weeks off-treatment).

Time frame: From baseline (week 0) to week 75

Population: SAS included all randomized participants exposed to at least one dose of randomized treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 2.4 mgNumber of Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)17 Events
PlaceboNumber of Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)7 Events
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving >=10% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)

Percentage of participants who achieved \>= 10% weight reduction from baseline (week 0) to week 68 is presented. In the reported data, 'Yes' infers the percentage of participants who have achieved \>= 10% weight reduction, whereas 'No' infers the percentage of participants who did not achieve \>= 10% weight reduction. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from date of randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: At week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 2.4 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving >=10% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)Yes61.8 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 2.4 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving >=10% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)No38.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving >=10% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)Yes8.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving >=10% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)No91.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving >=15% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)

Percentage of participants who achieved \>= 15% weight reduction from baseline (week 0) to week 68 is presented. In the reported data, 'Yes' infers the percentage of participants who have achieved \>= 15% weight reduction, whereas 'No' infers the percentage of participants who did not achieve \>= 15% weight reduction. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from date of randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: At week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 2.4 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving >=15% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)Yes53.4 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 2.4 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving >=15% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)No46.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving >=15% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)Yes4.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving >=15% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)No95.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving >=20% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)

Percentage of participants who achieved \>= 20% weight reduction from baseline (week 0) to week 68 is presented. In the reported data, 'Yes' infers the percentage of participants who have achieved \>= 20% weight reduction, whereas 'No' infers the percentage of participants who did not achieve \>= 20% weight reduction. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from date of randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: At week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 2.4 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving >=20% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)Yes37.4 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 2.4 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving >=20% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)No62.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving >=20% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)Yes3.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving >=20% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)No96.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving >=5% Reduction of BMI (Yes/no)

Percentage of participants who achieved \>= 5% reduction of BMI from baseline (week 0) to week 68 is presented. In the reported data, 'Yes' infers the percentage of participants who have achieved \>= 5% BMI reduction, whereas 'No' infers the percentage of participants who did not achieve \>= 5% BMI reduction. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from date of randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: At week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 2.4 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving >=5% Reduction of BMI (Yes/no)Yes75.6 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 2.4 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving >=5% Reduction of BMI (Yes/no)No24.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving >=5% Reduction of BMI (Yes/no)Yes22.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving >=5% Reduction of BMI (Yes/no)No77.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 5% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)

Percentage of participants who achieved \>= 5% weight reduction from baseline (week 0) to week 68 is presented. In the reported data, 'Yes' infers the percentage of participants who have achieved \>= 5% weight reduction, whereas 'No' infers the percentage of participants who did not achieve \>= 5% weight reduction. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from date of randomization to last contact with trial site.

Time frame: At week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 2.4 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 5% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)Yes72.5 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 2.4 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 5% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)No27.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 5% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)Yes17.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 5% Reduction of Body Weight (Yes/no)No82.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Improvement in Weight Category (Yes/no)

Percentage of participants who achieved improvement in weight category from baseline (week 0) to week 68 is presented. Improvement in weight category was defined as being in a lower weight category at week 68 compared to baseline according to CDC gender and age-specific growth charts: normal (BMI \<85th percentile), overweight (BMI \>=85th - \<95th percentile), obesity class I (BMI \>=95th - \<120% of the 95th percentile), obesity class II (BMI \>=120% of the 95th percentile - \<140% of the 95th percentile) and obesity class III (BMI \>=140% of the 95th percentile). In the reported data, 'Yes' infers the percentage of participants who have achieved improvement in weight category, whereas 'No' infers the percentage of participants who did not achieve improvement in weight category. Data is reported for 'in-trial' period: the uninterrupted time interval from date of randomization to date of last contact with trial site.

Time frame: At week 68

Population: FAS included all randomized participants according to the intention-to-treat principle. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Semaglutide 2.4 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Improvement in Weight Category (Yes/no)Yes71.8 Percentage of participants
Semaglutide 2.4 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving Improvement in Weight Category (Yes/no)No28.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Improvement in Weight Category (Yes/no)Yes21.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Improvement in Weight Category (Yes/no)No79.0 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026