Skip to content

Diagnostic Tools for Human African Trypanosomiasis Elimination and Clinical Trials: WP3 Post Elimination Monitoring

Diagnostic Tools for Human African Trypanosomiasis Elimination and Clinical Trials: WP3 Post Elimination Monitoring

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04099628
Acronym
DiTECT-HAT-WP3
Enrollment
13747
Registered
2019-09-23
Start date
2019-09-01
Completion date
2021-01-31
Last updated
2022-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

African Trypanosomiases, Human African Trypanosomiasis, Sleeping Sickness, Trypanosoma Brucei Gambiense; Infection, Trypanosomiasis; African, Due to Trypanosoma Brucei Gambiense, Gambiense, West African Sleeping Sickness

Keywords

monitoring, surveillance, re-emergence, rapid diagnostic test, trypanolysis, LAMP, ELISA, molecular biology, RT-PCR, serology, diagnosis, specificity, sensitivity

Brief summary

This study determines the feasibility, diagnostic performance and cost for monitoring of eliminated human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) foci using diagnostic algorithms of serological and molecular high throughput tests with and without previous rapid diagnostic test blood screening for early detection of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense HAT re-emergence.

Detailed description

In the last decade, the prevalence of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense (Tbg) human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) has fallen and HAT has been targeted for elimination. At low disease prevalence, HAT control is increasingly integrated into routine activities of peripheral health centres. However, the weak capacity of fixed health structures to implement control activities, lack of coverage, the unspecific clinical picture of HAT, and the existence of asymptomatic cases and animal reservoirs may result in under detection of HAT. To ensure sustainability of zero transmission and to avoid re-emergence caused by remaining Tbg reservoirs, continued post-elimination monitoring is therefore required. Health workers performing house to house visits in foci with very low HAT prevalence can easily collect blood on filter paper and send it to regional HAT reference centres for analysis. The objective of the DiTECT-HAT-WP3 study is to determine the feasibility and cost of diagnostic algorithms of serological and molecular high-throughput tests on blood on filter paper for post-elimination monitoring, with or without a previous screening with rapid diagnostic tests. In villages in low to zero prevalence foci in Democratic Republic (DR) Congo, Côte d'Ivoire and Burkina Faso, a health worker will go from house to house to 1) register all consenting inhabitants in a Personal Digital Assistant; 2) take a blood sample on filter paper 3) perform 3 rapid diagnostic tests. All dried blood spots (DBS) are sent to the reference laboratory for high-throughput testing (ELISA, trypanolysis, loop-mediated isothermal amplification method (LAMP) and real time (RT) -PCR). Subjects positive in at least 1 test - the RDTs or high-throughput tests - are revisited twice for parasitological confirmation. In each country, blood specimens of 6000 persons will be tested. The relative effectiveness and overall cost of the different diagnostic algorithms will be investigated. We will quantify the break-even point for an imperfect test algorithm by formulating a decision criterion to assess how many false negatives, but particularly how many false positives can be tolerated while still achieving an intervention with a reasonable cost burden. The results will enable us to propose a test algorithm and a threshold to send out specialised mobile teams for stopping HAT re-emergence, without unnecessarily raising the alarm.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTRapid diagnostic test (RDT); Serological and molecular tests on DBS

The population of low to zero prevalence HAT foci will be actively screened for HAT by taking a blood sample for performing 3 rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) and for preparing dried blood spots to perform 4 serological and molecular high throughput reference tests. If at least one of the RDTs, serological or molecular reference tests is positive, parasitological examination is performed twice. The combined results of parasitological examinations serve as reference standard. Other Names: rHAT Sero-Strip (Coris Bioconcept, Belgium) SD Bioline HAT 1.0 (Standard Diagnostics Korea) HAT Sero-K-Set (Coris Bioconcept, Belgium) Immune trypanolysis: presence of antibodies ELISA: on native LiTat 1.3 + LiTat 1.5 variant surface glycoprotein (VSG) LAMP T. brucei Detection Kit (Eiken) RT-PCR: Trypanozoon 18S, Tbg Trypanosoma gambiense specific glycoprotein (TgsGP)

Sponsors

Ministry of Public Health, Democratic Republic of the Congo
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Institut National de Sante Publique
CollaboratorOTHER
CIRDES
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Institut National de Recherche Biomédicale. Kinshasa, République Démocratique du Congo
CollaboratorOTHER
Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Liverpool
CollaboratorOTHER
Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Sequential assignement

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Permanent resident of village (in low to zero prevalence HAT focus) for minimum 1 year

Exclusion criteria

* Previously treated for HAT (irrespective of time elapsed since treatment) * No informed consent * \< 4 years old

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity for HAT diagnosis of RDT, RDT combinations, algorithms of RDT and serological and/or molecular tests on the population at risk6 monthsIndex tests: 3 RDTs on fresh blood, immune trypanolysis on DBS, ELISA on DBS, LAMP on DBS, RT-PCR on DBS. Reference standard: for index test positives only: combined results of 2 parasitological examinations. Subjects negative in all index tests are considered HAT negative.
Specificity for HAT diagnosis of RDT, RDT combinations, algorithms of RDT and serological and/or molecular tests on the population at risk6 monthsIndex tests: 3 RDTs on fresh blood, immune trypanolysis on DBS, ELISA on DBS, LAMP on DBS, RT-PCR on DBS. Reference standard: for index test positives only: combined results of 2 parasitological examinations. Subjects negative in all index tests are considered HAT negative.

Countries

Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026