Skip to content

Clinical Investigation of the AcrySof IQ Vivity Extended Vision Intraocular Lens (IOL)

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center Clinical Investigation of the AcrySof IQ Vivity Extended Vision IOL vs. TECNIS Symfony and AT LARA Extended Depth of Focus IOLs

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04098367
Enrollment
222
Registered
2019-09-23
Start date
2019-11-18
Completion date
2021-07-22
Last updated
2022-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aphakia

Keywords

Cataracts, Extracapsular cataract extraction, IOL, Extended depth of focus, Visual disturbances, Presbyopia, Intraocular lens

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the visual disturbance profile of an intraocular lens (IOL) using nondiffractive optics, the VIVITY IOL, to two diffractive IOLs in subjects requiring bilateral cataract surgery. IOLs are implantable medical devices intended for long-term use over the lifetime of the cataract patient.

Detailed description

A total of 10 scheduled visits are planned. The visits include a screening visit, 2 operative visits, and 7 postoperative visits. Both eyes will be implanted. The second eye implant will occur within 7-21 days of the first eye implant. The primary endpoint data will be collected at the Month 3 visit. Individual subject participation is expected to last 6-7 months. This study will be conducted in Australia and New Zealand.

Interventions

DEVICEVIVITY

Extended vision intraocular lens intended for primary implantation for the visual correction of aphakia in adult patients with less than 1.00 diopter of preoperative corneal astigmatism in whom a cataractous lens has been removed by extracapsular cataract extraction

DEVICESYMFONY

Extended range of vision intraocular lens indicated for primary implantation for the visual correction of aphakia in adult patients with less than 1.00 diopter of pre-existing corneal astigmatism in whom a cataractous lens has been removed

DEVICEAT LARA

Extended depth of focus intraocular lens indicated for implantation for the visual correction of aphakia in patients with and without presbyopia in whom a cataractous lens has been removed by extracapsular cataract extraction

PROCEDURECataract surgery

Cataract removal by routine small incision surgery

Sponsors

Alcon Research
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Planned cataract removal in both eyes. * Willing and able to complete all required postoperative visits. * Able to understand, read and write English and willing to sign an approved statement of informed consent. * Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

* Women of childbearing potential, pregnant, intend to become pregnant, breastfeeding. * Any eye condition, disease or pathology, other than cataract, that is expected to reduce postoperative best corrected distance visual acuity, as specified in the protocol. * Ocular trauma or ocular surface disease that would affect study measurements. * Patients who desire monovision correction. * Other protocol-specified

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects Not Bothered at All by Halos (QUVID Question 2.3)Month 3 postoperative (Day 120-180 from second eye surgery)QUVID is a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire that collects responses from the subject about vision-related experiences. A halo is a circular spreading of light around a light source, such as car headlights at night. Question 2 of QUVID asked the subject, In the past 7 days, have you experienced halos? Subjects responding No were automatically imputed as reporting, 0=Not bothered at all. Subjects responding Yes were then asked Question 2.3: In the past 7 days, how much have your halos bothered you? Subjects responded on a 5-point scale: 0=Not bothered at all; 1=Bothered a little bit; 2=Bothered somewhat; 3=Bothered quite a bit; 4=Bothered very much. Percentage was calculated as number of subjects with score of 0 divided by number of subjects with data regardless of response, times 100.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects Not Bothered at All by Glare (QUVID Question 3.3)Month 3 postoperative (Day 120-180 from second eye surgery)Glare is a wide dispersion of light, such as an intensified reflection of the sun off a glass building. Question 3 of QUVID asked the subject, In the past 7 days, have you experienced glare? Subjects responding No were automatically imputed as reporting, 0=Not bothered at all. Subjects responding Yes were then asked Question 3.3: In the past 7 days, how much has your glare bothered you? Subjects responded on a 5-point scale: 0=Not bothered at all; 1=Bothered a little bit; 2=Bothered somewhat; 3=Bothered quite a bit; 4=Bothered very much. Percentage was calculated as number of subjects with score of 0 divided by number of subjects with data regardless of response, times 100.
Percentage of Subjects Not Bothered at All by Starbursts (QUVID Question 1.3)Month 3 postoperative (Day 120-180 from second eye surgery)A starburst is a star-shaped spreading of light around a light source, such as car headlights at night. Question 1 of QUVID asked the subject, In the past 7 days, have you experienced starbursts? Subjects responding No were automatically imputed as reporting, 0=Not bothered at all. Subjects responding Yes were then asked Question 1.3: In the past 7 days, how much have your starbursts bothered you? Subjects responded on a 5-point scale: 0=Not bothered at all; 1=Bothered a little bit; 2=Bothered somewhat; 3=Bothered quite a bit; 4=Bothered very much. Percentage was calculated as number of subjects with score of 0 divided by number of subjects with data regardless of response, times 100.

