Skip to content

AGN-151586 Dose-Ranging Study for Treatment of Glabellar Lines

A Phase 2b Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of AGN-151586 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04096326
Enrollment
198
Registered
2019-09-19
Start date
2019-09-26
Completion date
2020-09-09
Last updated
2023-07-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glabellar Lines

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of AGN-151586 over a range of doses for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines (GL).

Interventions

AGN-151586 solution for injection.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo solution for injection.

Sponsors

Allergan
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

-Female participants willing to minimize the risk of inducing pregnancy for the duration of the clinical study and follow-up period (at least 10 weeks after study intervention).

Exclusion criteria

* Known immunization or hypersensitivity to any botulinum neurotoxin serotype * Any medical condition that may put the participant at increased risk with exposure to AGN-151586, including diagnosed myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or any other condition that might interfere with neuromuscular function * Marked facial asymmetry, dermatochalasis, deep dermal scarring, excessively thick sebaceous skin, or the inability to substantially lessen facial lines even by physically spreading them apart, as determined by the investigator * Any brow or eyelid ptosis, as determined by the investigator * Infection or skin disorder at the injection sites * History of facial nerve palsy * Any uncontrolled systemic disease * Anticipated need for treatment with botulinum neurotoxin of any serotype for any reason during the study (other than study intervention) * Anticipated need for surgery or overnight hospitalization during the study * Prior periorbital surgery, facial lift (full face or mid-face), thread lift, brow lift, or related procedures (eg, eyelid \[blepharoplasty\] and/or eyebrow surgery) * Prior facial treatment with permanent soft tissue fillers, synthetic implantation (eg, Gore-Tex®), and/or autologous fat transplantation * Current enrollment in an investigational drug or device study or participation in such a study within 30 days of Screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the FWS According to Investigator's Assessment at Any Postintervention Timepoint Through Day 7Baseline (Day 1) through Day 7Percentage of participants achieving a ≥ 2-grade improvement from baseline on the FWS according to investigator assessments of GL severity at maximum frown at any postintervention timepoint through Day 7 were reported. Investigators' assessments of the severity of GL at rest and maximum frown using the validated FWS was assessed using the 4-grade FWS, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Higher scores indicate more severity. Percentages are rounded off to nearest single decimal.
Number of Participants Who Experience One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From first dose of study drug until the end of study (up to 42 days)An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether considered related to the study intervention or not. TEAEs were defined as events event began on or after the date and time of the study intervention; or the adverse event was present before the date and time of the study intervention, but increased in severity or became serious on or after the date and time of the study intervention.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameters Post InterventionFrom first dose of study drug until the end of study (up to 42 days)Potentially clinically significant post intervention laboratory values included hematology, chemistry, and urinalysis as defined in the SAP.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Signs Post InterventionFrom first dose of study drug until the end of study (up to 42 days)Potentially clinically significant post intervention vital sign measurements included systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, respiration rate, body temperature as defined in the SAP.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings Post InterventionFrom first dose of study drug until the end of study (up to 42 days)Potentially clinically significant post intervention values in 12-lead ECG recordings included heart rate and measures PR, QRS, QT and QTcF intervals. 12-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participants have rested for at least 10 minutes in semi-supine or supine position as defined in the SAP. A post-baseline value is considered potentially clinically significant if it meets either the observed-value or the change-from-baseline criteria such as QRS interval observed value: ≥ 150 msec; PR interval observed value: ≥ 250 msec; QTcB observed value: \> 500 msec or change from baseline value: increase of \> 60 msec; QTcF observed value: \> 500 msec or change from baseline value: increase of \> 60 msec.
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Up to Day 42Number of participants with positive anti-drug antibodies are reported. Binding and neutralizing anti-bodies are evaluated as anti-drug antibodies. Only participants with positive samples for binding antibodies have been analyzed for presence of neutralizing antibodies.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 198 participants with moderate to severe glabellar lines (GL) were enrolled and randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive AGN-151586 in 5 sequential AGN-151586 dose rising cohorts or Placebo in each of the 5 cohorts.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1: Placebo
Participants received AGN-151586-matching placebo, intramuscular (IM) injections in the glabellar complex on Day 1 in Cohort 1.
8
Cohort 1: AGN-151586
Participants received AGN-151586 lowest dose, IM injections in the glabellar complex on Day 1.
32
Cohort 2: Placebo
Participants received AGN-151586-matching placebo, IM injections in the glabellar complex on Day 1 in Cohort 2.
12
Cohort 2: AGN-151586
Participants received AGN-151586, IM injections in the glabellar complex on Day 1.
28
Cohort 3: Placebo
Participants received AGN-151586-matching placebo, IM injections in the glabellar complex on Day 1 in Cohort 3.
11
Cohort 3: AGN-151586
Participants received AGN-151586, IM injections in the glabellar complex on Day 1.
27
Cohort 4: Placebo
Participants received AGN-151586-matching placebo, IM injections in the glabellar complex on Day 1 in Cohort 4.
10
Cohort 4: AGN-151586
Participants received AGN-151586, IM injections in the glabellar complex on Day 1.
30
Cohort 5: Placebo
Participants received AGN-151586-matching placebo, IM injections in the glabellar complex on Day 1 in Cohort 5.
9
Cohort 5: AGN-151586
Participants received AGN-151586 highest dose, IM injections in the glabellar complex on Day 1.
31
Total198

