Skip to content

Replaceability of Fluoroscopy and Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Hemidiaphragm Excursion

Replaceability of Fluoroscopy and Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Hemidiaphragm Excursion

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04098939
Enrollment
42
Registered
2019-09-23
Start date
2020-05-01
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2024-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diaphragm Disease

Brief summary

Precise measurement of diaphragm function is difficult. Several methods exist. No are sufficiently validated. With this study, the investigators wish to investigate the validity of different ultrasound and radiological methods and compare them with inspiratory pressure measurements.

Detailed description

Fluoroscopy assessment of diaphragm motility is obtained and simultaneously correlated to sonographic assessments of motility.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTDiaphragm evaluation

Ultrasound and radiographic evaluation of diaphragm function

Sponsors

University of Aarhus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Completed informed consent * one of the following conditions: * Healthy participants, control group * Lung disease group. * COPD or * Ideopatic pulmonary fibrosis. * Heart disease group. Heart disease that lead to: * heart transplantat or * left ventricular assist device.

Exclusion criteria

* Known diaphragm dysfunction. * Neuromuscular disease. * Pleural effusion. * Pneumothorax. * In the healthy group: Significant comorbidity that affect heart og lung function (arterial hypertention, mild valve disease and COPD without symptoms are accepted). * In the healthy group and in the lung disease group: Previous thorax surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diaphragm Functionduring intervention, up to 1 hourMovement of diaphragm measured with ultrasound Ultrasound measures: Diaphragm excursion in centimeters with M-mode.

Countries

Denmark

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Participants
Participants undergoing ultrasound and fluoroscopy assessment of diaphragm excursion. Diaphragm evaluation: Ultrasound and radiographic evaluation of diaphragm function
42
Total42

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicParticipants
Age, Continuous59.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
Height, cm176.7 Centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants
Weight. Kg81.9 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.4

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 42
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 42
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 42

Outcome results

Primary

Diaphragm Function

Movement of diaphragm measured with ultrasound Ultrasound measures: Diaphragm excursion in centimeters with M-mode.

Time frame: during intervention, up to 1 hour

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ParticipantsDiaphragm Function4.25 centimetersStandard Deviation 2.05
p-value: <0.0595% CI: [0.26, 1.04]Bland-Altman plots

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026