Countries

Australia, New Zealand

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from nine investigative sites located in Australia and three investigative sites located in New Zealand.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 222 enrolled, 24 subjects were exited as screen failures prior to randomization. Of the 198 subjects randomized, both eyes from five subjects and second eyes from 2 subjects (i.e., 5 first eyes, 7 second eyes) were discontinued after randomization and prior to attempted implantation. This reporting group includes all randomized and implanted subjects (193).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
VIVITY
VIVITY IOL implanted in the eye during cataract surgery
63
SYMFONY
SYMFONY IOL implanted in the eye during cataract surgery
65
AT LARA
AT LARA implanted in the eye during cataract surgery
65
Total193

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up152
Overall StudySick . Could not attend visit100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVIVITYSYMFONYAT LARATotal
Age, Continuous67.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.07
67.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.25
66.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
66.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.63
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants6 Participants7 Participants15 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Indigenous or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants8 Participants3 Participants13 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White (Caucasian)
58 Participants47 Participants54 Participants159 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
38 Participants36 Participants40 Participants114 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
25 Participants29 Participants25 Participants79 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1930 / 630 / 630 / 630 / 650 / 650 / 650 / 650 / 630 / 65
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1937 / 637 / 630 / 6312 / 6510 / 650 / 6517 / 6516 / 630 / 65
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1931 / 630 / 630 / 631 / 653 / 651 / 653 / 652 / 634 / 65

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Subjects Not Bothered at All by Halos (QUVID Question 2.3)

QUVID is a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire that collects responses from the subject about vision-related experiences. A halo is a circular spreading of light around a light source, such as car headlights at night. Question 2 of QUVID asked the subject, In the past 7 days, have you experienced halos? Subjects responding No were automatically imputed as reporting, 0=Not bothered at all. Subjects responding Yes were then asked Question 2.3: In the past 7 days, how much have your halos bothered you? Subjects responded on a 5-point scale: 0=Not bothered at all; 1=Bothered a little bit; 2=Bothered somewhat; 3=Bothered quite a bit; 4=Bothered very much. Percentage was calculated as number of subjects with score of 0 divided by number of subjects with data regardless of response, times 100.

Time frame: Month 3 postoperative (Day 120-180 from second eye surgery)

Population: AAS with data at Month 3 postoperative visit

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
VIVITYPercentage of Subjects Not Bothered at All by Halos (QUVID Question 2.3)88.7 percentage of subjects
SYMFONYPercentage of Subjects Not Bothered at All by Halos (QUVID Question 2.3)58.1 percentage of subjects
AT LARAPercentage of Subjects Not Bothered at All by Halos (QUVID Question 2.3)58.6 percentage of subjects
97.5% CI: [13.34, 46.79]Miettinen-Nurminen
97.5% CI: [12.54, 46.68]Miettinen-Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Not Bothered at All by Glare (QUVID Question 3.3)

Glare is a wide dispersion of light, such as an intensified reflection of the sun off a glass building. Question 3 of QUVID asked the subject, In the past 7 days, have you experienced glare? Subjects responding No were automatically imputed as reporting, 0=Not bothered at all. Subjects responding Yes were then asked Question 3.3: In the past 7 days, how much has your glare bothered you? Subjects responded on a 5-point scale: 0=Not bothered at all; 1=Bothered a little bit; 2=Bothered somewhat; 3=Bothered quite a bit; 4=Bothered very much. Percentage was calculated as number of subjects with score of 0 divided by number of subjects with data regardless of response, times 100.

Time frame: Month 3 postoperative (Day 120-180 from second eye surgery)

Population: AAS with data at Month 3 postoperative visit

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
VIVITYPercentage of Subjects Not Bothered at All by Glare (QUVID Question 3.3)53.2 percentage of subjects
SYMFONYPercentage of Subjects Not Bothered at All by Glare (QUVID Question 3.3)55.6 percentage of subjects
AT LARAPercentage of Subjects Not Bothered at All by Glare (QUVID Question 3.3)35.0 percentage of subjects
97.5% CI: [-21.91, 17.42]Miettinen-Nurminen
97.5% CI: [-12, 27.8]Miettinen-Nurminen
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Not Bothered at All by Starbursts (QUVID Question 1.3)

A starburst is a star-shaped spreading of light around a light source, such as car headlights at night. Question 1 of QUVID asked the subject, In the past 7 days, have you experienced starbursts? Subjects responding No were automatically imputed as reporting, 0=Not bothered at all. Subjects responding Yes were then asked Question 1.3: In the past 7 days, how much have your starbursts bothered you? Subjects responded on a 5-point scale: 0=Not bothered at all; 1=Bothered a little bit; 2=Bothered somewhat; 3=Bothered quite a bit; 4=Bothered very much. Percentage was calculated as number of subjects with score of 0 divided by number of subjects with data regardless of response, times 100.

Time frame: Month 3 postoperative (Day 120-180 from second eye surgery)

Population: AAS with data at Month 3 postoperative visit

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
VIVITYPercentage of Subjects Not Bothered at All by Starbursts (QUVID Question 1.3)79.0 percentage of subjects
SYMFONYPercentage of Subjects Not Bothered at All by Starbursts (QUVID Question 1.3)55.6 percentage of subjects
AT LARAPercentage of Subjects Not Bothered at All by Starbursts (QUVID Question 1.3)38.3 percentage of subjects
97.5% CI: [4.66, 40.86]Miettinen-Nurminen
97.5% CI: [21.16, 57.22]Miettinen-Nurminen

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026