Skip to content

Relative Bioavailability Study of Marketed and Lower Dose Ambrisentan in Healthy Adult Participants

An Open-label, Randomized Three Period Cross-over Relative Bioavailability Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetic Parameters of a Lower Dose Formulation of Ambrisentan (GSK1325760) With Marketed Ambrisentan in Healthy Adult Participants

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04095286
Enrollment
29
Registered
2019-09-19
Start date
2019-09-30
Completion date
2019-12-17
Last updated
2020-08-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertension, Pulmonary

Keywords

Ambrisentan, Oral dosage forms, Pulmonary arterial hypertension, Bioavailability

Brief summary

This is a single center, open-label, randomized, single-dose, three-period cross-over study in healthy participants. The aim of this study is to provide clinically relevant information on the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profile of a new lower dose formulation ambrisentan (AMB) tablet, which is intended for pediatric use. The study will compare the relative bioavailability of the lower dose tablet, dispersed in water and administered orally, with the reference marketed AMB tablet in healthy adults. The total study duration for each participant is expected to be approximately 9 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGAMB new formulation (1 mg)

AMB tablets will be available at a unit dose strength of 1 mg. Participants will orally administer 5 tablets of 1 mg unit dose.

DRUGReference AMB (5 mg)

AMB reference tablet will be available as film-coated tablet at unit dose strength of 5 mg. Participants will orally administer 1 tablet of 5 mg unit dose

