Mild Cognitive Impairment, Neuropsychiatric Syndrome
Conditions
Brief summary
Co-existing neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), especially those worsening over time, are associated with more rapid cognitive and functional decline and a greater risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Optimal NPS management, meaning effectively managing multiple NPS simultaneously, requires a solid understanding of the shared neural mechanism across NPS. The goal of this proof-of-concept mechanistic intervention study is to validate the causal relationship between a NPS-shared neural circuit the investigators previously discovered and various NPS. The investigators will modify a key region within the NPS-shared neural circuit \[i.e. left precentral gyrus (LPG), critical for regulating visual attention\] with anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Our central hypothesis is that an activation of LPG and a reorganization of NPS-shared neural circuit will link to improvement in multiple NPS. Using a Stage 0 pilot randomized control trial design the investigators will recruit n = 40 older adults with informant-rated NPS that has worsened in the past 2 years, which is considered the most detrimental type of NPS in MCI. The investigators will assign participants to 4-week active anodal vs. sham LPG online tDCS group. The investigators will assess resting-state and visual attention task-related functional MRI and informant-rated NPS at baseline, and the end of week 4 and week 8, and diffusion MRI at baseline. The two primary aims are to determine the effect of tDCS on NPS-shared neural circuit (Aim 1), as well as the relationship between NPS-shared neural circuit and informant-report NPS (Aim 2). The exploratory aim will be to examine the relationship between NPS and the coherence between structural and functional aspects of the NPS-shared neural circuit. Probing the LPG via anodal tDCS provides a way to experimentally test the causal relationship between our previously discovered NPS-shared neural circuit and informant-rated NPS. The proposed research is highly innovative, while scientifically grounded, for targeting one brain region that may affect multiple NPS. Validating the hypotheses has the potential for future R01 study that directly conducts a Stage 2 trial addressing NPS in MCI, and thus ultimately improves patient's quality of life and reducing caregiving burden.
Interventions
DEVICEtDCS
tDCS (LPG/C3-anode, orbitofrontal cortex/Fp2-cathode) will be administered for 4 weeks (1 session per weekday for 2 weeks, and then 2 sessions per week for 2 weeks, for a total of 14 sessions). All subjects will receive anodal tDCS stimulation for 20 minutes per session, on C3 and the cathode electrode on Fp2 using 10/20 EEG system. tDCS will be applied with a pair of 35 cm2 single-use sponges soaked in approximately 4mL of saline solution on each side (\ 8mL per sponge) connected to the stimulator. During the 20-minute tDCS session, we will use online tDCS design (i.e., a subject will simultaneously work on the visual attention-oriented task.
Sponsors
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
University of Rochester
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1\. Forty subjects with MCI and comorbid NPS, which have worsened in the past 2 years (as rated by their study-partner's responses to the NPI-Q): 1. In the past month, presence of \> 2 symptoms; and 2. Compared to two years ago, having \> 1 pre-exist symptom whose severity rating has worsened, or having \> 1 new symptom; 2. Consensus diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease based on 2011 NIA-AA diagnostic criteria by the investigators based on screening information: i. Memory deficits at screening: 1 standard deviation (SD) below age- and/or education- corrected population norms for the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT, Lists C&D); ii. Global memory deficits at screening: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA, Version 2) total score within the range 18 ≤ x ≤ 26, after educational adjustment; iii. Preserved activity of daily living: ADL-PI-self total score ≤ 30; iv. Absence of dementia. 3. Stable (same dosage, frequency, type) on memory medications for ≥ 3 months before screening; 4. Stable (same dosage, frequency, type) on any anti-depressants, antipsychotics, and/or anxiolytics for ≥ 7 days; 5. Community-dwelling: Subjects live in homes or independent- and assisted- living facilities (i.e. - not nursing home residents, due to the large cognitive variability in nursing home residents); 6. Aged 60-89 years at screening; 7. English-speaking; 8. Adequate visual and hearing acuity for testing; 9. Verified tDCS and MRI safety: Subject should not have any contraindications to either and pass safety screening questions for both (see exclusion section for more information); 10. Capacity to consent, based on responses and ratings to the UCSD Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) form modified for this study 11. Availability of a study partner who spends at least several hours per week with the subject, supervises his/her care, and who is willing to accompany the subject to some study visits and participate in the study; 12. Informed consent for study participation obtained by both the subject and his/her study partner; 13. Agree to donate 20mL of blood at baseline, after fasting for at least 8 hours (only water and prescribed medicines)
Exclusion criteria
