Skip to content

Electromagnetic Navigation System Versus Freehand Technique in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Electromagnetic Navigation System Versus Freehand Technique in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04101864
Enrollment
84
Registered
2019-09-24
Start date
2017-05-04
Completion date
2018-02-02
Last updated
2019-09-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip Osteoarthritis

Keywords

navigation, hip arthroplasty, surgical time, landmark

Brief summary

A prospective randomized study comparing accuracy and precision of acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty with use of novel electromagnetic navigation system versus freehand technique.

Detailed description

Patients with hip arthritis, who are to be treated with total hip arthroplasty will be randomized in two groups. Patents allocated to study group will get their acetabular components implanted with the help of electromagnetic navigation system. Patients allocated to the control group will get their acetabular components implanted with freehand technique. Accuracy and precision of implanted acetabular components will be assessed on images obtained by postoperative computed tomography. Postoperative inclination and anteversion angles of acetabular components will be measured by the independent technician. Results will be statistically analyzed and compared.

Interventions

Acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty will be performed wit the help of electromagnetic image-less navigation system.

PROCEDUREFreehand

In the control group acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty will be placed with the help of the freehand technique.

Sponsors

Valdoltra Orthopedic Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Postoperative computed tomography measurements of acetabular component position will be done by independent technician.

Intervention model description

Sample size will be calculated. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement guidelines will be followed to perform this prospective, randomized, controlled, trial and to present the results. Included patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio into the study and the control group. Randomization will be conducted using computer-generated numbers.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age above 18 years * unilateral surgery * osteoarthritis of the hip * no previous surgery on the affected hip * implantation of the same acetabular component through the same approach * signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* age under 18 years * unwilling to participate * prior surgery on affected hip

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acetabular component positionUp to 48 hours after surgeryComparison of the precision and the accuracy of acetabular components between both groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Surgical timeImmediately after surgical procedureComparison of duration of surgery between both groups
Clinical result8-10 weeks postoperativelyComparison of improvement of Harris hip score between both groups

Countries

Slovenia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026