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This is a three-period crossover study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participants must be 18 to 65 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent. * Participants who are overtly healthy as determined by medical evaluation including medical history, physical examination, laboratory tests, vital signs and cardiac monitoring. * Average systolic blood pressure between 100-160 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) and diastolic between 55-90 mmHg (inclusive) over 3 readings at Screening. * Body weight \>=50 kilogram (kg) for men and \>= 45kg for women, and body mass index (BMI) within the range 18-30 kilogram per meter square (kg/m\^2) (inclusive). * Male participants are eligible to participate if they agree to the following during the study and for at least 13 weeks afterwards corresponding to time needed to eliminate study intervention (5 terminal half-lives) plus an additional 90 days (a spermatogenesis cycle): 1. Refrain from donating sperm plus either 2. Be abstinent from heterosexual intercourse as their preferred and usual lifestyle (abstinent on a long term and persistent basis) and agree to remain abstinent. OR * Must agree to use contraception/barrier, as follows: Agree to use a male condom; and Female partner to use an additional highly effective contraceptive method with a failure rate of \<1% per year as described. * A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP). * Capable of giving signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* History or presence of cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic, renal, gastrointestinal,endocrine, hematological, or neurological disorders capable of significantly altering the absorption, metabolism, or elimination of drugs; constituting a risk when taking the study intervention or interfering with the interpretation of data. * History or presence of palpitations or tachyarrhythmia. * Hemoglobin (Hb) below the normal range (Hb \<133 grams per liter \[g/L\] for male participants ; and Hb \<114 g/L for female participants). * Alanine transaminase (ALT) \>1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) * Bilirubin \>1.5 times ULN (isolated bilirubin \>1.5 times ULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin \<35%). * Current or chronic history of liver disease, or known hepatic or biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones). * Corrected QT interval (QTc) \>450 millisecond (msec). * Past or intended use of over-the-counter or prescription medication (including vitamins and dietary or herbal supplements but excluding paracetamol \<=2 grams/day) within 7 days (or 14 days if the drug is a potential enzyme inhibitor) or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to the first dose of study medication, unless approved by the Investigator in conjunction with GlaxoSmithKline Medical Monitor. * Participation in the study would result in loss of blood or blood products in excess of 500 milliliter (mL) within a 56-day period. * Exposure to more than 4 new chemical entities within 12 months prior to the first dosing day. * Current enrolment or past participation within 30 days before Screening in any other clinical study involving an investigational study intervention or any other type of medical research. * Presence of Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) at Screening or within 3 months prior to first dose of study intervention. * Positive Hepatitis C antibody test result at Screening or within 3 months prior to first dose of study intervention. * Positive Hepatitis C Ribonucleic acid (RNA) test result at Screening or within 3 months prior to first dose of study intervention. * Positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody test. * Positive pre-study drug/alcohol screen. * Regular use of known drugs of abuse. * Regular alcohol consumption within 6 months prior to the study defined as: An average weekly intake of \>14 units. One unit is equivalent to 8 grams of alcohol: a half-pint (equivalent to 240 mL) of beer, 1 glass (125 mL) of wine or 1 (25 mL) measure of spirits. * Smoking \> 5 cigarettes per week (or equivalent) and participants must be able to abstain from smoking for a 24-hour period prior to dose and any time whilst in the clinical unit. * Sensitivity to any of the study interventions, or components thereof, or drug or other allergy that, in the opinion of the investigator or medical monitor, contraindicates participation in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Apparent Terminal Phase Half-life (t1/2) After Administration of AMB Under Fasted ConditionPre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-doseBlood samples were collected at indicated time-points for PK analysis of AMB. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) After Administration of AMB Under Fasted ConditionPre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-doseBlood samples were collected at indicated time-points for PK analysis of AMB. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. PK Parameter Population included all participants who provided PK parameter data.
Time to Cmax (Tmax) After Administration of AMB Under Fasted ConditionPre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-doseBlood samples were collected at indicated time-points for PK analysis of AMB. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (Tlast) After Administration of AMB Under Fasted ConditionPre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-doseBlood samples were collected at indicated time-points for PK analysis of AMB. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time [(AUC(0-inf)] After Administration of AMB Under Fasted ConditionPre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-doseBlood samples were collected at indicated time-points for PK analysis of AMB. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Last Time of Quantifiable Concentration [AUC(0-t)] After Administration of AMB Under Fasted ConditionPre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-doseBlood samples were collected at indicated time-points for PK analysis of AMB. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-Serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs >=2%)Up to 40 daysAn AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment were categorized as SAE.
Number of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineBaseline (Day 1) and up to 40 daysVital signs were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest and included Systolic blood pressure (SBP), Diastolic blood pressure (DBP), Heart rate (HR). Data for number of participants with Post-Baseline worst case Vital Sign results relative to PCI Criteria relative to Baseline has been presented. Participants are counted in worst case category that their value changes to low, within range or high. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, are recorded in Within Range or No Change category. Participants are counted twice if values changed 'To Low' and 'To High', so the percentages are not added to 100%. Participants with missing baseline value are assumed as within range value. PCI ranges were: SBP \[lower: \<85, upper: \>160 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)\]; DBP (lower: \<40, upper: \>110 mmHg); HR (lower: \<45, upper: \>100 beats per minute). The value at Day 1 was considered as Baseline.
Number of Participants With Worst Case Post-Baseline Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsBaseline (Day 1) and up to 40 days12-lead ECGs were recorded in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest using an ECG machine that automatically calculated the heart rate and measured PR, QRS, QT and QT duration corrected for heart rate by Fridericia's formula (QTcF) intervals. Data for number of participants with abnormal clinically significant ECG findings for worst case post-Baseline has been presented. Clinically significant abnormal laboratory findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition. The value at Day 1 was considered as Baseline.
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineBaseline (Day -1) and up to 40 daysBlood samples were collected to analyze hemoglobin, hematocrit, lymphocytes, total neutrophils, platelet count, and white blood cell(WBC) counts. PCI ranges were hematocrit (high: \>0.54 proportion of red blood cells in blood and low: change from Baseline \<0.075); hemoglobin(high: \>180 grams per liter\[g/L\] and low: change from Baseline \<25 g/L); lymphocytes (low: \<0.8 Giga cells per liter\[GI/L\]); platelet count (low: \<100 GI/L and high: \>550 GI/L); neutrophil count (low: \<1.5 GI/L); WBC count (low: \<3 GI/L and high: \>20 GI/L). Participants were counted in worst-case category that their value changed to low, within range or no change, or high unless there was no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, were recorded in ''To within Range or No Change' category. Participants were counted twice if participant had both values that changed 'To Low' and 'To High'. Baseline is defined as Day -1.
Number of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineBaseline (Day -1) and up to 40 daysBlood samples were collected to analyze PCI ranges for aspartate amino transferase (AST), alanine amino transferase (ALT), & alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (high: \>=2 times (\*) upper limit of normal \[ULN\] International units per liter \[IU/L\]); bilirubin (high: \>=1.5 \* ULN micromoles per liter \[µmol/L\]); calcium (low: \<2 millimoles per liter \[mmol/L\] & high: \>2.75 mmol/L); glucose (low: \<3 & high: \>9 mmol/L); potassium (low: \<3 & high: \>5.5 mmol/L); sodium (low: \<130 & high: \>150 mmol/L) & Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) (high: \>=2 \* ULN µmol/L). Participants were counted in worst-case category that their value changed to (low, within range or no change, or high) unless there was no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, were recorded in the 'To within Range or No Change' category. Participants were counted twice if participant had both values that changed 'To Low' & 'To High'.
Number of Participants With Worst Case Any Increase in Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineBaseline (Day -1) and up to 40 daysUrine samples were collected for analysis of cellular casts, granular casts, hyaline casts and red blood cells. WBCs were counted as cells per high-power field (cells/HPF). Participants with worst case any increase in urinalysis results post-Baseline relative to Baseline has been presented. Baseline is defined as Day -1.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was a single center, open-label, randomized, single dose, 3-period crossover study in healthy participants that compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a new lower dose formulation (dispersed in water and administered intact orally) of ambrisentan (AMB) tablet with the reference marketed AMB tablet (administered orally).

