Colorectal Cancer, Surgery
Conditions
Brief summary
A prospective multicenter observational cost-utility study following older or high-risk patients with colorectal cancer with and without prehabilitation before surgery.
Detailed description
This study will answer the question whether prehabilitation is cost-effective in colorectal cancer surgery among individual patients aged 70 years and above or patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of III. We also aim to identify factors facilitating or impairing implementation of prehabilitation such that it is cost-effective.
Interventions
OTHERPrehabilitation
According to our definition, prehabilitation consists of exercise therapy during at least 2 weeks. This is combined with optimalisation of the patients' nutritional status at least 2 weeks before surgery.
Sponsors
Leading the Change: Collaboration of health Insurers in the Netherlands
Radboud University Medical Center
Study design
Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Age ≥ 70 years or American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of III * Scheduled for colorectal cancer surgery
Exclusion criteria
* Metastatic disease known preoperatively * ASA IV score or higher * Paralytic or immobilized patients (not capable to perform exercise) * Prior use of neoadjuvant therapy for the same indication * Not able or willing to provide written informed consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-5D-5L | 0-6 months | Quality of life according to the EuroQol-5 dimensions-5 levels questionnaire. The 5 dimensions cover mobility, selfcare, daily activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety. All dimensions are rated on a 5 level scale ranging from 'I have no problems with ....(dimension)' to 'I am not able to/I am extremely...(dimension)'. The first option is considered 'better' and the latter as 'worse'. |
| Costs | 0-6 months | From a societal perspective including health care consumption costs, patient out-of-pocket costs, and productivity losses of informal caregivers |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| (I)ADL dependence by GARS | 0-6 months | Dependence regarding (instrumental) acitivities of daily living ((I)ADL)according to the Gait Assessment Rating Scale (GARS). Several items with regard to self-reliance are scored according to the phrase 'I can do ....(item) completely independently.......'. Possible answers are 'Without any effort', 'with some effort', 'With a lot of effort', and 'Only with help from others'. The first is considered better and the latter as worse. |
| (I)ADL dependence by TOPICS-SF | 0-6 months | Dependence regarding (instrumental) acitivities of daily living according toThe Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Short form (TOPICS-SF) questionnaire for patients. This questionnaire contains GARS and EQ-5D amongst others and is spread throughout the questionnaire. |
| Number of deceased patients | 0-6 months | Data on mortality will be assessed based on medical records. |
| Care-related burden among informal caregivers | 0-6 months | The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum Dataset (TOPICS-MDS) questionnaire for caregivers in which the domains 'self-reported health' (by RAND-36 health survey), 'quality of life' (by carerQol), 'hours of informal care' (number), and 'perceived burden' (on visual analog scale) are covered. |
| Return to normal activity | 0-6 months | The return to normal activity (RNA) of patients is investigated by the different questionnaires listed above on several time-points. After surgery, we can examine the time within a time frame of 6 months that patients return to their normal activities. |
| Morbidity | 0-6 months | Number and severity of complications will be assed based on medical records. |
Countries
Netherlands
Outcome results
None listed