Skip to content

Surgery Compared to Masking Device for Venous Pulsatile Tinnitus

Surgery Compared to Masking Device for Venous Pulsatile Tinnitus

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04097041
Enrollment
0
Registered
2019-09-20
Start date
2018-11-08
Completion date
2023-08-26
Last updated
2019-09-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tinnitus

Brief summary

The investigators aim to study whether surgical resurfacing of the sigmoid sinus and jugular bulb will result in elimination of venous pulsatile tinnitus.

Detailed description

Currently there is no known treatments with efficacy for venous pulsatile tinnitus without any pathology. The investigators hope to learn that in surgery, resurfacing of the sigmoid sinus and jugular bulb (acoustic dampening) will eliminate symptoms such as pulsatile tinnitus in patients. The knowledge learned will significantly help treat and alleviate future patients that have pulsatile tinnitus. The purpose of the study is to examine whether surgical resurfacing of the sigmoid sinus and jugular bulb will result in elimination of pulsatile tinnitus in human subjects.

Interventions

PROCEDURETympanomastoidectomy

Patient undergoes tympanomastoidectomy (approx 2 hour operation on ear and mastoid) where a local soft tissue flap is transferred to cover the sigmoid sinus, a cartilage and perichondrial graft is taken from the tragus to cover the jugular bulb).

PROCEDURENon-Surgery

Screening performed at outpatient clinic after consultation for management of venous pulsatile tinnitus. Consent and formal recruitment into study performed at preoperative visit or at audiological visit. The masking device is a hearing aid that provides sound that is aimed to negate the internal sound from the pulsatile tinnitus. Almost all hearing aid can be converted to a masking device for tinnitus. It is externally worn on the ear and provides sound at a desired volume. The benefits of wearing the masking device are that it may reduce the volume of the pulsatile tinnitus. As it is worn on the external ear and is not invasive there are minimal risks but potential risks could include irritation of the external ear and discomfort from wearing.

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Surgery arm - patient undergoes tympanomastoidectomy (approx 2 hour operation on ear and mastoid) where a local soft tissue flap is transferred to cover the sigmoid sinus, a cartilage and perichondrial graft is taken from the tragus to cover the jugular bulb). Patient has routine follow up - H&P, 2 weeks after surgery and then H&P, Audiometry and Tympanometry over 12 months post surgery (3rd month, 6th month and 12th month). Non surgery arm - patient has audiological consult and fitting of masking device. The Patient has a routine follow up - H&P, 2 weeks after masking fitting and then H&P, Audiometry, Tympanometry over 12 months (3rd month, 6th month and 12th month). Patient cross over to change arms, at 6 months, if they have no resolution of symptoms.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Unilateral venous pulsatile tinnitus * Visual Analogue score of severity \>5

Exclusion criteria

* Surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline in patient-reported tinnitus score12 MonthsTinnitus severity rated on a 10-point Likert scale (range: 1-10; higher scores correspond to more severe symptoms).

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026