Pre-assignment details

A total of 29 participants were enrolled at a single center in the United Kingdom.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
Participants received a single oral dose of AMB tablet (administered as 5 x 1 mg tablet) dispersed in water (F1) or a single dose of AMB oral tablet (administered as 5 x 1 mg tablet) administered intact (F2) or a single oral dose of reference AMB tablet (R) administered as 1 x 5 mg tablet in the following six sequences F1/F2/R, F2/R/F1, R/F1/F2, F1/R/F2, F2/F1/R and R/F2/F1.
29
Total29

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Period 1 (4 Days) + Washout (7days)Adverse Event001000
Period 1 (4 Days) + Washout (7days)Met Protocol-defined Stopping Criteria010000
Period 1 (4 Days) + Washout (7days)Withdrawal by Subject100000
Period 2 (4 Days) + Washout (7days)Adverse Event000010
Period 2 (4 Days) + Washout (7days)Met Protocol-defined Stopping Criteria002000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Continuous42.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.16
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Central/South Asian Heritage
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - East Asian Heritage
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - Arabic/North African Heritage
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage
25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 270 / 250 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 277 / 255 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 270 / 250 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Apparent Terminal Phase Half-life (t1/2) After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for PK analysis of AMB. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.

Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

Population: PK Parameter Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
AMB Dispersed in WaterApparent Terminal Phase Half-life (t1/2) After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition19.250 HourGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15.6
AMB Oral TabletApparent Terminal Phase Half-life (t1/2) After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition18.119 HourGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19.3
Reference AMBApparent Terminal Phase Half-life (t1/2) After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition18.197 HourGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16.4
Primary

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time [(AUC(0-inf)] After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for PK analysis of AMB. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.

Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

Population: PK Parameter Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analysed.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
AMB Dispersed in WaterArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time [(AUC(0-inf)] After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition3006.443 Hours*nanogram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 23.6
AMB Oral TabletArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time [(AUC(0-inf)] After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition2859.283 Hours*nanogram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21.7
Reference AMBArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time [(AUC(0-inf)] After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition2963.908 Hours*nanogram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21.6
90% CI: [1.02, 1.09]
90% CI: [1, 1.08]
Primary

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Last Time of Quantifiable Concentration [AUC(0-t)] After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for PK analysis of AMB. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.

Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

Population: PK Parameter Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
AMB Dispersed in WaterArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Last Time of Quantifiable Concentration [AUC(0-t)] After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition2844.151 Hours*nanogram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 22.1
AMB Oral TabletArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Last Time of Quantifiable Concentration [AUC(0-t)] After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition2849.378 Hours*nanogram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 22
Reference AMBArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Last Time of Quantifiable Concentration [AUC(0-t)] After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition2779.364 Hours*nanogram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21.4
90% CI: [1.02, 1.08]
90% CI: [1.01, 1.07]
Primary

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for PK analysis of AMB. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis. PK Parameter Population included all participants who provided PK parameter data.

Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

Population: PK Parameter Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
AMB Dispersed in WaterMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition359.030 Nanogram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15.5
AMB Oral TabletMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition316.505 Nanogram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19.2
Reference AMBMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition353.252 Nanogram per milliliterGeometric Coefficient of Variation 29.3
90% CI: [0.96, 1.11]
90% CI: [0.85, 0.98]
Primary

Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (Tlast) After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for PK analysis of AMB. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.

Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

Population: PK Parameter Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
AMB Dispersed in WaterTime of Last Quantifiable Concentration (Tlast) After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition72.00 Hour
AMB Oral TabletTime of Last Quantifiable Concentration (Tlast) After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition72.00 Hour
Reference AMBTime of Last Quantifiable Concentration (Tlast) After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition72.00 Hour
Primary

Time to Cmax (Tmax) After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition

Blood samples were collected at indicated time-points for PK analysis of AMB. PK parameters were calculated by standard non-compartmental analysis.

Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

Population: PK Parameter Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
AMB Dispersed in WaterTime to Cmax (Tmax) After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition1.000 Hour
AMB Oral TabletTime to Cmax (Tmax) After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition2.000 Hour
Reference AMBTime to Cmax (Tmax) After Administration of AMB Under Fasted Condition1.750 Hour
Secondary

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-Serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs >=2%)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment were categorized as SAE.

Time frame: Up to 40 days

Population: Safety Population comprises of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the intervention actually received. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analysed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-Serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs >=2%)non-SAE (>=2%)5 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-Serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs >=2%)SAE0 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-Serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs >=2%)non-SAE (>=2%)7 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-Serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs >=2%)SAE0 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-Serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs >=2%)non-SAE (>=2%)5 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Non-Serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs >=2%)SAE0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Worst Case Any Increase in Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline

Urine samples were collected for analysis of cellular casts, granular casts, hyaline casts and red blood cells. WBCs were counted as cells per high-power field (cells/HPF). Participants with worst case any increase in urinalysis results post-Baseline relative to Baseline has been presented. Baseline is defined as Day -1.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -1) and up to 40 days

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Any Increase in Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineUrine Microscopy - Red Blood Cells0 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Any Increase in Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineUrine Microscopy - Cellular Casts0 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Any Increase in Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineUrine Microscopy - Granular Casts0 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Any Increase in Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineUrine Microscopy - Hyaline Casts0 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Any Increase in Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineUrine Microscopy-WBCs (1-9 cells/HPF)1 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Any Increase in Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineUrine Microscopy - Granular Casts0 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Any Increase in Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineUrine Microscopy-WBCs (1-9 cells/HPF)0 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Any Increase in Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineUrine Microscopy - Hyaline Casts0 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Any Increase in Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineUrine Microscopy - Red Blood Cells0 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Any Increase in Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineUrine Microscopy - Cellular Casts0 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Any Increase in Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineUrine Microscopy - Cellular Casts0 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Any Increase in Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineUrine Microscopy - Granular Casts0 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Any Increase in Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineUrine Microscopy - Red Blood Cells0 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Any Increase in Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineUrine Microscopy-WBCs (1-9 cells/HPF)1 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Any Increase in Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineUrine Microscopy - Hyaline Casts0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline

Blood samples were collected to analyze PCI ranges for aspartate amino transferase (AST), alanine amino transferase (ALT), & alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (high: \>=2 times (\*) upper limit of normal \[ULN\] International units per liter \[IU/L\]); bilirubin (high: \>=1.5 \* ULN micromoles per liter \[µmol/L\]); calcium (low: \<2 millimoles per liter \[mmol/L\] & high: \>2.75 mmol/L); glucose (low: \<3 & high: \>9 mmol/L); potassium (low: \<3 & high: \>5.5 mmol/L); sodium (low: \<130 & high: \>150 mmol/L) & Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) (high: \>=2 \* ULN µmol/L). Participants were counted in worst-case category that their value changed to (low, within range or no change, or high) unless there was no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, were recorded in the 'To within Range or No Change' category. Participants were counted twice if participant had both values that changed 'To Low' & 'To High'.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -1) and up to 40 days