* Participants may be excluded from enrollment, or have their enrollment deferred until they are eligible, for the reasons listed below. Final decisions regarding enrollment will be determined by the PI on a case-by-case basis. 1. Presence of any neurological or vascular disorders (e.g. - Multiple Sclerosis \[MS\], Traumatic Brain Injury \[TBI\], chronic heart failure \[CHF\], Parkinson's disease \[PD\]); 2. Clinical diagnosis of dementia as defined by the most recent version of the DSM; 3. Current enrollment in another study aimed at improving cognitive abilities and/or emotional well-being; 4. MRI contraindications (e.g. - pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator \[ICD\], aneurysm clips, severe claustrophobia); 5. tDCS contraindications (e.g. - scalp or skin condition, history of migraines, seizures or epilepsy, and/or strokes, TBI), metallic implants, history of adverse effects to previous tDCS or other brain stimulation techniques).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change of C3 Activation (NPS-shared Neural Circuit Measure | from baseline to post-intervention (4 weeks) | Change of arbitrary unit LPG activation in response to visual attention task (measured using task related fMRI). No theoretical minimum or maximum exists for this scale. |
| Change of C3 Connectivity (NPS-shared Neural Circuit Measure 21) | from baseline to post-intervention (4 weeks) | Change of arbitrary unit of correlation between LPG and amygdala at rest (resting fMRI). No theoretical minimum or maximum exists for this scale. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change of Patient-report NPS | from baseline to post-intervention (4 weeks) | Patient-reported NPS was measured using three mood-related questionnaires that probed mood within the past week: depression (Geriatric Depressive Scale ;GDS-30); anxiety (State-Trait-Anxiety-Inventory; STAI-state); and apathy (Apathy Evaluation Scale; AES). Total scores from individual measures were z-transformed (higher score indicating severer symptoms) across timepoints and averaged to create a composite mood score. A Z-score of 0 represents the population mean. Change of Z-score from baseline to post-intervention was used. |
| Change of Informant-rated NPS | from baseline to post-intervention (4 weeks) | Informant-reported NPS was measured using the 12-domain Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-Full), including both frequency and severity (based on present symptoms) during the past week. We first calculated the frequency x severity for each domain, then averaged across domains, and finally adjusted for caregiving burden. Higher is worse. We calculated the change of the arbitrary score from baseline to post-intervention. No theoretical minimum and maximum scores exist |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
all participants enrolled were assigned to groups.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Active tDCS We will apply the stimulation for 20 minutes using current at 1.5mA with a ramp up and ramp down period of 30 seconds at the start and end of the session.
tDCS: tDCS (LPG/C3-anode, orbitofrontal cortex/Fp2-cathode) will be administered for 4 weeks (1 session per weekday for 2 weeks, and then 2 sessions per week for 2 weeks, for a total of 14 sessions). All subjects will receive anodal tDCS stimulation for 20 minutes per session, on C3 and the cathode electrode on Fp2 using 10/20 EEG system. tDCS will be applied with a pair of 35 cm2 single-use sponges soaked in approximately 4mL of saline solution on each side (\
8mL per sponge) connected to the stimulator. During the 20-minute tDCS session, we will use online tDCS design (i.e., a subject will simultaneously work on the visual attention-oriented task. | 20 |
| Sham tDCS tDCS will ramp up for 30 seconds with 1 mA current and then ramp off within 10 seconds. As 30 seconds is too short for tDCS to have any effects, this will be the control condition. tDCS is on for 30 seconds because that is usually the only time individuals would experience tingling and itching - a factor we aim to equate between experimental and control conditions.
tDCS: tDCS (LPG/C3-anode, orbitofrontal cortex/Fp2-cathode) will be administered for 4 weeks (1 session per weekday for 2 weeks, and then 2 sessions per week for 2 weeks, for a total of 14 sessions). All subjects will receive anodal tDCS stimulation for 20 minutes per session, on C3 and the cathode electrode on Fp2 using 10/20 EEG system. tDCS will be applied with a pair of 35 cm2 single-use sponges soaked in approximately 4mL of saline solution on each side (\
8mL per sponge) connected to the stimulator. During the 20-minute tDCS session, we will use online tDCS design (i.e., a subject will simultaneously work on the visual attention-oriented task. | 20 |
| Total | 40 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Sham tDCS | Active tDCS | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 73 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1 | 70 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6 | 71 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race African American/Black | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race White, Hispanic/Latino | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race White, Non-Hispanic/Latino | 19 Participants | 19 Participants | 38 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 20 Participants | 20 Participants | 40 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 10 Participants | 14 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 10 Participants | 6 Participants | 16 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 20 | 0 / 20 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 20 | 0 / 20 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 20 | 0 / 20 |
Outcome results
Primary
Change of C3 Activation (NPS-shared Neural Circuit Measure
Change of arbitrary unit LPG activation in response to visual attention task (measured using task related fMRI). No theoretical minimum or maximum exists for this scale.