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007FG008FG009
Overall StudyCOVID-19-related reasons0000150000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up0100000000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0000001000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort 1: PlaceboCohort 1: AGN-151586Cohort 2: PlaceboCohort 2: AGN-151586Cohort 3: PlaceboCohort 3: AGN-151586Cohort 4: PlaceboCohort 4: AGN-151586Cohort 5: PlaceboCohort 5: AGN-151586Total
Age, Continuous49.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.24
52.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.85
47.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.39
50.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
50.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.63
47.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.53
39.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.94
45.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.06
51.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.37
46.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
48.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.91
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants9 Participants3 Participants4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants3 Participants12 Participants0 Participants7 Participants52 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants23 Participants9 Participants24 Participants7 Participants19 Participants7 Participants18 Participants9 Participants24 Participants146 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants2 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
7 Participants27 Participants10 Participants24 Participants10 Participants26 Participants10 Participants28 Participants7 Participants26 Participants175 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants29 Participants12 Participants25 Participants11 Participants24 Participants9 Participants26 Participants9 Participants30 Participants182 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants0 Participants1 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80 / 320 / 120 / 280 / 110 / 270 / 100 / 300 / 90 / 31
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 815 / 327 / 1210 / 287 / 119 / 273 / 109 / 301 / 912 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 320 / 120 / 280 / 110 / 270 / 100 / 300 / 90 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Who Experience One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether considered related to the study intervention or not. TEAEs were defined as events event began on or after the date and time of the study intervention; or the adverse event was present before the date and time of the study intervention, but increased in severity or became serious on or after the date and time of the study intervention.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug until the end of study (up to 42 days)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Experience One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)3 Participants
Cohort 1: AGN-151586Number of Participants Who Experience One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)15 Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Experience One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)7 Participants
Cohort 2: AGN-151586Number of Participants Who Experience One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)10 Participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Experience One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)7 Participants
Cohort 3: AGN-151586Number of Participants Who Experience One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)9 Participants
Cohort 4: PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Experience One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)3 Participants
Cohort 4: AGN-151586Number of Participants Who Experience One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)9 Participants
Cohort 5: PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Experience One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)1 Participants
Cohort 5: AGN-151586Number of Participants Who Experience One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)12 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)

Number of participants with positive anti-drug antibodies are reported. Binding and neutralizing anti-bodies are evaluated as anti-drug antibodies. Only participants with positive samples for binding antibodies have been analyzed for presence of neutralizing antibodies.

Time frame: Up to Day 42

Population: Safety population included all participants who received study intervention. Overall number of participants analyzed are the number of participants available for analyses. Number analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis for the below categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Binding Antibodies0 Participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Neutralizing Antibodies0 Participants
Cohort 1: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Neutralizing Antibodies0 Participants
Cohort 1: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Binding Antibodies0 Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Neutralizing Antibodies0 Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Binding Antibodies0 Participants
Cohort 2: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Binding Antibodies0 Participants
Cohort 2: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Neutralizing Antibodies0 Participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Binding Antibodies0 Participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Neutralizing Antibodies0 Participants
Cohort 3: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Neutralizing Antibodies0 Participants
Cohort 3: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Binding Antibodies0 Participants
Cohort 4: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Binding Antibodies0 Participants
Cohort 4: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Neutralizing Antibodies0 Participants
Cohort 4: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Binding Antibodies0 Participants
Cohort 4: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Neutralizing Antibodies0 Participants
Cohort 5: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Binding Antibodies0 Participants
Cohort 5: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Neutralizing Antibodies0 Participants
Cohort 5: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Binding Antibodies1 Participants
Cohort 5: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Neutralizing Antibodies0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings Post Intervention