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineSodium,To within Range/No Change, n=27, 25, 2627 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselinePotassium,To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineAST,To within Range/No Change, n=26, 25, 2626 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineGlucose,To High, n=27, 25, 262 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineALP,To within Range/No Change,n=27, 25, 2627 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineAST,To High, n=26, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineALT,To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineSodium,To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineBilirubin,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineGlucose,To within Range/No Change, n=27, 25, 2627 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineALT,To within Range/No Change, n=27, 25, 2627 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineBilirubin,To within Range/No Change, n=27, 25, 2627 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineBUN,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineALP,To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineBilirubin,To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineALP,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineSodium,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineCalcium,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineBUN,To within Range/No Change, n=27, 25, 2627 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineCalcium,To within Range/No Change, n=27, 25, 2627 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselinePotassium,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselinePotassium,To within Range/No Change, n=27, 25, 2627 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineCalcium,To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineBUN,To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineALT,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineGlucose,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineAST,To Low, n=26, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineGlucose,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineGlucose,To within Range/No Change, n=27, 25, 2625 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineBUN,To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineGlucose,To High, n=27, 25, 261 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselinePotassium,To within Range/No Change, n=27, 25, 2625 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineALT,To within Range/No Change, n=27, 25, 2625 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselinePotassium,To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineSodium,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineSodium,To within Range/No Change, n=27, 25, 2625 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineSodium,To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineALT,To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineBUN,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineALP,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineBUN,To within Range/No Change, n=27, 25, 2625 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineAST,To Low, n=26, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineAST,To within Range/No Change, n=26, 25, 2625 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineAST,To High, n=26, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineALP,To within Range/No Change,n=27, 25, 2625 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineBilirubin,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselinePotassium,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineBilirubin,To within Range/No Change, n=27, 25, 2625 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineBilirubin,To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineALP,To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineCalcium,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineCalcium,To within Range/No Change, n=27, 25, 2625 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineCalcium,To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineALT,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineBUN,To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselinePotassium,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineSodium,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineBUN,To within Range/No Change, n=27, 25, 2626 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineALP,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineALP,To within Range/No Change,n=27, 25, 2626 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineALP,To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineALT,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineALT,To within Range/No Change, n=27, 25, 2626 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineALT,To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineAST,To Low, n=26, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineAST,To within Range/No Change, n=26, 25, 2626 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineAST,To High, n=26, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineBilirubin,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineBilirubin,To within Range/No Change, n=27, 25, 2626 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineBilirubin,To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineCalcium,To within Range/No Change, n=27, 25, 2626 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineCalcium,To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineGlucose,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineGlucose,To within Range/No Change, n=27, 25, 2626 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineGlucose,To High, n=27, 25, 261 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselinePotassium,To within Range/No Change, n=27, 25, 2626 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselinePotassium,To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineSodium,To within Range/No Change, n=27, 25, 2626 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineSodium,To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineBUN,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineCalcium,To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline

Blood samples were collected to analyze hemoglobin, hematocrit, lymphocytes, total neutrophils, platelet count, and white blood cell(WBC) counts. PCI ranges were hematocrit (high: \>0.54 proportion of red blood cells in blood and low: change from Baseline \<0.075); hemoglobin(high: \>180 grams per liter\[g/L\] and low: change from Baseline \<25 g/L); lymphocytes (low: \<0.8 Giga cells per liter\[GI/L\]); platelet count (low: \<100 GI/L and high: \>550 GI/L); neutrophil count (low: \<1.5 GI/L); WBC count (low: \<3 GI/L and high: \>20 GI/L). Participants were counted in worst-case category that their value changed to low, within range or no change, or high unless there was no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, were recorded in ''To within Range or No Change' category. Participants were counted twice if participant had both values that changed 'To Low' and 'To High'. Baseline is defined as Day -1.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -1) and up to 40 days