Time frame: from baseline to post-intervention (4 weeks)
Population: AR(1) covariance matrix with Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) model. Data from 35 subjects (18 from intervention and 17 from control) were included in the data analysis on LSMC: in addition to the one participant that withdrew, one participant's data was excluded for excessive motion during MRI scanning, two for issues with co-registration and normalization, and one did not complete MRI scanning at timepoint 2 due to claustrophobia.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active tDCS | Change of C3 Activation (NPS-shared Neural Circuit Measure | -0.15 change of arbitrary unit LPG activation | Standard Deviation 0.39 |
| Sham tDCS | Change of C3 Activation (NPS-shared Neural Circuit Measure | 0.01 change of arbitrary unit LPG activation | Standard Deviation 0.33 |
Comparison: p-value was calculated, and is not attempting to indicate the threshold for statistical significance.p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Primary
Change of C3 Connectivity (NPS-shared Neural Circuit Measure 21)
Change of arbitrary unit of correlation between LPG and amygdala at rest (resting fMRI). No theoretical minimum or maximum exists for this scale.
Time frame: from baseline to post-intervention (4 weeks)
Population: AR(1) covariance matrix with Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) model. Data from 35 subjects (18 from intervention and 17 from control) were included in the data analysis on LSMC: in addition to the one participant that withdrew, one participant's data was excluded for excessive motion during MRI scanning, two for issues with co-registration and normalization, and one did not complete MRI scanning at timepoint 2 due to claustrophobia.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active tDCS | Change of C3 Connectivity (NPS-shared Neural Circuit Measure 21) | 0.10 change of arbitrary unit LPG correlation | Standard Deviation 0.26 |
| Sham tDCS | Change of C3 Connectivity (NPS-shared Neural Circuit Measure 21) | -0.10 change of arbitrary unit LPG correlation | Standard Deviation 0.29 |
Comparison: p-value was calculated, and is not attempting to indicate the threshold for statistical significance.p-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary
Change of Informant-rated NPS
Informant-reported NPS was measured using the 12-domain Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-Full), including both frequency and severity (based on present symptoms) during the past week. We first calculated the frequency x severity for each domain, then averaged across domains, and finally adjusted for caregiving burden. Higher is worse. We calculated the change of the arbitrary score from baseline to post-intervention. No theoretical minimum and maximum scores exist
Time frame: from baseline to post-intervention (4 weeks)
Population: AR(1) covariance matrix with Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) model; 1 person from control gorp was withdrawn during the beginning of intervention.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active tDCS | Change of Informant-rated NPS | -0.04 change of arbitrary score | Standard Deviation 0.45 |
| Sham tDCS | Change of Informant-rated NPS | -0.87 change of arbitrary score | Standard Deviation 1.63 |
Comparison: reported p-value was calculated, and is not attempting to indicate the threshold for statistical significancep-value: <0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary
Change of Patient-report NPS
Patient-reported NPS was measured using three mood-related questionnaires that probed mood within the past week: depression (Geriatric Depressive Scale ;GDS-30); anxiety (State-Trait-Anxiety-Inventory; STAI-state); and apathy (Apathy Evaluation Scale; AES). Total scores from individual measures were z-transformed (higher score indicating severer symptoms) across timepoints and averaged to create a composite mood score. A Z-score of 0 represents the population mean. Change of Z-score from baseline to post-intervention was used.
Time frame: from baseline to post-intervention (4 weeks)
Population: AR(1) covariance matrix with Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) model; 1 person from control gorp was withdrawn during the beginning of intervention.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active tDCS | Change of Patient-report NPS | -0.22 change of Z-score | Standard Deviation 0.52 |
| Sham tDCS | Change of Patient-report NPS | -1.01 change of Z-score | Standard Deviation 2.52 |
Comparison: reported p-value was calculated, and is not attempting to indicate the threshold for statistical significance.p-value: <0.05Chi-squared