Potentially clinically significant post intervention values in 12-lead ECG recordings included heart rate and measures PR, QRS, QT and QTcF intervals. 12-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participants have rested for at least 10 minutes in semi-supine or supine position as defined in the SAP. A post-baseline value is considered potentially clinically significant if it meets either the observed-value or the change-from-baseline criteria such as QRS interval observed value: ≥ 150 msec; PR interval observed value: ≥ 250 msec; QTcB observed value: \> 500 msec or change from baseline value: increase of \> 60 msec; QTcF observed value: \> 500 msec or change from baseline value: increase of \> 60 msec.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug until the end of study (up to 42 days)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings Post Intervention0 Participants
Cohort 1: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings Post Intervention0 Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings Post Intervention0 Participants
Cohort 2: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings Post Intervention0 Participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings Post Intervention0 Participants
Cohort 3: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings Post Intervention0 Participants
Cohort 4: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings Post Intervention0 Participants
Cohort 4: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings Post Intervention0 Participants
Cohort 5: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings Post Intervention0 Participants
Cohort 5: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram Findings Post Intervention0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameters Post Intervention

Potentially clinically significant post intervention laboratory values included hematology, chemistry, and urinalysis as defined in the SAP.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug until the end of study (up to 42 days)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameters Post Intervention0 Participants
Cohort 1: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameters Post Intervention7 Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameters Post Intervention1 Participants
Cohort 2: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameters Post Intervention5 Participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameters Post Intervention3 Participants
Cohort 3: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameters Post Intervention4 Participants
Cohort 4: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameters Post Intervention0 Participants
Cohort 4: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameters Post Intervention4 Participants
Cohort 5: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameters Post Intervention5 Participants
Cohort 5: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameters Post Intervention8 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Signs Post Intervention

Potentially clinically significant post intervention vital sign measurements included systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, respiration rate, body temperature as defined in the SAP.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug until the end of study (up to 42 days)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Signs Post Intervention2 Participants
Cohort 1: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Signs Post Intervention0 Participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Signs Post Intervention0 Participants
Cohort 2: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Signs Post Intervention2 Participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Signs Post Intervention1 Participants
Cohort 3: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Signs Post Intervention0 Participants
Cohort 4: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Signs Post Intervention0 Participants
Cohort 4: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Signs Post Intervention1 Participants
Cohort 5: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Signs Post Intervention0 Participants
Cohort 5: AGN-151586Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Signs Post Intervention1 Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the FWS According to Investigator's Assessment at Any Postintervention Timepoint Through Day 7

Percentage of participants achieving a ≥ 2-grade improvement from baseline on the FWS according to investigator assessments of GL severity at maximum frown at any postintervention timepoint through Day 7 were reported. Investigators' assessments of the severity of GL at rest and maximum frown using the validated FWS was assessed using the 4-grade FWS, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Higher scores indicate more severity. Percentages are rounded off to nearest single decimal.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) through Day 7

Population: mITT population included all randomized participants who received the study intervention and who had at least one postintervention investigator-rated FWS measurement at maximum frown.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the FWS According to Investigator's Assessment at Any Postintervention Timepoint Through Day 70.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: AGN-151586Percentage of Participants With ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the FWS According to Investigator's Assessment at Any Postintervention Timepoint Through Day 740.6 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the FWS According to Investigator's Assessment at Any Postintervention Timepoint Through Day 70.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: AGN-151586Percentage of Participants With ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the FWS According to Investigator's Assessment at Any Postintervention Timepoint Through Day 746.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the FWS According to Investigator's Assessment at Any Postintervention Timepoint Through Day 718.2 percentage of participants
Cohort 3: AGN-151586Percentage of Participants With ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the FWS According to Investigator's Assessment at Any Postintervention Timepoint Through Day 770.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 4: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the FWS According to Investigator's Assessment at Any Postintervention Timepoint Through Day 720.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 4: AGN-151586Percentage of Participants With ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the FWS According to Investigator's Assessment at Any Postintervention Timepoint Through Day 783.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 5: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the FWS According to Investigator's Assessment at Any Postintervention Timepoint Through Day 711.1 percentage of participants
Cohort 5: AGN-151586Percentage of Participants With ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the FWS According to Investigator's Assessment at Any Postintervention Timepoint Through Day 796.8 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.009695% CI: [23.6, 57.6]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.009495% CI: [28, 64.9]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.004495% CI: [23.6, 80.8]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.002695% CI: [35.2, 91.5]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 095% CI: [64.2, 100]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026