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselinePlatelet count, To High, n=27, 24, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineLymphocytes, To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineWBC, To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineWBC,To within Range/No Change,n=27,25,2627 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineWBC, To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineLymphocytes,To within Range/No Change,n=27,25,2627 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHemoglobin, To Low, , n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHemoglobin,To within Range/No Change, n=27,25,2627 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselinePlatelet count, To Low, n=27, 24, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineLymphocytes, To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHematocrit,To within Range/No Change, n=27,25,2627 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineNeutrophil count, To Low, n=27, 25, 261 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineNeutrophil,To within Range/No Change, n=27,25,2627 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHemoglobin, To High, , n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineNeutrophil count, To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHematocrit, To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselinePlatelet,To within Range/No Change,n=27,24,2627 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHematocrit, To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHemoglobin, To High, , n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselinePlatelet count, To High, n=27, 24, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselinePlatelet count, To Low, n=27, 24, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineLymphocytes, To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineWBC, To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineLymphocytes, To Low, n=27, 25, 261 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHematocrit, To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineWBC,To within Range/No Change,n=27,25,2625 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHematocrit, To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineNeutrophil count, To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineWBC, To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineNeutrophil count, To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHematocrit,To within Range/No Change, n=27,25,2625 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHemoglobin, To Low, , n=27, 25, 260 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineLymphocytes,To within Range/No Change,n=27,25,2625 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselinePlatelet,To within Range/No Change,n=27,24,2624 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHemoglobin,To within Range/No Change, n=27,25,2625 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineNeutrophil,To within Range/No Change, n=27,25,2625 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHemoglobin,To within Range/No Change, n=27,25,2626 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHemoglobin, To High, , n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHematocrit, To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHematocrit,To within Range/No Change, n=27,25,2626 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHematocrit, To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineLymphocytes, To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineLymphocytes,To within Range/No Change,n=27,25,2626 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineLymphocytes, To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineNeutrophil count, To Low, n=27, 25, 261 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineNeutrophil,To within Range/No Change, n=27,25,2626 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineNeutrophil count, To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselinePlatelet count, To Low, n=27, 24, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselinePlatelet,To within Range/No Change,n=27,24,2626 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselinePlatelet count, To High, n=27, 24, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineWBC, To Low, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineWBC,To within Range/No Change,n=27,25,2626 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineWBC, To High, n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to PCI Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHemoglobin, To Low, , n=27, 25, 260 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Worst Case Post-Baseline Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

12-lead ECGs were recorded in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest using an ECG machine that automatically calculated the heart rate and measured PR, QRS, QT and QT duration corrected for heart rate by Fridericia's formula (QTcF) intervals. Data for number of participants with abnormal clinically significant ECG findings for worst case post-Baseline has been presented. Clinically significant abnormal laboratory findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition. The value at Day 1 was considered as Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 40 days

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Post-Baseline Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsAbnormal, not clinically significant5 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Post-Baseline Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsAbnormal - clinically significant0 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Post-Baseline Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsAbnormal, not clinically significant6 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Post-Baseline Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsAbnormal - clinically significant0 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Post-Baseline Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsAbnormal, not clinically significant5 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Post-Baseline Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsAbnormal - clinically significant0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline

Vital signs were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest and included Systolic blood pressure (SBP), Diastolic blood pressure (DBP), Heart rate (HR). Data for number of participants with Post-Baseline worst case Vital Sign results relative to PCI Criteria relative to Baseline has been presented. Participants are counted in worst case category that their value changes to low, within range or high. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, are recorded in Within Range or No Change category. Participants are counted twice if values changed 'To Low' and 'To High', so the percentages are not added to 100%. Participants with missing baseline value are assumed as within range value. PCI ranges were: SBP \[lower: \<85, upper: \>160 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)\]; DBP (lower: \<40, upper: \>110 mmHg); HR (lower: \<45, upper: \>100 beats per minute). The value at Day 1 was considered as Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 40 days

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analysed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineDBP, To Low0 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineSBP, To High0 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineDBP, To High0 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineDBP, Within Range or No Change27 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineSBP, To Low0 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHR, To High0 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHR, Within Range or No Change25 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineSBP, Within Range or No Change27 Participants
AMB Dispersed in WaterNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHR, To Low2 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineSBP, To Low0 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineSBP, Within Range or No Change25 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineSBP, To High0 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineDBP, To Low0 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineDBP, Within Range or No Change25 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineDBP, To High0 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHR, To Low0 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHR, Within Range or No Change25 Participants
AMB Oral TabletNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHR, To High0 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineSBP, To High0 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineSBP, To Low0 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHR, To Low0 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineSBP, Within Range or No Change26 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHR, To High0 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineDBP, Within Range or No Change26 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineDBP, To Low0 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineHR, Within Range or No Change26 Participants
Reference AMBNumber of Participants With Worst Case Vital Sign Results Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria Post-Baseline Relative to BaselineDBP, To High0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026