Pancreatic Mass
Conditions
Brief summary
There are many factors that can affect the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA, including lesion factors, the endoscoist experience, the needle size, the number of needle passes, and the suction technique. since diagnostic efficacy of different suction techniques for EUS-FNB is still uncertain, thus we decided to compare the diagnostic efficacy of three common methods: the 10 ml standard negative pressure, slow pull and wet suction.
Detailed description
the standard suction: after the needle is inserted in the mass, removing the stylet before performing EUS-FNA. Then attach a 10mL syringe to the end of needle. 20 times of for-backward Suction was applied after the lesion was punctured. slow-pull : after the needle is inserted in the mass, slowly pull the stylet out while performing EUS-FNA with 20 times for-backward. wet suction: after removing the stylet, the needle was flushed with 5mL of saline solution to replace the column of air with saline. A 10mL syringe was attached to the end of the needle. 20 times of for-backward Suction was applied after the lesion was punctured.
Interventions
After the needle is inserted in the mass, removing the stylet before performing EUS-FNA. Then attach a 10mL syringe to the end of needle. 20 times of for-backward Suction was applied after the lesion was punctured.
After the needle is inserted in the mass, slowly pull the stylet out while performing EUS-FNA with 20 times for-backward.
After removing the stylet, the needle was flushed with 5mL of saline solution to replace the column of air with saline. A 10mL syringe was attached to the end of the needle. 20 times of for-backward Suction was applied after the lesion was punctured.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. age 18-75 years,male or female 2. diagnosis or suspection of solid pancreatic mass based on previous imaging examination (ultrasonography, CT or MRI) 3. lesion diameter larger than 1 cm 4. signed informed consent letter
Exclusion criteria
1. pregnant female 2. Pancreatic cystic lesions 3. Anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy cannot be suspended 4. unable or refuse to provide informed consent 5. Coagulopathy (platelet count \< 50× 103/μL,international normalized ratio \> 1.5) 6. Severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction that cannot tolerate intravenous anesthesia 7. with history of mental disease 8. other medical conditions that are not suitable for EUS-FNB
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| diagnostic accuracy of each individual technique | 1 year | The results are compared with the gold standard and calculated the accuracy |
| diagnostic sensitivity of each individual technique | 1 year | The results are compared with the gold standard and calculated the sensitivity |
| specificity of each individual technique | 1 year | The results are compared with the gold standard and calculated the specificity |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| adverse event rate of each individual technique | 1 year | record any adverse events related to the procedure |
| blood contamination | 1 year | the blood contamination will be determined by the pathologists analyzing the sample using a pre-defined scale. They will be blinded to the technique used |
| adequacy of specimens obtained by each individual technique | 1 year | the adequacy will be determined by the pathologists analyzing the sample using a pre-defined scale. They will be blinded to the technique used |
| cellularity | 1 year | the cellularity will be determined by the pathologists analyzing the sample using a pre-defined scale. They will be blinded to the technique used |
Countries
China